Intranasal salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal osteoporosis: effect of different therapeutic regimens on vertebral and peripheral bone density

Effect of intermittent administration of 200 IU intranasal salmon calcitonin and low doses of 1α(OH) vitamin D3 on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip region and biochemical bone markers in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a pilot study

A 1-year prospective, open, randomized, controlled trial was conducted as a pilot study to examine the effect of intermittent administration of 200 IU intranasal salmon calcitonin and 1alpha(OH) vitamin D3 [1alpha(OH)D3] on bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and hip as well as on the markers of bone metabolism in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. A total of 102 randomly recruited women received either 200 IU intranasal salmon calcitonin (Miacalcic nasal 200, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) daily, 1 month on-1 month off, 0.25 mug 1alpha(OH)D3, and 500 mg elemental calcium continuously (n=57 women) or only 0.25 mug 1alpha(OH)D3 and 500 mg calcium (n=45 women) for a period of 1 year. BMD of the lumbar spine and hip plus biochemical markers reflecting calcium (Ca) metabolism and bone turnover [serum Ca, serum phosphorus, intact parathormone (iPTH), total and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin levels, 24-h urinary Ca, morning fasting urinary Ca/creatinine, and Pyrilinks-D/creatinine ratio] were measured at the beginning of the study before treatment and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Baseline characteristics of participants, including age, body mass index, lumbar and hip BMD, and biochemical markers were similar between the two groups. A total of 91 patients completed the study (50 in the salmon calcitonin nasal spray group and 41 in the other group). Lumbar BMD increased significantly in the salmon calcitonin group from baseline (3.0%, p=0.005) and in comparison to the non-calcitonin-treated group (p=0.009). The salmon calcitonin group also had a significant increase in femoral neck BMD compared with baseline values (3.1%, p=0.0005) and in comparison to the non-calcitonin-treated group (p=0.0005) in Ward's triangle BMD (2.9% from baseline values, p=0.009) and in comparison to the non-calcitonin-treated group (p=0.005) in trochanteric BMD (3.4% from baseline values, p=0.007) and in comparison to the non-calcitonin-treated group (P=0.01). Urinary Ca/creatinine and Pyrilinks-D/creatinine levels were significantly decreased from baseline in the salmon calcitonin-treated group (-6.1 and -6.3%, respectively, p=0.001). Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase levels were also significantly decreased from baseline in the salmon calcitonin-treated group (-3.6%, p=0.003). In the same group, a significant decrease in iPTH serum levels compared to baseline values (-2.5%, p=0.005) and in comparison to the non-calcitonin-treated group (p=0.005) was noted. In conclusion, in this pilot study, 1-year intermittent treatment with 200 IU intranasal salmon calcitonin and low doses of 1alpha(OH)D3 produced a significant effect on bone turnover and BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. VI. Meta-analysis of calcitonin for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To review the effect of calcitonin on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women.

DATA SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to 2000 and examined citations of relevant articles and the proceedings of international osteoporosis meetings. We contacted osteoporosis investigators to identify additional studies and primary authors for unpublished data.

STUDY SELECTION

We included 30 studies that randomized women to calcitonin or an alternative (placebo or calcium and/or vitamin D) and measured bone density or fracture incidence for at least 1 yr.

DATA EXTRACTION

For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Calcitonin reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures, with a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.87, P = 0.02, n = 1404, 4 trials]. However, the RR from the one relatively large randomized controlled trial (RCT) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-1.00, P = 0.05, n = 1108). For nonvertebral fractures, the pooled RR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.22-1.23, P = 0.14, n = 1481, 3 trials). Once again, the single large trial showed a less impressive effect than the smaller trials (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.09, P = 0.16, n = 1245). For bone density of the lumbar spine, the pooled weekly dose of 250 to 2800 IU per week resulted in significant increase in the weighted mean difference (WMD) of 3.74 (2.04-5.43, P < 0.01, n = 2260, 24 trials). The combined forearm showed a similar effect, with a WMD of 3.02 (95% CI 0.98-5.07, P < 0.01, n = 468, 9 trials). At the femoral neck, the pooled weighted mean difference showed a nonsignificant trend toward benefit, WMD 3.80 (95% CI -0.32-7.91, P = 0.07, 9 trials, n = 513). Methodologically weaker studies tended to show greater effects on bone density, and the lumbar spine results suggested the possibility of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcitonin likely increases bone density in postmenopausal women predominantly at the lumbar spine and forearm for weekly doses of greater than 250 IU, although the true effect may be smaller than the pooled estimate would suggest. Calcitonin likely reduces the risk of vertebral fracture; its effect on nonvertebral fracture remains uncertain.

