Successful treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with thermochemotherapy and adjuvant immune therapy

The Clinical Validation of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia (mEHT)

The mEHT method uses tissues' thermal and bioelectromagnetic heterogeneity for the selective mechanisms. The success of the therapy for advanced, relapsed, and metastatic aggressive tumors can only be demonstrated by measuring survival time and quality of life (QoL). The complication is that mEHT-treated patients cannot be curatively treated any longer with "gold standards", where the permanent progression of the disease, the refractory, relapsing situation, the organ failure, the worsening of blood counts, etc., block them. Collecting a cohort of these patients is frequently impossible. Only an intent-to-treat (ITT) patient group was available. Due to the above limitations, many studies have single-arm data collection. The Phase III trial of advanced cervix tumors subgrouping of HIV-negative and -positive patients showed the stable efficacy of mEHT in all patients' subgroups. The single-arm represents lower-level evidence, which can be improved by comparing the survival data of various studies from different institutes. The Kaplan-Meier probability comparison had no significant differences, so pooled data were compared to other methods. Following this approach, we demonstrate the feasibility and superiority of mEHT in the cases of glioblastoma multiform, pancreas carcinomas, lung tumors, and colorectal tumors.

Systematic review about complementary medical hyperthermia in oncology

Hyperthermia is a generic term for different techniques using heat in cancer therapies. Temperatures of about 42° Celsius in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy may improve the effectiveness of those treatments. Clinical benefit is shown in “standard hyperthermia” with tumour temperatures assessed during treatment. This systematic review thoroughly assesses the state of evidence concerning the benefits and side effects of electro hyperthermia or whole-body hyperthermia (“alternative hyperthermia”) in oncology. From 26 April 2021 to 09 May 2021, a systematic search was conducted searching five electronic databases (Embase, Cochrane, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Medline) to find studies concerning the use, effectiveness and potential harm of alternative medical hyperthermia therapy on cancer patients. From all 47,388 search results, 53 publications concerning 53 studies with 2006 patients were included in this systematic review. The patients were diagnosed with different types of cancer. The hyperthermic methods included whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with different methods and electro hyperthermia (EH). The majority of the included studies were single-arm studies, counting in total 32 studies. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT). In addition, one systematic review (SR) was found. The most critical endpoints were tumour response, survival data, pain relief, myelosuppression and toxicities. Outcome was heterogeneous, and considering the methodological limitations, clinical evidence for the benefit of alternative hyperthermia in cancer patients is lacking. Neither for whole-body hyperthermia nor for electro hyperthermia there is any evidence with respect to improvement of survival or quality of life in cancer patients.

Hyperthermia enhances the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs in heat-sensitive cells through interfering with DNA damage repair

Background

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to be clinically effective, but the mechanisms by which hyperthermia enhances the sensitivity of cells to chemotherapeutic drugs has not yet been elucidated.

Methods

To identify the key molecules involved in thermochemotherapy, this study used mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantitative proteomics technology to analyze the effects of thermochemotherapy on the heat-sensitive ovarian cancer cell line A2780. We divided the A2780 cell line into four groups, one group served as blank control, and the other three groups were stimulated by oxaliplatin, stimulated by hyperthermia at 42 ℃, and stimulated by hyperthermia combined with oxaliplatin. Samples were then collected for tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling, high-performance liquid chromatography fractionation, and MS-based quantitative proteomics for analysis The differentially expressed proteins were quantitatively compared and identified, and Gene Ontology (GO) assessment and cluster analyses were performed. Finally, the above MS results were verified again by Western blotting experiments.

Results

A total of 349 differentially expressed proteins were identified between cells treated with chemotherapy alone (group B) and cells treated with a combination of chemotherapy and hyperthermia (group D). There were 145 upregulated proteins and 204 downregulated proteins. Among the top 20 proteins with significantly different expression levels, nearly two-thirds were involved in DNA damage repair. These proteins were subsequently verified by Western blot analysis. Indeed, consistent with MS data, the expression of the RBL1 protein was significantly upregulated in cells treated with thermochemotherapy (group D) compared to cells treated with chemotherapy alone (group B).

Conclusions

In heat-sensitive ovarian cancer cells, the damage repair of tumor cell DNA is disturbed by hyperthermia, making it unable to fully repair when damaged by chemotherapeutic drugs. As a result, hyperthermia enhances the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. RBL1, as a tumor suppressor gene, may be associated with the repair of DNA damage, and thus it may be a key target for hyperthermia to enhance the sensitivity of thermosensitive cells to chemotherapeutic drugs.