A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Actovegin in Patients with Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: ARTEMIDA Study Design

The efficacy and safety of animal-derived nootropics in cognitive disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis

•

Animal-derived nootropics may have potential in treating cognitive disorders, especially vascular cognitive impairment.

•

Despite widespread use, there are few randomized controlled trials on animal derived nootropics for cognitive disorders.

•

Our review suggested modest beneficial effects of these nootropics, but the strength of supporting evidence was limited.

•

The clinical significance of the reviewed nootropics in treating vascular cognitive impairment remains unclear.

•

The findings of this review indicate promising evidence to justify further large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Background

The animal-derived nootropics, Cerebrolysin, Actovegin and Cortexin, may have potential in treating neurocognitive disorders. Although these drugs have international usage, reports on their efficacy have been conflicting. These agents have been suggested for all dementia types, but may have particular utility in vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). We used systematic review and meta-analyses to summarize evidence of efficacy in all cause dementia, with a subgroup analysis restricted to VCI.

Methods

We searched multidisciplinary, electronic databases from inception to August 2020. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool and framed results using GRADE criteria. We used random effects models to create summary estimates. Our primary outcome was change in cognition based on any quantitative cognitive assessment scale using standardized mean difference (SMD). We assessed various secondary efficacy outcomes and a safety outcome of serious adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses limited to VCI.

Results

Summary estimates suggested Cerebrolysin was potentially beneficial in improving cognition (8 trials,793 participants, SMD:-0.16, 95%CI:-0.30 to -0.03) and global function (4 trials,479 participants, OR:2.64, 95%CI:1.17 to 5.98) in the short term. There was no difference in incidence of serious adverse events (6 trials,1014 participants, RR:0.96, 95%CI:0.78 to 1.18). In our VCI subgroup, results were similar to the main analysis, with a beneficial effect on cognition (SMD:-0.22, 95%CI:-0.42 to -0.03) and clinical global impression (OR 2.99, 95%CI:1.02 to 8.73). The limited number of eligible studies for Actovegin (n = 2 trials,563 participants) and Cortexin, (n = 1 trial,80 participants) precluded meta-analyses but data suggested potential efficacy and no safety concerns. Across all included studies, risk of bias was moderate to high, there was imprecision, and certainty of evidence was considered low to very low.

Conclusion

Although published data suggest potential benefits and relative safety of animal derived nootropics, the supporting evidence is weak. The size of the effects demonstrated were modest and probably less than would be considered clinically relevant.

[Review of clinical guidelines for the treatment and prevention of ischemic stroke]

One of the leading causes of death, disability and severe maladaptation of patients is ischemic stroke, which accounts for about 80% of all types of acute cerebrovascular accidents. At the same time, approximately ²/₃ of the patients show residual effects of cerebral circulation disorders of varying severity. Currently, the problem of ischemic stroke attracts great attention and international and domestic recommendations developed for the prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of stroke patients are one of the aspects of work in this area. The article provides an overview of the latest clinical guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke of the American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association, as well as features of stroke therapy and prevention in Russia, Europe and USA.

ARTEMIDA Trial (A Randomized Trial of Efficacy, 12 Months International Double-Blind Actovegin): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Actovegin in Poststroke Cognitive Impairment

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background and Purpose—

Poststroke cognitive impairment is a debilitating consequence of stroke. The aim of this study was to assess whether Actovegin confers cognitive benefit in patients who have had an ischemic stroke.

Methods—

This was a 12-month, parallel-group, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eligible patients were ≥60 years of age with a Montreal Cognitive Assessment test score of ≤25 points. Patients were randomized into 2 groups within 1 week of acute supratentorial ischemic stroke in a 1:1 ratio: Actovegin (a deproteinized hemoderivative of calf blood, 2000 mg/d for ≤20 intravenous infusions followed by 1200 mg/d orally) or placebo for 6 months. Patients were treated in accordance with standard clinical practice for a further 6 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline in Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive subscale, extended version at 6 months.

Results—

Two-hundred forty-eight patients were randomized to Actovegin and 255 patients to placebo. At month 6, the least squares mean change from baseline in Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive subscale, extended version was −6.8 for Actovegin and −4.6 for placebo; the estimated treatment difference was −2.3 (95% confidence interval, −3.9, −0.7; P=0.005). Recurrent ischemic stroke was the most frequently reported serious adverse event, with a nonsignificantly higher number for Actovegin versus placebo.

Conclusions—

Actovegin had a beneficial effect on cognitive outcomes in patients with poststroke cognitive impairment. The safety experience was consistent with the known safety and tolerability profile of the drug. These results warrant confirmation in additional robustly designed studies.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01582854.

Towards the concept of disease-modifier in post-stroke or vascular cognitive impairment: a consensus report

BACKGROUND

Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is a complex spectrum encompassing post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and small vessel disease-related cognitive impairment. Despite the growing health, social, and economic burden of VCI, to date, no specific treatment is available, prompting the introduction of the concept of a disease modifier.

CONSENSUS AND SUGGESTIONS

Within this clinical spectrum, VCI and PSCI remain advancing conditions as neurodegenerative diseases with progression of both vascular and degenerative lesions accounting for cognitive decline. Disease-modifying strategies should integrate both pharmacological and non-pharmacological multimodal approaches, with pleiotropic effects targeting (1) endothelial and brain-blood barrier dysfunction; (2) neuronal death and axonal loss; (3) cerebral plasticity and compensatory mechanisms; and (4) degenerative-related protein misfolding. Moreover, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment in PSCI or VCI requires valid study designs clearly stating the definition of basic methodological issues, such as the instruments that should be used to measure eventual changes, the biomarker-based stratification of participants to be investigated, and statistical tests, as well as the inclusion and exclusion criteria that should be applied.

