Gastric cancer staging with radiologic imaging modalities and UICC staging system

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Stomach Preservation Following Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Multicenter Randomized Phase III SENORITA Trial

BACKGROUND

The SENORITA phase III trial demonstrated the effectiveness of laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) in preserving stomach function for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), although some patients experienced surgical failure or recurrence. The purpose of this study was to analyze patients' clinicopathologic features from the SENORITA trial who were allocated to LSNNS with stomach-preserving surgery but ultimately did not preserve stomach or experienced recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were categorized into two groups: the failure group (stomach preservation failure or cancer recurrence after LSNNS) and the success group (stomach preservation without recurrence following LSNNS). This study analyzed the detailed clinicopathologic characteristics of patients in the failure group from the SENORITA trial.

RESULTS

Among 258 patients who underwent LSNNS, 193 patients (74.8%) achieved stomach preservation, while 65 patients (25.2%) failed to preserve. Intraoperative failure was the most common cause of unsuccessful stomach preservation, occurring in 35 of 65 cases (53.8%). Advanced pathological TNM stage was the only independent risk factor by multivariate analysis, with stage IB and IIA patients showing 5.9- and 45.0-fold higher failure risks. The main causes of failure included sentinel basin detection failure, metastatic lymph nodes, positive tumors at resection margins, and complications. The failure group also included five cases of gastric cancer recurrence following LSNNS.

CONCLUSION

Accurate preoperative staging and patient selection are crucial for optimizing LSNNS outcomes. Ensuring precise resection with an adequate number of harvested sentinel basin nodes is essential to succeed the stomach-preserving surgery.

Predicting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of patients with gastric cancer by computed tomography and clinical features

Background

There have been no studies on predicting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC) in the neoadjuvant and perioperative settings. We aimed to investigate the use of preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) imaging features combined with clinical characteristics for predicting HER2 expression in GC.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 301 patients with GC who underwent curative resection and preoperative CECT. HER2 status was confirmed by postoperative immunohistochemical analysis with or without fluorescence in situ hybridization. A prediction model was developed using CECT imaging features and clinical characteristics that were independently associated with HER2 status using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed and the performance of the prediction model was evaluated. The bootstrap method was used for internal validation.

Results

Three CECT imaging features and one serum tumor marker were independently associated with HER2 status in GC: enhancement ratio in the arterial phase (odds ratio [OR] = 4.535; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.220-9.264), intratumoral necrosis (OR = 2.64; 95% CI, 1.180-5.258), tumor margin (OR = 3.773; 95% CI, 1.968-7.235), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) level (OR = 5.551; 95% CI, 1.361-22.651). A prediction model derived from these variables showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.802 (95% CI, 0.740-0.864) for predicting HER2 status in GC. The established model was stable, and the parameters were accurately estimated.

Conclusions

Enhancement ratio in the arterial phase, intratumoral necrosis, tumor margin, and CA125 levels were independently associated with HER2 status in GC. The prediction model derived from these factors may be used preoperatively to estimate HER2 status in GC and guide clinical treatment.

The current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

3D reconstruction technology could revolutionise medicine. Within surgery, 3D reconstruction has a growing role in operative planning and procedures, surgical education and training as well as patient engagement. Whilst virtual and 3D printed models are already used in many surgical specialities, oesophagogastric surgery has been slow in their adoption. Therefore, the authors undertook a scoping review to clarify the current and future roles of 3D modelling in oesophagogastric surgery, highlighting gaps in the literature and implications for future research.

METHODS

A scoping review protocol was developed using a comprehensive search strategy based on internationally accepted guidelines and tailored for key databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Elsevier Scopus and ISI Web of Science). This is available through the Open Science Framework (osf.io/ta789) and was published in a peer-reviewed journal. Included studies underwent screening and full text review before inclusion. A thematic analysis was performed using pre-determined overarching themes: (i) surgical training and education, (ii) patient education and engagement, and (iii) operative planning and surgical practice. Where applicable, subthemes were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 56 papers were included. Most research was low-grade with 88% (n = 49) of publications at or below level III evidence. No randomised control trials or systematic reviews were found. Most literature (86%, n = 48) explored 3D reconstruction within operative planning. These were divided into subthemes of pre-operative (77%, n = 43) and intra-operative guidance (9%, n = 5). Few papers reported on surgical training and education (14%, n = 8), and were evenly subcategorised into virtual reality simulation (7%, n = 4) and anatomical teaching (7%, n = 4). No studies utilising 3D modelling for patient engagement and education were found.

