Multimodality treatment with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond the standard indications

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver neoplasia, represents the fifth most common malignant disease in men. Percutaneous ablation treatment is recommended among the treatments suggested for HCC patients in the very early/early stage. In the last decade, very important results in terms of survival benefits have been obtained with local ablative therapies, also outside the standard indications, thanks to many technical innovations. In particular, important results of ablation as a safe and effective technique have been obtained in the treatment of intermediate- or advanced-stage patients with HCC, and in the treatment of unfavourable tumour locations. Moreover, awareness is growing regarding the necessity of overcoming the rigidity of traditional guidelines in the treatment of HCC due to the complexity of patients with HCC, focusing on Precision Medicine. In this context, it is important to know the standard and non-standard indications of ablation in the treatment of HCC in order to offer the best therapeutic option tailored for each patient. The aim of this study was to analyse the possible clinical applications of ablative therapies for HCC patients, beyond the traditional indications recommended in the most widespread clinical practice guidelines for the management of HCC.

Postoperative recurrent factors and therapeutic and preventive strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. The recurrence rate is about 50% at 3 years and over 70% at 5 years after hepatectomy for HCC. The high recurrence rate seriously affects the curative effect and long-term survival of patients with HCC, and is the primary cause of death after operation. Postoperative recurrence of HCC is a complex multi-step, multi-factorial process involving three factors: the body, microenvironment, and tumor tissue, which include body immunity, local pH value, interstitial pressure, vascular osmotic pressure, inflammatory reaction, tumor cell adhesion, extracellular matrix degradation, cell migration, cell proliferation, and tumor angiogenesis. HCC recurrence is closely related to abnormal gene expression and related molecular function changes, but the molecular mechanism has not been fully elucidated. How to treat the recurrence of HCC after operation directly affects the prognosis of patients with HCC, and treatments include reoperation, liver transplantation, local minimally invasive treatment, radiotherapy, molecular targeted drugs, immunotherapy, and traditional Chinese medicine treatment. It is difficult to cure or control tumor progression by a single therapy. Two or more therapeutic methods need to be combined organically to achieve a synergistic therapeutic effect. According to the specific situation of patients with HCC, it is key to analyze the individual characteristics of patients, to combine the clinical experience of clinicians and the best evidence, to adopt the individualized treatment plan, and to choose the appropriate treatment methods. For HCC patients with high-risk factors for recurrence, selecting the appropriate treatment is important to reduce the recurrence of HCC after operation and prolong the survival of patients.

The treatment of intermediate stage tumours beyond TACE: From surgery to systemic therapy

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dependent on the stage of the disease. Intermediate stage HCC encompasses the largest subgroup of patients with the disease, and is characterized by substantial heterogeneity. The standard therapeutic approach, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), is probably over-used and may not be appropriate for all patients with intermediate stage HCC. In patients with extensive tumour bulk, multi-nodular spread or impaired liver function, TACE may not be optimal and other treatments can be considered as a first-line treatment. These include surgery, percutaneous ablation, radioembolization or systemic treatment. In addition, patients who do not achieve complete or partial necrosis (TACE failure) and patients with early recurrence after TACE, should be managed individually, considering systemic treatments usually reserved for advanced disease. In selected cases and in patients who achieve downstaging, radical approaches such as hepatic resection or even liver transplantation can be considered. In this review, we evaluate the current literature for the treatment strategies for patients with intermediate Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B stage HCC.

In vitro study of physical properties of various embolization particles regarding morphology before, during and after catheter passage

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate various embolization particles on their physical properties with special regard on morphological variability and elasticity.

METHODS

8 embolization particles (EmboCept®, Contour SE® Microspheres, Embosphere® Micorspheres 400 μm, 500 μm, 1300 μm, Embozene® Microspheres, DC Beads®, Embozene Tandem®) were evaluated and graduated from 1-6 microscopically due to morphologic changes in vitro before, during and after their catheter passage by 4 blinded reviewers. To facilitate comparison, microscopic images were provided with a scale.

RESULTS

All tested particles showed a homogenous shape and morphology before passage through the simulation catheter. During the passage all particles were elastically deformable, where necessary. After the catheter passage no loss of basic shape was seen. Changes in size were found in 5/8 particles. Grading of morphologic changes varied between mean value of 1.0 and 3.0. No complete destruction or loss of function was seen.

CONCLUSION

All tested embolization particles are, regarding their morphological properties in sense of homogenous shape and deformation after catheter passage, a safe treatment option. Tested in vitro no less of functionality regarding physical properties should be expected.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma - factors influencing outcome and disease-free survival

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation can be a curative treatment in selected patients. However, there are several factors that influence disease-free survival after transplantation. This review addresses the pre-, intra- and postoperative factors that influence the risk of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation.

Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation

Several therapeutic procedures have been proposed as bridging treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting liver transplantation (LT). The most used treatments include transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation. Surgical resection has also been successfully used as a bridging procedure, and LT should be considered a rescue treatment in patients with previous HCC resection who experience tumor recurrence or post-treatment severe decompensation of liver function. The aims of bridging treatments include decreasing the waiting list dropout rate before transplantation, reducing HCC recurrence after transplantation, and improving post-transplant overall survival. To date, no data from prospective randomized studies are available; however, for HCC patients listed for LT within the Milan criteria, prolonging the waiting time over 6-12 mo is a risk factor for tumor spread. Bridging treatments are useful in containing tumor progression and decreasing dropout. Furthermore, the response to pre-LT treatments may represent a surrogate marker of tumor biological aggressiveness and could therefore be evaluated to prioritize HCC candidates for LT. Lastly, although a definitive conclusion can not be reached, the experiences reported to date suggest a positive impact of these treatments on both tumor recurrence and post-transplant patient survival. Advanced HCC may be downstaged to achieve and maintain the current conventional criteria for inclusion in the waiting list for LT. Recent studies have demonstrated that successfully downstaged patients can achieve a 5-year survival rate comparable to that of patients meeting the conventional criteria without requiring downstaging.