Evaluating the Prognosis of Ischemic Stroke Using Low-Dose Multimodal Computed Tomography Parameters in Hyperacute Phase

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential value of low-dose multimodal computed tomography (CT) in predicting prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 6 hours.

METHODS

The admission "one-stop-shop" multimodal CT examination, including noncontrast CT (NCCT), low-dose CT perfusion, and CT angiography (CTA), was performed in patients with symptoms of stroke within 6 hours. Noncontrast CT, CTA source image (CTA-SI), cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time to peak (TTP), and mean transit time (MTT) maps were studied using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). The regional leptomeningeal collateral (rLMC) score (0-20) was dichotomized into 2 groups: good (11-20) and poor (0-10) rLMC. Poor functional outcomes were defined by a modified Rankin scale score of 3 to 6.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four patients were ultimately selected; 43.8% of them showed poor functional outcomes. They had lower ASPECTSs on NCCT, CTA-SI, CBV, CBF, TTP, and MTT, and poor rLMC was more frequently associated with poor functional outcomes (all P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis for AIS patients with conservative treatment, CTA-SI-ASPECTS 6 or less (odds ratio [OR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.9-18.4; P = 0.002) and poor collaterals (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.3-15.4; P = 0.017), CBV-ASPECTS 6 or less (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 2.7-24.0; P < 0.001), CBF-ASPECTS 4 or less (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 2.0-31.5; P = 0.003), MTT-ASPECTS≤3 (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.8-18.1; P = 0.003), TTP-ASPECTS 4 or less (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.6-15.1; P = 0.005), and NCCT-ASPECTS 8 or less (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.7-20.4; P = 0.005) were significantly associated with poor functional outcome. In the multivariate analysis for AIS patients with thrombolysis, CTA-SI-ASPECTS 6 or less (OR, 27.5; 95% CI, 2.9-262.3; P = 0.004), poor collaterals (OR, 28.0; 95% CI, 2.8-283.0; P < 0.028), and CBV-ASPECTS 6 or less (OR, 18.0; 95% CI, 3.0-107.7; P = 0.002) were associated with poor functional outcomes. Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC) of the combination of CTA-SI-ASPECTS 6 or less, poor collaterals, and CBV-ASPECTS 6 or less (AUC, 0.87) was greater than that for any single parameter alone: CTA-SI-ASPECTS 6 or less (AUC, 0.80; P < 0.001), poor collaterals (AUC, 0.76; P < 0.001), and CBV-ASPECTS 6 or less (AUC, 0.81; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CTA-SI-ASPECTS, collaterals, and CBV-ASPECTS may improve predictive power compared with a single parameter alone.

Utility of perfusion imaging in acute stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Variability in imaging protocols and techniques has resulted in a lack of consensus regarding the incorporation of perfusion imaging into stroke triage and treatment. The objective of our study was to evaluate the available scientific evidence regarding the utility of perfusion imaging in determining treatment eligibility in patients with acute stroke and in predicting their clinical outcome.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library focusing on themes of medical imaging, stroke, treatment, and outcome (CRD42016037817). We included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-controlled studies published from 2011 to 2016. Two independent reviewers conducted the study appraisal, data abstraction, and quality assessments of the studies.

RESULTS

Our literature search yielded 13 studies that met our inclusion criteria. In total, 994 patients were treated with the aid of perfusion imaging compared with 1819 patients treated with standard care. In the intervention group 51.1% of patients had a favorable outcome at 3 months compared with 45.6% of patients in the control group (p=0.06). Subgroup analysis of studies that used multimodal therapy (IV tissue plasminogen activator, endovascular thrombectomy) showed a significant benefit of perfusion imaging (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.51, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Perfusion imaging may represent a complementary tool to standard radiographic assessment in enhancing patient selection for reperfusion therapy, with a subset of patients having up to 1.9 times the odds of achieving independent functional status at 3 months. This is particularly important as patients selected based on perfusion status often included individuals who did not meet the current treatment eligibility criteria.

Combined Multimodal Computed Tomography Score Correlates With Futile Recanalization After Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Stroke

Background and Purpose—

Futile recanalization after acute ischemic stroke occurs in almost half of the patients despite optimal angiographic results. Multimodal neuroimaging may help to improve patient’s selection but is still dismissed by many interventionalists. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of each parameter of multimodal computed tomography (CT) and their combination for predicting futile recanalization after successful thrombectomy.

Methods—

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of consecutive patients with anterior circulation stroke, fully assessable multimodal CT, and successful recanalization. Nonenhanced CT, CT angiography source images, cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and mismatch CBV–CBF maps were studied by Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS); collaterals on CT angiography were graded as poor or good (≤50% or >50% of the middle cerebral artery territory). Futile recanalization was defined as modified Rankin Scale score >2 at 3 months despite successful recanalization.

Results—

One hundred fifty patients were included and 57% of them had futile recanalization. They had lower ASPECTS on nonenhanced CT, CT angiography source images, CBV, CBF, and mismatch CBV–CBF and presented more frequently poor collaterals (all P <0.001). Among them, CBV showed the highest area under the curve (0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–0.88). In multivariate analyses, CT angiography source images ≤5 (odds ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–21.9), CBV≤6 (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–9.7), and poor collaterals (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.8–41.7) were independent predictors of futile recanalization. A combined score of these 3 parameters added complementary information: 57% of the patients with score-1, 89% with score-2, and 100% with score-3 had futile recanalization. Reclassification analyses indicated that this score improved prediction of futile recanalization.

Conclusions—

In this population, a combined multimodal CT score predicted futile recanalization.