Poor outcomes in elderly kidney transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab induction

Alemtuzumab Associated With Higher Mortality Than Basiliximab in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation (KT) in older age is increasingly common as more elderly patients live with end-stage renal disease. Immunosuppression (IS) after KT confers additional risk in aging patients with weakened immune systems. We hypothesized that 1-year mortality among KT recipients aged 70 y and older would be higher in those receiving induction IS with alemtuzumab lymphocyte depletion versus basiliximab interleukin-2 inhibition.

METHODS

This single-institution retrospective analysis enrolled KT recipients aged 70 y and older who underwent transplantation between January 2010 and June 2022. Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing and the electronic medical record. Descriptive comparisons were performed using chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as appropriate. The primary outcome was a risk-adjusted analysis to assess the association of induction IS type with 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

The median age was 72 y [IQR 70-74] among 146 eligible KT recipients. Induction IS was achieved with alemtuzumab in 47 recipients and basiliximab in 99 recipients. At 1 y, higher rates of mortality (17.0% versus 3.0%, P = 0.005), infectious death (12.8% versus 1%, P = 0.005), and graft failure (21.3% versus 6.1%, P = 0.006) were observed among alemtuzumab compared to basiliximab recipients, with no significant difference in biopsy-proven acute rejection rate. On multivariate analysis, alemtuzumab was independently associated with 1-year mortality (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab is associated with increased 1-year mortality over basiliximab induction among KT recipients 70 y and older. Lymphocyte-depleting induction may contribute to inferior outcomes via infectious risk. Alemtuzumab induction should be approached with caution in this high-risk population.

The use of lymphocyte-depleting antibodies in specific populations of kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recommendations of the use of antibody induction treatments in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are based on moderate quality and historical studies. This systematic review aims to reevaluate, based on actual studies, the effects of different antibody preparations when used in specific KTR subgroups.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL and selected randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies looking at different antibody preparations used as induction in KTR. Comparisons were categorized into different KTR subgroups: standard, high risk of rejection, high risk of delayed graft function (DGF), living donor, and elderly KTR. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven RCT and 99 observational studies were finally included. Compared to anti-interleukin-2-receptor antibodies (IL2RA), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) reduced the risk of acute rejection at two years in standard KTR (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.61-0.89) and high risk of rejection KTR (RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.43-0.72), but without decreasing the risk of graft loss. We did not find significant differences comparing ATG vs. alemtuzumab or different ATG dosages in any KTR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many studies carried out on induction treatment in KTR, their heterogeneity and short follow-up preclude definitive conclusions to determine the optimal induction therapy. Compared with IL2RA, ATG reduced rejection in standard-risk, highly sensitized, and living donor graft recipients, but not in high DGF risk or elderly recipients. More studies are needed to demonstrate beneficial effects in other KTR subgroups and overall patient and graft survival.

Risks and ways of preventing kidney dysfunction in drug-induced immunosuppression in solid organ recipients

Immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) is the cornerstone of treatment after transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival and long-term graft function. However, the expected effects of IMT must be balanced against the major adverse effects of these drugs and their toxicity. The purpose of this review is to summarize world experience on current immunosuppressive strategies and to assess their effects on renal function.

Outcomes of induction antibody therapies in the nonbroadly sensitized adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort registry analysis

The outcomes of lymphocyte-depleting antibody induction therapy (LDAIT), [thymoglobulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab (ALM)] versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) in the nonbroadly-sensitized [pretransplant calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA), <80%] adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (adult-DDKTRs) are understudied. In this registry, study of 55 593 adult-DD-KTRs, outcomes of LDAIT [(ATG, N = 32 985) and (ALM, N = 9429)], and IL-2RA (N = 13 179) in <10% and 10-79% cPRA groups was analyzed. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of one-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was lower; while, aOR of 1-year composite of re-hospitalization, graft loss, or death was higher with LDAIT than IL2-RA in both cPRA groups. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of delayed graft function was higher with LDAIT than IL-2RA in the <10% cPRA group. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 5-year death-censored graft loss (DCGL) in both <80% cPRA groups seemed higher with ALM than other inductions [(<10% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.00-1.23 and ATG versus ALM: aHR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77-0.91; 10-79% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64; and ATG versus ALM, aHR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.98)]. Five-year aHR of death did not differ among induction therapies in both cPRA groups. In nonbroadly sensitized adult-DDKTRs, LDAIT is more protective against 1-year BPAR (not 5-year mortality) than IL-2RA; the trend of a higher 5-year DCGL risk with ALM than ATG or IL-2RA needs further investigation.

