Renal metanephric adenoma mimicking papillary renal cell carcinoma on computed tomography: a case report

Case Report: MRI, CEUS, and CT Imaging Features of Metanephric Adenoma with Histopathological Correlation and Literature Review

The metanephric adenoma is an extremely rare, benign, embryonal-epithelial neoplasm of the kidney and has a good prognosis with appropriate treatment. It can present at any age and is often asymptomatic. Histologically, the lesion is well established; however, there have been only a few cases described with available detailed imaging findings, most of them with large renal masses typically depicted by computed tomography (CT). This case report includes imaging of contrast-enhanced MRI, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and CT, and thus adds to the information available, potentially promoting a nephron-sparing clinical pathway. We report on the clinical presentation, imaging, histopathological diagnosis, and treatment data of a 27-year-old female, in whom an incidental, symptomatic kidney tumor was detected. CT, CEUS, and MRI showed a suspicious unifocal renal lesion with inhomogeneous enhancement, which was indistinguishable from renal cell carcinoma. After laparoscopic resection, a metanephric adenoma with microscopically partially glandular, partially nest-like solid growth and without distinctive atypia was diagnosed pathohistologically. Immunohistochemistry results were positive for Wilms Tumor 1 and CD57 and negative for EMA and CK7: 2–3% positive cells in MIB1 coloring. At 3-month and 1-year follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and imaging showed no recurrence of renal masses or metastases.

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of small renal masses in real practice: sensitivity and specificity according to subjective radiologic interpretation

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of small renal masses in real practice.

Methods

Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI were performed between February 2008 and February 2013 on 68 patients who had suspected small (≤4 cm) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) based on ultrasonographic measurements. CT and MRI radiographs were reviewed, and the findings of small renal masses were re-categorized into five dichotomized scales by the same two radiologists who had interpreted the original images. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was performed, and sensitivity and specificity were determined.

Results

Among the 68 patients, 60 (88.2 %) had RCC and eight had benign disease. The diagnostic accuracy rates of contrast-enhanced CT and MRI were 79.41 and 88.23 %, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was greater when using contrast-enhanced MRI because too many masses (67.6 %) were characterized as “4 (probably solid cancer) or 5 (definitely solid cancer).” The sensitivity of contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for predicting RCC were 79.7 and 88.1 %, respectively. The specificities of contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for predicting RCC were 44.4 and 33.3 %, respectively. Fourteen diagnoses (20.5 %) were missed or inconsistent compared with the final pathological diagnoses. One appropriate nephroureterectomy and five unnecessary percutaneous biopsies were performed for RCC. Seven unnecessary partial nephrectomies were performed for benign disease.

Conclusions

Although contrast-enhanced CT and MRI showed high sensitivity for detecting small renal masses, specificity remained low.

Metanephric adenoma with diffuse calcifications: A case report

Metanephric adenoma is a rare and benign renal neoplasm originating in the epithelial cells of the kidney. The tumor has a benign course and a characteristic histopathological appearance, typically exhibiting a solid and poorly-demarcated margin with rare cystic components or calcifications. However, it is often difficult to distinguish metanephric adenoma from malignant neoplasms prior to surgical resection. To the best of our knowledge, only one case of metastasis to the lymph nodes has been described in the literature thus far. The present study retrospectively analyzed one case of surgically and pathologically-confirmed atypical metanephric adenoma. Clinical and pathological analysis, as well as computed tomography scans, revealed a mass with a clearly defined margin and diffuse calcifications. The mass was subsequently resected and the patient recovered well following the procedure.

CT imaging spectrum and the histopathological features of adult metanephric adenoma

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the radiopathological features of adult metanephric adenoma (MA) and explore whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns.

METHODS

18 consecutive MA cases (age range, 18-66 years; 9 males and 9 females) were pathologically proven and recruited in our study between January 2004 and June 2014. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT were performed and correlated with corresponding pathological findings to differentiate between MA and other renal tumours. The enhancement pattern, lesion contour and presence of calcifications were evaluated.

RESULTS

On unenhanced CT scan, the most common (n = 15, 83.3%) CT imaging characteristics were the presence of homogeneity and well-defined solid renal masses; the minority (n = 3, 16.7%) were heterogeneous or centrally located low-attenuation masses. Contrast-enhanced CT image revealed hypoattenuating heterogeneous masses with varying degrees of contrast enhancement in 16 (88.9%) cases, in contrast to those without increased attenuation in 2 (11.1%) cases. Scattered calcification was found only in one case (5.6%). Pathological results revealed that a total of 6 (33.3%) cases had concomitant malignant carcinoma components; 2 (11.1%) patients had malignant MA; and pure MA was found in 10 cases, with a surprisingly high proportion of malignant tumours.

CONCLUSION

The positive-predictive values of "high" enhancement seemed relatively characteristic for the diagnosis of malignant and composite MA.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Radiopathological features of adult MA and exploring whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns.