Clotting abnormalities in chronic liver disease

Oral Surgical Treatment of Patients With Chronic Liver Disease: Assessments of Bleeding and Its Relationship With Thrombocytopenia and Blood Coagulation Parameters

PURPOSE

Cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation require eradication of infectious oral foci to prevent septic episodes after transplantation; however, cirrhosis can hinder hemostasis and can result in severe bleeding. The present study assessed the bleeding risk factors connected with the clinical history of these patients and the characteristics of the extractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1183 extractions in 318 patients, including 47 with severe end-stage liver disease who were outside of our intention-to-treat bracket (ie, platelet count [PLT] >40 × 10³/μL and international normalized ratio [INR] <2.5). Follow-up examinations included inspection of the oral cavity on the first, third, and seventh days, with reparatory surgery in the case of severe bleeding. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Binary logistic regression analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Within the intention-to-treat bracket, 1 of the 271 patients (0.4%) required surgical repair. The bleeding rate for an INR of 2.5 or more was significantly greater than that for a PLT of 40 × 10³/μL or less (4 of 10 [40%] versus 2 of 34 [6%]; P = .02]. All 3 patients with both an INR of 2.5 or more and a PLT of 40 × 10³/μL or less exhibited severe bleeding. No significant association between the occurrence of bleeding with either liver disease etiology or the number of molars extracted was found. No patient required hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a PLT greater than 40 × 10³/μL and an INR of less than 2.5 can be considered relatively low-risk patients. However, an INR of 2.5 or more and, to a minor degree, a PLT of 40 × 10³/μL or less represent significant risk factors.

Is there a rationale for treatment of chronic liver disease with antithrombotic therapy?

Recent advances in the understanding of the coagulopathy in chronic liver disease have provided a strong support for anticoagulation as a new therapeutic paradigm for patients with cirrhosis. Laboratory studies indicate that the net effect of changes in hemostasis in many patients with chronic liver disease is a hypercoagulable status. In turn, clinical thrombosis is increasingly recognized as a complication of liver disease. When occurring within the liver, thrombosis may even progress the disease course. Exciting preliminary data regarding the potential of low-molecular-weight heparin to slow down the progression of liver disease indicate that this class of drugs may improve outcome without a major increase in bleeding risk. However, this new era for antithrombotic therapy in chronic liver disease is still hindered by a persistent false notion that patients with cirrhosis are "auto-anticoagulated" by their underlying liver disease. In addition, there is insufficient clinical evidence on safety and efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in cirrhosis and the studies conducted so far are limited by small sample sizes, uncontrolled treatment arms, or by their retrospective nature. Finally, a lack of knowledge on how or when to monitor antithrombotic treatment to optimize the risk-benefit ratio has restricted a widespread application of anticoagulant treatment in clinical management algorithms. Nonetheless, by systematically covering possibilities and pitfalls, this review highlights the potential of antithrombotic therapy to improve the quality of life and the clinical outcome of patients with chronic liver disease.

Risk of hemorrhage in patients with chronic liver disease and coagulopathy receiving pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis on risk of hemorrhage while hospitalized in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and concurrent coagulopathy.

DESIGN

Retrospective, multicenter chart review.

SETTING

Five hospital, university-affiliated network in eastern Pennsylvania.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted to the network from January 1, 2012, until December 31, 2012, with ICD-9 code consistent with CLD and elevated international normalized ratio of 1.5 or greater not secondary to anticoagulation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-six patients met criteria for analysis, with 80 having received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and 176 having received no pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Differences were observed in the primary outcome of overall hemorrhage (composite of major and minor hemorrhage) for patients receiving VTE prophylaxis versus no VTE prophylaxis (17.5% vs 7.4%, p=0.02). Logistic regression revealed covariates independently associated with increased hemorrhage risk were pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.64, p=0.004), increasing international normalized ratio (AOR 1.31, p=0.007), and decreasing platelet count (AOR 0.99, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CLD and concurrent coagulopathy receiving pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis are at an increased risk of overall hemorrhage. Clinical implications remain unclear secondary to the difference in rate of overall hemorrhage being driven primarily by a difference in minor hemorrhage. In addition, no difference was demonstrated in many assessed clinically relevant markers.

Patients with liver cirrhosis suffer from primary haemostatic defects? Fact or fiction?

