Non-invasive monitoring of renal transplant recipients: urinary excretion of soluble adhesion molecules and of the complement-split product C4d

Advantages, Limitations, and Clinical Considerations in Using Cystatin C to Estimate GFR

Cystatin C has been shown to be a reliable and accurate marker of kidney function across diverse populations. The 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommended using cystatin C to confirm the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) determined by creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and to estimate kidney function when accurate eGFR estimates are needed for clinical decision-making. In the efforts to remove race from eGFR calculations in the United States, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Joint Task Force recommended increasing availability and clinical adoption of cystatin C to assess kidney function. This review summarizes the key advantages and limitations of cystatin C use in clinical practice. Our goals were to review and discuss the literature on cystatin C; understand the evidence behind the recommendations for its use as a marker of kidney function to diagnose CKD and risk stratify patients for adverse outcomes; discuss the challenges of its use in clinical practice; and guide clinicians on its interpretation.

Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples

Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, the full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene-expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leucocytes may be detectable by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, CXCL10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has yet been adopted in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of analysis procedures may help assess reproducibility and comparative diagnostic yield in large, prospective, multicentre trials.

Non-invasive Detection of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection by Measurement of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Urine

Urinary vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 199 renal allograft recipients and 80 healthy controls. Urinary VEGF level did not change significantly during the first 8 weeks after transplantation in 119 patients with stable renal function and there were no abnormal histological findings (No-AR). In 67 patients with acute rejection, urinary VEGF was significantly higher (28.57 ± 6.21 pg/μmol creatinine) than in the No-AR patients (3.05 ± 0.45 pg/μmol creatinine) and healthy controls (2.87 ± 0.35 pg/μmol creatinine). At a cut-off point of 3.26 pg/μmol creatinine, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of acute rejection were 86.6 and 71.4%, respectively. The 13 patients with subclinical rejection excreted urinary VEGF (16.14 ± 4.09 pg/μmol creatinine) at a significantly higher level than No-AR patients (3.05 ± 0.45 pg/μmol creatinine). At a cut-off point of 4.69 pg/μmol creatinine, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of subclinical rejection were 84.6 and 79.8%, respectively. In conclusion, monitoring VEGF in urine might offer a new non-invasive way to detect acute and subclinical rejection in renal transplant recipients.

The Maintenance Immunosuppression Scheme Influences Early C4d Urinary Excretion in Kidney Graft Recipients but Does Not Affect the Long-term Graft Survival

C4d urinary excretion varies according to the risk of graft rejection or progression of chronic allograft nephropathy. The most common maintenance immunosuppression (IS) schemes include cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC) with azathiopryne (AZA) or mycophenolate mophetil (MMF). The chosen IS may influence kidney transplant outcomes and possibly modify urinary C4d. The aim of the study was to determine whether early C4d urinary excretion varies in patients after kidney allograft transplantation (KTx) regarding administered IS and if these factors may help to predict long-term KTx outcomes. The study involved 185 patients who underwent KTx. The urinary specimens were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for C4d excretion. To increase the objectivity, C4d excretion was divided by urinary creatinine excretion (ng/mgCr). The study population was grouped according to the IS scheme, that is, CSA + AZA, CSA + MMF, and TAC + MMF. At baseline, the greatest C4d urinary excretion was noticed in patients treated with CSA + AZA, 199.5 ± 175.9 ng/mL (5.3 ± 7.1 ng/mgCr) and the lowest in those in whom tacrolimus and mycophenolate mophetil was administered, 166.6 ± 186.3 ng/mL (3.9 ± 6.2 ng/mgCr). In the CSA + MMF group, C4d excretion was 195.6 ± 200.3 ng/mL (5.0 ± 6.6 ng/mgCr). Statistically significant differences were seen only between the CSA + AZA and TAC + MMF groups, analysis of variance P < 0.05 (P < 0.01 for C4d/urinary creatinine ratio). No statistically significant differences were found in graft survival rates between different immunosuppressive regimens. Although early C4d measurements vary in patients after kidney allograft transplantation regarding administered IS, this IS dependant variation does not seem to affect the long-term graft survival.

