Radical surgery for pancreatic malignancy in the elderly

Comparisons of Outcomes Between Adolescent and Young Adult with Older Patients After Radical Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Propensity Score Matching: A Single-Center Study

Purpose

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in patients below 40 years old. Whether AYA patients have worse outcomes compared with older patients is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of AYA patients and older patients after radical surgery for PDAC.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective, cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent radical surgery for PDAC in Xiangya Hospital Central South University from January 2007 to December 2019. The clinicopathological data and results of patients with PDAC were collected and analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into AYA group and older group based on age (<40, AYA group; ≥40, older group). Based on all the considered covariates except age, we estimated 1:2 case propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

A total of 1033 cases were enrolled, 46 cases (4.45%) in the AYA group. Both before and after PSM, the AYA patients have a higher preoperative CA19-9 than the older patients (P < 0.001) and (P < 0.001). Pathological results showed that AYA group had a higher microvascular invasion rate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045) than older group. The median time of overall survival (OS) in AYA group and older group were 13 months (95% CI = 11.50-14.50) and 14 months (95% CI = 13.50-14.50), respectively. Additionally, AYA group have a worse 2-year OS rate than older group (8.70% vs 25.23%, P = 0.011 and 8.70% vs 25.00%, P = 0.023). According to the Log rank test, AYA group have a worse cumulative OS rate than older group (P = 0.002) and (P = 0.030), respectively.

Conclusion

PDAC might be more aggressive in AYA, and the cumulative OS after radical PDAC surgery in AYA patients is worse than that in older patients.

Pancreatic resections in renal failure patients: is it worth the risk?

Background. Chronic kidney disease affects 20 million US patients, with nearly 600,000 on dialysis. Long-term survival is limited and the risk of complex pancreatic surgery in this group is questionable. Previous studies are limited to case reports and small case series and a large database may help determine the true risk of pancreatic surgery in this population. Methods. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried (2005–2011) for patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Renal failure was defined as the clinical condition associated with rapid, steadily increasing azotemia (rise in BUN) and increasing creatinine above 3 mg/dL. Operative trends and short-term outcomes were reviewed for those with and without renal failure (RF). Results. In 18,533 patients, 28 had RF. There was no difference in wound infections, neurologic or cardiovascular complications. Compared to non-RF patients, those with RF had more unplanned intubation (OR 4.89, 95% CI 1.85–12.89), bleeding requiring transfusion (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.37–14.21), septic shock (OR 8.86, 95% CI 3.75–20.91), higher 30-day mortality (21.4% versus 2.3%, P < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (23 versus 12 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions. RF patients have much higher morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resections and surgeons should consider this before proceeding.

Evidence for treatment and survival disparities by age in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

Studies demonstrate safety and survival benefits of surgical resection in older individuals with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We investigated treatment disparities by age.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for survival and treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1983 and 2007 stratified by age: younger than 50 years, between 50 and 70 years, or older than 70 years. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival differences, and logistic regression models were used for treatment disparities and the decision to refuse surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 45,509 patients had microscopically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Of these, 7374 (16%) received surgery and 9842 (22%) received radiation. Younger patients were more likely to receive both surgery and radiation. The prevalence of surgery decreased from 21% for those younger than 50 years to 19% for those between 50 and 70 years to 13% for those older than 70 years (P < 0.001). Radiation decreased from 28% to 25% to 17% (P < 0.001). Overall survival decreased with increasing age at diagnosis, 10.4 months (age <50 years) to 9.1 months (age 50-70 years) to 6.4 months (age >70 years) controlling for stage, sex, race, radiation, and surgery (P < 0.001). Increasing age negatively predicted the odds of receiving both surgery and radiation and increased the likelihood of refusing surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment disparities exist by age despite advances in radiation and surgical treatment. Increased treatment in the elderly will increase overall survival from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Improved survival and quality of life in patients undergoing R1 pancreatic resection compared to patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively record the clinical consequences of R1 resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to patients with locally advanced tumours not undergoing surgery.

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment of pancreatic cancer, and postoperative safety is increasing. The rate of R1 resections might also increase unintentionally as surgical procedures with curative goal become more comprehensive, and the clinical outcome requires further prospective evaluation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective observational cohort study from October 2008 to December 2010. Outcome after R1 resection (group 1, surgery, n = 32) and conservative palliative chemoradiation/endoscopy (group 2, no surgery, n = 56) is compared with survival and longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL) as endpoints. QoL was assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS).

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics and tumour diameters were similar in both groups: 38.0 (31.3, 49.8) mm in group 1 versus 44.0 (39.6, 49.1) mm in group 2 (p = 0.18). Perioperative morbidity was 25% with no mortality. Disease-specific survival was 18.0 (14.5, 23.8) months in group 1 versus 8.1 (4.8, 10.1) months in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Overall survival was 11 (7.8, 14.4) months. Reduction in fatigue was significantly improved in the surgery group 6, 12, and 19 weeks after baseline, whereas reduction in global health was significantly better in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Radical removal (R0 resection) is the primary aim of surgery, but also R1 resection seems to improve survival and QoL, compared to outcome in patients with locally advanced tumours not undergoing surgery.

Pre- and intraoperative variables affecting early outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Conflicting data exist regarding the safety of pancreatic resections in elderly patients. In this study we compared early complication and mortality rates between patients younger and older than 80 years of age who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy using a validated national database.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for 2005-2009 was used for this retrospective analysis. The primary outcome measures for our analysis were 30-day postoperative mortality, major complication rate and overall complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 6293 patients who underwent PD for any cause were included in the analysis. Of these, 9.4% were aged ≥80 years. The incidence of 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients aged ≥80 years (6.3%) than in those aged <80 years (2.7%). Older patients were also noted to have higher rates of overall complications and serious complications. On multivariate analysis, age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification, reduced functional status, history of dyspnoea, and need for intraoperative transfusion were risk factors associated with the occurrence of overall complications, serious complications and postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that age among other factors is a determinant of postoperative morbidity and mortality following PD.