Hepatitis delta virus RNA detection in chronic HBsAg carriers with and without HIV infection

Diagnostic Efficacy of Serological Antibody Detection Tests for Hepatitis Delta Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims Coinfection of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) with hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes the most severe form of viral hepatitis, and the global prevalence of HDV infection is underestimated. Although serological testing of anti-HDV antibodies is widely used in the diagnosis of HDV, its diagnostic efficacy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of HDV serological tests, the results of which may assist in the diagnosis of HDV. Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched from the beginning to 31 May 2023. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. STATA SE was used for the meta-analysis of the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio. Results Among a total of 1376 initially identified studies, only 12 articles met the final inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.00-1.00) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.50-0.78) for HDV total antibodies, 0.96 (95% CI: 0.83-0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.82-1.00) for anti-HDV IgM and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.67-1.00) for anti-HDV IgG. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for HDV serological tests were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96). Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that serological tests have high diagnostic performance in detecting antibodies against HDV, especially in HDV IgM and IgG. However, this conclusion is based on studies of a limited number and quality, and the development of new diagnostic tools with higher precision and reliability is still necessary.

Natural history of chronic hepatitis B in co-infected patients

HIV co-infection influences the course and natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection by impairing the quantity and quality of the innate and adaptive immune response. The rates of spontaneous resolution after acute infection and spontaneous anti-HBe and anti-HBs seroconversions are decreased, and levels of HBV replication are increased in HIV-infected patients. A more rapid progression of liver fibrosis and a higher rate of cirrhosis decompensation (but not hepatocellular carcinoma) have been demonstrated in co-infected patients. The risk of HBV-associated end-stage liver disease and liver-related mortality may be increased by HIV co-infection. Antiretroviral therapy may trigger spontaneous anti-HBe and anti-HBs seroconversion and/or a better immune control of HBV replication by restoring adaptive immunity, but can also increase hepatitis flares. Reactivation of chronic hepatitis B has been observed after suspension of anti-retrovirals with anti-HBV activity or after occurrence of HBV resistance to lamivudine. Future research should focus on: the impact of HIV-induced changes in innate and adaptive immune response and modifications induced by anti-retroviral therapy that may impact on progression of advanced chronic hepatitis B; the association between HBV genotype and clinical course of disease; and the role of occult HBV infection as a co-factor with other causes of liver injury.

Comparison of clinico-pathological features in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma with or without hepatitis D virus superinfection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis D virus superinfection in hepatitis B virus carriers produces additional damage in an already injured liver. Earlier reports noted that the development of hepatocellular carcinoma may be accelerated in hepatitis D virus-superinfected patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of hepatitis D virus on the clinical course of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 42 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma cases seropositive for antibody against hepatitis D virus antigen (anti-HDV) were found from 1986 to 1994; the clinical manifestations, treatment and outcomes were compared with 255 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma cases seropositive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen but seronegative for anti-HDV.

RESULTS

The mean age was 60 years in both groups of patients. Other features, including sex, duration of follow-up, presence of cirrhosis or ascites, serum biochemistry, status of HBV-e antigen, and gross and microscopic tumor appearance, were not significantly different between the two groups. Though more patients in the anti-HDV-positive group underwent active treatment (operation or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization) than those in the anti-HDV-negative group (54.8% in 42 versus 34.9% in 255 cases, p = 0.02), the cumulative 4-year survival rates (9.5% versus 9.8%) were similar. For the anti-HDV-positive hepatocellular carcinoma patients, tumor size < 5 cm and active treatment were favorable prognostic predictors associated with survival > 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis D virus superinfection does not accelerate the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The clinical manifestations were similar, and the outcome in anti-HDV-positive patients was not worse than in the general HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma patients, as long as they were diagnosed at an early stage and actively treated.

Natural history of hepatitis D viral superinfection: significance of viremia detected by polymerase chain reaction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is very sensitive. The aim of the study was to reevaluate viral replication in hepatitis D virus (HDV) superinfection by PCR.

METHODS

HDV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) were detected by PCR in 185 patients.

RESULTS

The acute hepatitis group had the highest detection rate of HDV RNA compared with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and remission groups (63 of 64 vs. 35 of 47, 17 of 23, 19 of 30, and 7 of 21) and the highest alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (mean, 1741 U/L vs. 266 to 27 U/L; P < 0.05). The detection rate of HBV DNA was the lowest in the acute group (41%) compared with 66%, 70%, 80%, and 57% in the remaining groups (P < 0.02). At the chronic stage, 13%-25% of cases had HDV RNA, and 30%-48% of cases had HBV DNA detected by PCR but not by traditional method. HDV RNA was associated with ALT levels in horizontal and longitudinal analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

HDV superinfection may be divided into the following three phases: acute phase, active HDV replication and suppression of HBV with high ALT levels; chronic phase, decreasing HDV and reactivating HBV with moderate ALT levels; and late phase, development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma caused by replication of either virus or remission resulting from marked reduction of both viruses.

Hepatitis B and D genomes in hepatitis B surface antigen negative patients with chronic hepatitis C

Hepatitis B and hepatitis D viral genomes were tested by nested polymerase chain reaction in the serum and liver of 69 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive patients (47 with HCV RNA and 22 without HCV RNA). Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA-was detected in 49% of the patients with HCV-RNA and in 64% of those without HCV-RNA. Furthermore, intrahepatic HBV-DNA was found in four of five (80%) of the biopsies analysed. Delta genome was found in 72% and 73%, respectively, of the anti-HCV positive patients with or without HCV-RNA. In addition, intrahepatic delta virus genome was detected in another four liver biopsies studied. In the group of patients with HCV-RNA, the simultaneous presence of hepatitis B and D genomes was statistically higher in transfused patients than in drug addicts, or in those with an unknown infection route (P < 0.001). These results show a high percentage of B and D genomes in HBsAg negative patients with anti-HCV, irrespective of the presence or absence of the HCV genome. However, the clinical implications of this finding should be examined in future studies.

Factors associated with viremia and elevated transaminase levels in asymptomatic hepatitis D virus-infected risk groups

To detect hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA in asymptomatic HDV-infected risk groups, Northern blot hybridization was carried out using a strand-specific riboprobe. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate factors associated with HDV viremia and elevated transaminase levels in these subjects. Two (15%) of 13 antibody to HDV (anti-HDV) -positive intravenous drug addicts, 15 (33%) of 45 anti-HDV positive prostitutes, and 6 (40%) of 15 anti-HDV positive brothel goers had detectable serum HDV RNA. Older age (> 31 years old) was negatively associated with HDV RNA (P < .04), while hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) was positively associated with it (P < .002) in univariate analysis. Only HBeAg was still significant in multivariate analysis (P < .05). Of the 76 asymptomatic anti-HDV positive case, 28 (37%) had mildly elevated serum ALT levels and only 5 (7%) had ALT levels more than twice normal (> 80 U/L). HBeAg (P < .05) and HDV RNA (P < .02) were two factors associated with ALT elevation in univariate analysis, and HDV RNA was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis (P < .005). In summary, active replication of HBV seemed to be of help for the assembly of HDV and viremia. However, active replication of HDV was associated mostly with mildly elevated ALT levels in these subjects. These cases may represent a particular group in the disease spectrum of HDV infection.