Mechanical trauma as the major cause of troponin T release after transvenous implantation of cardioverter/defibrillators

Release of high-sensitive TROPonin T by implantation of an entirely subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator compared to a conventional transvenous approach: the TROPIC registry

PURPOSE

Implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has become an alternative option when a conventional transvenous approach is not suitable. The myocardial damage caused by S-ICD implantation appears to be minimal despite mandatory defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing. However, there has not been a direct comparison with the traditional transvenous placement of a single-chamber ICD (VVI-ICD). The aim of this study was to determine the extent of myocardial damage by analysing the changes in serum levels of cardiac enzymes after S-ICD implantation in comparison with VVI-ICD.

METHODS

In 43 patients who received an S-ICD system, differences in serum levels of high-sensitive troponin T (ΔhsTnT) and creatine kinase total (ΔCK) and muscle brain fraction (ΔCK-MB) were acquired by blood sampling before and the day after implantation. The control group consisted of 43 patients from the TropShock study who had received a transvenous VVI-ICD without DFT.

RESULTS

After S-ICD implantation and testing procedure, ΔhsTnT (0.000 ng/ml, IQR - 0.003-0.002 ng/ml) was significantly lower than after conventional VVI-ICD implantation (0.018 ng/ml, IQR 0.004-0.032 ng/ml; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in CK (ΔCK_S-ICD 85.0 U/I, IQR 30.5-225.8 U/I vs ΔCK_VVI-ICD 69.5 U/I, IQR 22.9-172.3 U/I; p = 0.357), but there was a significant difference in CK-MB (ΔCK-MB_S-ICD of - 0.60, IQR - 2.60-1.0 vs ΔCK-MB_VVI-ICD 1.0, IQR - 1.08-3.18; p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

S-ICD implantation causes less myocardial damage than VVI-ICD implantation evidenced by ΔhsTnT and ΔCK-MB.

Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury and Inflammation after Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: The Lead Fixation Type Effect

Background

Permanent pacemaker implantation is accompanied by minor myocardial damage, indicated by elevated serum levels of cardiac biomarkers. Aim of this prospective study was to comparably investigate the lead fixation type effect on the extent of myocardial injury and inflammation following pacemaker implantation, and to assess the possible clinical implications.

Methods

Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at baseline, 6 and 24h after implantation in 101 patients, categorized into the active and passive lead fixation group. Patients were followed up for clinical adverse events or abnormal pacing parameters at 24h, 7 and 30 days post-procedure.

Results

cTnI increased at 6h post-procedure (p<0.05) in 23.8% of patients, and returned to baseline after 24h. The passive group demonstrated significantly higher cTnI at 6h compared to the active group (p=0.006). CRP increased significantly at 6h, and maintained an upward trend after 24h (p<0.01) in both groups. The active group demonstrated significantly higher CRP at 6h compared to the passive group. We did not identify an association of positive biomarkers with adverse events.

Conclusion

cTnI and CRP can increase early after permanent pacemaker implantation, indicating mechanical myocardial injury and inflammation. The extent of these biomarkers elevation depends on the lead fixation type, and is not related to worse short-term prognosis.

Pacemaker Implantation Associated Myocardial Micro-Damage: A Randomised Comparison between Active and Passive Fixation Leads

Fixation of the pacemaker leads during pacemaker implantation leads to an increase of cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) that can be interpreted as a sign of minimal myocardial damage. This trial evaluates whether the mechanism type of lead fixation influences the magnitude of cTnT release. Patients having a de-novo cardiac pacemaker implantation or a lead revision were centrally randomized to receive either a ventricular lead with an active (screw) or passive (tine) fixation mechanism. High-sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) was determined on the day of the procedure beforehand and on the following day. 326 Patients (median age (IQR) 75.0 (69.0–80.0) years, 64% male) from six international centers were randomized to receive ventricular leads with an active (n = 166) or passive (n = 160) fixation mechanism. Median (IQR) hsTnT levels increased by 0.009 (0.004–0.021) ng/ml in the group receiving screw-in ventricular leads and by 0.008 (0.003–0.030) ng/ml in the group receiving tined ventricular leads (n.s.). In conclusion pacemaker implantations are followed by a release of hsTnT. The choice between active or passive fixation ventricular leads does not have a significant influence on the extent of myocardial injury and the magnitude of hsTnT release.

Factors underlying elevated troponin I levels following pacemaker primo-implantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponins are routinely used as markers of myocardial damage. Originally, they were only intended for use in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes; however, we now know that raised serum troponin levels are not always caused by ischemia. There are many other clinical conditions that cause damage to cardiomyocytes, leading to raised levels of troponin. However, the specificity of cardiac troponins towards the myocardium is absolute. Our work focuses on mechanical damage to the myocardium and on monitoring the factors that raise the levels of cardiospecific markers after primo-implantation of a pacemaker with an actively fixed electrode.

