Occult Breast Carcinoma Is More Common in Women Undergoing Breast Reduction after Contralateral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Occult breast carcinoma is occasionally found in breast reduction specimens. Although its incidence varies widely, there is a trend toward an increased incidence for women with a history of breast cancer. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of occult carcinoma incidence in breast reduction specimens.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies with no language restrictions for studies that recorded the incidence of occult carcinoma in breast reduction specimens. Cancer incidence per specimen was pooled for women with and without a history of breast cancer.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 29 were quantitatively analyzed. The pooled incidence of carcinoma was higher within specimens from women with breast cancer (3.4 percent; 95 percent CI, 2.2 to 5.3 percent) than without (0.6 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.4 to 0.8 percent), and this increased likelihood was significant when populations were compared directly (OR, 6.02; 95 percent CI, 3.06 to 11.86; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with a history of breast cancer have an increased incidence of occult breast carcinoma within their breast reduction specimens compared with women with no breast cancer history. There is a need for preoperative radiology screening, counseling, and histopathology guidelines to ensure adequate diagnosis and management of these women.

Pathology Evaluation of Reduction Mammaplasty Specimens and Subsequent Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Disease: A Claims-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to measure the use of pathology evaluation of breast specimens among patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty and assess rates of new diagnoses of breast disease and associated cost.

METHODS

We analyzed the Truven MarketScan Databases from 2009 to 2015 to identify adult female patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty for macromastia. We recorded patient age, rates of obtaining pathology evaluation, new diagnoses of benign or malignant breast disease after pathology evaluation, and total cost for the surgery encounter.

RESULTS

Among 17,738 macromastia patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty, 91.3% (n = 16,193) received pathology evaluation. Pathology evaluation rates were clinically similar across age groups <70 years (90.8-92.1%) and slightly lower for patients ≥70 (85.0%). Among 6987 patients less than 40 years who received pathology evaluation, 0.06% (n = 4) were subsequently diagnosed with malignant breast disease within 3 months, compared to 0.23% in the entire cohort (n = 37/16,193). Pathology claims resulted in an added $307 (SD 251) on average for the breast reduction surgery encounters.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast tissue after reduction mammaplasty is routinely submitted for pathology evaluation, without consideration of age-based risk for breast cancer. Routine pathology evaluation of breast tissue in patients in lower risk age groups (less than 40 years) required an additional $536,000 on average to detect a single occult breast cancer compared to an added $85,600 to detect a new malignancy in patients 40 years and older. Clinicians and policy makers should consider whether routine pathology evaluation of breast tissue should be individualized based on risk factors for breast cancer.

Incidental breast carcinoma in reduction mammoplasty

AIM

The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence and treatment options of occult cancer or atypical lesions found in the histopathological examination of reduction mammoplasty (RM) specimens. The role of preoperative mammography and systematic histopathological examination are discussed.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center database review of all patients who underwent a RM between January 2005 and December 2014. Preoperative examination, histopathological findings and follow-up were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 1045 patients underwent RM, of which 97% were bilateral (1021). All patients received a mammography and routine clinical examination to exclude cancer preoperatively. The overall mean patient age was 40.2 years (14.2-73.4). A total of 19 patients (1.18%) had significant histopathological findings, all of whom were over 40 years of age. There were 4 incidental carcinomas (0.38%), of which 2 were DCIS (0.19%) and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas (0.19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of postoperative diagnosis of occult breast cancer in RM specimens remains low, but poses significant therapeutic challenges. While emphasis should lay on preoperative diagnostics, routine histological analysis of RM specimens is recommended.

Incidental atypical proliferative lesions in reduction mammoplasty specimens: analysis of 2498 cases from 2 tertiary women's health centers

Atypical proliferative lesions (APLs) are occasionally found in breast reduction specimens. The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of APL in reduction mammoplasty specimens from patients who were treated mainly for macromastia. A retrospective medical record review of pathology records on patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty from 2006 to 2012 generated 2498 cases. The sole exclusion criterion was a history of invasive and/or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Laterality, specimen weight, number of blocks submitted, and presence of APL were recorded and analyzed. We defined APL as invasive carcinoma, DCIS or lobular carcinoma in situ, atypical ductal (ADH) or lobular hyperplasia, and flat epithelial atypia (FEA). The presence of papillomas, radial scars, and fibroadenomas was also recorded. At least 1 APL was identified in 107 (4.3%) of 2498 reduction mammoplasty specimens including invasive duct carcinoma (n = 2), DCIS (n = 4), ADH/FEA (n = 47), and lobular carcinoma in situ/atypical lobular hyperplasia (n = 54). One hundred four (97%) of the 107 patients underwent bilateral, and 3 (3%) underwent unilateral reductions. In conclusion, the frequency of detection of APLs in patients with no history of breast cancer is low (4.3%). Detection of invasive and DCIS lesions is extraordinarily low at 0.2%. The most common APL is lobular neoplasia (2.2%), whereas ADH and FEA are seen in 1.9%. Our findings provide data on the distribution of these lesions in this setting, as well as some insight into their prevalence in the general population. A protocol for submitting tissues from these specimens is also proposed.