Multimodal treatment of hepatic metastasis in the form of a bile duct tumor thrombus from pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: case report of successful resection after chemoradiation therapy

Survival Outcome and Prognostic Factors for Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis from the German Cancer Registry Group

Simple Summary

Less than 1% of all pancreatic malignancies are acinar cell carcinomas. Based on data from the German Cancer Registry Group, we performed a comparative analysis of characteristics and prognostic factors of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and the most common type of pancreatic cancer—pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, patients with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma were younger at the time of diagnosis and the percentage of males was higher. The prognosis of patients with pancreatic acinar carcinoma was better than that of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgical resection was the strongest positive prognostic factor for pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma. The study shows that pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma has features distinct from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Radical resection should be advocated, whenever feasible.

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a distinct type of pancreatic cancer with low prevalence. We aimed to analyze prognostic factors and survival outcome for PACC in comparison to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), based on data from the German Cancer Registry Group. Methods: Patients with PACC and PDAC were extracted from pooled data of the German clinical cancer registries (years 2000 to 2019). The distribution of demographic parameters, tumor stage and therapy modes were compared between PACC and PDAC. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to delineate prognostic factors for PACC. Propensity score matching was used to compare survival between PACC and PDAC. Results: There were 233 (0.44%) patients with PACC out of 52,518 patients with pancreatic malignancy. Compared to PDAC, patients with PACC were younger (median age 66 versus 70, respectively, p < 0.001) and the percentage of males was higher (66.1% versus 53.3%, respectively, p < 0.001). More patients were resected with PACC than with PDAC (56.2% versus 38.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). The estimated overall median survival in PACC was 22 months (95% confidence interval 15 to 27), compared to 12 months (95% confidence interval 10 to 13) in the matched PDAC cohort (p < 0.001). Surgical resection was the strongest positive prognostic factor for PACC after adjusting for sex, age, and distant metastases (hazard ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.51, p < 0.001). There was no survival benefit for adjuvant therapy in PACC. Conclusions: PACC has overall better prognosis than PDAC. Surgical resection is the best therapeutic strategy for PACC and should be advocated even in advanced tumor stages.

Acinar Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas Successfully Controlled by IRIS: A Case Report and Literature Review

Acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) of the pancreas is a rare pancreatic tumor with poor prognosis. We present the first case of ACC of the pancreas successfully controlled by S-1 combined with a colorectal regimen. A 49-year-old Japanese female was referred to our clinic for right upper quadrant pain. Imaging studies demonstrated 2 solid tumors under the pancreas, and pancreatoduodenectomy with tumor resection was performed. Based on pathologic examination, the diagnosis of ACC of the pancreas was made according to the World Health Organization criteria. Eleven months after surgery, lymph node recurrence with elevations in serum concentrations of carbohydrate antigens (CA) 19–9 and CA125 were recognized. Treatments with carboplatin combined with paclitaxel, docetaxel, and gemcitabine, respectively, were attempted; however, there were no significant responses to these regimens. After starting S–1/irinotecan combination chemotherapy (IRIS), the concentrations of the tumor markers declined, accompanied by a reduction in tumor size. Because S-1 is an oral anticancer agent used on an outpatient basis with a low incidence of side effects, we believe that S–1-based chemotherapy is a strong candidate for the first-line treatment of recurrent or unresectable ACC.