Is deep dorsal vein arterialization an alternative surgical approach to treat venogenic impotence?

The role of computerized tomography angiography in the management of cases undergoing penile revascularization due to erectile dysfunction: prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In this study, the role and efficiency of computerized tomography angiography (CTA) in the postoperative management of patients with penile revascularization were evaluated.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, penile revascularization surgery was performed in 78 patients who presented with the complaint of erectile dysfunction (ED). The mean age of the patients was 47.17 ± 13.26 (23-69) years. Patients with a regular sexual partner and relationship, who hadn't benefitted from medical treatment and who had ED complaints for at least three months were included in the study. The cases were divided into three groups according to their age (20-40, 41-60, and > 61 years). All the cases were evaluated preoperatively using the five and 15-item International Index of Erectile Dsysfunction (IIEF-5 and IIEF-15) questionnaire, cavernosometry, corpus cavernosum electromyography, and penil color doppler ultrasonography. At the postoperative third month, IIEF 5-15 questionnaire was repeated and anastomotic patency was evaluated by performing CTA scanning.

RESULTS

CTA performed at the postoperative third month revealed anastomosis patency in 56. In 22 cases, the anastomosis area could not be observed. Among the patients with anastomosis patency, the rate of the IIEF-5 increase in the postoperative period was between 35.0 and 80.8%, while in those patients without anostomotic patency, the increase rate of IIEF-5 were between 12.5 and 23.3%. Increases in the IIEF-5 and IIEF-15 questionnaire scores were found to be significantly higher in the group in which anastomotic patency was observed on CTA compared to remaining patients.

CONCLUSION

The CTA results and changes in the IIEF rates after penile revascularization had a high correlation. Anastomotic patency with CTA can guide the timing of more invasive procedures such as penile prosthesis implantation.

[Surgical therapy of erectile dysfunction. Current status]

In the light of the current domination of oral pharmacotherapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, the aim of this paper is to give a critical and up-to-date overview of the possibilities of surgical therapy. We evaluate possible therapy options such as penile vein surgery, arterial revascularisation surgery and penile prosthetics surgery. Today, vein surgery has faded into total insignificance due to the efficiency of oral and intracavernous therapeutics, and as a result of the pathomechanism of cavernoveinous insufficiency and the disappointing long-term results published in the literature. A similar fate has been met by penile revascularisation surgery, which today is performed only in a very limited number patients with strict selection criteria such as age and exclusion of diabetes mellitus. Thus, aside from pharmacotherapy, penile prosthetics is the only surgical therapy option maintaining its significance as a cure for erectile dysfunction. There are convincing long-term results with a high degree of patient and partner satisfaction, high patient acceptance and a good functional durability of the mostly three-part hydraulic implants.

Vasculogenic impotence. Arterial and venous surgery

Arterial revascularization and venous ligation procedures have been introduced within the past 2 decades. Each procedure has in common with the other the fact that initial applications of the operations were widespread among the population of men with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. In each case, disappointing long-term results led to more limited use of surgery targeting specific groups that clearly would benefit from the procedures. The wider application of these procedures in vasculogenic erectile dysfunction is not supported by the available results. The Clinical Guidelines Panel of the American Urological Association supported this view in 1996 after a meta-analysis of literature reports and declared that venous and arterial surgery was not justified in routine use, especially in patients with arteriosclerosis. Further studies are likely to refine patient selection but are unlikely to expand the therapeutic use of these procedures.