The effect of cell kinetics and harvest time on SCE and NOR associations in Macaca fuscata lymphocytes

Dicamba-induced genotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells is prevented by vitamin E

In the present study the cytogenetic and genotoxic effect of benzoic herbicide dicamba and its Argentinean commercial formulation banvel (57.71% dicamba) was evaluated and whether this effect is mediated through oxidative damage or not. The protective role of vitamin E was also studied. Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency, cell-cycle progression, and cell viability analyses in CHO cells were used as in vitro end-points. Treatments with the test compounds were performed either during 24h (Protocol A) or 12h (Protocol B) before harvesting. Protocol A showed that vitamin E decreased pesticide SCE induction, corrected the cell-cycle delay and partially protected cell-death only in 500 microg/ml dicamba-treated cultures. A similar trend was found in banvel-treated cultures. Protocol B revealed similar protective role of vitamin E only for dicamba-induced geno- and cytotoxicity. Based on these observations it could be suggested that dicamba injures DNA by delivering reactive oxygen species rather than by another type of mechanism/s. Although banvel mimics the effect observed by dicamba, its formulation contains other xenobiotic/s agents able to induce cellular and DNA damage by a different mechanism/s. Further investigations are needed to acquire a comprehensive knowledge of the possible mechanism/s through dicamba and banvel exert their toxic effects.

The genetic toxicology of 5-bromodeoxyuridine in mammalian cells

The thymidine analog, BrdUrd, induces many biological responses which are of importance to the field of genetic toxicology and related disciplines. These include the induction of SCE, specific-locus mutations, and toxicity, inhibition of cell proliferation, and the expression of fragile sites in the human genome. In early models which addressed the mechanisms of the biological effects of BrdUrd exposure, two pathways were proposed to account for the induction of the biological responses. Incorporation of the enol form of BrdUrd into the nascent DNA strand after pairing with deoxyguanosine was proposed as one pathway, whereas the incorporation of BrdUrd opposite adenosine in place of thymidine was proposed as the second pathway. Many novel and sophisticated techniques have been applied to the study of the mechanism of the induction of biological effects by BrdUrd leading to a substantial increase in our understanding of these mechanisms. However, the experimental evidence clearly supports the contention that BrdUrd exerts its effects on eukaryotic cells through mechanisms similar to those originally proposed to explain the genotoxicity of BrdUrd.