Absence of C4d urinary excretion in the early post-transplant period is associated with improved long-term kidney graft survival

INTRODUCTION

C4d urinary excretion varies according to the risk of graft rejection or progression of chronic allograft nephropathy, but its influence on long-term kidney transplant (KTx) outcomes remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine whether the initial (1-3 months post KTx) level of C4d urinary excretion may help to predict long-term kidney allograft transplantation outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 185 patients who had undergone KTx. The urinary specimens taken from the morning urine portion were assessed by ELISA test for C4d excretion. To increase the objectivity of the assessment, all measurements were divided by urinary creatinine excretion (ng/mgCr). The study population was grouped according to the C4d excretion cut-off value into low (LC4d, 109 participants) and high (HC4d, 76 participants) C4d excretion groups. Additionally a subgroup with absence of C4d in the urine (ZC4d, 26 patients) was formed.

RESULTS

The calculated Roc curve indicated the cut off value of the urinary C4d excretion as 12.4ng/mgCr (AUC 0.77; 95%CI 0.73-0.95). The mean C4d urinary excretions in LC4d and HC4d were 1.9±3.27 and 20.6±4.6ng/mgCr, respectively, whereas after exclusion of ZC4d subgroup, the mean C4d was 14.9±6.3ng/mgCr in the remainder. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated a slightly higher graft survival rate (GSR) in LC4d than in HC4d group (p=0.04 by log-rank). The subsequent analysis showed the highest GSR in ZC4d subgroup (p=0.0006 by log-rank).

CONCLUSION

Although lower C4d urinary excretion in the early post-transplant period seems to be associated with better long-term kidney allograft transplantation outcomes, only its absence in the urine appears to be a solid predictor of improved graft survival.

Urinary proteomic shotgun approach for identification of potential acute rejection biomarkers in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection (AR) episodes in renal transplant recipients are suspected when plasma creatinine is elevated and other potential causes out ruled. Graft biopsies are however needed for definite diagnosis. Non-invasive AR-biomarkers is an unmet clinical need. The urinary proteome is an interesting source in the search for such a biomarker in this population.

METHODS

In this proof of principle study, serial urine samples in the early post transplant phase from 6 patients with biopsy verified acute rejections and 6 age-matched controls without clinical signs of rejection were analyzed by shotgun proteomics.

RESULTS

Eleven proteins fulfilled predefined criteria for regulation in association with AR. They presented detectable regulation already several days before clinical suspicion of AR (increased plasma creatinine). The regulated proteins could be grouped by their biological function; proteins related to growth and proteins related to immune response. Growth-related proteins (IGFBP7, Vasorin, EGF and Galectin-3-binding protein) were significantly up-regulated in association with AR (P = 0.03) while proteins related to immune response (MASP2, C3, CD59, Ceruloplasmin, PiGR and CD74) tended to be up-regulated ( P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

The use of shotgun proteomics provides a robust and sensitive method for identification of potentially predictive urinary biomarkers of AR. Further validation of the current findings is needed to establish their potential clinical role with regards to clinical AR diagnosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00139009.

Evaluation of a new immunoassay for cystatin C, based on a double monoclonal principle, in men with normal and impaired renal function

Background.

Elevated cystatin C in blood reflects impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but current cystatin C assays, based on polyclonal antibodies and immunoturbidimetric or nephelometric detection, have several limitations. We evaluated a new immunoassay based on monoclonal antibodies in samples from patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods.

The study enrolled 170 men without known CKD (Group A) and 104 men with CKD (Group B). All patients were assessed with iohexol clearance, plasma creatinine and plasma cystatin C by a conventional particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (PETIA) and by the new double monoclonal assay. In Group A, three serial blood draws were performed at median intervals of 4 h and 12 days between samples, to also allow assessments of the variability in cystatin C values with the new assay. Concordance correlation coefficients and the 95% limits of agreement were used to estimate the agreement of reciprocal cystatin C and reciprocal creatinine with iohexol clearance.

Results.

