Atenolol is inferior to metoprolol in improving left ventricular function and preventing ventricular remodeling in dogs with heart failure

Management of Chronic Congestive Heart Failure Caused by Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease in Dogs: A Narrative Review from 1970 to 2020

Simple Summary

Myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) is the most common acquired cardiovascular disease in dogs. The progression of the disease and the increasing severity of valvular regurgitation cause a volume overload of the left heart, leading to left atrial and ventricular remodeling and congestive heart failure (CHF). The treatment of chronic CHF secondary to MMVD in dogs has not always been the same over time. In the last fifty years, the drugs utilized have considerably changed, as well as the therapeutic protocols. Some drugs have also changed their intended use. An analysis of the literature concerning the therapy of chronic heart failure in dogs affected by this widespread degenerative disease is not available; a synthesis of the published literature on this topic and a description of its current state of art are needed. To the authors’ knowledge, a review of this topic has never been published in veterinary medicine; therefore, the aim of this study is to overview the treatments of chronic CHF secondary to MMVD in dogs from 1970 to 2020 using the general framework of narrative reviews.

Abstract

The treatment of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), secondary to myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) in dogs, has considerably changed in the last fifty years. An analysis of the literature concerning the therapy of chronic CHF in dogs affected by MMVD is not available, and it is needed. Narrative reviews (NRs) are aimed at identifying and summarizing what has been previously published, avoiding duplications, and seeking new study areas that have not yet been addressed. The most accessible open-access databases, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, were chosen, and the searching time frame was set in five decades, from 1970 to 2020. The 384 selected studies were classified into categories depending on the aim of the study, the population target, the pathogenesis of MMVD (natural/induced), and the resulting CHF. Over the years, the types of studies have increased considerably in veterinary medicine. In particular, there have been 43 (24.29%) clinical trials, 41 (23.16%) randomized controlled trials, 10 (5.65%) cross-over trials, 40 (22.60%) reviews, 5 (2.82%) comparative studies, 17 (9.60%) case-control studies, 2 (1.13%) cohort studies, 2 (1.13%) experimental studies, 2 (1.13%) questionnaires, 6 (3.40%) case-reports, 7 (3.95%) retrospective studies, and 2 (1.13%) guidelines. The experimental studies on dogs with an induced form of the disease were less numerous (49–27.68%) than the studies on dogs affected by spontaneous MMVD (128–72.32%). The therapy of chronic CHF in dogs has considerably changed in the last fifty years: in the last century, some of the currently prescribed drugs did not exist yet, while others had different indications.

Elamipretide for Barth syndrome cardiomyopathy: gradual rebuilding of a failed power grid

Barth syndrome is a rare and potentially fatal X-linked disease characterized by cardiomyopathy, skeletal muscle weakness, growth delays, and cyclic neutropenia. Patients with Barth syndrome are prone to high risk of mortality in infancy and the development of cardiomyopathy with severe weakening of the immune system. Elamipretide is a water-soluble, aromatic-cationic, mitochondria-targeting tetrapeptide that readily penetrates and transiently localizes to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Therapy with elamipretide facilitates cell health by improving energy production and inhibiting excessive formation of reactive oxygen species, thus alleviating oxidative stress. Elamipretide crosses the outer membrane of the mitochondrion and becomes associated with cardiolipin, a constituent phospholipid of the inner membrane. Elamipretide improves mitochondrial bioenergetics and morphology rapidly in induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with Barth syndrome and other genetically related diseases characterized by pediatric cardiomyopathy. Data with elamipretide across multiple models of disease are especially promising, with results from several studies supporting the use of elamipretide as potential therapy for patients with Barth syndrome, particularly where there is a confirmed diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. This review highlights the challenges and opportunities presented in treating Barth syndrome cardiomyopathy patients with elamipretide and addresses evidence supporting the durability of effect of elamipretide as a therapeutic agent for Barth syndrome, especially its likely durable effects on progression of cardiomyopathy following the cessation of drug treatment and the capability of elamipretide to structurally reverse remodel the failing left ventricle at the global, cellular, and molecular level in a gradual manner through specific targeting of the mitochondrial inner membrane.

