[Effect of carteolol and timolol eyedrops on the pressure tolerance of the optic nerve head]

Ocular Carteolol

Ocular carteolol (Mikelan), Teoptic, Ocupress) is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). Ocular carteolol effectively reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH). Twice-daily administration of standard carteolol has generally similar IOP-lowering efficacy to other ocular beta-adrenoceptor antagonists such as timolol, betaxolol and metipranolol in patients with OAG or OH. In addition, long-term treatment with carteolol has similar efficacy to timolol and betaxolol in terms of reducing IOP and maintaining visual fields in patients with newly diagnosed primary OAG (POAG). The new long-acting formulation of once-daily carteolol has equivalent efficacy to the standard formulation of carteolol administered twice daily in patients with OAG or OH. Both the standard and long-acting formulations of ocular carteolol are generally well tolerated in terms of topical adverse effects involving the eyes or systemic adverse effects involving the cardiovascular system. Thus, twice-daily carteolol is a well established option in the treatment of glaucoma and OH, and the new once-daily formulation of long-acting carteolol offers similar efficacy and tolerability with a potential for improved patient adherence.

Ocular carteolol. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Carteolol is a relatively potent nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with partial agonist activity. It is used topically to reduce elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Twice-daily ocular administration of carteolol 1 or 2% lowers IOP by approximately 32% on average in patients with these conditions, an efficacy equivalent to that of timolol 0.25 or 0.5%. Carteolol eyedrops lack local anaesthetic activity, appear to cause less local irritation than timolol, and produce less pronounced decreases in heart rate or dyspnoea, possibly due to partial agonist activity. The latter activity may also improve retinal perfusion. Thus, although additional comparative trials are needed to accurately assess the precise place of carteolol in therapy, this drug offers a useful alternative to timolol in the management of conditions associated with a raised IOP, and may have advantages in older patients with regard to its tolerability profile, although careful monitoring is still wise.