1
|
Graf L, Arnold A, Blache S, Honegger F, Müller-Gerbl M, Stieger C. Effect of freezing and embalming of human cadaveric whole head specimens on bone conduction. Hear Res 2023; 429:108700. [PMID: 36680872 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Conserved specimens do not decay and therefore permit long-term experiments thereby overcoming limited access to fresh (frozen) temporal bones for studies on middle ear mechanics. We used a Thiel conservation method which is mainly based on a watery solution of salts. In contrast to pure Formalin, Thiel conservation aims to preserve the mechanical proprieties of human tissue. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of Thiel conservation on bone conduction in the same specimen before and after conservation. METHODS Nine ears of five defrosted whole heads were stimulated with a direct, electrically driven, bone anchored hearing system (Baha, Baha SuperPower). The motion produced by bone conduction stimulation was measured with a single point laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) at the promontory, the ossicular chain, and the round window through a posterior tympanotomy. After the initial experiments, the entire whole heads were placed in Thiel solution. In order to enable direct comparison between fresh frozen and Thiel specimens, our Thiel conservation did not include intravascular and intrathecal perfusion. The measurements were repeated 3 and 12 months later. To determine the effect of freezing, defrosting, and embalming on the whole heads, CT scans were performed at different stages of the experimental procedure. Additionally, three extracted temporal bones were stimulated a Baha, motion of the promontory measured by LDV and embalmed in Thiel solution to investigate the direct impact of Thiel solution on the bone. RESULTS The averaged magnitude of motion on the promontory increased in whole head specimens by a mean of 10.3 dB after 3 months of Thiel embalming and stayed stable after 12 months. A similar effect was observed for motion at the tympanic membrane (+7.2 dB), the stapes (+9.5 dB), and the round window (+4.0 dB). In contrast to the whole head specimens, the motion of the extracted temporal bones did not change after 3 months of Thiel embalming (-0.04 dB in average). CT scans of the whole heads after conservation showed a notable brain volume loss mostly >50% as well as a remarkable change in the consistency and structure of the brain. Partial changes could already be observed before the Thiel embalming but after 1-2 days of defrosting. In an additional experiment, a substitution of brain mass and weight by Thiel fluid did not lead to new deterioration in sound transmission. In contrast, a frozen (non-defrosted) whole head showed a distinctively reduced magnitude of promontory motion before defrosting. DISCUSSION For our setup, the vibration of the ear due to bone conduction in the same whole head specimens significantly increased after Thiel conservation. Such an increase was not observed in extracted temporal bone specimens. Due to brain changes in the CT scans, we investigated the consequences of the brain volume changes and structure loss on the frozen brain before defrosting. The loss of brain volume alone could not explain the increase of ear vibrations, as we did not observe a difference when the volume was replaced with Thiel fluid. However, freezing and defrosting of the entire brain seems to have a major influence. Beside the destructive effect of freezing on the brain, the modified conservation method without perfusion changed the brain structure. In conclusion, bone conduction in whole heads depends on the physical condition of the brain, rather than on the conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Graf
- Department of ORL, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 10, Basel CH-4031, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Arnold
- Department of ORL, Spital Münsingen, Inselspital Bern and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Blache
- Department of Anatomy, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Flurin Honegger
- Department of ORL, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 10, Basel CH-4031, Switzerland
| | | | - Christof Stieger
- Department of ORL, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 10, Basel CH-4031, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Strijbos RM, Straatman LV, Stokroos RJ, Johansson ML. Ex vivo Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices. Front Surg 2022; 9:858117. [PMID: 35388366 PMCID: PMC8977416 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.858117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The procedure for installation of a percutaneous bone-conducting device has undergone significant improvements since its introduction 40 years ago. Today, the linear incision technique with tissue preservation (LITT-P) and the minimally invasive procedure (MIPS) are the most commonly used approaches. In both these techniques, a gradual increase of the osteotomy using a three-step drilling sequence is utilized, as this approach can allow a stepwise deepening and widening of the osteotomy in the mastoid and can prevent bone overheating. A new minimally invasive procedure (MONO) has been developed that allows an osteotomy to be performed and enables complete removal of the bone volume in one single drill