Emerging Role of Compartmentalized G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling in the Cardiovascular Field

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface receptors that for many years have been considered to function exclusively at the plasma membrane, where they bind to extracellular ligands and activate G protein signaling cascades. According to the conventional model, these signaling events are rapidly terminated by β-arrestin (β-arr) recruitment to the activated GPCR resulting in signal desensitization and receptor internalization. However, during the past decade, emerging evidence suggest that many GPCRs can continue to activate G proteins from intracellular compartments after they have been internalized. G protein signaling from intracellular compartments is in general more sustained compared to G protein signaling at the plasma membrane. Notably, the particular location closer to the nucleus is beneficial for selective cellular functions such as regulation of gene transcription. Here, we review key GPCRs that undergo compartmentalized G protein signaling and discuss molecular considerations and requirements for this signaling to occur. Our main focus will be on receptors involved in the regulation of important physiological and pathological cardiovascular functions. We also discuss how sustained G protein activation from intracellular compartments may be involved in cellular functions that are distinct from functions regulated by plasma membrane G protein signaling, and the corresponding significance in cardiovascular physiology.

Chronic Therapy With Elamipretide (MTP-131), a Novel Mitochondria-Targeting Peptide, Improves Left Ventricular and Mitochondrial Function in Dogs With Advanced Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Elamipretide (MTP-131), a novel mitochondria-targeting peptide, was shown to reduce infarct size in animals with myocardial infarction and improve renal function in pigs with acute and chronic kidney injury. This study examined the effects of chronic therapy with elamipretide on left ventricular (LV) and mitochondrial function in dogs with heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fourteen dogs with microembolization-induced HF were randomized to 3 months monotherapy with subcutaneous injections of elamipretide (0.5 mg/kg once daily, HF+ELA, n=7) or saline (control, HF-CON, n=7). LV ejection fraction, plasma n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein were measured before (pretreatment) and 3 months after initiating therapy (post-treatment). Mitochondrial respiration, membrane potential (Δψm), maximum rate of ATP synthesis, and ATP/ADP ratio were measured in isolated LV cardiomyocytes obtained at post-treatment. In HF-CON dogs, ejection fraction decreased at post-treatment compared with pretreatment (29 ± 1% versus 31 ± 2%), whereas in HF+ELA dogs, ejection fraction significantly increased at post-treatment compared with pretreatment (36 ± 2% versus 30 ± 2%; P<0.05). In HF-CON, n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide increased by 88 ± 120 pg/mL during follow-up but decreased significantly by 774 ± 85 pg/mL in HF+ELA dogs (P<0.001). Treatment with elamipretide also normalized plasma tumor necrosis factor-α and C-reactive protein and restored mitochondrial state-3 respiration, Δψm, rate of ATP synthesis, and ATP/ADP ratio (ATP/ADP: 0.38 ± 0.04 HF-CON versus 1.16 ± 0.15 HF+ELA; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term therapy with elamipretide improves LV systolic function, normalizes plasma biomarkers, and reverses mitochondrial abnormalities in LV myocardium of dogs with advanced HF. The results support the development of elamipretide for the treatment of HF.

A pathway and network review on beta-adrenoceptor signaling and beta blockers in cardiac remodeling

It is well established that cardiac remodeling plays a pivotal role in the development of heart failure, a leading cause of death worldwide. Meanwhile, sympathetic hyperactivity is an important factor in inducing cardiac remodeling. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of beta-adrenoceptor signaling pathways would help to find better ways to reverse the adverse remodeling. Here, we reviewed five pathways, namely mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, Gs-AC-cAMP signaling, Ca(2+)-calcineurin-NFAT/CaMKII-HDACs signaling, PI3K signaling and beta-3 adrenergic signaling, in cardiac remodeling. Furthermore, we constructed a cardiac-remodeling-specific regulatory network including miRNA, transcription factors and target genes within the five pathways. Both experimental and clinical studies have documented beneficial effects of beta blockers in cardiac remodeling; nevertheless, different blockers show different extent of therapeutic effect. Exploration of the underlying mechanisms could help developing more effective drugs. Current evidence of treatment effect of beta blockers in remodeling was also reviewed based upon information from experimental data and clinical trials. We further discussed the mechanism of how beta blockers work and why some beta blockers are more potent than others in treating cardiac remodeling within the framework of cardiac remodeling network.

Differential effects of metoprolol and atenolol to neuropeptide Y blockade in coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To explore possible differential effects between metoprolol and atenolol in patients with coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

The study was randomized, double blind, two-way crossover with the Y1 antagonist AR-H040922 given as IV infusion for 2 h or placebo. Most patients were treated with metoprolol or atenolol. In a post hoc analysis we compared the hemodynamic response to exercise of the Y1 antagonist in patients on metoprolol (n = 16) and atenolol (n = 5), and assessed respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), an indirect measurement of cardiac vagal activation, in the placebo phase in patients on metoprolol (n = 26) and on atenolol (n = 24).

