Botulinum toxin A injection in ISDN ointment-resistant chronic anal fissures

Early botulinum toxin injection reduces pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidectomy is the standard procedure for treating high-grade hemorrhoids. However, postoperative pain usually causes patients to delay or refuse surgical treatment. Because maximal resting pressure in the internal anal sphincter plays a major role in post-hemorrhoidectomy pain, Botulinum toxin injections have been proposed to reduce it. However, the optimal timing of Botulinum toxin injections is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of early and intraoperative Botulinum toxin injections for postoperative pain control.

METHODS

In this pilot study, we enrolled patients who had grade III or IV hemorrhoids and underwent Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy at a single tertiary care center from October 1, 2018 to November 30, 2020. The experimental group received 50 U Botulinum toxin injections to the internal anal sphincter 1 week before the operation, and the control group received injections intraoperatively. The primary endpoint was the daily maximal and resting visual analogue scale (VAS) score recorded from postoperative days 0-6. The secondary endpoints were analgesia requirements, number of bowel movements per day, healing time, and postoperative length of stay. Power of the daily resting VAS score is at least 93%, but the power of the daily maximal VAS is a little lower (71%) (calculated by G*Power 3.1.9.2).

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (male: female = 27:35; mean age = 47.6 ± 13.1 years) were randomized to the experimental group (n = 31) or control group (n = 31). The experimental group  (n = 31) showed significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the controls (n = 31; p = 0.019). A generalized estimating equations model revealed that the group that received Botulinum toxin  yielded a significantly lower maximal (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-1.0, p = 0.041) and resting (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7, p < 0.001) VAS compared to controls at all time points. The Botulinum toxin group also had significantly less resting pain from postoperative days 1-5, and lower maximal subjective pain scores on postoperative days 1 (p = 0.024) and 4 (p = 0.044). Similar trends were observed on other days.

CONCLUSIONS

Early Botulinum toxin injection produced shorter hospital stays, and less reported pain after hemorrhoidectomy than intraoperative injections, especially for pain at rest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Identifier: NCT04485780 on ClinicalTrials.gov (retrospectively registered).

S3-Leitlinie: Analfissur

Die Analfissur ist eine der häufigsten Pathologien, welche sich dem Proktologen präsentiert. Entsprechend ist es wichtig, verlässliche Leitlinien dazu zu entwickeln. Die aktuelle Leitlinie wurde anhand eines systematischen Literaturreview von einem interdisziplinären Expertengremium diskutiert und verabschiedet.

Die akute Analfissur, soll auf Grund ihrer hohen Selbstheilungstendenz konservativ behandelt werden. Die Heilung wird am besten durch die Einnahme von Ballaststoff reicher Ernährung und einer medikamentösen Relaxation durch Kalziumkanal-Antagonisten (CCA) unterstützt. Zur Behandlung der chronischen Analfissur (CAF), soll den Patienten eine medikamentöse Behandlung zur „chemischen Sphinkterotomie“ mittels topischer CCA oder Nitraten angeboten werden. Bei Versagen dieser Therapie, kann zur Relaxation des inneren Analsphinkters Botulinumtoxin injiziert werden. Es ist belegt, dass die operativen Therapien effektiver sind. Deshalb kann eine Operation schon als primäre Therapie oder nach erfolgloser medikamentöser Therapie erfolgen. Die Fissurektomie, evtl. mit zusätzlicher Botulinumtoxin Injektion oder Lappendeckung, ist die Operation der Wahl. Obwohl die laterale Internus Sphinkterotomie die CAF effektiver heilt, bleibt diese wegen dem höheren Risiko für eine postoperative Stuhlinkontinenz eine Option für Einzelfälle.

Gastrointestinal Uses of Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin (BT), one of the most powerful inhibitors that prevents the release of acetylcholine from nerve endings, represents an alternative therapeutic approach for "spastic" disorders of the gastrointestinal tract such as achalasia, gastroparesis, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, chronic anal fissures, and pelvic floor dyssynergia.BT has proven to be safe and this allows it to be a valid alternative in patients at high risk of invasive procedures but long-term efficacy in many disorders has not been observed, primarily due to its relatively short duration of action. Administration of BT has a low rate of adverse reactions and complications. However, not all patients respond to BT therapy, and large randomized controlled trials are lacking for many conditions commonly treated with BT.The local injection of BT in some conditions becomes a useful tool to decide to switch to more invasive therapies. Since 1980, the toxin has rapidly transformed from lethal poison to a safe therapeutic agent, with a significant impact on the quality of life.

Botulinum Toxin Injection for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Is There Any Dose-Dependent Efficiency? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is a linear split of the anoderm. The minimally invasive management of CAF such as botulinum toxin (BT) injection is recommended. However, the exact efficient dose of BT, number of injections per session and the injection sites are still debatable. The aim of this analysis was to assess the dose-dependent efficiency of botulinum toxin injection for CAF.

METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for terms: "anal fissure" AND "botulinum toxin." Studies published between October 1993 and May 2015 were included and had to meet the following criteria: (1) chronic anal fissure, (2) prospective character of the study, (3) used simple BT injection without any other interventions and (4) no previous treatment with BT.