Median iohexol clearance (mL/min/1.73 m²) was 81 [interquartile range (IQR) 70, 92] in Group A and 23 (IQR 16, 34) in Group B. The concordance correlation with GFR for the new cystatin C assay compared to the established assay was similar in Group A (0.441 versus 0.465) but higher in Group B (0.680 versus 0.593). Cystatin C measured by both assays exhibited closer agreement with GFR than creatinine. The agreement between the two cystatin C assays was high, with concordance correlations of 0.815 in Group A and 0.935 in Group B. Compared to the conventional assay, the new assay tended to yield lower values of cystatin C at the low end of the range in Group A. The new cystatin C assay exhibited small intraindividual variability across serial samples (coefficient of variation ≤6%).

Conclusions.

In this first clinical evaluation, the new cystatin C assay performed similarly to the established PETIA in patients with normal GFR and better in patients with CKD. The new assay may offer an alternative to current commercial assays to detect and monitor impaired kidney function.

Review: Serum and urine biomarkers of kidney disease: A pathophysiological perspective

The use of reliable biomarkers is becoming increasingly important for the improved management of patients with acute and chronic kidney diseases. Recent developments have identified a number of novel biomarkers in serum or urine that can determine the potential risk of kidney damage, distinguish different types of renal injury, predict the progression of disease and have the potential to assess the efficacy of therapeutic intervention. Some of these biomarkers can be used independently while others are more beneficial when used in combination with knowledge of other clinical risk factors. Advances in gene expression analysis, chromatography, mass spectrometry and the development of sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays have facilitated accurate quantification of many biomarkers. This review primarily focuses on describing new and established biomarkers, which identify and measure the various pathophysiological processes that promote kidney disease. It provides an overview of some of the different classes of renal biomarkers that can be assessed in serum/plasma and urine, including markers of renal function, oxidative stress, structural and cellular injury, immune responses and fibrosis. However, it does not explore the current status of these biomarkers in terms of their clinical validation.

Urinary soluble HLA-DR is a potential biomarker for acute renal transplant rejection

BACKGROUND.: Urine is a potentially rich source of biomarkers for monitoring kidney dysfunction. In this study, we have investigated the potential of soluble human leukocyte antigen (sHLA)-DR in the urine for noninvasive monitoring of renal transplant patients. METHODS.: Urinary soluble HLA-DR levels were measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 103 patients with renal diseases or after renal transplantation. sHLA-DR in urine was characterized by Western blotting and mass spectrometry. RESULTS.: Acute graft rejection was associated with a significantly elevated level of urinary sHLA-DR (P<0.0001), compared with recipients with stable graft function or healthy individuals. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the area under the curve to be 0.88 (P<0.001). At a selected threshold, the sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 98% for detection of acute renal transplant rejection. sHLA-DR was not exosomally associated and was of lower molecular weight compared with the HLA-DR expressed as heterodimer on the plasma membrane of antigen-presenting cells. CONCLUSIONS.: sHLA-DR excreted into urine is a promising indicator of renal transplant rejection.

Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents

GFR is the best indicator of renal function in children and adolescents and is critical for diagnosing acute and chronic kidney impairment, intervening early to prevent end-stage renal failure, prescribing nephrotoxic drugs and drugs cleared by a failing kidney, and monitoring for side effects of medications. Renal inulin clearance was the gold standard for GFR but is compromised by lack of availability, difficult assays, and problems of collecting timed urine samples, especially in children with vesicoureteral reflux or bladder dysfunction. Creatinine clearance-based estimates of GFR are often used in pediatrics. The addition of cimetidine to eliminate creatinine secretion permits accurate measurement of GFR in those who can completely empty their bladders to provide timed urine collections. Radioisotopes are used in plasma disappearance GFR determinations; however, these are not ideal for use in children, especially for repeated studies. The plasma disappearance of iohexol serves as a promising alternative GFR marker, because it is safe and not radioactive, easily measured, not metabolized or transported by the kidney, and excreted primarily by glomerular filtration. GFR estimating equations, based on serum concentrations of creatinine or cystatin C, are popular clinically and in research studies. Efforts are ongoing to improve these estimating equations for children and make the results readily available to clinicians obtaining standard chemistry profiles, as is being done for adults. However, at this time, there is no dependable substitute for an accurately determined GFR, and iohexol plasma disappearance offers the best combination of safety, accuracy, and reproducible precision.

