1
|
Modell SM, Schlager L, Allen CG, Marcus G. Medicaid Expansions: Probing Medicaid’s Filling of the Cancer Genetic Testing and Screening Space. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:1066. [PMID: 35742117 PMCID: PMC9223044 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is the third largest source of spending for Medicaid in the United States. A working group of the American Public Health Association Genomics Forum Policy Committee reviewed 133/149 pieces of literature addressing the impact of Medicaid expansion on cancer screening and genetic testing in underserved groups and the general population. Breast and colorectal cancer screening rates improved during very early Medicaid expansion but displayed mixed improvement thereafter. Breast cancer screening rates have remained steady for Latina Medicaid enrollees; colorectal cancer screening rates have improved for African Americans. Urban areas have benefited more than rural. State programs increasingly cover BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome genetic testing, though testing remains underutilized in racial and ethnic groups. While increased federal matching could incentivize more states to engage in Medicaid expansion, steps need to be taken to ensure that they have an adequate distribution of resources to increase screening and testing utilization.
Collapse
|
2
|
Green RF, Kumerow MT, Rodriguez JL, Addie S, Beachy SH, Senier L. Implementing Cancer Genomics in State Health Agencies: Mapping Activities to an Implementation Science Outcome Framework. Public Health Genomics 2020; 23:218-229. [PMID: 32942283 DOI: 10.1159/000510336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To show how state health agencies can plan and evaluate activities to strengthen the evidence base for public health genomics, we mapped state cancer genomics activities to the Doyle et al. [Genet Med. 2018;20(9):995-1003] implementation science outcome framework. METHODS We identified state health agency activities addressing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome by reviewing project narratives from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cancer Genomics Program funding recipients, leading discussions with state health agencies, and conducting an environmental scan. RESULTS State health agencies' cancer genomics activities included developing or adding to state surveillance systems, developing educational materials, bidirectional reporting, promoting health plan policy change, training providers, and promoting recommendations and standards. To address health disparities, programs have tracked group differences, developed culturally appropriate educational materials, and promoted access to services for underserved populations. CONCLUSION State health agencies can use the Doyle et al. [Genet Med. 2018;20(9):995-1003] performance objectives and outcome measures to evaluate proposed and ongoing activities. By demonstrating whether activities result in improved outcomes, state health agencies can build the evidence for the implementation of cancer genomics activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ridgely Fisk Green
- Carter Consulting, Inc. and Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,
| | - Marie T Kumerow
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Juan L Rodriguez
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Siobhan Addie
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sarah H Beachy
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Laura Senier
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology and Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Senier L, McBride CM, Ramsey AT, Bonham VL, Chambers DA. Blending Insights from Implementation Science and the Social Sciences to Mitigate Inequities in Screening for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16:E3899. [PMID: 31618814 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Genomic screening to identify people at high risk for adult-onset hereditary conditions has potential to improve population health. However, if not equitably accessible, genomics-informed screening programs will exacerbate existing health inequities or give rise to new ones. To realize the disease prevention potential of these screening tools, we need strategies to broaden their reach. We propose a conceptual framework that merges insights from implementation science and sociological research on health inequities. Our framework does three things: first, it broadens the arenas of action beyond those typically addressed in implementation science frameworks; second, it argues for recruiting more diverse partners to share the work of implementation and dissemination; and third, it shows how implementation activities can be coordinated more effectively among those partners. We use screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers (HBOC) as a case to illustrate how this enhanced framework could guide implementation science and distribute the benefits of genomic medicine more equitably. Although our example is specific to genomics, this approach is more broadly applicable to the field of implementation science. Coordinated action among multiple stakeholders could translate a host of new technologies from the bench to the trench without creating new inequities or exacerbating existing ones.
