Juillerat P, Vader JP, Felley C, Pittet V, Gonvers JJ, Mottet C, Bemelman WA, Lémann M, Oresland T, Michetti P, Froehlich F. Appropriate maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease: Results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel - EPACT II.
J Crohns Colitis 2009;
3:241-9. [PMID:
21172282 DOI:
10.1016/j.crohns.2009.05.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2009] [Revised: 05/13/2009] [Accepted: 05/13/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Biological therapy has dramatically changed management of Crohn's disease (CD). New data have confirmed the benefit and relative long-term safety of anti-TNFα inhibition as part of a regular scheduled administration programme. The EPACT appropriateness criteria for maintenance treatment after medically-induced remission (MIR) or surgically-induced remission (SIR) of CD thus required updating.
METHODS
A multidisciplinary international expert panel (EPACT II, Geneva, Switzerland) discussed and anonymously rated detailed, explicit clinical indications based on evidence in the literature and personal expertise. Median ratings (on a 9-point scale) were stratified into three assessment categories: appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6 and/or disagreement) and inappropriate (1-3). Experts ranked appropriate medication according to their own clinical practice, without any consideration of cost.
RESULTS
Three hundred and ninety-two specific indications for maintenance treatment of CD were rated (200 for MIR and 192 for SIR). Azathioprine, methotrexate and/or anti-TNFα antibodies were considered appropriate in 42 indications, corresponding to 68% of all appropriate interventions (97% of MIR and 39% of SIR). The remaining appropriate interventions consisted of mesalazine and a "wait-and-see" strategy. Factors that influenced the panel's voting were patient characteristics and outcome of previous treatment. Results favour use of anti-TNFα agents after failure of any immunosuppressive therapy, while earlier primary use remains controversial.
CONCLUSION
Detailed explicit appropriateness criteria (EPACT) have been updated for maintenance treatment of CD. New expert recommendations for use of the classic immunosuppressors as well as anti-TNFα agents are now freely available online (www.epact.ch). The validity of these criteria should now be tested by prospective evaluation.
Collapse