Comparison of Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice of induction immunosuppression for elderly kidney transplant recipients remains unclear. Although alemtuzumab has been associated with escalating risk of death and graft loss in this population, this risk has not been adequately explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab with basiliximab induction in this population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective matched cohort study of kidney transplant recipients aged ≥65 years. Patients who received alemtuzumab induction were matched (1:2) to a basiliximab control. The primary outcome was allograft survival. The incidence of acute rejection, infection, and all-cause mortality was measured.

RESULTS

Fifty-one and 102 patients were included in the alemtuzumab and basiliximab groups, respectively. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, except for more living donor transplant recipients in the alemtuzumab group (26/51 [51%] vs 31/102 [30.4%], P = .02). Acute cellular rejection occurred more frequently within the first year in the basiliximab group (P = .02). There was no difference in rates of infection within the first year. Graft and patient survival rates were similar over the follow-up period. Patients receiving basiliximab had a higher glomerular filtration rate at 2 years posttransplant (59 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 49 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction is associated with similar outcomes to basiliximab in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients With Low Immunological Risk

BACKGROUND

In nonimmunized patients, similar rejection rates are observed for patients who have undergone thymoglobulin (antithymocyte globulins [ATG]) or basiliximab (BSX) therapy. While ATG may improve delayed graft function, it may also be associated with higher infection rates and malignancy risk. We compared survival and clinical outcomes in elderly recipients with low immunological risk according to their induction therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentric study on nonimmunized patients ≥65 years of age receiving a first kidney transplant between 2010 and 2017. The principal outcome was patient and graft survival. Secondary outcomes were cumulative probabilities of infection, first acute rejection episode, malignancy, de novo donor specific antibody, posttransplant diabetes (PTD), cardiac complications, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and occurrence of delayed graft function. Cox, logistic, or linear statistical models were used depending on the outcome studied, and models were weighted on the propensity scores.

RESULTS

Two hundred and four patients were included in the BSX group and 179 in the ATG group with the average age of 71.0 and 70.5 years, respectively. Patient and graft survival at 3 years posttransplantation were 74% (95% CI, 65%-84%) and 68% (95% CI, 60%-78%) in ATG and BSX group, respectively, without significant difference. Occurrence of PTD was significatively higher in BSX group (23% versus 15%, P = 0.04) due to higher trough levels of Tacrolimus on month 3 (9.48 versus 7.30 ng/mL, P = 0.023). There was no difference in other evaluated outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly recipients, ATG does not lead to poorer outcomes compared with BSX and could permit lower trough levels of Tacrolimus, thus reducing occurrence of PTD.

Alemtuzumab Induction Is Associated With Equalization of Graft Outcomes Between Elderly and Nonelderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Report

OBJECTIVES

Alemtuzumab (monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody) provides profound lymphocyte depletion and offers numerous advantages as an induction agent. Elderly recipients (> 65 years old) traditionally have inferior posttransplant outcomes versus younger recipients. We investigated short-term and long-term patient and graft survival rates following alemtuzumab induction in elderly recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis, which included 676 renal allograft transplant recipients with alemtuzumab induction, was conducted at the University of Toledo Medical Center between March 2006 and November 2015. We used 2-sided t test, Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and Cox proportional hazard regressions with 95% confidence interval for analyses. P < .05 was significant.

