1
|
Retrospectively investigating the 12-year experience of prenatal diagnosis of small supernumerary marker chromosomes through array comparative genomic hybridization. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 58:139-144. [PMID: 30638468 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study retrospectively evaluated the incidences of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) in prenatal diagnoses and detected with gain of pathogenic copy number variation through array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in a laboratory in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively searched and reviewed the sSMC cases detected during prenatal diagnoses in the Youthgene medical laboratory, between 2004 and 2015 and used array CGH to successfully analyze 45 of 47,XN,+mar or 47,XN + mar/46,XN. RESULTS A total of 68,087 cases of amniocentesis were analyzed, of which 59 were identified as sSMCs. The overall frequency of sSMCs was 0.087%, and 7 of 45 sSMCs were identified with gain of pathogenic copy number variation (CNV). CONCLUSION Array CGH offers useful tools that can be used to detect small fragments of chromosomal abnormalities and sSMC origins in prenatal diagnosis. In this study, we successfully used array CGH to detect 7 out of 45 sSMCs, which were identified with gain in pathogenic CNV.
Collapse
|
2
|
Layte R, Banks J. Socioeconomic differentials in mortality by cause of death in the Republic of Ireland, 1984-2008. Eur J Public Health 2016; 26:451-8. [PMID: 27069003 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT/PROBLEM Comparative analysis of relative and absolute mortality differentials between socioeconomic groups are now available. These show consistently increasing relative increases in mortality differentials but complex trends in absolute mortality differentials. OBJECTIVE This paper provides an analysis of relative and absolute trends in mortality by cause of death and socioeconomic group (SEG) from 1984 to 2008 among men and active women aged 30-64 years in Ireland and compares these results with recent European and US studies to give an overview of trends. METHODS This paper uses mortality data from the Irish Central Statistics Office from 1984 to 2008 to calculate standardized death rates by age, sex, socioeconomic status and cause of death showing trends in SEG inequalities in mortality in Ireland. These show which specific causes of death are driving all-cause mortality trends. RESULTS SEG differentials in all-cause mortality among men and women have been increasing since the 1980s. Some of this increase reflects larger falls in cardiovascular causes among advantaged groups, but the trend is largely accounted for by increasing inequalities in mortality in digestive, neoplasm and external causes of deaths. CONCLUSIONS These findings are in line with international findings that show that socioeconomic differentials in digestive, neoplasm and external cause deaths are driving general socioeconomic differentials in all-cause mortality. External cause deaths may have been influenced by levels of economic activity, particularly in construction, during the economic boom among manual workers. Furthermore, deaths from digestive diseases during the 1990s and 2000s may well be the result of increases in liver disease associated with excessive alcohol consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Layte
- 1 Department of Sociology, Trinity College Dublin and the Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joanne Banks
- 2 Economic and Social Research Institute and Adjunct Research Associate, Department of Sociology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen CP, Chen M, Su YN, Huang JP, Chern SR, Wu PS, Su JW, Chang SP, Chen YT, Lee CC, Chen LF, Pan CW, Wang W. Mosaic small supernumerary marker chromosome 1 at amniocentesis: prenatal diagnosis, molecular genetic analysis and literature review. Gene 2013; 529:169-75. [PMID: 23933412 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2013] [Revised: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 07/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analysis of mosaic small supernumerary marker chromosome 1 [sSMC(1)]. We review the literature of sSMC(1) at amniocentesis and chromosome 1p21.1-p12 duplication syndrome. We discuss the genotype-phenotype correlation of the involved genes of ALX3, RBM15, NTNG1, SLC25A24, GPSM2, TBX15 and NOTCH2 in this case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Ping Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical and Community Health Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marle N, Martinet D, Aboura A, Joly-Helas G, Andrieux J, Flori E, Puechberty J, Vialard F, Sanlaville D, Fert Ferrer S, Bourrouillou G, Tabet AC, Quilichini B, Simon-Bouy B, Bazin A, Becker M, Stora H, Amblard S, Doco-Fenzy M, Molina Gomes D, Girard-Lemaire F, Cordier MP, Satre V, Schneider A, Lemeur N, Chambon P, Jacquemont S, Fellmann F, Vigouroux-Castera A, Molignier R, Delaye A, Pipiras E, Liquier A, Rousseau T, Mosca AL, Kremer V, Payet M, Rangon C, Mugneret F, Aho S, Faivre L, Callier P. Molecular characterization of 39 de novo sSMC: contribution to prognosis and genetic counselling, a prospective study. Clin Genet 2013; 85:233-44. [PMID: 23489061 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2012] [Revised: 03/05/2012] [Accepted: 03/05/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are structurally abnormal chromosomes that cannot be characterized by karyotype. In many prenatal cases of de novo sSMC, the outcome of pregnancy is difficult to predict because the euchromatin content is unclear. This study aimed to determine the presence or absence of euchromatin material of 39 de novo prenatally ascertained sSMC by array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Cases