Patients with cirrhosis can have abnormalities in laboratory tests reflecting changes in primary haemostasis, including bleeding time, platelet function tests, markers of platelet activation, and platelet count. Such changes have been considered particularly relevant in the bleeding complications that occur in cirrhosis. However, several studies have shown that routine diagnostic tests, such as platelet count, bleeding time, PFA-100, thromboelastography are not clinically useful to stratify bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, treatments used to increase platelet count or to modulate platelet function could potentially do harm. Consequently the optimal management of bleeding complications is still a matter of discussion. Moreover, in the last two decades there has been an increased recognition that not only bleeding but also thrombosis complicates the clinical course of cirrhosis. Thus, we performed a literature search looking at publications studying both qualitative and quantitative aspects of platelet function to verify which primary haemostasis defects occur in cirrhosis. In addition, we evaluated the contribution of qualitative and quantitative aspects of platelet function to the clinical outcome in cirrhosis and their therapeutic management according to the data available in the literature. From the detailed analysis of the literature, it appears clear that primary haemostasis may not be defective in cirrhosis, and a low platelet count should not necessarily be considered as an automatic index of an increased risk of bleeding. Conversely, caution should be observed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia where its correction is advised if bleeding occurs and before invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Neonatal liver failure: aetiologies and management--state of the art

Acute liver failure in neonates is rare, but carries a high mortality. Neonatal liver failure can be defined as "failure of the synthetic function of liver within 4 weeks of birth". Encephalopathy is not essential for the diagnosis. Acute liver failure in neonates differs from children with regard to aetiology and outcome. Common causes of neonatal liver failure are neonatal hemochromatosis, haematological malignancies, viral infections and liver-based metabolic defects. Early diagnosis and referral to a paediatric liver centre is recommended as liver transplantation is the only definitive treatment when supportive or a disease-specific treatment fails.

Superimposed coagulopathic conditions in cirrhosis: infection and endogenous heparinoids, renal failure, and endothelial dysfunction

In this article, the authors discuss three pathophysiologic mechanisms that influence the coagulation system in patients who have liver disease. First, bacterial infections may play an important role in the cause of variceal bleeding in patients who have liver cirrhosis, affecting coagulation through multiple pathways. One of the pathways through which this occurs is dependent on endogenous heparinoids, on which the authors focus in this article. Secondly, the authors discuss renal failure, a condition that is frequently encountered in patients who have liver cirrhosis. Finally, they review dysfunction of the endothelial system. The role of markers of endothelial function in cirrhotic patients, such as von Willebrand factor and endothelin-1, is discussed.

MELD-XI: a rational approach to "sickest first" liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients requiring anticoagulant therapy

Priority for "sickest first" liver transplantation (LT) in the United States is determined by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). MELD is a good predictor of short-term mortality in cirrhosis, but it can overestimate risk when international normalized ratio (INR) is artificially elevated by anticoagulation. An alternate prognostic index omitting INR is needed in this situation. We retrospectively analyzed survival data for 554 cirrhotic veterans referred for consideration of LT prior to December 1, 2003 (training group). Using logistic regression we derived a predictive formula for 90-day pretransplant mortality incorporating bilirubin and creatinine but omitting INR. We normalized this formula to the same scale as MELD using linear regression. This yielded MELD-XI (for MELD excluding INR) = 5.11 Ln(bilirubin) + 11.76 Ln(creatinine) + 9.44. Accuracy of MELD-XI was validated in a holdout group of 278 cirrhotic veterans referred after December 1, 2003, and in an independent validation dataset of 7,203 cirrhotic adults listed for LT in the United States between May 1, 2001, and October 31, 2001. MELD-XI and MELD correlated well in training, holdout, and independent validation cohorts (r = 0.930, 0.954, and 0.902, respectively). In the holdout cohort, c-statistics of MELD vs. MELD-XI for mortality were, respectively, 0.939 vs. 0.906 at 30 days;0.860 vs. 0.841 at 60 days; 0.842 vs. 0.829 at 90 days; and 0.795 vs. 0.797 at 180 days. In the independent validation dataset, c-statistics for MELD vs. MELD-XI as predictors of 90-day survival were, respectively, 0.857 vs. 0.843 in noncholestatic liver diseases and 0.905 vs. 0.894 in cholestatic liver diseases. Comparable MELD and MELD-XI scores were associated with comparable prognosis. In conclusion, MELD-XI, despite omission of INR, is nearly as accurate as MELD in predicting short-term survival in cirrhosis. In patients treated with oral anticoagulants, substitution of MELD-XI for MELD may permit more accurate assessment of risk and more rational assignment of "sickest first" priority for LT.