CONCLUSION

The use of 3D reconstruction is in its infancy in oesophagogastric surgery. The quality of evidence is low and key themes, such as patient engagement and education, remain unexplored. Without high quality research evaluating the application and benefits of 3D modelling, oesophagogastric surgery may be left behind.

Recent Advances in the Diagnosis, Staging, Treatment, and Prognosis of Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Literature Review

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cause of cancer related deaths worldwide which results in malignant tumors in the digestive tract. The only radical treatment option available is surgical resection. Recently, the implementation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in 5-year survival rates of 95% for early gastric cancer. The main reason of treatment failure is that early diagnosis is minimal, with many patients presenting advanced stages. Hence, the greatest benefit of radical resection is missed. Consequently, the main therapeutic approach for advanced gastric cancer is combined surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy. In this review, we will discuss the various treatment options for advanced gastric cancer. Clinical practice and clinical research is the most practical way of reaching new advents in terms of patients' characteristics, optimum drug choice, and better prognosis. With the recent advances in gastric cancer diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis, we are evident that the improvement of survival in this patient population is just a matter of time.

Can endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) improve the accuracy of clinical T staging by computed tomography (CT) for gastric cancer?

INTRODUCTION

With the introduction of new therapeutic options for gastric cancer treatment, more precise preoperative staging of gastric cancer is needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for improving the accuracy of clinical T staging by computed tomography (CT) for gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2636 patients underwent stomach protocol CT (S-CT) and EUS, followed by gastrectomy for primary gastric adenocarcinoma between September 2012 and February 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital. The results of preoperative S-CT and EUS were compared to the postoperative pathologic staging.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of S-CT and EUS for T staging were 69.4% and 70.4%, respectively. When T staging was divided into T1-2 and T3-4 for clinically advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the positive predictive value for T3-4 using S-CT, EUS, and a combination of both modalities was 73.8%, 79.3%, and 85.6%, respectively. In 114 cases of indeterminate lesions between cT1 and cT2 by S-CT, EUS had a better prediction rate than the final decision based on endoscopy or the agreement between the two experts (Match rate: EUS vs. final decision, 69.3% vs. 58.8%).

CONCLUSION

EUS can be a complementary diagnostic tool to clinical T staging of gastric cancer by CT for selecting T3-4 lesion.

Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis

Gastric cancer preoperative staging is of outmost importance to assure proper management of the disease. Providing a relevant clinical stage relies on different imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis for gastric cancer clinical stage diagnostic tests, thus comparing the diagnostic accuracy of EUS vs. multidetector CT (MDCT) and EUS vs. EUS + MDCT. We plotted study estimates of pooled sensitivity and specificity on forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic space to explore between-study variation in the performance of EUS, MDCT and EUS + MDCT for T1-T4, N0-N3, M0-M1 when data were available. Exploratory analyses were undertaken in RevMan 5. We included twelve studies with 2047 patients. Our results suggest that EUS was superior to MDCT in preoperative T1 and N staging. MDCT is more specific for the M stage but no significant difference in sensitivity was obtained. When comparing EUS vs. EUS + MDCT for T1 both sensitivity and specificity were not relevant. No significant differences were observed in T2-T4 stages. Even though EUS helped differentiate between the presence of invaded nodules, N stages should be carefully assessed by both methods since there is not sufficient data.

PIPAC-OX: A Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin-Based Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases

PURPOSE

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel laparoscopic, intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivery technique aiming to improve drug distribution and tissue penetration to treat peritoneal metastases. Thus far, PIPAC oxaliplatin is conducted at an arbitrary dose of 92 mg/m². We conducted a phase I study to establish safety and tolerability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a 3+3 dose-escalation design of PIPAC oxaliplatin for patients with peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal tumors, after failure of at least first-line chemotherapy. Dose levels were planned at 45, 60, 90, and 120 mg/m².