Meta-analysis about efficacy of anti-resorptive drugs in post-menopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of three groups of anti-resorptive drugs in post-menopausal osteoporosis.

DATA SOURCES

We collected data covering the period between 1983 and 1995, by first using MEDLINE. References retrieved were scanned further to identify additional papers.

STUDY SELECTION

Only randomized studies evaluating bone mass by means of dual-photon or dual energy densitometry over a period of 1 year were accepted.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were arranged into three drug groups. We used densitometry results after 1 year in all treatment or control groups. Factors which might interfere with the results were recorded for subsequent separate analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The MEDLINE search identified almost 25,000 studies. On reading the abstracts, 275 trials appeared to be controlled trials and original copies were retrieved for detailed analysis. A total of 31 articles which satisfied the inclusion criteria were identified. The first meta-analysis included studies which compared oestrogens and placebo, and the global effect-size was 0.54 (95% CI 0.34, 0.73). The second meta-analysis compared calcitonins with placebo and produced an effect-size of 0.41 (95% CI 0.21, 0.61) The third analysis compared bisphosphonates and placebo and showed an effect-size of 0.87 (95% CI 0.68, 1.07). Only oestrogen dose affected the results found.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates had the greatest effect on bone mass in post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Calcitonin versus etidronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials

This review examines the evidence on the efficacy of calcitonin and etidronate in the prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. MEDLINE was searched for clinical trials calcitonin or etidronate and reviews of the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The reference sections of the papers retrieved were again searched for trials on the treatments of interest. Two people independently collected data from the trials that met the inclusion criteria of the study. Weighted means in the change in bone mineral density (BMD) and differences in vertebral fracture rates were computed for calcitonin and etidronate separately. The existence of publication bias was investigated by funnel plots of effect size against sample size. Eighteen clinical trials and calcitonin and six with etidronate were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled change in vertebral BMD at the end of the studies was 1.97 (95% CI 1.77 to 2.17) with calcitonin and 3.20 (95% CI 2.92 to 3.48) with etidronate. Pooled change in proximal femur BMD was 0.32 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.91) with calcitonin and 2.42 (95% CI 2.16 to 2.68) with etidronate. The aggregated number of vertebral fractures prevented by the treatment was 59.2 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 55.1 to 63.3) for calcitonin and 28.3 (95% CI 26.2 to 30.4) for etidronate. With the available evidence we cannot establish the superiority of either of the two drugs for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The clinical trials are particularly lacking in data on hip fracture, the most important consequence of osteoporosis. In this situation consideration of the relative costs of the drugs is prominent.

Effects of resistance training on regional and total bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a randomized prospective study

This study was designed to assess the effects of 18 months of resistance exercise on regional and total bone mineral density (BMD) and soft tissue lean mass (STL) in premenopausal women aged 28-39 randomly assigned to an exercise or control group. Twenty-two exercise and 34 control subjects completed the 18-month training study. All subjects were previously inactive and untrained women. Initial, 5-, 12- and 18-month assessments were made of total and regional BMD and total and regional STL using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. All subjects consumed a 500 mg/day elemental calcium supplement throughout the study. Initial Ca intake without supplement averaged 1,023 mg/day in total sample. Serum levels of bone osteocalcin and dietary assessments using 12 randomly assigned days of diet records were also completed. Muscular strength was assessed from both 1 repetition maximum (RM) testing of 10 weightlifting exercises and by peak torque for hip abduction/adduction and knee extension/flexion. Training increased strength by 58.1% based on 1 RM testing and by 33.8% based on isokinetic testing at 18 months versus baseline. BMD increased significantly above baseline at the lumbar spine for the exercise group at 5 months (2.8%), 12 months (2.3%), and 18 months (1.9%) as compared with controls. Femur trochanter BMD increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the exercise group at 12 months (1.8%) and 18 months (2.0%) but not at 5 months (0.7%) as compared with controls. No changes in total BMD, arm BMD, or leg BMD were found. There was a 20% increase in BGP in the exercise group as compared with controls at 5 months and this difference was maintained throughout the study. For STL, significant increases for total, arm, and leg were found at 5, 12, and 18 months for the exercise group versus control ranging from 1-6% over baseline. These results support the use of strength training for increasing STL and muscular strength with smaller but significant regional increases in BMD in the premenopausal population.