CONCLUSION

A consensus emerged to propose the development of a disease-modifying strategy in VCI and PSCI based on pleiotropic pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches.

Post-stroke dementia - a comprehensive review

Post-stroke dementia (PSD) or post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) may affect up to one third of stroke survivors. Various definitions of PSCI and PSD have been described. We propose PSD as a label for any dementia following stroke in temporal relation. Various tools are available to screen and assess cognition, with few PSD-specific instruments. Choice will depend on purpose of assessment, with differing instruments needed for brief screening (e.g., Montreal Cognitive Assessment) or diagnostic formulation (e.g., NINDS VCI battery). A comprehensive evaluation should include assessment of pre-stroke cognition (e.g., using Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly), mood (e.g., using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and functional consequences of cognitive impairments (e.g., using modified Rankin Scale). A large number of biomarkers for PSD, including indicators for genetic polymorphisms, biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum, inflammatory mediators, and peripheral microRNA profiles have been proposed. Currently, no specific biomarkers have been proven to robustly discriminate vulnerable patients ('at risk brains') from those with better prognosis or to discriminate Alzheimer's disease dementia from PSD. Further, neuroimaging is an important diagnostic tool in PSD. The role of computerized tomography is limited to demonstrating type and location of the underlying primary lesion and indicating atrophy and severe white matter changes. Magnetic resonance imaging is the key neuroimaging modality and has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting pathological changes, including small vessel disease. Advanced multi-modal imaging includes diffusion tensor imaging for fiber tracking, by which changes in networks can be detected. Quantitative imaging of cerebral blood flow and metabolism by positron emission tomography can differentiate between vascular dementia and degenerative dementia and show the interaction between vascular and metabolic changes. Additionally, inflammatory changes after ischemia in the brain can be detected, which may play a role together with amyloid deposition in the development of PSD. Prevention of PSD can be achieved by prevention of stroke. As treatment strategies to inhibit the development and mitigate the course of PSD, lowering of blood pressure, statins, neuroprotective drugs, and anti-inflammatory agents have all been studied without convincing evidence of efficacy. Lifestyle interventions, physical activity, and cognitive training have been recently tested, but large controlled trials are still missing.

Pharmacotherapy to Enhance Cognitive and Motor Recovery Following Stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of disability among older adults and more than half of stroke survivors have some residual neurological impairment. Traditionally, managing the aftermath of stroke has been by the implementation of several physical and language therapy modalities. The limitations of these rehabilitation efforts have sparked an interest in finding other ways to enhance neurological recovery. Some of these novel approaches have included pharmacological interventions, cell-derived treatments, and cortical magnetic stimulation. Mounting evidence over the last 2 decades suggests that pharmacological manipulations may have the potential to modulate practice-dependent neuroplasticity and potentially improve neurological recovery after stroke. Multiple pharmacological agents with different mechanisms of action have been evaluated, showing conflicting results. Some studies suggest some promise, yet the quality of the available studies is suboptimal overall, with most of the studies being underpowered. So far, the most promising agents include the antidepressants for motor recovery and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for aphasia. However, large, well-designed clinical trials are needed to address the shortcomings of the available data and before any pharmacological agent can be recommended for routine use as part of the standard algorithm of stroke management.

Understanding and preventing the development of post-stroke dementia

Post-stroke dementia (PSD) is a clinical entity but it now appears that most of PSD may be categorized as vascular dementia. The well-established relationship between vascular factors and dementia provides a rationale for the implementation of intervention and prevention efforts. Larger primary prevention trials related to lifestyle factors are warranted in association with dementia. Published clinical trials have not been promising and there is meager information on whether PSD can be prevented through the use of pharmacological agents. Control of vascular disease risk and prevention of recurrent strokes are obviously key to reducing the burden of cognitive decline and dementia after stroke. However, modern imaging and analysis techniques will help to elucidate the mechanism of PSD and establish better treatment.

Diabetes and the brain: issues and unmet needs

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of mild cognitive impairment, dementia and stroke. The association between DM and dementia appears to be stronger for vascular cognitive impairment than for Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting cerebrovascular disease may be an important factor in cognitive impairment in DM. Although the exact mechanisms by which DM affects the brain remain unclear, changes to brain vasculature, disturbances of cerebral insulin signaling, insulin resistance, glucose toxicity, oxidative stress, accumulation of advanced glycation end products, hypoglycemic episodes, and alterations in amyloid metabolism may all be involved. Cognitive impairment and dementia associated with DM may also be mediated via vascular risk factors, in particular brain ischemia, the occurrence of which can have an additive or synergistic effect with concomitant neurodegenerative processes. To date, no drug has been approved for the treatment of vascular dementia and there are no specific pharmacological treatments for preventing or reducing cognitive decline in patients with DM. Most focus has been on tighter management of vascular risk factors, although evidence of reduced cognitive decline through reducing blood pressure, lipid-lowering or tighter glycemic control is inconclusive. Tailored, multimodal therapies may be required to reduce the risk of cognitive dysfunction and decline in patients with DM. The use of pleiotropic drugs with multimodal mechanisms of action (e.g., cerebrolysin, Actovegin) may have a role in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction and their use may warrant further investigation in diabetic populations.