AIMS

(i) To determine whether the use of a primo-implanted pacemaker with an electrode system with active fixation will raise troponin levels over baseline. (ii) To assess whether troponin I elevation is dependent on procedure complexity.

METHODS

We enrolled 219 consecutive patients indicated for pacemaker primo-implantation; cardiospecific marker values (troponin I, CKMB, myoglobin) were determined before the implantation procedure and again at 6- and 18-h intervals after the procedure. We monitored duration of cardiac skiascopy, number of attempts to place the electrode (active penetration into the tissue) and intervention range (single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing), and we assessed the clinical data.

RESULTS

The average age of the enrolled patients was 78.2 ± 8.0 years (median age, 80 years); women constituted 45% of the group. We implanted 128 dual-chamber and 91 single-chamber devices with an average skiascopic time of 38.6 ± 22.0 s (median, 33.5 s). Troponin I serum levels increased from an initial 0.03 ± 0.07 μg/L (median, 0.01) to 0.18 ± 0.17 μg/L (median, 0.13) and 0.09 ± 0.18 μg/L (median, 0.04) at 6 and 18 h, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001 or P < 0.001). We confirmed a correlation between troponin increase and duration of skiascopy (P < 0.001). We also demonstrated a correlation between increased troponin I and number of attempts to place a pacemaker electrode (penetration into the tissue) at 6 h (P < 0.001) post-implantation.

CONCLUSION

We detected slightly elevated troponin I levels in patients with primo-implanted pacemakers using electrodes with active fixation. We demonstrated a direct correlation between myocardial damage (number of electrode penetrations into the myocardium) and troponin I elevation, as well as between complexity (severity) of the implantation procedure (indicated by prolonged skiascopy) and raised troponin I. The described phenomenon demonstrates the loss of the diagnostic role of troponin I early after pacemaker primo-implantation in patients with concomitant chest pain.

Troponin I rise after pacemaker implantation at the time of "universal definition of myocardial infarction"

We assessed incidence, magnitude, and time course of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) increase after pacemaker implantation in patients without acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Seventy patients (mean age 71 years, interquartile range 44 to 92, 38 men) undergoing elective implantation of a single-/dual-chamber pacemaker with active/passive fixation leads were enrolled, excluding subjects with clinical suspicion of ACS, abnormal basal cTnI level, or presenting conditions predisposing to abnormal cTnI. Cardiac TnI concentrations were determined in basal conditions, at the end of the procedure, and after 8, 12, and 24 hours. Single-/dual-chamber devices were implanted in 31 of 39 patients. Cardiac TnI peak concentration occurred within the 12-hour assay in 69 of 70 patients; 26 of 70 had a cTnI above the normal cut-off range. All patients presented normal cTnI at 24-hour assay. In conclusion, pacemaker implantation is associated with increases of cTnI levels in up to 37% of patients. This can affect the specificity of cTnI assessment for ruling out ACS, especially within 12 hours after the procedure. These data deserve consideration in a contemporary setting, in which troponin has gathered a pivotal role in the diagnosis and therapy of ACS, and in particular clinical presentations in which electrocardiogram loses its diagnostic capabilities (due to paced rhythms) and symptoms may be lacking or confusing.

Present and Future Biochemical Markers for Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome

The use of biochemical markers in the diagnosis and management of patients with acute coronary syndrome has increased continually in recent decades. The development of highly sensitive and cardiac-specific troponin assays has changed the view on diagnosis of myocardial infarction and also extended the role of biochemical markers of necrosis into risk stratification and guidance for treatment. The consensus definition of myocardial infarction places increased emphasis on cardiac marker testing, with cardiac troponin replacing creatine kinase MB as the "gold standard" for diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Along with advances in the use of more cardiac-specific markers of myocardial necrosis, biochemical markers that are involved in the progression of atherosclerotic plaques to the vulnerable state or that signal the presence of vulnerable plaques have recently been identified. These markers have variable abilities to predict the risk of an individual for acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the well-established markers of myocardial necrosis, with a special focus on cardiac troponin I, together with a summary of some of the potential future markers of inflammation, plaque instability, and ischemia.

Effect of transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation on cardiac troponin I release

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation increases cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels which indicates myocardial injury. During implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, balloon inflation for coronary sinus (CS) venogram, cannulation of CS side branch, and electrode advancement may interfere with CS drainage and, hence, may decrease the washout of toxic metabolites from the heart. Thus, CRT implantation may further increase cTnI levels. In this study, we investigated the effects of CRT implantation on cTnI release.