step for a 4 mm implant using a novel parabolic twist drill. Here, the feasibility of the MONO procedure was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated in terms of the dura response to drill trauma in comparison with the outcomes achieved with guide drills used for the LITT-P and MIPS techniques. Fresh frozen temporal bone from a human cadaver was subjected to penetration by three drills beyond the base of the mastoid bone to different depths. The sites were evaluated, and the damage to and possible penetration of the dura were determined. The results showed that for a drill depth exceeding mastoid bone thickness by not more than 1 mm, damage to the dura was limited or nonexistent, whereas for a drill depth exceeding bone thickness by 2 mm, damage increased, or the dura was penetrated. There was a trend toward more damage and penetration for both the round burr and MIPS guide drill compared with the MONO drill bit. From this experimental ex vivo study, it can be concluded that if the dura is encountered, the MONO system is not more inclined to penetrate the dura than the conventional LITT-P and MIPS systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben M. Strijbos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Louise V. Straatman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Robert J. Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Martin L. Johansson
- Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research and Technology, Oticon Medical AB, Askim, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Martin L. Johansson
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ellsperman SE, Nairn EM, Stucken EZ. Review of Bone Conduction Hearing Devices. Audiol Res 2021; 11:207-219. [PMID: 34069846 PMCID: PMC8161441 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres11020019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone conduction is an efficient pathway of sound transmission which can be harnessed to provide hearing amplification. Bone conduction hearing devices may be indicated when ear canal pathology precludes the use of a conventional hearing aid, as well as in cases of single-sided deafness. Several different technologies exist which transmit sound via bone conduction. Here, we will review the physiology of bone conduction, the indications for bone conduction amplification, and the specifics of currently available devices.
Collapse
|
4
|
Strijbos RM, Straatman LV, Calon TGA, Johansson ML, de Bruijn AJG, van den Berge H, Wagenaar M, Eichhorn E, Janssen M, Jonhede S, van Tongeren J, Holmberg M, Stokroos R. Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices. Front Neurol 2021; 12:632987. [PMID: 33716934 PMCID: PMC7945693 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Comparing the surgical outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) technique with the linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation (LITT-P) for bone conduction devices after a follow-up of 22 months. Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, there was the inclusion of 64 adult patients eligible for unilateral surgery. There was 1:1 randomization to the MIPS (test) or the LITT-P (control) group. The primary outcome was an (adverse) soft tissue reaction. Secondary outcomes were pain, loss of sensibility, soft tissue height/overgrowth, skin sagging, implant loss, Implant Stability Quotient measurements, cosmetic scores, and quality of life questionnaires. Results: Sixty-three subjects were analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. No differences were found in the presence of (adverse) soft tissue reactions during complete follow-up. Also, there were no differences in pain, wound dehiscence, skin level, soft tissue overgrowth, and overall quality of life. Loss of sensibility (until 3-month post-surgery), cosmetic scores, and skin sagging outcomes were better in the MIPS group. The Implant Stability Quotient was higher after the LITT-P for different abutment lengths at various points of follow-up. Implant extrusion was nonsignificantly higher after the MIPS (15.2%) compared with LITT-P (3.3%). Conclusion: The long-term results show favorable outcomes for both techniques. The MIPS is a promising technique with some benefits over the LITT-P. Concerns regarding nonsignificantly higher implant loss may be overcome with future developments and research. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02438618.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben M Strijbos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Louise V Straatman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tim G A Calon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Martin L Johansson
- Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Oticon Medical AB, Askim, Sweden
| | | | - Herbert van den Berge
