Renal transplant recipients and chronic liver disease: statistical evaluation of predisposing factors

Lamivudine in the Treatment of HBV-related Liver Disease after Renal Transplantation: An Update

Diminished survival due to hepatitis B has been observed after renal transplantation (RT). Lamivudine, a second-generation nucleoside analogue, has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with normal renal function. Numerous clinical experiences with lamivudine after RT have been recently published. Despite numerous shortcomings, all of these reports have shown encouraging results. The rate of clearance of HBV viremia ranged between 67% and 100%, and the frequency of ALT normalization was between 50% and 100% with lamivudine use. Even patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, a serious form of HBV-related liver disease with ominous course, have been successfully treated with lamivudine. Lamivudine therapy significantly improved the survival of HBsAg positive renal allograft recipients. However, numerous issues concerning the treatment of hepatitis B after RT remain unclear: the optimal time to initiate lamivudine, the appropriate duration of antiviral therapy after RT, and the role for pre-transplantation liver biopsy. Also, the management of lamivudine resistance remains a concern for physicians. Clinical trials are under way.

Hepatitis B virus and renal transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains an important cause of liver disease in the renal transplant (RT) population, potentially diminishing survival. Consequences of HBV infection after RT include progression to decompensated cirrhosis and an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Although precautions initially recommended by the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention 30 years ago have substantially reduced HBV transmission within hemodialysis units, acute HBV outbreaks continue to be reported in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis. In addition, immigration from areas of high HBV prevalence implies that HBV-infected organs with chronic kidney disease will continue to enter the RT pool. Fortunately, the advent of oral therapy for HBV infection now reduces the risk of HBV progression post-RT.

Discontinuation of lamivudine treatment for hepatitis flare after kidney or heart transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients: A retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the clinical course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after discontinuation of lamivudine prescribed for kidney or heart posttransplantation hepatitis flare

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons for discontinuation, subsequent reappearance of HBV DNA, and mortality in heart and kidney transplant recipients who discontinued lamivudine treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective case series followed up male and female hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive Taiwanese transplant recipients from the National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, between July 1989 and January 1999. Biochemical, virologic, and serologic parameters and liver-related mortality of patients who discontinued lamivudine 100 mg QD prescribed for posttransplantation hepatitis flare were compared with those in a group of patients who continued use of lamivudine administered for the same indication over the same period of time. Serum HBV DNA levels were checked in all patients before and after discontinuation of lamivudine, and after resumption of lamivudine treatment and in patients with breakthrough hepatitis flare.

RESULTS

A total of 39 HBsAg-positive transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 45 [10.0] years) were identified during regular follow-up visits. Nine patients discontinued lamivudine use; 11 patients who continued it were selected as a control group. No significant between-group differences were observed in mean (SD) age (46 [14.0] vs 45 [6.9] years), sex (men/women,vs 1), type of transplant received (heart/kidney,vs ), or pretransplantation liver function test results. The reasons for discontinuation were informed patient decision (4 patients); YMDD mutation (2); self-discontinuation without physician consultation (2); and pregnancy (1). Of those who discontinued lamivudine, serum HBV DNA was undetectable at a mean of 30 (range, 9-47) months' follow-up in 6 (66.7%) of 9 patients. Lamivudine treatment was resumed in 3 patients on reappearance of HBV DNA, and a subsequent rapid decline in the serum HBV DNA was observed. The liver-related mortality rate was not significantly higher in patients who discontinued treatment compared with continuously treated patients (both, 0%). The between-group difference in overall mortality rates was not significant (22.2% and 18.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This case series illustrated a variety of clinical situations in which discontinuation of lamivudine treatment prescribed for posttransplantation hepatitis flare may occur. However, liver-related mortality was not increased in these patients compared with those who continued lamivudine treatment.

Natural history of hepatitis B and C in renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

In renal allograft recipients, most cases of liver dysfunction are caused by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The natural history of hepatitis C and B was studied in 286 renal allograft recipients who received a kidney allograft between 1972 and 1989 when tests for anti-HCV became available.

METHODS

In all patients, hepatitis B (HB) surface (s) antigen (Ag) was tested before and anti-HCV (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay II) after transplantation.

