Prospective study on captopril renography in hypertensive patients

(99m)Tc Diethylenetriaminepentacetic Acid Angiotension-coverting Enzyme Inhibitor Renography as Screening Test for Renovascular Hypertension in Unilateral Small Kidney: A Prospective Study

To know the probability of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in unilateral small kidney and function of the unilateral small kidney, which includes glomerular filtration rate, differential function, uptake, Tmax by ^99mTc diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid (DTPA) base and ^99mTc DTPA angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition scan. All our patients were subjected to ^99mTc DTPA ACE inhibition renal scintigraphy. All the patients underwent either computed tomography (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was done in those patients in which kidney function test was deranged. Renal angiography was subsequently performed in cases with the suggestion of RAS on CT or MR angiography. The quantitative data was expressed as the arithmetic mean, standard deviation and percentages. The intergroup comparisons for parametric data were done by Student's t-test, whereas non-parametric data was compared with Mann-Whitney U-test. The intergroup comparisons were made by paired t-test and Wilcoxon sign rank test. P <0.05 was considered to be significant, and data was analyzed by Statistical package for social sciences(SPSS-20) software. Out of 47 patients, 25 patients were in the low probability group out of which none was positive for RAS on CT/MR angiography. Out of 47 patients, 12 were in the intermediate group out of which none was positive for RAS. Ten, out of 47 patients were suspected of high probability for RAS by ACE inhibition scan out of which 4 were positive for RAS by CT/MR angiography including one with bilateral RAS. ^99mTc DTPA angiotension-coverting enzyme inhibitor renography is a safe, non-invasive, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective test for excluding renovascular hypertension in patients who have normal or nearly normal renal function in unilateral small kidney.

Clinical problems in renovascular disease and the role of nuclear medicine

Although renovascular disease remains defined as a stenosis of the main renal artery or its proximal branches (renal artery stenosis [RAS]), its clinical overview has changed dramatically over the last 15-20 years and its management is more controversial than ever before. The clinical problems, not only diagnosis and treatment but also the relative contribution of different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the progression of kidney disease, have shifted dramatically. This presentation aims to emphasize the paradigm change revisiting the (recent) past focused on renovascular hypertension (RVH) to the current context of preservation or recovery of threatened renal function in patients with progressive atherosclerotic renovascular disease until its last stage of irreversible "ischemic nephropathy." In the past, the foreground was occupied by RVH, a very rare disease, where the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) was supposed to play the major, if not only, role in RVH issues. The retrospective RVH diagnosis was established either on the improvement or, more rarely, on the cure of hypertension after revascularization by, most often, a percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty with or without a stent placement. At this time, captoptril radionuclide renography was an efficient diagnostic tool, because it was a functional (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition), noninvasive test aiming to evidence both the RAAS activation and the lateralization (or asymmetry) of renin secretion by the kidney affected by a "hemodynamically significant" RAS. At present, even if captoptril radionuclide renography could be looked upon as the most efficient (and cost effective in selected high-risk patients) noninvasive, functional test to predict the improvement of hypertension after RAS correction, its clinical usefulness is questioned as the randomized, prospective trials failed to demonstrate any significant benefits (either on blood pressure control or on renal function protection) of the revascularization over current antihypertensive therapy. Today many patients with RVH remain undetected for years because they are treated successfully and at low expense with these new blockers of RAAS. In addition to its well-known role in hemodynamics, angiotensin II promotes activations of profibrogenic and inflammatory factors and cells and stimulates reactive oxygen species generation. The "atherosclerotic milieu" itself plays a role in the loss of renal microvessels and defective angiogenesis. After an "adaptative" phase, ischemia eventually develops and induces hypoxia, the substratum of ischemic nephropathy. Because blood oxygen level-dependent MRI may provide an index of oxygen content in vivo, it may be useful to predict renal function outcome after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. New PET tracers, dedicated to assess RAAS receptors, inflammatory cell infiltrates, angiogenesis, and apoptose, would be tested in this context of atherosclerotic renovascular disease.