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Mariette Wagenaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Edwin Eichhorn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Miranda Janssen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Joost van Tongeren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Robert Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Han JJ, Park HR, Song JJ, Koo JW, Choi BY. A comparison study of audiological outcome and compliance of bone conduction implantable hearing implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277:3003-3012. [PMID: 32405813 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06025-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcome of different bone conduction hearing implants (BCHIs) in subjects with mixed hearing loss (MHL) and single-sided deafness (SSD) in terms of audiometric results and compliance. METHODS Twenty-one subjects with MHL and 18 subjects with SSD undergoing implantation of Baha connect, Baha attract, or Bonebridge were enrolled. Functional gain, effective gain, and usage rate of BCHIs were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS As for MHL, the functional gain of three devices was not significantly different (p = 0.477), while the effective gain of Bonebridge was higher (- 8.8 [- 15.0, - 3.5] dB) than that of Baha connect (- 20.0 [- 26.3, - 11.3] dB, p = 0.037), especially at 0.5 kHz (p = 0.010) and 1 kHz (p = 0.014). In SSD subjects, the effective gain of Bonebridge was significantly higher than that of Baha attract (- 11.3 [- 15.0, - 7.5] vs - 21.3 [- 21.3, - 16.3] dB, p = 0.012), while the functional gain of Bonebridge and Baha attract was not different. The constant usage rate of BCHIs tends to be higher in MHL subjects [17/21 (82%)] than that in SSD subjects [10/18 (56%)]. In SSD subjects, the constant user group showed higher functional gain than the non-constant user group, with a significant difference at 3 kHz (35.0 [33.8, 45.0] vs 17.5 [10.0, 27.5] dB, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION Bonebridge shows a higher effective gain than Baha connect in the MHL group and Baha attract in the SSD group. The usage rate of BCHIs is lower in SSD than that in MHL. In SSD subjects, the constant user group tended to show higher functional gain than the non-constant user group. Irrespective of the device type, the tendency of higher functional gain of BCHIs, especially at mid frequencies, may potentially lead to yield good compliance in SSD, mandating a meticulous fitting strategy ensuring a sufficient mid-frequency functional gain in SSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Joon Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Rim Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-Ro, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Jin Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-Ro, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
| | - Ja-Won Koo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-Ro, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Yoon Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-Ro, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:5264124. [PMID: 30356363 PMCID: PMC6176295 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5264124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To measure the audiological benefit of the Baha SoundArc, a recently introduced nonimplantable wearing option for bone conduction sound processor, and to compare it with the known softband wearing option in subjects with normal cochlear function and a purely conductive bilateral hearing loss. Methods Both ears of 15 normal hearing subjects were occluded for the time of the measurement, yielding an average unaided threshold of 49 dB HL (0.5 – 4 kHz). Soundfield thresholds, speech understanding in quiet and in noise, and sound localization were measured in unaided conditions and with 1 or 2 Baha 5 sound processors mounted on either a softband or a SoundArc device. Results Soundfield thresholds and speech reception thresholds were improved by 19.5 to 24.8 dB (p<.001), when compared to the unaided condition. Speech reception thresholds in noise were improved by 3.7 to 4.7 dB (p<.001). Using 2 sound processors rather than one improved speech understanding in noise for speech from the direction of the 2nd device and sound localization error by 23° to 28°. No statistically significant difference was found between the SoundArc and the softband wearing options in any of the tests. Conclusions Bone conduction sound processor mounted on a SoundArc or on a softband resulted in considerable improvements in hearing and speech understanding in subjects with a simulated, purely conductive, and bilateral hearing loss. No significant difference between the 2 wearing options was found. Using 2 sound processors improves sound localization and speech understanding in noise in certain spatial settings.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ihler F, Blum J, Berger MU, Weiss BG, Welz C, Canis M. The Prediction of Speech Recognition in Noise With a Semi-Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing System by External Bone Conduction Stimulation With Headband: A Prospective Study. Trends Hear 2016; 20:2331216516669330. [PMID: 27698259 PMCID: PMC5051673 DOI: 10.1177/2331216516669330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Revised: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction devices are treatment options for conductive and mixed hearing loss (CHL/MHL). For counseling of patients, realistic simulation of the functional result is desirable. This study compared speech recognition in noise with a semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device to external stimulation with a bone conduction device fixed by a headband. Eight German-language adult patients were enrolled after a semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device (Bonebridge, Med-El) was implanted and