RESULTS

A total of 1577 patients from 34 prospective studies used either Botox or Dysport formulations were qualified for this meta-analysis. A total number of BT units per session ranged from 5 to 150 IU, whereas the efficiency across analyzed studies ranged from 33 to 96 %. Surprisingly, we did not observe a dose-dependent efficiency (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.060; p = 0.0708). Moreover, there were no BT dose-dependent postoperative complications or fecal incontinence and significant difference in healing rates compared BT injection into the anal sphincter muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

BT injection has been an accepted method for the management of CAF. Surprisingly, there is no dose-dependent efficiency, and the postoperative incontinence rate is not related to the BT dosage regardless the type of formulation of botulinum neurotoxin used. Moreover, no difference in healing rate has been observed in regard to the site and number of injections per session.

Long-term outcomes of Botulinum toxin in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: 5 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissure is a frequent and disabling disease, often affecting young adults. Botulinum toxin and lateral internal sphincterotomy are the main therapeutic options for refractory cases. Botulinum toxin is minimally invasive and safer compared with surgery, which carries a difficult post-operative recovery and fecal incontinence risk. The long-term efficacy of Botulinum toxin is not well known.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxin in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study at a single center, including patients treated with Botulinum toxin from 2005 to 2010, followed over at least a period of 5 years. All patients were treated with injection of 25U of Botulinum toxin in the intersphincteric groove. The response was registered as complete, partial, refractory and relapse.

RESULTS

Botulinum toxin was administered to 126 patients, 69.8% (n = 88) were followed over a period of 5 years. After 3 months, 46.6% (n = 41) had complete response, 23.9% (n = 21) had partial response and 29.5% (n = 26) were refractory. Relapse was observed in 1.2% (n = 1) at 6 months, 11.4% (n = 10) at 1 year, 2.3% (n = 2) at 3 years; no relapse at 5 years. The overall success rate was 64.8% at 5 years of follow-up. Botulinum toxin was well tolerated by all patients and there were no complications.

CONCLUSION

The use of Botulinum toxin to treat patients with chronic anal fissure was safe and effective in long-term follow-up.

Treatment of gastrointestinal sphincters spasms with botulinum toxin A

Botulinum toxin A inhibits neuromuscular transmission. It has become a drug with many indications. The range of clinical applications has grown to encompass several neurological and non-neurological conditions. One of the most recent achievements in the field is the observation that botulinum toxin A provides benefit in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Although toxin blocks cholinergic nerve endings in the autonomic nervous system, it has also been shown that it does not block non-adrenergic non-cholinergic responses mediated by nitric oxide. This has promoted further interest in using botulinum toxin A as a treatment for overactive smooth muscles and sphincters. The introduction of this therapy has made the treatment of several clinical conditions easier, in the outpatient setting, at a lower cost and without permanent complications. This review presents current data on the use of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of pathological conditions of the gastrointestinal tract.

Isosorbide dinitrate ointment vs botulinum toxin A (Dysport) as the primary treatment for chronic anal fissure: a randomized multicentre study

AIM

Nitric oxide donors, such as isosorbide dinitrate ointment (ISDN), are considered as first-choice agents in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Injection with botulinum toxin A in the internal anal sphincter is often used as a second-line therapy, although it may give better results and fewer side effects than nitric oxide donors. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate whether botulinum toxin A (Dysport) is more effective than ISDN in the primary treatment of chronic anal fissure.

METHOD

From April 2005 until October 2009, 60 patients (32 men) with a median age of 42 (25-82) years were randomized to receive either ISDN 10 mg/ml (1%) (n = 33) or injection with 60 units of Dysport (n = 27). The primary end-point was the percentage of complete fissure healing after 8 weeks.

RESULTS

After a median of 9 weeks complete fissure healing was noted in 18 of 27 patients in the Dysport group and in 11 of 33 patients in the ISDN group (P = 0.010). Absolute improvement of pain scores after 9 weeks was similar in both groups (P = 0.733). Patients treated with Dysport had fewer side effects than patients treated with ISDN (P = 0.028). Of the patients with a healed fissure, 28% of the Dysport group and 50% of the ISDN group had a recurrence within 1 year (P = 0.286; hazard ratio 2.08; 95% CI = 0.54-7.97).

CONCLUSION

Dysport is more effective than ISDN ointment and has fewer side effects in the primary treatment of chronic anal fissure. The recurrence rate within 1 year in both treatment groups is high.

Effect of chronic anal fissure components on isosorbide dinitrate treatment

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissure is diagnosed in the presence of persistent symptoms: The classic triad includes a linear mucosal tear exposing the internal sphincter fibers, hypertrophied anal papilla, and a sentinel skin tag. Thus, chronic anal fissure can be divided into three components: the fissure itself; hypertrophied anal papilla; the sentinel skin tag. Not every chronic anal fissure has all three components; some have two components, and others present with only a persistent fissure. The success rate of medical treatment for chronic anal fissure is reported as 42-86 %. In this study, we intended to observe the effect of said components on healing with isosorbide dinitrate treatment.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients with chronic anal fissures were admitted and were divided into three groups. Patients in group I had a single component (only the fissure with a linear mucosal tear exposing the internal sphincter fibers); group II had two components (skin tag or hypertrophied papilla in addition to the fissure); group III had all three components (fissure, skin tag, hypertrophied papilla). Isosorbide dinitrate 0.25 % was applied three times a day.