RESULTS

This study included 16 patients with 24 PIPAC procedures (8 gastric; 5 colorectal; and 1 gallbladder, pancreas, and appendix cancer each). Median age and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score were 62 years and 17, respectively. Two patients developed pancreatitis (grade 2 and 3) at 45 mg/m², necessitating cohort expansion. Another patient developed grade 2 pancreatitis at 90 mg/m². There were no other dose-limiting toxicities, and the highest-dose cohort (120 mg/m²) tolerated PIPAC well. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated good linearity between dose and maximum concentration (r ² = 0.95) and AUC (r ² = 0.99). On the basis of RECIST, 62.5% and 50% had stable disease after one and two PIPAC procedures, respectively. A total of 8 patients underwent two PIPAC procedures, with improvement of median PCI and peritoneal regression grade score from 15 to 12 and 2.5 to 2.0, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II dose is 120 mg/m². Future studies should further delineate the efficacy and role of PIPAC oxaliplatin for peritoneal metastases.See related commentary by de Jong et al., p. 1830.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical and pathological results of gastric cancer patients: A case-control study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery represents a treatment option for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). This case-control study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of GC patients who received NACT, and its impact on survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with GC who underwent gastrectomy. A total of 45 cases with NACT were matched with consecutive 45 patients who underwent upfront gastrectomy for the following characteristics: gender, age, gastrectomy type, lymphadenectomy extent, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, histological type, cT and cN.

RESULTS

NACT group had smaller tumors (4.9 vs 6.8 cm P = .006), lower lymphatic invasion rate (40% vs 73.3%, P = .001), lower venous invasion rate (18% vs 46.7%, P = .003) and lower perineural invasion rate (35% vs 77.8%, P < .0001). The ypTNM stage was lower in patients treated with NACT (P < .001). The major postoperative complication (POC) rate was lower in NACT patients (6.7% vs 24.4%, P = .02), as was hospital length of stay (10.8 vs 17 days, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

NACT allowed nodal and tumor downstaging. In addition, patients who underwent NACT had fewer POC and shorter length of hospital stay.

Performance of a machine learning-based decision model to help clinicians decide the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in gastric cancer before surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Controversy still exists on the optimal surgical resection for potentially curable gastric cancer (GC). Use of radiologic evaluation and machine learning algorithms might predict extent of lymphadenectomy to limit unnecessary surgical treatment. We purposed to design a machine learning-based clinical decision-support model for predicting extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in local advanced GC.

METHODS

Clinicoradiologic features available from routine clinical assignments in 557 patients with GCs were retrospectively interpreted by an expert panel blinded to all histopathologic information. All patients underwent surgery using standard D2 resection. Decision models were developed with a logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and auto-encoder (AE) algorithm in 371 training and tested in 186 test data, respectively. The primary end point was to measure diagnostic performance of decision model and a Japanese gastric cancer treatment guideline version 4th (JPN 4th) criteria for discriminate D1 (pT1 + pN0) versus D2 (≥ pT1 + ≥ pN1) lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

The decision model with AE analysis produced highest area under ROC curve (train: 0.965, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.948-0.978; test: 0.946, 95% CI 0.925-0.978), followed by SVM (train: 0.925, 95% CI 0.902-0.944; test: 0.942, 95% CI 0.922-0.973) and LR (train: 0.886, 95% CI 0.858-0.910; test: 0.891, 95% CI 0.891-0.952). By this improvement, overtreatment was reduced from 21.7% (121/557) by treat-all pattern, to 15.1% (84/557) by JPN 4th criteria, and to 0.7-0.9% (4-5/557) by the new approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision model with machine learning analysis demonstrates high accuracy for identifying patients who are candidates for D1 versus D2 resection. Its approximate 14-20% improvements in overtreatment compared to treat-all pattern and JPN 4th criteria potentially increase the number of patients with local advanced GCs who can safely avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy.