Radionuclides in nephrourology, Part 2: pitfalls and diagnostic applications

Radionuclide renal scintigraphy provides important functional data to assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with a variety of suspected genitourinary tract problems, but the procedures are underutilized. Maximizing the utility of the available studies (as well as the perception of utility by referring physicians) requires a clear understanding of the clinical question, attention to quality control, acquisition of the essential elements necessary to produce an informed interpretation, and production of a report that presents a coherent impression based on data contained in the report and that specifically addresses the clinical question. To help achieve these goals, part 1 of this review addressed the available radiopharmaceuticals, quality control, and quantitative indices, including the measurement of absolute and relative renal function. Part 2 assumes familiarity with part 1 and focuses on the common clinical indications of suspected obstruction and renovascular hypertension; part 2 also summarizes the status of radionuclide renal imaging in the evaluation of the transplanted kidney and the detection of infection, discusses potential pitfalls, and concludes with suggestions for future research. The series of SAM questions accompanying parts 1 and 2 has been designed to reinforce and extend points made in the review. Although the primary focus is the adult patient, aspects of the review also apply to the pediatric population.

Interpretation of captopril renography using artificial neural networks

The purpose of this study was to develop a method based on artificial neural networks for interpretation of captopril renography tests for the detection of renovascular hypertension caused by renal artery stenosis and to assess the value of different measurements from the test. A total of 250 99mTc-MAG3 captopril renography tests were used in the study. The material was collected from two different patient groups. One group consisted of 101 patients who also had undergone a renal angiography. The angiographies, which were used as gold standard, showed a significant renal artery stenosis in 53 of the 101 cases. The second group consisted of 149 patients, who's captopril renography tests all were interpreted as not compatible with significant renal artery stenosis by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. Artificial neural networks were trained for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis using eight measures from each renogram. The neural network was then evaluated in separate test groups using an eightfold cross validation procedure. The performance of the neural networks, measured as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 0.93. The sensitivity was 91% at a specificity of 90%. The lowest performance was found for the network trained without use of a parenchymal transit measure, indicating the importance of this feature. Artificial neural networks can be trained to interpret captopril renography tests for detection of renovascular hypertension caused by renal artery stenosis. The result almost equals that of human experts shown in previous studies.

The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: Comparative analysis with conventional arteriography

PURPOSE

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is commonly used as a screening modality for the detection of renal artery stenosis. However, evidence supporting its utility in clinical practice is lacking; few rigorous studies have compared MRA with contrast arteriography (CA). After making anecdotal clinical observations that MRA sometimes overestimated the degree of renal artery stenosis, we decided to determine the interobserver variability, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of MRA compared with CA.

METHODS

From September 1999 to April 2003, we evaluated 68 renal arteries in 34 patients with clinically suspected renal artery stenosis using both MRA and CA. All studies were independently reviewed by four blinded observers. Renal arteries were categorized by MRA as normal, <50%, and >50% stenosis/occlusion. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRA detection of renal artery stenosis were compared to CA as the gold standard. Interobserver variability (kappa) was also calculated.

RESULTS

MRA demonstrated 87% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 85% accuracy, 95% negative predictive value, and 51% positive predictive value for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Interobserver agreement was moderate for MRA (kappa = 0.53) and good for CA (kappa = 0.76). In 21 arteries (31%), MRA was falsely positive.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a high clinical suspicion of renal artery stenosis, MRA is 87% sensitive in the detection of >50% stenosis. However, MRA is relatively nonspecific compared with CA and results in significant overestimation of renal artery stenosis in nearly one third of patients. To reduce unnecessary CA, clinicians should consider supplemental studies.

Detection of renal artery stenosis: prospective comparison of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced scintigraphy, and MR angiography

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to compare the value of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for detecting renal artery stenosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with suspected renovascular hypertension were prospectively examined with captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and catheter angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of each technique for detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater and 70% or greater were compared using the McNemar test. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated for populations with 5% and 30% prevalence of renal artery stenosis. Kappa values for interobserver agreement were assessed for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and catheter angiography.

RESULTS

For detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, the sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (96.6%) was greater than that of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography (69%, p = 0.005) and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy (41.4%, p = 0.001). No significant difference in specificity was observed among modalities. For renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 62% and 86% for captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, 49% and 76% for captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and 53% and 98% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Interobserver agreement was high for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (kappa = 0.829) and catheter angiography (kappa = 0.729).

CONCLUSION

Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is the most accurate noninvasive modality for detecting renal artery stenosis greater than or equal to 50%. The use of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography in combination with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for identifying renal artery stenosis needs to be evaluated with a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Diuretic renography and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor renography

Renovascular hypertension and renal outlet obstruction are two clinical conditions well evaluated by nuclear medicine techniques. They both require a specific intervention to challenge a specific aspect of renal functional reserve. Diuretic renography is the oldest common example in nuclear medicine where functional change in the kidney is provoked for diagnostic purposes. The kidney's tubular functional reserve, in this instance, is challenged to induce diuresis and increase urine flow. This intervention permits diuretic renography to retain an essential role in the evaluation of hydroureteronephrosis. Captopril renography is a more recent example of a similar principle and depends on a reactive renin-angiotensin system to identify a kidney responsible for RVH. In both renal outlet obstruction and RVH, an anatomic abnormality is also identified (hydronephrosis and RAS, respectively) at some point in the diagnostic workup. The final diagnosis in each instance, however, depends on evidence for a functional disorder, provoked and measured during the radionuclide interventional examination. These serve as excellent examples of the power of functional imaging to identify specific medical disorders.