Acute renal allograft rejection is associated with increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in the urine

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess whether measurement of urinary vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) could be adopted as a new non-invasive diagnostic tool for acute rejection following renal transplantation.

METHODS

Urinary concentration of VEGF was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique in 215 renal allograft recipients and 80 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Subjects with acute rejection (n=67) excreted urinary VEGF at a significantly higher level (28.57+/-6.21, 95% CI: 16.18-40.97 pg/mumol creatinine) than those without acute rejection. This included subjects with stable renal function and no abnormal histological findings (n=119), acute tubular necrosis (n=15), chronic allograft nephropathy (n=14) and healthy controls (n=80). Using a urinary VEGF/creatinine ratio of 3.64 pg/micromol as the cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing acute rejection were 85.1 and 74.8%, respectively (P<0.001). Patients with steroid-resistant acute rejection had significantly greater urinary VEGF concentration than patients with steroid-sensitive acute rejection (42.09+/-10.00 vs 9.74+/-2.63 pg/micromol creatinine, P<0.001). Patients with graft loss after acute rejection had significantly greater urinary VEGF concentration than patients with reversible acute rejection (106.66+/-38.60 vs 19.46+/-4.13 pg/micromol creatinine, P=0.001). Using a urinary VEGF/creatinine ratio of 22.48 pg/micromol as the cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity of the prediction to graft loss after acute rejection were 85.7% and 78.3%, respectively (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the monitoring of urinary VEGF may be a useful non-invasive approach for the detection of acute rejection. Additionally, urinary VEGF levels were shown to predict the response to anti-rejection therapy and to predict a poor outcome after acute rejection.

Optimizing protein recovery for urinary proteomics, a tool to monitor renal transplantation

Despite attractiveness of urine for biomarker discovery for systemic and renal diseases, the confounding effect of the high abundance plasma proteins in urine, and a lack of optimization of urine protein recovery methods are bottlenecks for urine proteomics. Three methods were performed and compared for percentage protein yield, yield consistency, ease and cost of analysis: (i) organic solvent precipitation, (ii) dialysis/lyophilization, and (iii) centrifugal filtration. Urine samples were subjected to an immunoaffinity column to deplete high abundance proteins. Difference gel electrophoresis was performed to assess use of depletion strategy for detection of low abundance proteins. Urine from healthy volunteers (n = 10) and kidney transplant recipients with proteinuria (n = 11) were used. Centrifugal filtration performed best for analysis ease and yield consistency. Highest percentage yield was obtained from dialysis/lyophilization but was laborious and residual salt interfered with subsequent gel electrophoresis. Organic solvent precipitation was inexpensive, but suffered from varying yield consistency. Increased spot intensity for some low abundance and previously undetected proteins were noted after depletion of high abundance proteins. In conclusion, we compare the pros and cons of different protein recovery methods and reveal an increase in the dynamic range of protein detection after depletional strategy that could be critical for biomarker discovery, particularly with reference to processing human study samples from clinical trials.

Renal transplant rejection markers

Acute rejection is one of the key factors which determine long-term graft function and survival in renal transplant patients. Timely detection and treatment of rejection is therefore, an important goal in the post-transplant surveillance. The standard care with serum creatinine measurements and biopsy upon allograft dysfunction implies that acute rejection is detected in an advanced stage. Therefore, non-invasive monitoring for acute rejection by markers in blood and urine has been tried over the past decades. This review describes the requirements that should be met by non-invasive markers. The experience with single biomarkers and with newer approaches--mRNA expression analysis, metabolomics, and proteomics--will be discussed, including future directions of necessary research.