Evaluation of D-dimer and factor VIII in cirrhotic patients with asymptomatic portal venous thrombosis

D-dimer and factor VIII levels raise in advanced cirrhosis. We investigated the behavior and the diagnostic usefulness of D-dimer and factor VIII in cirrhotic patients with asymptomatic portal venous thrombosis. Factor VIII coagulant and D-dimer values were measured in 136 consecutive outpatients with stable cirrhosis divided according to Child-Pugh (CP) classification, who underwent color/power ultrasonography to detect portal thrombosis. Portal thrombosis was found in 33 patients (24.2%). In patients without thrombosis, factor VIII was significantly higher in CP class C compared with class A and B. Conversely, class C patients with portal thrombosis had lower factor VIII levels than those without thrombosis. In both groups, D-dimer was significantly increased in class C compared with class A and B. In class C, thrombotic patients showed higher D-dimer values than did patients without thrombosis. In class C, a D-dimer value > or = 0.55 microg/mL provided a sensitivity and a negative predictive value for portal thrombosis of 100%, and a factor VIII coagulant level < or = 80% showed a specificity and a negative predictive value of 76% and 84%, respectively. In class B, a D-dimer value > or = 0.225 microg/mL had a sensitivity of 89% and a negative predictive value of 82%. In conclusion, our study shows that factor VIII values increase in severe cirrhosis but significantly decrease in the presence of concomitant portal thrombosis, likely because of consumption during thrombosis; D-dimer is enhanced by both liver failure and portal thrombosis; in severe cirrhosis, normal D-dimer and factor VIII values may safely exclude the presence of asymptomatic portal thrombosis.

Prolonged prothrombin time, Factor VII and activated FVII levels in chronic liver disease are partly dependent on Factor VII gene polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Prothrombin time is a benchmark for functional assessment in cirrhosis and Factor VII levels (FVII), crucial in determining the prothrombin time, are genetically determined.

METHODS

We have evaluated the prothrombin time, a number of haemostatic variables synthesised by the liver (FII, FV, FVII and activated FVII, AT and fibrinogen) and two polymorphisms of the FVII gene (5'F7 and 353R/Q) in: (a) patients with liver cirrhosis (n=118), (b) patients with chronic hepatitis (n=102) and (c) controls (n=100).

RESULTS

By one-way analyses of variance, the prothrombin time and the mean levels of the FII, FV, FVIIc, FVIIa, and AT were statistically different between cirrhotics, chronic hepatitis patients and controls. The allele frequency of the FVII polymorphisms did not differ between the three groups. Those rare patients (4.6%) who were homozygous for the type 2 alleles had markedly reduced FVIIc and FVIIa levels. The analysis carried out taking into account Child class versus FVII genotype showed that the mean FVIIc levels were comparable for different genotypes within each Child's class, with the exception of the patients homozygous for the type 1 allele.

CONCLUSION

Our findings help to explain the not infrequent finding of a severely prolonged prothrombin time in patients who are otherwise in a good functional class.

Erythropoietin increases platelet reactivity and platelet counts in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Patients with liver cirrhosis have a complex haemostasis disturbance including thrombocytopenia and abnormal bleeding time. Erythropoietin is the primary stimulator for erythrocyte production and also induces megakaryocyte formation. In healthy men erythropoietin increased platelet count and platelet reactivity.

AIM

As patients with liver cirrhosis often undergo invasive procedures, we were interested to study whether erythropoietin could improve platelet function in addition to thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

In total, 22 thrombocytopenic (platelet counts < 120 g/L) patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis received either 100 IE/kg erythropoietin or placebo on days 1, 3 and 5 in a 2:1 randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind fashion. Platelet counts and platelet reactivity (activator-stimulated expression of P-selectin on platelets measured by flow cytometry) were determined on study days 1, 3, 5 and 9.

RESULTS

Median platelet count was 80 g/L which is borderline for major elective surgical interventions. Baseline values were not different between groups (P > 0.05). Treatment with erythropoietin increased platelet count by 25% (P = 0.01) and platelet reactivity twofold (P < 0.01) vs. baseline. The increase in platelet count vs. baseline was more pronounced in patients with platelet counts <80 g/L. No significant effect was observed in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with erythropoietin significantly increased platelet counts and platelet reactivity in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Preoperative treatment with erythropoietin is therefore expected to yield higher platelet levels and better platelet function.

