Ischemic colitis during pregnancy and contraceptive medication

Drug-Induced Colitis

Drug-induced colitis encompasses a wide spectrum of colon disorders that can manifest microscopically or macroscopically. Patients present with new-onset colitis or exacerbations of inflammatory bowel diseases; in some cases, colitis resolves with discontinuation of medication. Mucosal injury can be focal or extensive, involving the entire colonic mucosa, and sometimes involves other parts of the gastrointestinal tract. It has been a challenge to determine the proportion of new-onset colitis caused by medication and there are few data on the overall prevalence. We review the drugs that have been linked with development of drug-induced colitis and strategies for physicians who believe their patients have this disorder-usually discontinuation of the drug believed to cause colitis and treatment with steroids or immune-modulating therapies. Physicians must be aware of medications that can cause colitis.

Ischaemic colitis diagnosed by sigmoidoscopy during pregnancy

A 21-year-old woman visited out hospital for lower abdominal pain and bloody diarrhoea at 19 weeks of pregnancy. Endoscopic findings revealed longitudinal ulcerations with hyperaemia and oedema in the sigmoid colon. These findings and clinical presentation confirmed the diagnosis of ischaemic colitis. Conservative treatment, including fasting and intravenous hydration, was administered, and the patient made a good recovery. After discharge, there was no recurrence during pregnancy and postpartum period. It is important to make early diagnosis and treatment, and multidisciplinary teamwork between obstetricians, gastroenterologist and endoscopist is required.

Older patients are significantly more likely to have colon ischaemia-associated conditions that are chronic and complex

BACKGROUND

Colon ischaemia is a common disease which has been associated with various medications and comorbidities.

AIM

To test the hypothesis that there are differences in the frequencies of these associations in older compared with younger patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients hospitalized with colon ischaemia at two major medical centres from 2005-2017. Clinical, colonoscopic and pathologic criteria were used to identify patients admitted with colon ischaemia; patients with other types of colitis were excluded. Demographic and medical data were extracted. Two cohorts were created: patients aged 18-64 years and patients > 65 years. These were compared using SAS 14.3.

RESULTS

A total of 788 patients were included, of which 271 (34.4%) were of ages 18-64 years, and 517 (66.6%) were 65 years old or older. In the older cohort, constipation-inducing medications (83.8% vs 64.1%; P = <0.0001), diuretics (38.1% vs 25.1%; P = <0.001) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (58% vs 41.5%; P = <0.0001) were more common than in the younger cohort. Antipsychotic medication use was more common in the younger cohort (10.4% vs 5.4%; P = 0.01). There was a higher percentage of younger patients with a history of hypercoaguable state (1.9% vs 0.2%; P = 0.03) and dialysis dependence (22.9% vs 8.7%; P = <0.01), while a higher percentage of patients in the older cohort had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (12% vs 6.3%; P = 0.01) or atrial fibrillation (18.9% vs 10.3%; P = <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that older patients are more likely to have colon ischaemia-associated conditions that are chronic and complex, while younger patients are more likely to have acute colon ischaemia-associated conditions.

Review article: the pharmacological causes of colon ischaemia

BACKGROUND

Colon ischaemia is the most common ischaemic disorder of the gastrointestinal system, can affect any segment of the colon, and may present with a range of symptoms. Diagnosis can be challenging due to symptom overlap with other conditions, varied aetiology, and often rapid and self-resolving course.

AIM

To review comprehensively the literature regarding the pharmacological aetiologies of colonic ischaemia to enhance the understanding of the various mechanisms of disease, presentations, distribution, and outcomes.

METHODS

A PubMed search for "colon ischaemia" and "ischaemic colitis" alone as well as in combination with various known pharmacologic causes was performed. Only the highest quality and relevant literature was included in this review. The quality of the literature for each association was rated by the authors and a consensus was made when discrepancies were encountered. Only associations that were deemed "moderate" or "strong" were included.