Collapse
|
4
|
Senier L, Tan C, Smollin L, Lee R. Understanding the potential of state-based public health genomics programs to mitigate disparities in access to clinical genetic services. Genet Med 2019; 21:373-81. [PMID: 29895854 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0056-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose State Health Agencies (SHAs) have developed public health genomics
(PHG) programs that play an instrumental role in advancing precision public
health, but there is limited research on their approaches. This study
examines how PHG programs attempt to mitigate or forestall health
disparities and inequities in the utilization of genomic medicine. Methods We compared PHG programs in three states: Connecticut, Michigan, and
Utah. We analyzed 85 in-depth interviews with SHA internal and external
collaborators and program documents. We employed a qualitative coding
process to capture themes relating to health disparities and inequities. Results Each SHA implemented population-level approaches to identify
individuals who carry genetic variants that increase risk of hereditary
cancers. However, each SHA developed a unique strategy—which we
label public health action repertoires—to reach specific subgroups
who faced barriers in accessing genetic services. These strategies varied
across states given demographics of the state population, state-level
partnerships, and availability of healthcare services. Conclusion Our findings illustrate the imperative of tailoring PHG programs to
local demographic characteristics and existing community resources.
Furthermore, our study highlights how integrating genomics into precision
public health will require multilevel, multisector collaboration to optimize
efficacy and equity.
Collapse
|
5
|
Senier L, Lee R, Nicoll L. The strategic defense of physician autonomy: State public health agencies as countervailing powers. Soc Sci Med 2017; 186:113-121. [PMID: 28622609 PMCID: PMC5531602 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Revised: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/02/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Advances in genetic testing and the aggressive marketing of genetic tests by commercial diagnostic laboratories have driven both consumer demand and the need for unbiased information about how tests should guide healthcare delivery. This paper uses the countervailing powers framework to explore the role of state public health agencies as arbiters of quality and safety, specifically through their efforts to encourage physicians to follow evidence-based recommendations for screening for hereditary cancers. Social scientists have often viewed actions by the state to regulate cost, quality, or safety as a threat to physician autonomy. This paper draws on case studies from two US states-Michigan and Connecticut-to better understand the specific role of state public health agencies, and especially whether their activities to encourage adherence to evidence-based recommendations bolster or subvert the interests of other parties in the healthcare arena. We find that lacking authority to compel provider to follow evidence-based recommendations, they improvised ways to foster compliance voluntarily, for example, by emphasizing the role of the physician as gatekeeper, thus affirming the importance of physician autonomy and clinical judgment. Both states also used public health surveillance data to make rare diseases visible and illustrate gaps between recommendations and practice. Finally, they both showed that following evidence-based recommendations could align the professional and market interests of healthcare stakeholders. Both states employed similar strategies with similar effects, despite substantial differences in the regulatory climate and organizational capacity. Taken as a whole, their activities orchestrated a countervailing response that checked the profit-seeking motives of commercial laboratories. Our findings demonstrate that rather than eroding physician autonomy, state action to monitor healthcare quality and encourage adherence to evidence-based recommendations can actually reinforce physician authority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Senier
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.
| | - Rachael Lee
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Lauren Nicoll
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Doyle N, Cirino A, Trivedi A, Flynn M. Exploring Barriers to Payer Utilization of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2014; 24:122-33. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9745-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/08/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
7
|
St Pierre J, Bach J, Duquette D, Oehlke K, Nystrom R, Silvey K, Zlot A, Giles R, Johnson J, Anders HM, Gwinn M, Bowen S, Khoury MJ. Strategies, actions, and outcomes of pilot state programs in public health genomics, 2003-2008. Prev Chronic Dis 2014; 11:E97. [PMID: 24921900 PMCID: PMC4060875 DOI: 10.5888/pcd11.130267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
State health departments in Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, and Utah explored the use of genomic information, including family health history, in chronic disease prevention programs. To support these explorations, the Office of Public Health Genomics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided cooperative agreement funds from 2003 through 2008. The 4 states' chronic disease programs identified advocates, formed partnerships, and assessed public data; they integrated genomics into existing state plans for genetics and chronic disease prevention; they developed projects focused on prevention of asthma, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other chronic conditions; and they created educational curricula and materials for health workers, policymakers, and the public. Each state's program was different because of the need to adapt to existing culture, infrastructure, and resources, yet all were able to enhance their chronic disease prevention programs with the use of family health history, a low-tech "genomic tool." Additional states are drawing on the experience of these 4 states to develop their own approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janice Bach
- Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan
| | - Debra Duquette
- Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan
| | | | | | | | - Amy Zlot
- Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | - Marta Gwinn
- McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Scott Bowen
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333. E-mail:
| | - Muin J Khoury
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Radford C, Prince A, Lewis K, Pal T. Factors which impact the delivery of genetic risk assessment services focused on inherited cancer genomics: expanding the role and reach of certified genetics professionals. J Genet Couns 2013; 23:522-30. [PMID: 24306140 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9668-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
There is tremendous excitement about the promise of new genomic technologies to transform medical practice and improve patient care. Although the full power of genetic diagnosis has not yet been realized, paradigms of clinical decision-making are changing. In fact, recent policy level changes to promote genetic counseling by certified genetics professionals (GP) such as genetic counselors and clinical geneticists, are occurring at both the payer and state level. However, there remain opportunities to develop policies within the United States to: 1) enhance the access to the limited workforce of GPs; 2) revise reimbursement schemes such that costs to deliver these services may be recouped by institutions with GPs; and 3) protect against the potential for discrimination based on genetic information. Although many of these issues predate advances in genomic technologies, they are exacerbated by them, with increasing access and awareness as costs of testing decrease. Consequently, evolving shifts in national policies poise GPs to serve as a hub of information and may be instrumental in facilitating new models to deliver genetics-based care through promoting academic-community partnerships and interfacing with non-GPs. As we acknowledge the potential for genomics to revolutionize medical practice, the expertise of GPs may be leveraged to facilitate incorporation of this information into mainstream medicine.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pal T, Bonner D, Cragun D, Johnson S, Akbari M, Servais L, Narod S, Vadaparampil S. BRCA sequencing and large rearrangement testing in young Black women with breast cancer. J Community Genet 2013; 5:157-65. [PMID: 24013928 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0166-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2013] [Accepted: 08/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Young Black women in the United States are disproportionately afflicted with breast cancer, a proportion of which may be due to BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) gene mutations. In a cancer registry-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer, we evaluated: (1) the prevalence of BRCA mutations detected through full gene sequencing and large rearrangements testing and (2) proportions that accessed genetic services pre-dating study enrollment. Black women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer ≤age 50 years in 2009-2012 were recruited through the Florida Cancer Registry. Participants completed genetic counseling, a study questionnaire, and consent for medical record release. Saliva specimens were collected for BRCA testing. Overall, 13 participants (9 %) had BRCA mutations detected (including 11 through full gene sequencing and two through large rearrangements testing). One of these large rearrangements, BRCA1 (delExon8), was identified in a participant who had previously tested negative on clinical comprehensive BRCAnalysis that was performed prior to undergoing a lumpectomy. Although all 144 participants met national criteria for referral for cancer genetic risk assessment, 61 (42 %) were referred for genetic counseling and/or had genetic testing preceding study enrollment, and only 20 (14 %) received genetic counseling. Our findings emphasize the importance of large rearrangements testing to increase detection of deleterious BRCA mutations in young Black women with breast cancer. The registry-based design of our study increase the generalizability of findings compared with efforts focused on clinic-based populations. Furthermore, results suggest efforts are needed to improve access to genetic counseling and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuya Pal
- Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bowen MS, Kolor K, Dotson WD, Ned RM, Khoury MJ. Public health action in genomics is now needed beyond newborn screening. Public Health Genomics 2012; 15:327-34. [PMID: 22986915 PMCID: PMC4748713 DOI: 10.1159/000341889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2012] [Accepted: 07/09/2012] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, newborn screening was the only public health program in the US focused on reducing morbidity, mortality and disability in people affected by genetic conditions. The landscape has changed, however, as evidence-based recommendations are now available for several other genomic applications that can save lives now in the US. Many more such applications are expected to emerge in the next decade. An action plan, based on evidence, provides the impetus for a new paradigm for public health practice in genomics across the lifespan using established multilevel processes as a guide. These include policy interventions, education, clinical interventions, and surveillance. Applying what we know today in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome and familial hypercholesterolemia has the potential to affect thousands of people in the US population every year. Enhanced partnerships between genetic and nongenetic providers of clinical medicine and public health are needed to overcome the challenges for implementing genomic medicine applications both now and in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Bowen
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|