RESULTS

The success rates in the study groups were 93, 74, and 64 %, respectively. The success rate was significantly higher for group I than for groups II and III.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic anal fissure components should be considered when evaluating the success rates of studies reporting the results of various medical treatments. The number of components seems to be an important factor that affects the results of isosorbide dinitrate treatment.

Botulinum toxin and anal fissure: efficacy and safety systematic review

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin in the treatment of anal fissure. An answer was attempted to the following research questions: (i) what is the efficacy of botulinum toxin in healing of anal fissure compared to placebo, (ii) what is the efficacy of botulinum toxin in healing of anal fissure compared to other means of chemical sphincterotomy, (iii) what is the efficacy of botulinum toxin in healing of anal fissure compared to surgical sphincterotomy, (iv) what is the short term safety of botulinum toxin injections and (v) what is the long term safety of botulinum toxin injections.

METHODS

Clinical trials investigating the effect of botulinum toxin in the treatment of anal fissure met inclusion criteria. Case reports and case series were also included for the estimation of safety. Meta-analysis was not performed due to clinical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The comparator could be placebo, nitroglycerin ointment, or lateral internal sphincterotomy, with dosage ranging from 20 IU to 50 IU of botulinum toxin. Fissure healing was the most commonly reported primary endpoint but the time period from botulinum toxin injection to fissure healing ranged from 2 weeks to 4 months. Accordingly, outcome data were also heterogenous.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin injections should be considered a minimally invasive therapeutic option for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. However, well designed randomized trials are needed for the valid estimation of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin in this therapeutic indication.

Pharmacological sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures by botulinum toxin a

Chronic anal fissure is a common proctologic disease. Botulinum toxin (BTX) can be used for temporary chemical denervation to treat this painful disorder. Its application is by intramuscular injections into either the external or internal anal sphincter muscle. The mode of action, application techniques, and possible complications or adverse effects of BTX therapy are discussed in this report. The healing rate is dependent on the BTX dosage. The short-term healing rate (</= 6 months) is 60-90%, whereas about 50% of the patients show a complete response in long-term follow-up studies (> 1 year). Adverse effects are generally mild, but relapses occur more often than with surgery. Conservative therapy is currently considered as a first-line treatment. With increasing evidence for its efficacy, BTX can now be considered among the first-line nonsurgical treatements. Although, surgical management by lateral sphincterotomy is the most effective treatment, it shows a higher incidence of incontinence and greater general morbidity rate than BTX. BTX is a useful alternative to surgery and in many cases, surgery can be avoided with the use of BTX.

Conservative and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: prospective longer term results

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of different medical treatments and surgery in the treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to March 2009, 311 patients with typical CAF completed the study. All patients were initially treated with 0.2% nitroglycerin ointment (GTN) or anal dilators (DIL) for 8 weeks. If no improvement was observed after 8 weeks, the patients were assigned to the other treatment or a combination of the two. Persisting symptoms after 12 weeks or recurrence were indications for either botulinum toxin injection into the internal sphincter and fissurectomy or lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). During the follow-up (29 +/- 16 months), healing rates, symptoms, incontinence scores, and therapy adverse effects were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

Overall healing rates were 64.6% and 94% after GTN/DIL or BTX/LIS. Healing rate after GTN or DIL after 12 weeks course were 54.5% and 61.5%, respectively. Fifty-four patients (17.4%) responded to further medical therapy. One hundred two patients (32.8%) underwent BTX or LIS. Healing rate after BTX was 83.3% and overall healing after LIS group was 98.7% with no definitive incontinence.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, although LIS is far more effective than medical treatments, BTX injection/fissurectomy as first line treatment may significantly increase the healing rate while avoiding any risk of incontinence.

Blinded randomized clinical trial of botulinum toxin versus isosorbide dinitrate ointment for treatment of anal fissure

BACKGROUND

Nitric oxide donors such as isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) are considered the first choice of treatment for anal fissure. After reports of the successful treatment of such fissures with botulinum toxin, this randomized blinded trial compared botulinum toxin with ISDN in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive an injection of botulinum in the internal anal sphincter and a placebo ointment, or a placebo injection and ISDN ointment. The primary endpoint was macroscopic fissure healing after 4 months.

RESULTS

After 4 months macroscopic healing of the fissures was noted in 14 of 37 patients in the botulinum group and 21 of 36 in the ISDN group. Pain scores were lower among patients who received ISDN, although the difference was not significant. Side-effects were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In contrast with previous reports on botulinum toxin as a therapeutic agent for anal fissure, this study found no advantage over treatment with a nitric oxide donor as regards fissure healing and fissure-related pain.