Effect of the degree of gastric filling on the measured thickness of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography

Imaging of gastric cancer thickness is closely associated with the depth of tumor invasion, which provides guidance for clinical staging and assists the evaluation of the effects of adjuvant therapy. However, it is unclear whether the measurement of thickness is affected by the degree of gastric filling, and its accuracy and reliability are under-reported. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of the degree of gastric filling on the measurement of gastric cancer thickness. A total of 38 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning at the Department of CT and MR in The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Shijiazhuang, China) between July and September 2016 were recruited, consisting of 21 newly diagnosed cases and 17 follow-up cases following non-surgical treatments. Plain scanning (prior to filling) and enhanced scanning in venous phase (following filling) were performed. Axial CT images prior to and following filling of the normal part of gastric wall and the lesions were compared. The same procedure was repeated on these participants 1 month later by the same radiologist, and the results were compared with those obtained previously. Normal gastric wall thickness prior to and following gastric filling was significantly different (all P<0.001) with the most substantial changes observed at the greater curvature. Lesion thickness prior to and following filling was similar in newly diagnosed patients, but significantly different in patients for re-examination (P<0.05). The two thickness measurements in the same patients were consistent. The measured thickness of gastric cancer in newly diagnosed patients was relatively stable, and could be used as an indicator in baseline CT examination. Maintaining a similar degree of gastric filling during re-examination could aid the accurate evaluation of treatment efficacy.

Adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric carcinoma: State of the art and perspectives

An estimated 990,000 new cases of gastric cancer are diagnosed worldwide each year. Surgical excision, the only chance for prolonged survival, is feasible in about 20% of cases. Even after surgery, the median survival is limited to 12 to 20 months due to the frequency of locoregional and/or metastatic recurrences. This led to clinical trials associating surgery with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments to improve tumor control and patient survival. The most studied modalities are perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. To date, evidence has shown a survival benefit for postoperative chemoradiotherapy and for perioperative chemotherapy. Phase III trials are ongoing to compare these two modalities. The aim of this review is to synthesize current knowledge about adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma, and to consider its prospects by integrating modern radiotherapy techniques.

Microrna-136 promotes proliferation and invasion ingastric cancer cells through Pten/Akt/P-Akt signaling pathway

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second most frequent cause of cancer-associated mortality in the world. Previous studies have revealed that expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) are associated with the initiation and progression of several types of cancer, including gastric cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated that the abnormal expression of miRNA-136 may serve a function in the progression of several types of human cancer. However, the expression pattern of miR-136, its functions and underlying molecular mechanisms in gastric cancer remain unresolved. In the present study, it was revealed that the expression of miR-136 was aberrantly up regulated in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines. The suppression of miR-136 was able to inhibit proliferation and invasion in gastric cancer cell lines. Furthermore, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) was identified as a direct target gene of miR-136 in gastric cancer. PTEN was under expressed in gastric cancer tissues compared with non-tumor gastric tissues, and PTEN expression was negatively correlated with miR-136 expression. Furthermore, PTEN overexpression mimics the effects of miR-136 knockdown on gastric cancer cells. Additionally, miR-136 under expression decreased phospho-(p) AKT expression, but did not affect AKT expression in gastric cancer cells. In conclusion, the data of the present study suggest that miR-136 acts as an oncogene in gastric cancer via regulation of the PTEN/AKT/p-AKT signaling pathway and may potentially serve as a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression in Unresectable Gastric Cancers: Relationship with CT Characteristics

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the qualitative CT features that correlate with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-expression in pathologically-proven gastric cancers.

Materials and Methods

A total of 181 patients with pathologically-proven unresectable gastric cancers with HER2-expression (HER2-positive [n = 32] and negative [n = 149]) were included. CT features of primary gastric and metastatic tumors were reviewed. The prevalence of each CT finding was compared in both groups. Thereafter, binary logistic regression determined the most significant differential CT features. Clinical outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

HER2-postive cancers showed lower clinical T stage (21.9% vs. 8.1%; p = 0.015), hyperattenuation on portal phase (62.5% vs. 30.9%; p = 0.003), and was more frequently metastasized to the liver (62.5% vs. 32.2%; p = 0.001), than HER2-negative cancers. On binary regression analysis, hyperattenuation of the tumor (odds ratio [OR], 4.68; p < 0.001) and hepatic metastasis (OR, 4.43; p = 0.001) were significant independent factors that predict HER2-positive cancers. Median survival of HER2-positive cancers (13.7 months) was significantly longer than HER2-negative cancers (9.6 months) (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

HER2-positive gastric cancers show less-advanced T stage, hyperattenuation on the portal phase, and frequently metastasize to the liver, as compared to HER2-negative cancers.