Diagnostic Tools for Monitoring Kidney Transplant Recipients

Recent advancements in immunobiology have introduced several new diagnostic tools for monitoring kidney transplant recipients. These have been added to more established tests that, although imperfect, remain important benchmarks of diagnostic utility. Both new and old tests can be characterized with regard to their practicality, and as to whether they detect aberrant function or define the cause of dysfunction. Unfortunately, no current test is both practical and specific to a particular disease entity. Accordingly, the diagnosis of graft dysfunction remains dependent on the proper use and interpretation of many studies. This article reviews the current assays that have been evaluated in the clinic for the diagnosis of renal allograft-related diseases. These are limited to assays based on routinely obtainable samples such as blood, biopsy tissue, and urine. Newer studies are presented, along with more mundane assays, to highlight the practical use of studies regardless of their degree of mechanistic sophistication.

Urinary β2-Microglobulin Is Associated With Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

BACKGROUND

Identifying urinary biomarkers associated with acute rejection (AR) of kidney allografts could improve recipient care by allowing AR to be diagnosed noninvasively and treated earlier. We attempted to identify novel biomarkers associated with AR by analyzing urinary proteins by using matrix-associated laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF MS).

METHODS

Using MALDI-TOF MS, we analyzed urine samples from 30 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-proven AR, 15 allograft recipients without AR, preoperative samples from 29 kidney donors, and 10 subjects with proteinuric native kidney disease.

RESULTS

In samples obtained at the time of AR, we identified a protein peak at 11.7 kd that correlated strongly with AR. In regard to its predictive power for AR, this protein peak showed sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 89%, and negative predictive value of 70.6%, suggesting that this protein is highly associated with AR. We identified this peak as being beta2-microglobulin. This was validated by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which documented the presence of high urinary beta2-microglobulin levels in subjects with AR.

CONCLUSION

Beta2-microglobulin could be a strong biomarker for AR if used in conjunction with other biomarkers, producing an AR-specific urinary protein signature. This possibility must be confirmed in a larger cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

Detection of acute tubulointerstitial rejection by proteomic analysis of urinary samples in renal transplant recipients

This study investigates proteomic analysis of urinary samples as a non-invasive method to detect acute rejection of renal allografts. Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS) was used to analyze urinary samples in 19 patients with different grades of subclinical or clinical acute rejection (BANFF Ia to IIb), 10 patients with urinary tract infection and 29 patients without evidence of rejection or infection. A distinct urinary polypeptide pattern identified 16 out of 17 cases of acute tubolointerstitial rejection, but was absent in two cases of vascular rejection. Urinary tract infection resulted in a different polypeptide pattern that allowed to differentiate between infection and acute rejection in all cases. Potentially confounding variables such as acute tubular lesions, tubular atrophy, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, proteinuria, hematuria, allograft function and different immunosuppressive regimens did not interfere with test results. Blinded analysis of samples with and without rejection showed correct diagnosis by CE-MS in the majority of cases. Detection of acute rejection by CE-MS offers a promising non-invasive tool for the surveillance of renal allograft recipients. Further investigation is needed to establish polypeptide patterns in vascular rejection and to explore whether changes in the urinary proteome occur before the onset of histologically discernible rejection.

Acute humoral rejection of human lung allografts and elevation of C4d in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Antibody-mediated rejection is well established for renal allografts but remains controversial for lung allografts. Cardinal features of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts include antibodies to donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and evidence for antibody action, such as complement activation demonstrated by C4d deposition. We report a lung allograft recipient with circulating antibodies to donor HLA who failed treatment for acute cellular rejection but responded to therapy for humoral rejection. To address the second criteria for antibody-mediated rejection, we determined whether complement activation could be detected by measuring C4d in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by ELISA. Airway allergen challenge of asthmatics activates the complement pathway; therefore, we used BALF from asthmatics pre- and post-allergen challenge to measure C4d. These controls demonstrated that ELISA could detect increases in C4d after allergen challenge. BALF from the index patient had elevated C4d concomitant with graft dysfunction and anti-donor HLA in the absence of infection. Analysis of BALF from 25 additional lung allograft recipients showed that C4d concentrations >100 ng/mL were correlated with anti-HLA antibodies (p = 0.006), but were also observed with infection and in asyptomatic patients. The findings support the occurrence of anti-HLA-mediated lung allograft rejection and suggest that C4d measurement in BALF may be useful in diagnosis.