RESULTS

At enrollment in 1989 (5.5+/-4 years after transplantation), 209 patients were anti-HCV positive (C+), 42 patients were HBsAg-positive (B+), and 35 patients were both B+ and C+ (C+B+). One hundred four patients were receiving azathioprine (AZA) and 182 were on cyclosporine A (CsA). Since transplantation, the median follow-up was 18 years in AZA-treated and 13 years in CsA-treated patients. Liver biopsy showed chronic hepatitis in 73 patients, cirrhosis in 20 patients, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in 2 patients. In 34 patients, liver biopsy was repeated, and progression of fibrosis was observed in 24 patients. The 12-year patient survival rate was similar in B+, C+, and B+C+ patients (67%, 78%, and 71%, respectively; P=not significant). Liver-related death was the first cause of death in B+ and B+C+ infected patients (58% and 72%, respectively), whereas cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death in C+ patients (40%). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (>40 years) (relative risk [RR], 2.8), B+ status (RR, 2.36), and C+ status (RR, 1.65) were independently associated with a worse patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long term, B+ patients had a higher risk of death related to liver disease than C+ patients, and co-infection did not worsen patient survival.

Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient

Viruses are among the most common causes of opportunistic infection after transplantation and the most important. The risk for viral infection is a function of the specific virus encountered, the intensity of immune suppression used to prevent graft rejection, and other host factors governing susceptibility. Viral infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, causes the "direct effects" of invasive disease and "indirect effects," including immune suppression predisposing to other opportunistic infections and oncogenesis. Rapid and sensitive microbiologic assays for many of the common viruses after transplantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosis of infection. Furthermore, quantitative molecular tests allow the individualization of antiviral therapies for prevention and treatment of infection. This advance is most prominent in the management of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C viruses. Diagnostic advances have not been accompanied by the development of specific and nontoxic anti-viral agents or effective antiviral vaccines. Vaccines, where available, should be given to patients as early as possible and well in advance of transplantation to optimize the immune response. Studies of viral latency, reactivation, and the cellular effects of viral infection will provide clues for future strategies in prevention and treatment of viral infections.

Excellent outcome of Lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic renal failure and hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and renal transplant recipients. Lamivudine (3TC) has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of HBV replication. It appears to be safe and effective in patients with CRF, though experience is still limited. We describe 4 patients with CRF on hemodialysis who showed a rapid and full response to 3TC, administered for a median of 10 months. All patients had serum alanine transferase (ALT) levels 3 to 6 times the upper limit of normal prior to treatment, and different degrees of histologic inflammatory activity (Knodell score 4 to 8, median 6). All were serum HBsAg- and HBeAg-positive, with serum HBV DNA 1-3.9 x 107 copies/mL (median 1 x 107 copies/mL). Within 4 to 8 weeks of initiation of therapy, HBV DNA became undetectable and serum ALT normalized. Serum HBeAg disappeared in all 4 patients, with the emergence of anti-HBeAb in 3 of them. Three patients also lost HBsAg with the evolution of a protective anti-HBsAb titer. One patient has already undergone successful kidney transplantation with no evidence of HBV recurrence (serum HBV DNA negative) 16 months postoperatively. Although our study sample is small, these data suggest that 3TC can induce a complete biochemical, virological and serological response in patients with CRF and HBV infection. Its use may enable safe kidney transplantation in selected patients.

Chronic liver disease in kidney recipients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive test is higher among patients in dialysis and in kidney recipients than in general population. Hepatitis C virus infection is the main cause of chronic liver disease in renal transplant patients. Liver biopsy and virological analysis were performed to clarify the grade of liver damage in kidney recipients.

METHODS

Renal recipients patients with at least 5 yr under immunosuppression were submitted to clinical and laboratory analysis. Patients who tested anti-HCV positive were candidates to liver biopsy with no regard to transaminase levels.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients tested anti-HCV positive and 42 anti-HCV negative. Twenty-six anti-HCV and RNA-HCV positive patients were submitted to liver biopsy. Seventy-three percentage of these patients presented chronic active hepatitis, from these only one patient presented cirrhosis. Only 29% of the anti-HCV positive group presented elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Anti-HCV positive patients presented longer previous time on dialysis and less rejection episodes than the group anti-HCV negative (p < 0.05). All anti-HCV positive patients but one tested RNA-HCV positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series the prevalence of anti-HCV positive is 51.7%. Most of the patients presented liver damage in histology caused by HCV. However, we found only mild or minimal fibrosis and inflammatory activity grade, despite 10 yr of HCV infection and 5 yr of immunosuppressive treatment. Only one patient presented cirrhosis (4%). Performing serial liver biopsies in a long-term follow-up is needed to clarify the impact of HCV infection in renal transplant patients.