Expression and significance of annexin A2 in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and the association with E-cadherin

Annexin A2 is a calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding protein, involved in invasion, angiogenesis and migration in cancer cells. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the expression levels of annexin A2 and E-cadherin in gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), and to investigate the association between the expression of annexin A2 and that of E-cadherin and Ki67, in addition to various clinicopathological factors. This study included 126 patients that were histopathologically diagnosed with GAC. Tissue samples were acquired by surgical resection, and annexin A2 mRNA expression levels were determined using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Annexin A2, E-cadherin and Ki67 protein expression levels were detected using western blot analysis and/or immunohistochemical staining. The expression of annexin A2 mRNA and protein was significantly upregulated in the GAC tissues. Annexin A2 expression was detected in 52/126 cases (41.3%) of gastric cancer (GC), and correlations were identified between annexin A2 expression and Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage (P=0.002), lymph node metastasis (P=0.016) and distal metastasis (P=0.005). The positive expression rates of E-cadherin and Ki67 in the tumor tissue of patients with GAC were 27.8% (35/126) and 56.2% (71/126), respectively. A negative correlation was observed between the expression of annexin A2 and E-cadherin (P<0.001). No significant association was detected between the expression levels of annexin A2 and Ki67 (P=0.801). In conclusion, upregulated annexin A2 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis, distal metastasis, advanced TNM stage and E-cadherin expression in patients with GAC. The association between the expression of annexin A2 and that of E-cadherin may indicate an underlying mechanism by which annexin A2 contributes to the metastasis in GC, and thus annexin A2 may represent a potential target for the treatment of GAC.

CT differentiation of poorly-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumours from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours and gastric adenocarcinomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differential CT features of gastric poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (PD-NETs) from well-differentiated NETs (WD-NETs) and gastric adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and to suggest differential features of hepatic metastases from gastric NETs and ADCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study population was comprised of 36 patients with gastric NETs (18 WD-NETs, 18 PD-NETs) and 38 patients with gastric ADCs who served as our control group. Multiple CT features were assessed to identify significant differential CT findings of PD-NETs from WD-NETs and ADCs. In addition, CT features of hepatic metastases including the metastasis-to-liver ratio were analyzed to differentiate metastatic NETs from ADCs.

RESULTS

The presence of metastatic lymph nodes was the sole differentiator of PD-NETs from WD-NETs (P = .001, odds ratio = 56.67), while the presence of intact overlying mucosa with mucosal tenting was the sole significant CT feature differentiating PD-NETs from ADCs (P = .047, odds ratio = 15.3) For hepatic metastases, metastases from NETs were more hyper-attenuated than those from ADCs.

CONCLUSION

The presence of metastatic LNs and intact overlying mucosa with mucosal tenting are useful CT discriminators of PD-NETs from WD-NETs and ADCs, respectively. In addition, a higher metastasis-to-liver ratio may help differentiate hepatic metastases of gastric NETs from those of gastric ADCs with high accuracy.

KEY POINTS

• Presence of metastatic LNs is a useful differentiator of PD-NETs from WD-NETs. • Intact overlying mucosa with mucosal tenting suggests PD-NETs more than gastric ADCs. • Metastatic LNs are larger in size and greater in necrotic volume in PD-NETs. • Hepatic metastases from gastric NETs are more hyper-attenuated than those from ADCs.

The role of three-dimensional multidetector CT gastrography in the preoperative imaging of stomach cancer: emphasis on detection and localization of the tumor

Multidetector CT (MDCT) gastrography has been regarded as a promising technique for the preoperative imaging of gastric cancer. It has the ability to produce various three-dimensional (3D) images. Because 3D reconstruction images are more effective and intuitive for recognizing abnormal changes in the gastric folds and subtle mucosal nodularity than two-dimensional images, 3D MDCT gastrography can enhance the detection rate of early gastric cancer, which, in turn, contributes to the improvement of the accuracy of preoperative tumor (T) staging. In addition, shaded surface display and tissue transition projection images provide a global view of the stomach, with the exact location of gastric cancer, which may replace the need for barium studies. In this article, we discuss technical factors in producing high-quality MDCT gastrographic images and present cases demonstrating the usefulness of MDCT gastrography for the detection and T staging of gastric cancer while emphasizing the significance of preoperative localization of gastric cancer in terms of surgical margin.