Assessing liver function and hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn

In clinical practice, “liver function” is assessed by either measuring the concentration of substances produced by the hepatocyte, measuring the serum content of substances that are changed by hepatocyte damage, evaluating the serum concentrations of substances released from the cells as a result of injury, assessing the ability of the liver to perform a metabolic task such as conjugation or detoxification, or by measuring enzyme activity and substrate content of the cell and its organelles. After birth, with cessation of placental function, the neonatal liver must assume many different tasks. Distinct developmental sequences rapidly progress for numerous hepatic functions as the newborn adapts to its environment. This manuscript is an attempt to provide guidelines for the evaluation and management of the newborn infant when assessing liver function and hyperbilirubinemia. These guidelines, like all sets of guidelines, are only recommendations and do not substitute for good clinical judgment based upon the individual circumstances of each patient.

Bleeding time does not predict gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. The CALC Group. Coagulation Abnormalities in Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Bleeding time, a laboratory test which explores primary hemostasis, may be prolonged in cirrhosis, but whether abnormal bleeding time identifies patients with cirrhosis who are at risk of bleeding has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between bleeding time and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

Eighty consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis (47 males, 33 females; age, 60 +/- 9 years; range 31 to 83 years) and esophageal varices were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

In the whole series of patients bleeding time was 11 +/- 6 min; it increased as the degree of liver deficiency increased, from low to severe (p = 0.007). During 14 +/- 9 (median (range): 12 (1-34) months of follow-up, 28 (35%) patients experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. They had a longer bleeding time, higher incidence of previous bleeding, more severe liver failure and larger variceal size than patients who did not bleed. However, multivariate analysis (Cox's model) showed that only previous bleeding, liver failure and variceal size were independently associated with bleeding. Similar data were obtained in patients with moderate-severe liver insufficiency (B and C degree according to Child-Pugh's classification). In patients who had never bled (n = 54), the severity of liver failure and variceal size were independent predictors of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that bleeding time is not a predictor of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Association between low-grade disseminated intravascular coagulation and endotoxemia in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hyperfibrinolysis may complicate the clinical course of liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate if, in cirrhosis, hyperfibrinolysis is primary or secondary to intravascular clotting activation and if endotoxemia is associated with activation of clotting and/or the fibrinolytic system.

METHODS

Clotting, fibrinolytic indexes, and endotoxemia were studied in 41 cirrhotic patients and 20 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven cirrhotic patients (66%) had high plasma levels of prothrombin fragment F1 + 2, a marker of thrombin generation. Nineteen patients had elevated values of D-dimer, a marker of fibrinolysis in vivo. All patients with high values of D-dimer also had high values of prothrombin fragment F1 + 2. Endotoxemia was elevated in patients with severe liver failure and significantly correlated to prothrombin fragment F1 + 2. Thirty patients were treated for 7 days either with standard therapy (n = 15) or with standard therapy plus nonabsorbable antibiotics (n = 15). Although standard therapy did not significantly change laboratory indexes, a significant reduction of endotoxemia, prothrombin fragment F1 + 2, and D-dimer was found in those patients who received the combined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, in cirrhotic patients, hyperfibrinolysis is not a primary phenomenon but occurs as a consequence of clotting activation and that endotoxemia might play a pathophysiological role.

Hyperfibrinolysis resulting from clotting activation in patients with different degrees of cirrhosis. The CALC Group. Coagulation Abnormalities in Liver Cirrhosis

This study explored the relationship between clotting activation and tissue plasminogen activator and its inhibitor in cirrhotic patients with different degrees of liver failure. Sixty-seven patients (40 men, 27 women; age = 31-77 yr) with cirrhosis diagnosed by liver biopsy were divided into three subgroups (A, B and C) on the basis of Child-Pugh classification. Tissue plasminogen activator antigen and activity, plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen and activity, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, and D-dimer were measured in each patient. Forty-two patients with normal levels of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer showed significant progressive decreases of plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen levels (p < 0.01) and activity (p < 0.0001) from class A to class C. This decrease was significantly related to prothrombin time (p < 0.003). Tissue plasminogen activator values were not different in the three Child classes. Twenty-five patients (7 class B and 18 class C) with high circulating values of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer had higher values of tissue plasminogen activator antigen (20.0 +/- 10.1 ng/ml vs. 5.9 +/- 3.0 ng/ml; p < 0.0001) and activity (6.9 +/- 2.2 U/ml vs. 2.1 +/- 1.3 U/ml; p < 0.0001) and lower values of plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen (6.9 +/- 4.1 ng/ml vs. 14.8 +/- 5.6 ng/ml; p < 0.0001) and activity (4.1 +/- 2.8 U/ml vs. 9.8 +/- 3.7 U/ml; p < 0.0001) than did patients with normal values of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)