were prospectively ascertained from the study of 65,000 prenatal samples [0.060%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.042-0.082]. Array-CGH showed that 22 markers were derived from non-acrocentric markers (56.4%) and 7 from acrocentic markers (18%). The 10 additional cases remained unidentified (25.6%), but 7 of 10 could be further identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization; 69% of de novo sSMC contained euchromatin material, 95.4% of which for non-acrocentric markers. Some sSMC containing euchromatin had a normal phenotype (31% for non-acrocentric and 75% for acrocentric markers). Statistical differences between normal and abnormal phenotypes were shown for the size of the euchromatin material (more or less than 1 Mb, p = 0.0006) and number of genes (more or less than 10, p = 0.0009). This study is the largest to date and shows the utility of array-CGH or SNP array in the detection and characterization of de novo sSMC in a prenatal context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Marle
- Département de Génétique, Hôpital Le Bocage, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Human ring chromosomes and small supernumerary marker chromosomes-do they have telomeres? Chromosome Res 2012; 20:825-35. [PMID: 23076733 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-012-9316-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2012] [Revised: 10/01/2012] [Accepted: 10/02/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Ring chromosomes and small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are enigmatic types of derivative chromosomes, in which the telomeres are thought to play a crucial role in their formation and stabilization. Considering that there are only a few studies that evaluate the presence of telomeric sequences in ring chromosomes and on sSMC, here, we analyzed 14 ring chromosomes and 29 sSMC for the presence of telomeric sequences through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The results showed that ring chromosomes can actually fall into two groups: the ones with or without telomeres. Additionally, telomeric signals were detectable at both ends of centric and neocentric sSMC with inverted duplication shape, as well as in complex sSMC. Apart from that, generally both ring- and centric minute-shaped sSMC did not present telomeric sequences neither detectable by FISH nor by a second protein-directed immunohistochemical approach. However, the fact that telomeres are absent does not automatically mean that the sSMC has a ring shape, as often deduced in the previous literature. Overall, the results obtained by FISH studies directed against telomeres need to be checked carefully by other approaches.
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang B, Pearle P, Rauen KA, Cotter PD. Supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosome 6: cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic, and array CGH characterization. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 158A:1568-73. [PMID: 22639445 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2011] [Accepted: 03/05/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMC) are relatively common in prenatal diagnosis. As the clinical outcomes vary greatly, a better understanding of the karyotype-phenotype correlation for different SMCs will be important for genetic counseling. We present two cases of prenatally detected de novo, small SMCs. The markers were present in 80% of amniocyte colonies in Case 1 and 38% of the colonies in Case 2. The SMCs were determined to be derived from chromosome 6 during postnatal confirmation studies. Although the sizes and the chromosomal origin of the SMCs in these two cases appeared to be similar, the clinical outcomes varied. The clinical manifestations observed in Case 1 included small for gestational age, feeding difficulty at birth, hydronephrosis, deviated septum and dysmorphic features, while the phenotype is apparently normal in Case 2. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed and showed increase in dosage for approximately 26 Mb of genetic material from the proximal short and long arms of chromosome 6 in Case 1. Results of array CGH were uninformative in Case 2, either due to mosaicism or lack of detectable euchromatin. The difference in the clinical presentation in these two patients may have resulted from the difference in the actual gene contents of the marker chromosomes and/or the differential distribution of the mosaicism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Huang
- Integrated Genetics, Monrovia, California 91016, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guediche N, Brisset S, Benichou JJ, Guérin N, Mabboux P, Maurin ML, Bas C, Laroudie M, Picone O, Goldszmidt D, Prévot S, Labrune P, Tachdjian G. Chromosomal breakpoints characterization of two supernumerary ring chromosomes 20. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A:464-71. [DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
8
|
Callier P, Faivre L, Pigeonnat S, Quilichini B, Marle N, Thauvin-Robinet C, Mosca AL, Masurel-Paulet A, Rousseau T, Sagot P, Laurent N, Mugneret F. Contribution of array CGH in prognosis and genetic counselling of prenatally diagnosed supernumerary ring chromosome 20. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29:1002-5. [PMID: 19670346 DOI: 10.1002/pd.2333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
9
|
