Long-term follow-up of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma treated with debulking surgery and chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Gynecologic Oncology Group of the Comprehensive Cancer Center

Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).

Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women. In addition to diagnosis and staging, primary surgery is performed to achieve optimal cytoreduction (surgical efforts aimed at removing the bulk of the tumour) as the amount of residual tumour is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. An optimal outcome of cytoreductive surgery remains a subject of controversy to many practising gynae-oncologists. The Gynaecologic Oncology group (GOG) currently defines 'optimal' as having residual tumour nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter, with complete cytoreduction (microscopic disease) being the ideal surgical outcome. Although the size of residual tumour masses after surgery has been shown to be an important prognostic factor for advanced ovarian cancer, it is unclear whether it is the surgical procedure that is directly responsible for the superior outcome that is associated with less residual disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal primary cytoreductive surgery for women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (stages III and IV).To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between zero and 2 cm, on overall survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3) and the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to August 2010). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Retrospective data on residual disease from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective and retrospective observational studies which included a multivariate analysis of 100 or more adult women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no RCTs or prospective non-RCTs identified that were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgery when performed as a primary procedure in advanced stage ovarian cancer.We found 11 retrospective studies that included a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. Analyses showed the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction, where the residual disease was microscopic that is no visible disease, as overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly prolonged in these groups of women. PFS was not reported in all of the studies but was sufficiently documented to allow firm conclusions to be drawn.When we compared suboptimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction the survival estimates were attenuated but remained statistically significant in favour of the lower volume disease group There was no significant difference in OS and only a borderline difference in PFS when residual disease of > 2 cm and < 2 cm were compared (hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.31; and HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.61, P = 0.05 for OS and PFS respectively).There was a high risk of bias due to the retrospective nature of these studies where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection bias was still likely to be of particular concern.Adverse events, quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness were not reported by treatment arm or to a satisfactory level in any of the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

During primary surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer all attempts should be made to achieve complete cytoreduction. When this is not achievable, the surgical goal should be optimal (< 1 cm) residual disease. Due to the high risk of bias in the current evidence, randomised controlled trials should be performed to determine whether it is the surgical intervention or patient-related and disease-related factors that are associated with the improved survival in these groups of women. The findings of this review that women with residual disease < 1 cm still do better than women with residual disease > 1 cm should prompt the surgical community to retain this category and consider re-defining it as 'near optimal' cytoreduction, reserving the term 'suboptimal' cytoreduction to cases where the residual disease is > 1 cm (optimal/near optimal/suboptimal instead of complete/optimal/suboptimal).

Radical cytoreductive surgery combined with platinums-carboplatin and cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

In an attempt to improve the therapeutic outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, primary radical cytoreductive surgery consisting of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node resection, with optimal cytoreduction in case of metastatic lesions, was followed by five courses of chemotherapy of carboplatin 280 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2, every four weeks. A total of 51 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer comprised the study (6 with stage IIC, 32 with stage III, and 13 with stage IV). Following radical cytoreductive surgery, 29 patients (57%) showed 2 cm or less of residual disease. There was a low incidence of severe complications and no postoperative mortality. An overall response rate of 76% of patients consisting of 42% pathologic complete response and 34% partial response was observed. The overall four-year survival rate for patients with stage III cancer was 70%. The dose-limiting toxicity was identified to be hematologic toxicity, which showed grade 3/4 of leuopenia 37% (neutropenia 73%) and thrombocytopenia 24%. The incidence of peripheral neurotoxicity was comparatively low. An evaluation of nerve conduction velocity revealed that motor neurotoxicity was liable to appear in the lower extremity, while sensory nerve damage was often noted in the periphery in both the upper and lower extremities. The combined chemo-surgery treatment resulted in good response and good survival without fatal toxicity for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Long-term results in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with a combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide

From 1984 to 1988, thirty-nine untreated patients with epithelial ovarian cancer received Cisplatin 50 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (CAP), at 3 weekly intervals. All patients had FIGO stage III or IV tumors except 2 patients with stage IIb and IIc, respectively. After initial surgery 23 patients had residual disease > 2 cm in diameter. Twenty-five patients (64%) were evaluable for response to chemotherapy. Objective responses were observed in 13 out of 25 patients (52%, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 32.42% to 71.58%), 6 patients had a cCR (24%) and 7 had a cPR (28%). Seventeen out of the 39 patients (44%) had a second-look laparotomy. A pCR was achieved in 5 out of 17 patients (29%); a pPR was obtained in 8 patients (47%). Median duration of survival was 41,5 months (range 2-107+); median duration of time to failure was 21 months (range 2-107+). Median disease-free survival was 86 months (range 3,5-107+). Eleven patients (28%) are alive and 9 patients (23%) are free of recurrence at median follow-up of 86 months. Only 4 of 11 long-term survivors had a pCR. In univariate analysis, histology, clinical response to chemotherapy, and the presence of ascites at the time of diagnosis, achieved a significant correlation with survival and time to failure (TTF); in addition, TTF was significantly affected by pathological response to induction chemotherapy. The only important predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) were tumor grade and stage of disease. In multivariate analysis, the presence of ascites was the only significant prognostic factor with respect to survival and TTF. Our study confirms the effectiveness of CAP in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer and the relatively poor long term prognosis.