RESULTS

The literature considering pharmacologically associated colonic ischaemia is diverse, lacks codification and is characterised by numerous case reports and case series. Constipation-inducing drugs, digoxin, hormonal therapies, illicit drugs, immunomodulators, laxatives, and NSAIDs were strongly associated with colonic ischaemia. Antimicrobials, appetite suppressants, chemotherapies, decongestants, diuretics, ergot alkaloids, serotonin agents, statins, and vasopressor agents were moderately associated.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with abdominal pain, diarrhoea, or bloody stool need to be evaluated for the possibility of this condition and treated accordingly. Timely diagnosis is necessary to improve patient outcomes. This review aims to increase awareness among clinicians regarding the presentation of pharmacologically induced colonic ischaemia.

The Ever-Changing Landscape of Drug-Induced Injury of the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract

CONTEXT

-There is an ever-growing armamentarium of pharmacologic agents that can cause gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal injury, the most common symptoms being diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting. These are often self-limiting and without serious sequelae, but some symptoms are of greater concern, like drug-induced mucosal ulceration that can manifest as GI hemorrhage, stricture formation, and even perforation. Histologically, there is significant overlap between drug-induced injuries and various disease entities. A single type of medication may cause multiple patterns of injury, which can involve the entire GI tract or just some parts of it.

OBJECTIVE

-To review the most common drug-induced injury patterns affecting the colon, which may be recognized by the surgical pathologist on colonic mucosal biopsies. This review does not address the injuries occurring in the upper GI tract.

DATA SOURCES

-A PubMed review of English-language literature, up to December 2015, on drug-induced injury of GI tract was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

-There are numerous drugs that damage the colonic mucosa. The most common drugs are included in this review according to their histologic pattern of injury. It is important for the pathologist to keep in mind that a single drug type can induce many histologic patterns of mucosal injury that can mimic many disease entities. Although there are some histologic clues helpful in the diagnosis of drug-induced colonic injury, correlation with clinical history and especially medication history is essential to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Iatrogenic pathology of the intestines

Many drugs and chemical agents can cause enteritis and colitis, producing clinical gastrointestinal side effects, the most common of which are diarrhoea, constipation, nausea and vomiting. Significant histological overlap exists between some patterns of medication or chemical injury and various disease entities. A particular medication may cause multiple patterns of injury and may mimic common entities such as coeliac disease, Crohn's disease, infectious enteritis and colitis. Thus, given the common absence of specific histopathological features, the diagnosis often relies upon thorough clinicopathological correlation. This review concentrates on selected examples of medication-induced injury of the intestinal tract in which the pathology can be recognized, particularly on biopsies, with a focus on newly described medication-induced gastrointestinal effects.

Does lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy pose a risk for mother and child? - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal endoscopy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal disorders. When endoscopy is indicated during pregnancy, concerns about the effects on pregnancy outcome often arise. The aim of this study was to assess whether lower gastrointestinal endoscopies (LGEs) across all three trimesters of pregnancy affects pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using Embase (including MEDLINE), Medline OvidSP, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web-of-Science, Google scholar and Pubmed. All original research articles from 1990 until May 2014 involving pregnant women who underwent LGE for any indication were included. Adverse pregnancy events like spontaneous abortion, preterm birth and fetal demise were assessed for a temporal and etiological relation with the LGE.

RESULTS

In total, 5514 references were screened by two independent reviewers. Eighty-two references met the inclusion criteria and were selected. Two retrospective, controlled studies, one uncontrolled study and 79 case reports were identified. In the three studies, birth outcomes did not differ between women undergoing LGE during pregnancy, compared to women that had an indication for LGE but in whom LGE was not performed because of pregnancy. In 79 case reports, 92 patients are described who underwent 100 LGE's during pregnancy. LGEs performed in all trimesters (n = 32, 39 and 29) were both temporally and etiologically related to 1, 3 and 2 adverse events, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available literature, this review concludes that lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy is of low risk for mother and child in all three trimesters of pregnancy.

Ischemic enterocolitis and its differential diagnosis

Ischemia is a common type of gastrointestinal injury that can be clinically misdiagnosed due to its often mild and transient clinical presentation as well as a tendency to masquerade as other disorders. A wide range of etiologies can contribute to the development of ischemia. These include hypovolemic states, systemic diseases such as vasculitis and hypercoagulable states, mechanical obstruction, therapeutic drug effects, infection, and a host of other diseases. An accurate diagnosis of ischemia relies on a strong clinical suspicion in combination with endoscopic and pathologic findings. Most cases show histologic features that are diagnostic of ischemia, but do not point to a specific differential diagnosis, whereas the cause of ischemia can be recognized or suspected based on careful review of vascular changes in others. This review is focused on providing an overview of ischemic enterocolitis and its differential diagnosis.