fitted. Patients received a bone conduction device for external stimulation (Baha BP110, Cochlear) fixed by a headband for comparison. The main outcome measure was speech recognition in noise (Oldenburg Sentence Test). Pure-tone audiometry was performed and subjective benefit was assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaires. Unaided, patients showed a mean signal-to-noise ratio threshold of 4.6 ± 4.2 dB S/N for speech recognition. The aided results were -3.3 ± 7.2 dB S/N by external bone conduction stimulation and -1.2 ± 4.0 dB S/N by the semi-implantable bone conduction device. The difference between the two devices was not statistically significant, while the difference was significant between unaided and aided situation for both devices. Both questionnaires for subjective benefit favored the semi-implantable device over external stimulation. We conclude that it is possible to simulate the result of speech recognition in noise with a semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device by external stimulation. This should be part of preoperative counseling of patients with CHL/MHL before implantation of a bone conduction device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friedrich Ihler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jenny Blum
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Max-Ulrich Berger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), University of Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard G Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christian Welz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Martin Canis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Strijbos RM, Bom SJH, Zwerver S, Hol MKS. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 274:109-117. [PMID: 27439945 PMCID: PMC5222941 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4210-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this historical cohort study is to identify if there are differences in soft tissue reactions and skin thickening between implantation of the percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant (BAHI) using the dermatome or linear incision technique. All adult patients who received a BAHI between August 2005 and January 2013 were selected. One surgeon performed all procedures and only the dermatome and linear incision technique were used. A total of 132 patients/implants were included and significantly more patients with risk factors were seen in the linear incision cohort. A soft tissue reaction Holgers ≥1 was present in 18 patients (40.9 %) in the dermatome compared to 36 patients (40.9 %) in the linear incision group. A Holgers ≥2 was noticed in 9 (20.5 %) and 19 (21.6 %) patients, respectively. Skin thickening was described in 14 (31.8 %) and 11 patients (12.5 %) in, respectively, the dermatome and linear incision cohort, which was a significant difference (p = 0.001). Nevertheless, therapeutic interventions were effective. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in (adverse) soft tissue reactions; however, skin thickening was more present in the dermatome technique. In addition, significantly more patients with risk factors were allocated to the linear incision technique. Based on these results, the linear incision is advocated as preferred technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben M Strijbos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post 377, PO box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven J H Bom
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Zwerver
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Myrthe K S Hol
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post 377, PO box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery without soft-tissue reduction: up to 42 months of follow-up. Otol Neurotol 2015; 35:1596-600. [PMID: 25076228 PMCID: PMC4554229 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000000522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To report the results of bone-anchored hearing implant (BAHI) surgery without soft-tissue reduction (WoSR); in our case, a series of 30 patients with a follow-up period of up to 42 months. Patients The study group included 30 patients between ages 17 and 79 years, where BAHI was indicated, during a 42-month period, between February 2010 and July 2013. Initially, only patients with medical comorbidities that could compromise wound healing were offered the procedure but, subsequently, all our patients are now offered this technique. Intervention Unlike in traditional techniques where all dermal and subcutaneous tissue and muscle are removed to enable the thinned skin to sit directly on the periosteum, here, in our series, using the WoSR technique, the soft tissue was preserved and only longer abutments (8.5, 9, and 12 mm) were used. Main Outcome Measure Good early postoperative wound healing, absence of flap necrosis, absence of numbness around the surgical site, and trouble-free follow-up period, with 25 patients encountering no complications. Results Of the 30 patients, 25 have had no postoperative problems and five had mild inflammation, of which three patients developed intractable pain and underwent soft-tissue reduction. Conclusion The technique WoSR for BAHI surgery seems to be a safe technique with consistently good results, decreasing operating time and patient morbidity and avoiding some of the complications seen in traditional techniques using soft-tissue reduction.