Long term survival by cytoreductive surgery to less than 1 cm, induction weekly cisplatin and monthly cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide therapy in advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Survival rates for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer remain low despite improved chemotherapy regimens and cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-six patients with Stage III or IV ovarian cancer were treated with primary cytoreductive surgery followed by cisplatin induction, 1 mg/kg weekly x 4 followed by 10 cycles of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2). Second-look surgery was performed on those patients who were clinically without evidence of disease at the end of the planned chemotherapy course. Survival and progression-free survival were calculated, and prognostic factors regarding survival and progression-free survival were evaluated by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Cytoreductive surgery to less than or equal to 2 cm was performed on 83% of patients and to less than 1 cm in 40%. A surgical complete response (SCR) rate of 34.9% and surgical partial response (SPR) rate of 47.6% were noted. Of the SCRs, recurrences developed in 52.7% of the patients. Estimated 5- and 8-year survival for all 136 patients was 31.2% and 21.5%, and 5- and 8-year progression-free survival was 23.9% and 20.6%, respectively. Those patients with less than 1-cm residual disease after primary surgery had significantly improved survival compared with those with 1-2 cm or greater than 2 cm (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified residual disease status and age as the most significant prognostic factors associated with survival and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Compared with those patients with greater than 1-cm residuum after initial surgery, a statistically significant improvement in long term survival was noted for those patients whose cancers were cytoreduced to less than 1-cm residuum.

Long-term follow-up of patients with epithelial carcinoma of the ovary

OBJECTIVES

To determine the long-term outcomes of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A group of 298 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with combination chemotherapy between July 1979 and January 1986 at the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group. Long-term results of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Five-year survival and 10-year survival rates of all the patients were 53% and 47%, respectively. Five-year survival and 10-year survival rates for stage I were 89% and 79%, 59% and 56% for stage II, 27% and 22% for stage III, and 9% and 9% for stage IV, respectively. Survival of mucinous and endometrioid cell types were decreased after 5 or more years. In stages II-IV, cisplatin-based chemotherapy produced better results than mitomycin-C, 5-Fu, cytarabine (MFC) therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results of epithelial ovarian cancer were not favorable even in mucinous and endometrioid cell types. For long-term results, cisplatin-based chemotherapy was effective in advanced ovarian cancer. Long-term follow-up of ovarian cancer is important and necessary.

Chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian carcinoma. The Gynecologic Oncology Group of the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Limburg, The Netherlands

Between January 1985 and May 1988, 87 patients with stage III-IV ovarian carcinoma were entered in a study assessing chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2, epirubicin, 75 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 50 mg/m2, intravenously (IV) on day 1, every 4 weeks (CEP-1). The results after a median follow-up of 4 years are presented. The pathologically complete remission rate was 36%. The median survival of all patients was 26 months. For patients with stage III disease debulked to lesions < or = 1.5 cm before the initiation of chemotherapy (n = 35), the median survival was 61+ months. These data are not clearly different from the results of a previous study conducted by our group utilizing CAP-1 chemotherapy.

Treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: 10 years of experience

Although the majority of the patients with advanced ovarian cancer will die of the disease, optimism is justified in view of the improved results of surgery followed by cisplatin--and carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Currently, approximately 30% of the patients reach a complete remission and a long therapy-free period with a good quality of life after treatment with 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. Cisplatin-based two-, three-, and four-drug regimens probably give equal results, with respect to survival outcome, if equitoxic dosages are used. Because of its more favourable toxicity spectrum, carboplatin is likely to replace cisplatin in the near future. The group of long-term survivors includes patients with a good performance status, a well-differentiated tumour, and small tumour residuals after the initial laparotomy. Patients who relapse after a period without treatment may benefit from retreatment with cisplatin or the analogue, carboplatin, given alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide. New promising approaches are now being tested in clinical trials and may be expected to yield new ways to improve treatment results. Results of fundamental research may lead to the development of new treatment strategies in the next decade and further improve the outlook for patients with ovarian cancer.