METHODS

We included 10 patients (mean age = 57 +/- 15 years) in whom a successful transvenous CRT system was implanted (CRT group). Twenty patients (mean age = 65 +/- 10 years) who underwent a transvenous pacemaker or ICD implantation were included as the control group. Blood samples for cTnI were drawn at baseline and at six, 12, 18, and 24 hours thereafter.

RESULTS

Baseline median cTnI levels were similar in CRT and control groups (0.03 ng/mL vs 0.02 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.1). Postoperative cTnI levels during 24 hours were significantly higher in the CRT group (P < 0.05) by two-way repeated measures of analysis of variance. Post hoc analysis revealed that cTnI levels were higher at the 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th hours compared to baseline levels (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively). There was a significant difference in the area under the curves (AUCs) of cTnI measurements (1.79 hr.ng/mL in the CRT group and 0.78 hr.ng/mL in the control group, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative cTnI levels were higher after CRT implantation than simple pacemaker/ICD implantation. This may be due to CS manipulation during CRT implantation.

The new definition of myocardial infarction and the impact of troponin determination on clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the more controversial clinical and laboratory aspects in the application of the new biochemical diagnostic standard for myocardial infarction, 4 years after its introduction, and to make some suggestions, which could allow for a more realistic application of the new definition in the current clinical practice.

METHODS

Studies published in the last 4 years in the most important cardiology and laboratory medicine journals (including proceedings of the international meetings), discussing advantages and limits of the new definition of myocardial infarction, were reviewed and pertinent data were discussed and compared with similar information available in literature.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Although the exact status of implementation of the new definition of myocardial infarction cannot yet be known, the trend toward such recommendation is evolving significantly, even if at different rates in different countries. To make the transition smoother, major educational efforts are required to disseminate the conceptual reasoning behind the new guidelines. On the other hand, more knowledge is needed for some relevant issues, such as the different analytical performance of cardiac troponin assays or the prognostic significance of biomarker changes after a percutaneous coronary intervention.

Biochemical Evidence of Cardiac Damage Following Transvenous Implantation of a Permanent Antibradycardia Pacemaker Lead

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that transvenous permanent pacemaker lead implantation causes clinically detectable myocardial damage.

BACKGROUND

Histological evidence of myocardial damage has been reported after antibradycardia pacemaker lead implantation.

METHODS

We studied 30 patients undergoing implantation of a full antibradycardia pacemaker system (pulse generator plus leads) and 10 patients in whom only a generator was implanted. Blood samples for cardiac troponin-I (CTNI), CK-MB mass, and myoglobin measurement were drawn at baseline, at the end of the procedure, and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours thereafter.

RESULTS

Abnormal CTNI levels were noted only in 24 of the 30 patients undergoing a full system implantation. CTNI levels were already abnormal at the end of the procedure in 16 and became so in all 24 during the next 6 hours. Peak levels were reached within 6 hours in 21 patients and were compatible with "minimal" necrosis (CTNI < 1.5 pg/mL) in 20. Maximum ventricular lead diameter and number of implanted leads were independent predictors of peak CTNI levels. CK-MB mass also increased after the procedure, but exceeded the normal range in only 10 patients. Myoglobin levels increased significantly both in patients undergoing a complete system implantation and in those where only a pulse generator was implanted.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous insertion of endocardial leads for permanent pacing is accompanied in most patients by "minimal" myocardial damage. In this setting CTNI level kinetics are fast, characterized by early elevation and peak.

Biochemical markers of cardiac diseases

This article reviews the current contribution of the determination of biochemical markers to clinical cardiology and discusses some important developments in this field. Biochemical markers play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), as witnessed by the incorporation of cardiac troponins into new international guidelines for patients with ACS and in the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Despite the success of cardiac troponins, there is still a need for development of early markers that can reliably rule out ACS from the emergency room at presentation and detect myocardial ischemia also in the absence of irreversible myocyte injury. Under investigation are two classes of indicators: markers of early injury/ischemia and markers of coronary plaque instability and disruption. Finally, with the characterization of the cardiac natriuretic peptides, Laboratory Medicine is also assuming part in the assessment of cardiac function.

The measurement of cardiac markers: where should we focus?

Cardiac markers are presently a hot topic, with active debate on their use. They now have a major role for cost-effective management of acute chest pain and suspected acute coronary syndrome. The laboratory has a pivotal role in proper selection and interpretation of available markers, depending on the creation of evidence-based knowledge about test utilization and sources of variation. This article reviews this knowledge in the field of biomarkers determination and summarizes the major analytic and clinical issues, with reference to various recent recommendations of laboratory medicine and cardiology expert groups.