Ischaemic colitis associated with oral contraceptive and bisacodyl use

A woman with a history of hip replacement presented 3 days prior to revision of the hip with abdominal pain, diarrhoea and haematochezia. These symptoms began 6 h after she began taking bisacodyl in preparation for her upcoming surgery. She was on low-dose estradiol for hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Subsequent colonoscopy and biopsies were consistent with acute colonic ischaemia (CI). She was treated with intravenous fluids and antibiotics and discharged and told to stop HRT and bisacodyl. Follow-up colonoscopy 1 month after discharge was normal. This case adds to the three other previously reported cases of bisacodyl-associated CI.

A Case of Oral-contraceptive Related Ischemic Colitis in Young Woman

Ischemic colitis is generally considered a disease of the elderly. The causes of ischemic colitis include low-flow states due to cardiac dysfunction or hypovolemia and certain medications including estrogen. Here we report a case of ischemic colitis in a 26-year-old woman. She had no specific medical history except taking oral-contraceptives for a long time. The mechanism of estrogen-induced ischemic colitis is not clearly understood. But we recommend that oral-contraceptives should be considered as a cause of ischemic colitis in young women.

Ischemic colitis in postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Estrogen and progestins have established effects on the gastrointestinal tract and ischemic colitis was related in the past with certain regimens including both hormones. On this basis, we aimed to evaluate a group of postmenopausal women who presented with ischemic colitis after taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for the last several months.

METHOD

Postmenopausal women taking conjugated estrogens, conjugated estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone and estradiol valerate plus norgestrel are included in the present study. All patients, without a medical history of bowel problems, reported an acute crisis of colitis a few months after the beginning of the treatment.

RESULTS

Fasting, parenteral nutrition, intravenous antibiotic treatment with metronidazole and discontinuation of HRT proved successful. Antibiotics were continued after the patients' discharge from the hospital. A second-look colonoscopy, 3 to 4 months after the initial episode, was normal in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Ischemic colitis is a rare complication of HRT that should not be ignored when HRT is prescribed.

Ischemic colitis due to obstruction of mesenteric and splenic veins: A case report

Ischemic injury to the bowel is a well known disease entity that has a wide spectrum of pathological and clinical findings. A sudden drop in the colonic blood supply is essential to its development. We encountered a 41-year-old male patient, who presented with abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea. A colonoscopy showed markedly edematous mucosa with tortuous dilatation of the veins and a deep ulceration at the rectosigmoid junction. On an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan and CT angiography, the mesenteric and splenic veins were absent with numerous venous collaterals for drainage. The patient gradually responded to oral aminosalicylate therapy, and was in remission after nine months. In most cases, non-occlusive ischemic injury is caused by idiopathic form and occlusive ischemia is caused by abnormalities of arteries and acute venous thrombosis. However, chronic venous insufficiency due to obstruction of macrovascular mesenteric vein rarely causes ischemia of the bowel. This report describes the first case of ischemic colitis caused by obstruction of the mesenteric and splenic veins.

Estradiol treatment ameliorates acetic acid-induced gastric and colonic injuries in rats

To evaluate the role of estrogen treatment on the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric or colonic injury, rats were given 17beta estradiol benzoate (0.001, 0.1, and 10 mg/kg) or vehicle for 7 days (following the induction of ulcer) or 4 days (following the induction of colitis) until they were decapitated. Food intake and fecal output were decreased by estradiol treatment but gastric emptying rate was not changed. Estradiol (10 mg/kg) reduced gastric ulcer index and colonic damage score compared to vehicle-treated groups. SEM and light microscopy demonstrated a significant reduction in the severity of ulcers and colitis by estradiol treatment. Gastric microscopic score was not changed by estradiol treatment, whereas in the colonic tissue score was significantly reduced. Elevated gastric MPO levels were reduced in gastric but not in colonic tissues as compared with corresponding vehicle groups. In conclusion, exogenous estradiol treatment at pharmacological doses improves the healing of both gastric and colonic injury induced by acetic acid in rats.