Captopril renography and the relevance of abnormal but bilateral identical curves in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Captopril renography (CR) has been shown to improve the effectiveness of renal scintigraphy in renovascular hypertension, by inhibiting angiotensin-converting enzyme. CR is particularly sensitive and specific in unilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS), but results in patients with bilateral RAS are less favourable. The aim of this study was to investigate the meaning of abnormal but identical renographic curves in the diagnosis of RAS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-eight patients clinically suspected for renovascular hypertension underwent CR, using 50 MBq (99)Tc(m)-mercaptoacetyltriglycine ((99)Tc(m)-MAG(3)), prior to performing renal angiography. CR was performed 1 h after captopril administration. Renograms were analysed according to the consensus criteria. All patients underwent angiography, considered as the "gold standard" in the detection of the presence of RAS (stenosis >50% was defined as significant). All kidneys were categorized into three groups, scintigraphically as well as angiographically: no stenosis, unilateral stenosis and bilateral stenosis.

RESULTS

Out of 158 patients 100 (63%) showed a RAS on angiography (58 (37%) unilateral, 42 (26%) bilateral). The sensitivity and specificity of CR evaluated by patient was 83% and 75%, respectively. Thirty patients with completely identical curves were identified, 21 patients with normal curves and nine patients with abnormal identical curves. All but one patient showed no RAS on the angiogram. In this single patient a unilateral stenosis was found.

CONCLUSION

Identical curves on the renogram generally suggest no RAS and are probably due to intrinsic parenchymal disease.

Assessment of renal artery stenosis: comparison of captopril renography and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography

AIM

To determine the accuracy of captopril renography (CR) and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the diagnosis of 50-99% renal artery stenosis (RAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients with possible RAS, of whom 53% had renal function impairment (creatinine >130 micromol/l), were included.(99m)Tc-mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG(3)) renography was performed after an oral dose of 25 mg captopril. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was performed on a standard 1.5 Tesla system: TR 13.5, TE 3.5, flip angle 60 degrees, matrix 195 x 512. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the standard of reference.

RESULTS

Captropril renography accurately categorized 22 of 26 patients who had either uni- or bilateral RAS of 50-99%. The sensitivity and specificity of CR for the detection of 50-99% stenosis were 85 and 71%, respectively. With MR angiography one occluded artery was incorrectly diagnosed as a stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 94%, respectively. The difference between the accuracies of MR angiography and CR was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The accuracy of CR was lower in patients with renal impairment (70%) than in those with normal renal function (90%).

CONCLUSION

MR angiography showed a high accuracy in diagnosing RAS of between 50 and 99%. CR was less accurate than MR angiography, especially in patients with renal function impairment. In patients with normal renal function, however, CR remains a useful diagnostic test.

Renovascular disease

The gold standard for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis is angiography, with response to treatment the proof of its significance. Non-invasive methods of investigation are required and are now available including functional imaging, ultrasound, CT and MR angiography and the merits and limitations of these tests are discussed.

Interventions in renal scintirenography

Nuclear nephrourology continues to develop and expand on traditional provocative physiological maneuvers, such as diuretic and captopril renography. In addition, newer interventions are conceived, such as aspirin renography, which test new and fascinating aspects of renal functional reserve. Since the last review of this topic in 1991, nephrourologic nuclear medicine has made considerable progress in diverse ways. Captopril and diuresis renography have made strides in establishing greater consensus of interpretation and procedure. Commonplace aspirin, the ubiquitous wonder drug, has revealed an unexpected role in renography by way of its inhibition of prostaglandin E2. Finally, further investigations of exercise renography in essential hypertension have deepened the plausibility of a renal role in the etiology of perhaps 50% of affected individuals.

Risk of morbidity from renovascular disease in elderly patients with congestive cardiac failure

BACKGROUND

Renovasular disease commonly affects elderly people. Elderly patients with heart failure are routinely treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which may increase risk of renal dysfunction. We investigated the frequency of renovascular disease among elderly people with heart failure.