Kitsiou-Tzeli S, Manolakos E, Lagou M, Kontodiou M, Kosyakova N, Ewers E, Weise A, Garas A, Orru S, Liehr T, Metaxotou A. Characterization of a prenatally assessed de novo supernumerary minute ring chromosome 20 in a phenotypically normal male. Mol Cytogenet 2009; 2:1. [PMID: 19128450 PMCID: PMC2635371 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-2-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2008] [Accepted: 01/07/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The heterogeneous group of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) presents serious counseling problems, especially if they are present de novo and diagnosed prenatally. The incidence has been estimated at 1 in 1000 prenatal samples. We present a case of mosaic sSMC diagnosed prenatally after amniocentesis. The sSMC was characterized by various molecular cytogenetic techniques and determined to be a r(20) chromosome. After genetic counseling, the parents decided to continue the pregnancy, and a boy with minor phenotypic variants was born after 39 weeks of pregnancy. The case is compared with four other cases of prenatally detected r(20) mosaicism. Results Here we describe a 3 months old male child with normal pre- and postnatal development and with a de novo ring supernumerary marker chromosome in amniocytes cultures. Using new fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, three distinguishable sSMCs (cryptic mosaicism), all derived from chromosome 20, were observed, including ring and minute chromosomes. This heterogeneity was impossible to detect by the conventional G-banding technique or conventional FISH technique that were used before the application of new FISH techniques (subcentromere-specific multicolor-FISH [subcenM-FISH]) and a probe, specific for the 20p12.2 band. The sSMC present in 25% of the cells was present as r(20)(::p12.2~12.3->q11.1::)[5]/r(20;20)(::p12.1->q11.1::q11.1 >p12.1::)[2]/min(20;20)(:p12.1->q11.1::q11.1->p12.1:)[1]. The final karyotype was 47,XY,+r(20)[25%]/46,XY[75%]. Conclusion We emphasize the importance of application of molecular cytogenetics in a prenatally diagnostic laboratory and description of more cases to enable a better genetic counseling and risk evaluation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Douet-Guilbert N, Marical H, Pinson L, Herry A, Le Bris MJ, Morel F, De Braekeleer M. Characterisation of supernumerary chromosomal markers: a study of 13 cases. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007; 116:18-23. [PMID: 17268173 DOI: 10.1159/000097413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2006] [Accepted: 06/30/2006] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Marker chromosomes are defined as 'structurally abnormal chromosomes in which no part can be identified' (ISCN 1995). Supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMC) are 'additional markers' whose origin and composition cannot be determined by conventional cytogenetics. Molecular cytogenetic methods are necessary to identify these additional chromosomal markers. In one third, the SMCs are clinically well-defined in the literature, the remaining two thirds present a major problem for genetic counselling in prenatal diagnosis. At present, different molecular cytogenetic methods are used to determine the origin of SMCs. In this work, we studied 13 SMCs detected by RHG-banding, completed by C-banding and/or NOR-staining. 24-color FISH was used as the primary technique when the chromosomal origin was unknown. Targeted FISH procedures with specific probes (whole chromosome painting, centromeric probe, locus-specific identifier, BAC, etc.) were then performed to confirm and/or specify the chromosomal material present in the SMC. Seven SMCs were found to be associated with phenotypic abnormalities. Five derived from autosomes and two from gonosomes; these are: der(12)t(4;12), dic(15), i(18p), r(19), der(22)t(11;22), r(X), and der(Y). Two markers, r(8) and idic(15), were identified during investigations of infertile couples. Three cases seemed to be phenotypically normal. Four were discovered prenatally: r(2) and r(19) referred for elevated maternal serum markers, der(13/21) referred for advanced maternal age. The fourth SMC, der(14/22), was found during familial investigation following the identification of the same marker in an infertile son. The precise characterisation of the SMCs is of utmost importance for genetic counselling, especially in prenatal diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Douet-Guilbert
- Laboratoire d'Histologie, Embryologie et Cytogénétique, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Padilla-Nash HM, Barenboim-Stapleton L, Difilippantonio MJ, Ried T. Spectral karyotyping analysis of human and mouse chromosomes. Nat Protoc 2006; 1:3129-42. [PMID: 17406576 PMCID: PMC4772431 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Classical banding methods provide basic information about the identities and structures of chromosomes on the basis of their unique banding patterns. Spectral karyotyping (SKY), and the related multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH), are chromosome-specific multicolor FISH techniques that augment cytogenetic evaluations of malignant disease by providing additional information and improved characterization of aberrant chromosomes that contain DNA sequences not identifiable using conventional banding methods. SKY is based on cohybridization of combinatorially labeled chromosome-painting probes with unique fluorochrome signatures onto human or mouse metaphase chromosome preparations. Image acquisition and analysis use a specialized imaging system, combining Sagnac interferometer and CCD camera images to reconstruct spectral information at each pixel. Here we present a protocol for SKY analysis using commercially available SkyPaint probes, including procedures for metaphase chromosome preparation, slide pretreatment and probe hybridization and detection. SKY analysis requires approximately 6 d.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesed M Padilla-Nash
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health, 50 South Drive-MSC 8010, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|