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 273:105-11. [PMID: 25790770 PMCID: PMC4705128 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the stability, survival, and tolerability of 2 percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing: a 4.5-mm diameter implant (test) and a 3.75-mm diameter implant (control). Fifty-seven adult patients were included in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty implants were allocated in a 2:1 (test–control) ratio. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days; 6 and 12 weeks; and 6 months. At every visit, implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and skin reactions were evaluated according to the Holgers classification. Implants were loaded with the bone conduction device at 3 weeks. Hearing-related quality of life was evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and the Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI). ISQ values were statistically significantly higher for the test implant compared to the control implant. No implants were lost and soft tissue reactions were comparable for both implants. Positive results were reported in the hearing-related quality of life questionnaires. These 6-month results indicate that both implants and their corresponding hearing devices are safe options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with the appropriate indications. Loading at 3 weeks did not affect the stability of either implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rik C Nelissen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Christine A den Besten
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emmanuel A M Mylanus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Myrthe K S Hol
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Takumi Y, Matsumoto N, Cho B, Ono H, Mori K, Tsukada K, Ichinose A, Yoshimura H, Iwasaki S, Komune S, Usami SI. A clinical experience of 'STAMP' plate-guided Bonebridge implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2014; 134:1042-6. [PMID: 25115972 PMCID: PMC4196550 DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2014.900703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Conclusion The surface template-assisted marker positioning (STAMP) method is useful for successful Bonebridge™ (BB) implantation on a planned site while avoiding dangerous positions. Objectives To confirm the usefulness of the STAMP method for the safe operation of BB. Methods From a patient’s temporal bone CT data, a guide plate and confirmation plate were generated by the STAMP method. The guide plate is used to mark the correct place for implantation, while the confirmation plate lets us know the correct angle and depth of the hole. Results With the guide plate, the correct place for BB implantation was easily found. The hole was made to be an appropriate size with the confirmation plate while exposing only a small part of sigmoid sinus as simulated. Finally, the BB implant was successfully placed exactly at the planned site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Takumi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto
| | - Nozomu Matsumoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Byunghyun Cho
- Department of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Satoshi Iwasaki
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto
| | - Shizuo Komune
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Shin-ichi Usami
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Influence of directionality and maximal power output on speech understanding with bone anchored hearing implants in single sided deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 271:1395-400. [PMID: 23700268 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2565-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2012] [Accepted: 05/08/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHI) are routinely used to alleviate the effects of the acoustic head shadow in single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD). In this study, the influence of the directional microphone setting and the maximum power output of the BAHI sound processor on speech understanding in noise in a laboratory setting were investigated. Eight adult BAHI users with SSD participated in this pilot study. Speech understanding in noise was measured using a new Slovak speech-in-noise test in two different spatial settings, either with noise coming from the front and noise from the side of the BAHI (S90N0) or vice versa (S0N90). In both spatial settings, speech understanding was measured without a BAHI, with a Baha BP100 in omnidirectional mode, with a BP100 in directional mode, with a BP110 power in omnidirectional and with a BP110 power in directional mode. In spatial setting S90N0, speech understanding in noise with either sound processor and in either directional mode was improved by 2.2-2.8 dB (p = 0.004-0.016). In spatial setting S0N90, speech understanding in noise was reduced by either BAHI, but was significantly better by 1.0-1.8 dB, if the directional microphone system was activated (p = 0.046), when compared to the omnidirectional setting. With the limited number of subjects in this study, no statistically significant differences were found between the two sound processors.
Collapse
|