Evaluation of a new method for assessing symptoms

Turkish language validity and reliability of the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test and its comparison with other scales

OBJECTIVES

Patients with asthma often suffer from concomitant allergic rhinitis (AR). The Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) is a validated tool to assess asthma and rhinitis multimorbidity. Turkish language validity and reliability of CARAT and its compatibility with other scales were evaluated in the study.

METHODS

Patients with asthma and concomitant AR were tested with CARAT. Pulmonary function tests, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) were also used at the same day. With the VAS, patients determined their rhinitis symptom levels, and asthma specialist determined the rhinitis and asthma control levels separately. These questionnaires were repeated in 14 ± 2 days.

RESULTS

Three quarters (77%) of the 100 patients were female (mean age 46.5 years). The mean CARAT score was 19.6 ± 7.2. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Turkish version of the CARAT scale was 0.83, showing a high level of internal consistency. Test-retest reliability coefficient was determined as r = 0.98 (p < 0.001). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient of the CARAT scale was 0.79. The p value of the Bartlett test was <0.001. ACT, ATA and VAS expert scales were correlated with CARAT total score (0.577 ≤ r ≤ 0.871). The CARAT scale did not show statistically significant difference according to gender, education, working status, smoking status, presence of polyps and multiple allergen sensitivity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the CARAT is a reliable alternative tool for physicians in determining disease control in adult patients with asthma and AR.

β-Glucan supplementation, allergy symptoms, and quality of life in self-described ragweed allergy sufferers

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study compared the effects of daily supplementation for 4 week with 250 mg Wellmune WGP® β-1,3/1,6-Glucan (WGP) with placebo 250 mg/day (rice flour) on physical and psychological health attributes of self-described “moderate” ragweed allergy sufferers. Study participants (mean age = 36 ± 9 year; range 18–53 year) were recruited before the beginning of ragweed season (September) in Northeastern Ohio. Serum IgE concentration, allergy symptoms [via self-report, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)], psychological well-being [Profile of Mood States (POMS)], and physical function (RAND SF-36 Medical Outcomes Study) were measured immediately prior to and after supplementation with WGP (n = 24) or placebo (n = 24) for 4 weeks. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA). Compared with placebo, WGP reduced total allergy symptoms (28%), symptom severity (52%), and symptom rating on the VAS (37%) (P < 0.05), but had no effect on serum IgE levels. As measured by the POMS, WGP increased participants' rating of vigor (10%), but reduced tension (34%), depression (45%), anger (41%), fatigue (38%), and confusion (34%) (P < 0.05). Study participants given WGP reported increased physical health (11%), energy (19%), and emotional well-being (7%) compared with study participants given the placebo (RAND SF-36 Medical Outcomes Study). The WGP group also reported decreased sleep problems (53%), reduced nasal symptoms (59%), eye symptoms (57%), non-nasal symptoms (50%), activities (53%), emotions (57%), and improved quality of life (QOL) (56%), as well as improved global mood state (13%). Supplementation with WGP for 4 weeks improved allergy symptoms, overall physical health, and emotional well-being compared with placebo in self-described “moderate” ragweed allergy sufferers during ragweed allergy season.

Visual analog scales can assess the severity of rhinitis graded according to ARIA guidelines

BACKGROUND

The allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines provide a new classification of allergic rhinitis, but a quantitative analysis for severity assessment is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether a visual analog scale (VAS) for global rhinitis symptoms could be used to assess the disease severity according to ARIA.

METHODS

Three thousand fifty-two allergic rhinitis patients seen in primary care were tested. Fifty three per cent had an objective diagnosis of allergy and 58% of the patients were treated. Patients were categorized according to ARIA guidelines. The severity of nasal symptoms was assessed using a VAS. Quality of life was measured using the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ).

RESULTS

Severity had more impact on VAS levels than duration: mild intermittent rhinitis (3.5, 2.4-5.0 cm), mild persistent rhinitis (4.5, 3.2-5.6 cm), moderate/severe intermittent rhinitis (6.7, 5.3-7.7 cm) and moderate/severe persistent rhinitis (7.2, 6.1-8.2 cm). The receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that patients with a VAS of under 5 cm could be classified as 'mild' rhinitis (negative predictive value: 93.5%) and those with a VAS of over 6 cm as 'moderate/severe' rhinitis (positive predictive value: 73.6%). Receiver operating characteristic curves and a logistic regression showed that current treatment and allergy diagnosis have no effect on the assessment of rhinitis severity using VAS. Visual analog scale and the RQLQ global score were significantly correlated (rho = 0.46; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A simple and quantitative method (VAS) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of severity of allergic rhinitis.

Efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy with a modified mite extract

BACKGROUND

In specific immunotherapy (SIT), modified extracts have been used to allow safe administration of higher allergen doses. Schedules reaching maintenance doses in approximately 1 month, which may have greater efficacy, have even been proposed.

AIMS

To assess the safety and efficacy of SIT with modified (depigmented and polymerized) Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis and who were monosensitized to Dermatophagoides were included in this controlled, pragmatic, 1-year open study. The patients were randomly allocated to receive treatment with a Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 100 % modified allergen vaccine (active group, n = 25) or pharmacological treatment only (control group, n = 25). All SIT-related adverse reactions were recorded. Efficacy was assessed primarily through the results of nasal allergen challenges, through visual analog scale (VAS) and symptom scores.

RESULTS

In SIT-treated patients, significant improvements were found in symptom scores (mean reduction > 40 %), VAS scores (mean improvement > 20 %) and nasal challenges (mean increase in allergen concentration threshold > 500 %). For symptom and VAS scores, statistically significant differences between control and SIT-treated patients were recorded at 12 months. In nasal challenges statistically significant differences were observed as early as at 6 months. Control patients showed no significant differences during the study period. Local reactions were observed in 28 % of SIT-treated patients (total 24 reactions). There was only one immediate grade I systemic reaction, which was successfully treated with an antihistamine.

CONCLUSIONS

SIT with this modified extract appears to be a relatively safe treatment, which can rapidly improve nasal allergenic tolerance, reduce symptom scores and improve subjective self-evaluation measured through VAS, reflecting a general improvement in patients' well-being.