Fine needle aspiration of primary pleomorphic liposarcoma of the breast. A case report

Pleomorphic liposarcoma: A clinicopathologic study of 20 FNA cases

BACKGROUND

Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS) is the least common but most aggressive of all forms of liposarcoma (LPS). Its diagnosis relies on the recognition of pleomorphic lipoblasts (PLBs), whose numbers vary considerably. Because few large fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy studies exist, the authors review their experience with PLPS.

METHODS

The authors' cytopathology files were searched for PLPS with histopathologic verification. FNA biopsy smears were performed via standard techniques.

RESULTS

Twenty cases from 20 patients (male/female ratio, 2.3/1; age range, 22-77 years; mean age, 58 years) met the inclusion criteria. All had tissue confirmation. Biopsy sites included the following: thigh (11 [55%]), upper extremity (4 [20%]), axilla (2 [10%]), neck (1 [5%]), chest wall (1 [5%]), and mediastinum (1 [5%]). Aspirates were from primary (17 [85%]), locally recurrent (2 [10%]), and metastatic neoplasms (1 [5%]). The FNA diagnoses were PLPS (10 [50%]), myxofibrosarcoma (4 [20%]), LPS (2 [10%]), sarcoma (2 [10%]), and high-grade malignant neoplasm (2 [10%]). Smears showed thick cell clusters and dissociated single forms. Pleomorphic, epithelioid, and bizarre cell/nuclear shapes were common. PLBs were absent, rare, or unnoticed in 45%. In 25%, smears dominated by myxoid stroma were diagnosed as high-grade myxofibrosarcoma or myxoid LPS. Ancillary testing performed in 5 cases had limited diagnostic efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

FNA biopsy of PLPS, although able to successfully recognize malignancy, suffers from a sampling bias due to an inability to capture or recognize PLBs in a significant proportion of cases secondary to the heterogeneous composition of this neoplasm.

Imaging Evaluation of Male Breast Masses with Histopathologic Correlation: A Case Series

The male breast can be afflicted with a wide spectrum of benign and malignant masses, similar to the female breast. A systematic radiological evaluation using mammography, ultrasonography, and when appropriate, magnetic resonance imaging, could aid this differentiation and provide clues to the diagnosis. In this article, we present six cases of male breast masses with an emphasis on the role of imaging in characterization and diagnosis.

Nonepithelial malignancies mimicking primary carcinoma of the breast

Although primary carcinomas account for the majority of breast malignancies, nonepithelial malignancies form a subset that must be differentiated accurately for treatment purposes. The purpose of this study was to identify cytological characteristics that differentiate between these two entities. Twenty-six fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens with histological correlation were reviewed (five lymphomas, two myelomas, six sarcomas, seven melanomas, and six carcinomas). On review, nonepithelial tumors presented as single cells with scant or ill-defined cytoplasm with rare cluster formations present. In contrast, carcinomas were arranged predominantly in clusters and contained more-defined, abundant, and sometimes vacuolated cytoplasm. Moreover, a major aid to diagnosis was an accurate clinical history. We conclude that nonepithelial malignancies of the breast are best differentiated from epithelial malignancies by a combination of cytological features and clinical information. These findings emphasize the importance of the triple test, in which integration of cytological findings and clinical information play a key role.