Ecthyma-gangrenosum-like bullous pemphigoid

Efficacy and safety of tetracyclines for pemphigoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tetracyclines for treatment of pemphigoid. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies involving pemphigoid patients treated with tetracyclines published in English before 29 February 2020. References of included studies were also screened to widen the scope of the literature search. Data regarding predefined clinical outcomes of 341 patients from 77 studies were extracted and analyzed. A meta-analysis was conducted on the basis of 4 studies including 2 randomized controlled trials and 2 comparative studies. The patients had a mean age of 74.60 ± 13.18 years, 45.4% were males, and 54.6% were females. There were 185 patients with mild-to-moderate and 143 patients with severe disease. The average initial doses were 1.62 ± 0.39 g/day for tetracycline, 0.20 ± 0.01 g/day for doxycycline, and 0.11 ± 0.05 g/day for minocycline. The average time on tetracyclines was 3.74 ± 5.99 months, and 261 (81.3%) patients reported partial or complete remission. Relapses occurred in 72 (28.3%) cases. Adverse effects were experienced by 130 (41.9%) patients. The pooled ORs for short-term effectiveness, relapse, adverse effects, and 1-year survival in patients treated with oral tetracyclines vs. systemic corticosteroids were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.22-0.76), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.44-1.10), 0.47 (95% CI, 0.27-0.82) and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.16-3.50), respectively. Compared to doxycycline and minocycline, tetracycline was significantly associated with better treatment outcomes and fewer adverse effects (p < 0.05). This review revealed tetracyclines' efficacy and safety in pemphigoid treatment and may offer support for clinical use of tetracyclines in pemphigoid.

Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune blistering diseases

Blistering skin diseases are a group of autoimmune disorders that are characterized by autoantibodies against structural proteins of the epidermis or the dermal-epidermal junction and clinically by blisters and erosions on skin and/or mucous membranes. Since clinical criteria and histopathological characteristics are not sufficient for diagnosis, direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a biopsy specimen or serological tests are needed for exact diagnosis. The differentiation between the various disorders became more important since prognosis as well as different treatment options are nowadays available for the various diseases. Moreover, some bullous diseases may indicate the presence of an underlying malignancy. The detection of serum autoantibodies have been shown to correlate with disease activity and thus may be helpful in deciding treatment options for these patients.

Clinical features and practical diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) represents the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease. BP typically affects the elderly and is associated with significant morbidity. It has usually a chronic course with spontaneous exacerbations. The cutaneous manifestations of BP can be extremely protean. While diagnosis of BP in the bullous stage is straightforward, in the non-bullous stage or in atypical variants of BP signs and symptoms are frequently non-specific with eg, only itchy excoriated, eczematous, papular and/or urticarial lesions that may persist for several weeks or months. Diagnosis of BP critically relies on immunopathologic examinations including direct immunofluorescence microscopy and detection of serum autoantibodies by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy or BP180-ELISA.

Bullous pemphigoid: from the clinic to the bench

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) constitutes the most frequent autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease. It is associated with autoantibodies directed against the BP antigens 180 (BP180, BPAG2) and BP230 (BPAG1-e). The pathogenicity of anti-BP180 antibodies has been convincingly demonstrated in animal models. The clinical features of BP are extremely polymorphous. The diagnosis of BP critically relies on immunopathologic findings. The recent development of novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays has allowed the detection of circulating autoantibodies with relatively high sensitivity and specificity. Although potent topical steroids have emerged in the past decade as first-line treatment of BP, management of the disease may be challenging.