Lamivudine treatment failure risks in chronic hepatitis B patients with low viral load

Targeting hepatitis B virus-associated nephropathy: efficacy and challenges of current antiviral treatments

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major global health challenge, affecting approximately 296 million people and causing significant mortality annually. Despite vaccination efforts, HBV prevalence persists, particularly in low- and middle-income regions and endemic areas like China. HBV is closely associated with various kidney diseases, including acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and glomerulonephritis, through mechanisms such as immune complex deposition, direct viral invasion, and chronic inflammation. Patients undergoing hemodialysis or kidney transplantation are at increased risk of HBV infection and reactivation, highlighting the need for effective preventive and therapeutic measures. This review examines the classification and clinical features of HBV-associated nephropathy, focusing on membranous nephropathy and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. It explores the pathogenesis, emphasizing immune complex deposition and podocyte apoptosis. Antiviral therapy, particularly with nucleos(t)ide analogs like entecavir and tenofovir (including TAF and TMF), demonstrates superior efficacy and safety compared to older agents such as lamivudine and adefovir. While interferon therapy offers benefits, its use is limited by adverse effects. Additionally, individualized treatment strategies for specific populations, including pregnant women and HIV co-infected patients, are crucial. Addressing HBV-associated nephropathy requires enhanced surveillance, timely antiviral intervention, and tailored therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes.

High treatment modification rates with lamivudine therapy in HBV-infected patients with low baseline viremia and early virological response: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

Low baseline viremia and an early treatment response predict the best outcomes in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients treated with nucleoside analogues with low barriers to resistance. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term results and effectiveness of lamivudine in patients with low baseline viremia and early virological treatment response.

METHODS

In this multicenter, real-life setting study, 111 antiviral-naive patients with low baseline viremia (HBV DNA <10(7) copies/mL) plus an early virological response (HBV DNA <300 copies/mL at week 24) treated with lamivudine were enrolled. The primary end-point was treatment failure, defined as the re-emergence of detectable viremia or at least a 1 log increase in HBV DNA, resulting in a titer of ≥ 300 copies/mL with lamivudine treatment after week 24, which required treatment modification.

RESULTS

Altogether 111 patients, including 78 non-cirrhotic and 33 cirrhotic patients, were included in the study. Treatment failure occurred in 30.8% of the non-cirrhotic patients over a median follow-up period of 32.5 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year treatment failure rates were 6.5%, 14.0%, 31.4%, 39.6% and 43.1%, respectively. Treatment failure occurred in 28.8% of the whole group. There were no differences between the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine treatment had a high treatment modification rate in patients with low baseline viremia and early virological response over a long-term follow-up in a real-life setting. The pretreatment and on-treatment favorable characteristics found in the studies with telbivudine appeared to be inapplicable to lamivudine.