Hepatitis C virus infection and renal transplantation

With the success of organ transplantation, liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality of renal transplant (RT) recipients. Numerous studies performed during the 1990s have shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease among RT recipients. The transmission of HCV by renal transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-infected organ donor has been shown unequivocally. Liver biopsy is essential in the evaluation of liver disease of RT recipients, and histological studies have shown that HCV-related liver disease after renal transplantation is progressive. The outcome of HCV-related liver disease is probably more aggressive in RT recipients than immunocompetent individuals. Various factors can affect the progression of HCV in the RT population: coinfection with hepatitis B virus, time of HCV acquisition, type of immunosuppressive treatment, and concomitant alcohol abuse. The role of virological features of HCV remains unclear. The natural history of HCV infection after renal transplantation is under evaluation; however, recent surveys with long follow-ups have documented adverse effects of HCV infection on patient and graft survival in RT recipients. Use of renal grafts from HCV-infected donors in recipients with HCV infection does not appear to result in a greater burden of liver disease, at least for a short period. The association between HCV and de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis after RT has been hypothesized and is an area of avid research. Reported studies do not support interferon (IFN) treatment for RT recipients with chronic hepatitis C because of the frequent occurrence of graft failure, and information on the use of other types of IFN or combined therapy (IFN plus ribavirin or amantadine) is not yet available in the RT population.

Hepatitis in patients with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C are two common pathogens causing chronic hepatitis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). With the acceptance of hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg) screening, infected patients have been identified and isolated over the past 20 years. Consequently, hepatitis B is now being seen less frequently in dialysis units. Even though hepatitis B has become less of a problem, non-A, non-B hepatitis has been recognized as a significant problem since 1979. With the availability of serological testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV), more specific information is now available in regard to HCV infection in dialysis patients. The prevalence of anti-HCV in haemodialysis (HD) patients is quite variable, ranging from 5 to over 50%. Anti-HCV positivity is associated with previous blood transfusions, mode of therapy and duration of haemodialysis. In Spain and Italy, the annual seroconversion rates of HCV antibodies in dialysis patients are 2-9%; this rate was much higher in Taiwan (15%). Whether patients with HCV infection should be identified and isolated during HD treatment is an issue of controversy. Transplantation is associated with increases in hepatitis B virus (HBV) replicative markers. The survival disadvantage in HBsAg-positive recipients usually did not become apparent until 8 years after transplantation. Hepatitis C virus-infected renal transplant recipients are presumably in a similar situation to patients with hepatitis B, although confirmatory data are currently lacking. Coinfection of HBV and HCV may lead to aggressive liver disease and cirrhosis. A hepatitis B vaccine is recommended for all susceptible dialysis patients. Dialysis patients have lower response rates to hepatitis B vaccines than do other people. Currently, no vaccine is available for hepatitis C. To date, there are no effective treatments available for hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Combination therapy with interferon/lamivudine for hepatitis B and interferon/ribavirin for hepatitis C may offer a promise of effective control of viral replication in the future.

The long-term course of hepatitis C after kidney transplantation

Patients with chronic hepatitis run the risk of developing progressive liver disease during immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. To determine the impact of chronic hepatitis C on morbidity and mortality we analyzed 162 anti-HCV positive of 1241 renal-grafted patients (prevalence 13.1%; 84.9% HCV RNA positive) regularly surveyed in our outpatient clinic between 1992 and 1994. The mean age at transplantation was 44.5 (6-69) years, and follow-up after grafting was 7.4 (0.1-23.9) years. The immunosuppressive regimen and frequency of rejection episodes in HCV-infected patients were comparable to the total population. Only 4.3% (5/117) of the anti-HCV positive, HBV negative patients living with functioning grafts developed a markedly compromised liver function. Fifteen (9.3%) of the HCV-infected patients died, but none suffered from posthepatitic cirrhosis. An additional retrospective analysis of causes of death after transplantation prior to 1992 revealed that liver disease had only been responsible for 2% of the deaths (7 of 324) in the HBsAg negative population (n= 1901). In contrast, the predominant cause of death in the HBsAg positive population (n=76) was posthepatitic cirrhosis in 58% (15 of 26). Thus, kidney transplantation in patients with replicative hepatitis C and normal liver function appears to be justified because of low early and late morbidity and mortality due to chronic liver disease. HBV infection and hemosiderosis substantially increase the risk of chronic liver disease in renal transplant recipients with hepatitis C.