RESULTS

1) The Y1 antagonist reduced the systolic blood pressure rise during and after exercise during atenolol, but not during metoprolol, while heart rate and maximal load were similar with the two beta-blockers and not affected by the Y1 antagonist. 2) At equal heart- and respiration-rate 7-8 min after exercise the RSA was significantly lower in atenolol than in metoprolol patients, while no difference was seen at rest before exercise.

CONCLUSION

These findings from this hypothesis generating study indicate that peripheral effects of NPY contribute less to cardiovascular stress reactions in patients on metoprolol than in those on atenolol.

β-adrenergic blockade attenuates cardiac dysfunction and myofibrillar remodelling in congestive heart failure

Although β-adrenoceptor (β-AR) blockade is an important mode of therapy for congestive heart failure (CHF), subcellular mechanisms associated with its beneficial effects are not clear. Three weeks after inducing myocardial infarction (MI), rats were treated daily with or without 20 and 75 mg/kg atenolol, a selective β₁-AR antagonist, or propranolol, a non-selective β-AR antagonist, for 5 weeks. Sham operated rats served as controls. All animals were assessed haemodynamically and echocardiographically and the left ventricle (LV) was processed for the determination of myofibrillar ATPase activity, α- and β-myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms and gene expression as well as cardiac troponin I (cTnI) phosphorylation. Both atenolol and propranolol at 20 and 75 mg/kg doses attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and lung congestion in addition to increasing LV ejection fraction and LV systolic pressure as well as decreasing heart rate, LV end-diastolic pressure and LV diameters in the infarcted animals. Treatment of infarcted animals with these agents also attenuated the MI-induced depression in myofibrillar Ca²⁺-stimulated ATPase activity and phosphorylated cTnI protein content. The MI-induced decrease in α-MHC and increase in β-MHC protein content were attenuated by both atenolol and propranolol at low and high doses; however, only high dose of propranolol was effective in mitigating changes in the gene expression for α-MHC and β-MHC. Our results suggest that improvement of cardiac function by β-AR blockade in CHF may be associated with attenuation of myofibrillar remodelling.

Effect of atenolol vs metoprolol succinate on vascular function in patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effect of atenolol vs metoprolol succinate on vascular function in patients with essential hypertension.

HYPOTHESIS

Given intrinsic differences between these agents, we hypothesized that atenolol and metoprolol succinate would have disparate effects on vascular function.

METHODS

This study included 24 patients with hypertension (age 56 ± 2 years, 8 female, body mass index 28 ± 1) and featured a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Each β-blocker (atenolol or metoprolol succinate) was taken by patients once daily for a 4-week period. Measures of vascular function included peripheral augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave amplitude reactive hyperemia index from peripheral arterial tonometry, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation from ultrasound.

RESULTS

There were similar reductions in mean arterial pressure following treatment with atenolol and metoprolol succinate. Compared with metoprolol succinate, there was a significant increase in peripheral AIx following atenolol therapy (P < 0.05). There were no changes in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation or pulse wave amplitude reactive hyperemia index following either drug treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although atenolol and metoprolol succinate have similar effects on blood-pressure reduction, they have different effects on vascular function. Compared with metoprolol succinate, atenolol increases peripheral AIx. Neither drug has an effect on vascular endothelial function. These findings may have clinical implications, depending on the indication for treatment in an individual patient.

Mechanisms of the beneficial effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in congestive heart failure

Many clinical studies have documented favourable effects (reduced morbidity and mortality) of beta-adrenoceptor (β-AR) antagonists, such as carvedilol, metoprolol, propranolol, atenolol and bisoprolol, in congestive heart failure. These agents attenuate the effects of sympathetic activation during the development of heart failure, prevent ventricular remodelling and improve cardiac function. Because β-AR blockers are known to exert negative inotropic action, the mechanisms responsible for their beneficial effects in heart failure have been a subject of debate. While attenuation of changes in β-AR cyclic AMP-mediated signal transduction in heart failure is considered to be responsible for the beneficial effects of β-AR antagonists, other mechanisms such as the effects of these agents on subcellular remodelling, oxidative stress, apoptosis and defect in calcium handling, are equally important in preventing cardiac alterations in the failing heart. Moreover, β-AR antagonists are not a homogeneous group of drugs because they differ in their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, in addition to the selective and nonselective nature of their actions on β-AR. Various β-AR blocking agents have been shown to possess different ancillary properties and produce effects that are independent of β-AR. In fact, different β-AR antagonists have been observed to lower the elevated levels of plasma catecholamines in heart failure. Thus, the beneficial effects of β-AR antagonists are not only elicited through their interaction with mediated β-AR signal transduction sites in the myocardium, but other mechanisms may also contribute to their favourable actions in heart failure.