RESULTS

Elderly recipients were more likely to receive a kidney from an inferior donor (deceased donor: 82% vs 72.4%; P = .030) and have higher mean kidney donor profile index (46.2 vs 38.4; P = .024) than nonelderly recipients. Elderly recipients were more likely to experience delayed graft function (15.1% vs 8.5%; P = .038). Elderly recipients demonstrated death-censored graft survival (1 year: 95.4% vs 93.1%; 3 years: 88.5% vs 93.3%; 5 years: 83.1% vs 86.4%) and rejection rates (1 year: 19.8% vs 21.2%; 3 years: 22.1% vs 25.3%; 5 years: 23.8% vs 26.9%) similar to nonelderly recipients. Elderly recipients had significantly higher overall mortality rates than recipients under 65 years old (29.8% vs. 13.2%; P = .001). Although 1-year patient survival was similar to younger recipients (94.8% vs 96.3%; P = .431), 3-year (80.0% vs 91.5%; P = .006) and 5-year (72.9% vs 86.2%; P = .19) rates were significantly decreased in elderly recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly age is not a predictor of rejection or death-censored graft loss in individuals who receive alemtuzumab induction. Despite elevated overall mortality, elderly recipients induced with alemtuzumab demonstrated rejection, graft, and short-term patient survival rates similar to younger recipients.

Comparing Outcomes between Antibody Induction Therapies in Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplant recipients often receive antibody induction. Previous studies of induction therapy were often limited by short follow-up and/or absence of information about complications. After linking Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data with Medicare claims, we compared outcomes between three induction therapies for kidney recipients. Using novel matching techniques developed on the basis of 15 clinical and demographic characteristics, we generated 1:1 pairs of alemtuzumab-rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) (5330 pairs) and basiliximab-rATG (9378 pairs) recipients. We used paired Cox regression to analyze the primary outcomes of death and death or allograft failure. Secondary outcomes included death or sepsis, death or lymphoma, death or melanoma, and healthcare resource utilization within 1 year. Compared with rATG recipients, alemtuzumab recipients had higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.03 to 1.26; P<0.01) and death or allograft failure (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.28; P<0.001). Results for death as well as death or allograft failure were generally consistent among elderly and nonelderly subgroups and among pairs receiving oral prednisone. Compared with rATG recipients, basiliximab recipients had higher risk of death (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.16; P=0.03) and death or lymphoma (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.23; P=0.03), although these differences were not confirmed in subgroup analyses. One-year resource utilization was slightly lower among alemtuzumab recipients than among rATG recipients, but did not differ between basiliximab and rATG recipients. This observational evidence indicates that, compared with alemtuzumab and basiliximab, rATG associates with lower risk of adverse outcomes, including mortality.

Cytopenia Occurrence in Kidney Transplant Recipients Within Early Post-transplant Period

Objective:

This study assessed incidence, severity, and time to occurrence of drug-induced leukopenia/thrombocytopenia within 1^st month after kidney transplantation.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted on newly kidney transplant recipients from two hospitals, Iran. Patients with thrombocytopenia due to acute antibody-mediated rejection were excluded from the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of patients within the 1^st month after transplantation were collected.

Findings:

Of 213 patients, 14.1% and 66.2% experienced leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Cytopenia happened more commonly among patients with thymoglobulin-containing regimen (for leukopenia: 24.6% vs. 0%, P < 0.001; for thrombocytopenia 84.4% vs. 41.8%, P < 0.001). Most leukopenia patients experienced Grades 1 and 2 of leukopenia (46.6% and 40% of patients). Most thrombocytopenic patients showed Grade 1 of thrombocytopenia (78.7%). Cumulative dose of thymoglobulin did not differ between patients with and without leukopenia (5.57 ± 1.13 vs. 5.9 ± 1.96 mg/kg; P = 0.613) or with and without thrombocytopenia (5.87 ± 1.86 vs. 5.56 ± 1.38 mg/kg; P = 0.29). Cytopenia were more common among recipients from deceased compared with from living donors (91.3% vs. 8.7% for leukopenia patients, P = 0.001; 69.9% vs. 33.1% for thrombocytopenia, P = 0.02). More patients with kidney from deceased donors received thymoglobulin in their immunosuppressive regimen (82% vs. 37%; P < 0.001). The median time to leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were 3 days and 1 day, respectively.

Conclusion:

Among immunosuppressive and prophylactic antimicrobial agents, thymoglobulin is more related to cytopenia; therefore, thymoglobulin dose reduction is recommended as the first intervention to manage cytopenia without need for reduction of its cumulative dose. The higher prevalence of cytopenia among recipients from deceased donors may be related to the higher use of thymoglobulin in these patients.