METHODS

From the local population of Salford, UK, we recruited 86 patients with heart failure with a mean age of 77.5 (SD 5.6) years, who were admitted as acute emergencies or who attended general medical clinics. We selected patients by intention to treat with ACE inhibitors. We used captopril renography to screen for renovascular disease. All patients with abnormal renograms underwent magnetic-resonance angiography of the renal arteries as well as 40% of patients with normal renograms as negative controls.

FINDINGS

Magnetic-resonance angiography showed severe renovascular disease (>50% renal-artery stenosis or occlusion) in 29 (34%) patients. Captopril renography had an estimated sensitivity of 78.8% (95% CI 72.7-97.8) and specificity of 94.3% (67.6-97.3) for detection of renovascular disease. The estimated positive predictive value of captopril renography was 89.7% and the negative predictive value was 87.5%. Patients with renovascular disease had worse renal function (mean creatinine 201 [SD 56] vs 136 [40] pmol/L, p<0.001), were older (mean age 80.7 [5.6] vs 76.8 [5.3] years, p<0.01), and were more likely than patients without renovascular disease to have peripheral arterial disease.

INTERPRETATION

Some elderly patients with occult renovascular disease on ACE inhibitors will be at risk of developing uraemia. Renal function should be closely monitored to detect any deterioration early.

The true clinical significance of renography in nephro-urology

Isotopic renography is a non-invasive technique used routinely by the clinician to provide information about kidney structure and function. Whilst there is no doubt of its value in the accurate measurement of glomerular filtration rate and in the detection of parenchymal abnormalities, its role in the diagnosis of renovascular disease (especially in patients with renal insufficiency), the exclusion of obstruction and the evaluation of the patient with either acute renal failure or renal transplant dysfunction remains unproven. In part, this reflects a failure to standardise protocols and rigorously evaluate diagnostic techniques. Recent developments in ultrasound, computerised X-ray tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance now present the clinician with rival techniques and emphasise the need for the clinical development of isotopic renography.

Diagnosing renal artery stenosis: a comparison between conventional renography, captopril renography and ultrasound Doppler in a large consecutive series of patients with arterial hypertension

The purpose of the study was to compare the positive and negative predictive values of conventional renography (Reno-A), captopril renography (Reno-B) and ultrasound Doppler (UD) with regard to the diagnosis renal artery stenosis. These three tests, and in addition a renal angiography, were performed in consecutively admitted patients with arterial hypertension, owing to either suspicion of renovascular hypertension or refractoriness to treatment. Patients with occlusion of a renal artery or a serum creatinine level higher than 300 mumol/l, or a previous investigation for renovascular hypertension at another hospital, were excluded from the analysis. The European Multicenter Study (EMS) criteria and local criteria for abnormal renography were compared. Of 131 patients, 28 had a renal artery stenosis (RAS) exceeding 50% reduction in diameter of the artery and 19 exceeding 70%. Using the EMS criteria for renography the predictive values of a negative test for a RAS more than 50% were 0.88 for Reno-A, 0.90 for Reno-B, 0.86 for changes from Reno-A to Reno-B, 0.92 for abnormalities either in Reno-A, Reno-B or changes from Reno-A to Reno-B, and 0.91 for UD. The corresponding values for a RAS more than 70% were 0.94, 0.97, 0.93, 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. The predictive values of a positive test were clearly lower, ranging from 0.20 to 0.75, but best when changes from Reno-A to Reno-B were used, 0.69-0.75. Using local criteria for renography the predictive values of a negative test were almost equal to those obtained by using the EMS criteria, but the predictive values of a positive test were slightly lower. It is concluded that conventional renography, captopril renography and ultrasound Doppler all are very good screening tests for renal artery stenosis, but the positive predictive values are clearly highest when using changes from conventional renography to captopril renography. It is suggested that captopril renography always should be performed when conventional renography is abnormal and vice versa to obtain the highest positive predictive value, on the assumption that total renal function is normal or almost normal, and that renal function is not absent in the affected kidney.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibited renography for the diagnosis of ischemic kidneys

This report synthesizes the literature and the authors' experience in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibited renography for the diagnosis of hypertension associated with critical renal arterial disease. The pathophysiology underlying the performance of the test and its interpretation are provided. The test is not a screening test of patients with hypertension. The need for preselection of patients is emphasized. The differences in using glomerular versus tubular radioisotopic agents are identified. Patient preparation, testing procedure, and interpretation of the data are reviewed. Clinical conditions, other than those in which hypertension is associated with critical disease of the main renal artery, in which false-positive renographic tests have occurred, are listed.