Predictive factors for spontaneous conception in women with moderate and severe endometriosis following operative laparoscopy: A cohort study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To externally validate the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) and to assess cumulative spontaneous pregnancy rates in women with moderate to severe endometriosis following fertility-enhancing minimally invasive surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care center for infertility treatment.

PARTICIPANTS

Women diagnosed with r-ASRM Stage III or IV endometriosis following fertility-sparing surgery between June 2013 and July 2023, and who desired for fertility.

INTERVENTION

Minimally invasive laparoscopy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The follow-up rate was 76.3 %, with a median duration of 15 months [Range (1-130 months)]. The mean age of women was 28.5 ± 3.8 years. Women with low EFI scores (0-3) had lower cumulative spontaneous pregnancy rates (11.4 % at six months, 17 % at three years) compared to those with higher EFI scores (7-8), who had significantly higher rates (35 % at six months, 84.5 % after three years) (P < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for overall pregnancy rates. Factors negatively correlated with spontaneous pregnancy included lower least function scores (P < 0.001), increasing maternal age (P = 0.003), rASRM scores of 16-40 vs. ≥ 71 (P < 0.001), lower antral follicle count (P = 0.02), and increasing paternal age (P < 0.001). Cystectomy (P = 0.001) was positively associated with spontaneous pregnancy post-surgery. Among the 518 women identified with moderate and severe endometriosis, 395 were followed up, out of which 370 attempted spontaneous conception for at least six months, resulting in a pregnancy rate of 37.3 % (138/370).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that EFI scores correlate with pregnancy rates, validating the scoring system in a South Asian population. Additionally, clinical factors such as low antral follicle count, and advanced paternal age may be considered to make informed clinical decisions post-surgery for women with advanced endometriosis who wish to conceive.

Epidemiology of infertility in women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a benign, chronic, inflammatory condition affecting up to 10 % of women and characterised by the presence of glands and stroma tissue outside the uterus. Epidemiological and clinical studies demonstrate a consistent association between endometriosis and infertility. However, this relationship is far to be clearly understood and several mechanisms are involved. Available data show that patients with endometriosis have an increased estimated risk of infertility between two and four times compared with the general population. On the other hand, the probability of patients with infertility to have endometriosis is reported up to about 50 % of the cases. Future studies should aim to better elucidate the mechanisms behind endometriosis-associated infertility in order to offer the more appropriate and tailored management for the patients.

Pelvic pain symptoms and endometriosis characteristics in relation to oxidative stress among adolescents and adults with and without surgically-confirmed endometriosis

Background: While the majority of reproductive-aged females will experience pelvic pain during their lives, biological mechanisms underlying pelvic pain are not well understood. We investigated associations between pelvic pain symptoms and oxidative stress among people with and without surgically-confirmed endometriosis. Methods: Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we measured 8-Hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in urine samples and corrected for creatinine levels in 434 surgically-confirmed endometriosis participants compared to 605 participants never diagnosed with endometriosis. At enrollment, participants reported details of their pelvic pain symptoms. Linear regression was used to compute geometric mean (GM) creatinine-corrected 8-OHdG levels with 95% confidence intervals (CI) among all participants and those with and without endometriosis separately, adjusting for potential confounders. Interactions by surgically-confirmed endometriosis status were tested by Wald statistics. Results: No trends in 8-OHdG were observed among those with or without endometriosis for severity or frequency of dysmenorrhea, acyclic pelvic pain, dyspareunia or pain with bowel movements. Among endometriosis participants, lower 8-OHdG levels were observed for participants with any white, blue/black, or brown lesions (GM=76.7 versus 82.9 ng/mg; p=0.10), which was primarily driven by lower levels of 8-OHdG for any blue/black lesions (GM=72.8 versus 81.6 ng/mg; p=0.05). Conclusion: While no associations were observed between 8-OHdG and pelvic pain symptoms, future research is needed to assess how other pathways of oxidative damage, e.g. through proteins or lipids, may affect endometriosis-associated symptoms. Additionally, further research is needed to understand differences in oxidative stress among endometriosis lesion sub-phenotypes.

Diagnostic value of the combination of circulating serum miRNAs and CA125 in endometriosis

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) can serve as noninvasive biomarkers for endometriosis, but their diagnostic and prognostic values require investigation. This study evaluated the potential of 6 miRNAs in diagnosing endometriosis and predicting fertility. The study included patients with endometriosis (stages I-IV) and controls admitted to Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital between May 2013 and March 2014. The serum expression levels of 6 miRNAs (miR-199a, miR-145*, miR-122, miR-9*, miR-141*, and miR-542-3p) were determined using qRT-PCR. Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy. The study included 155 patients with endometriosis and 77 controls. The model combining miR-199a, miR-122, miR-145*, and miR-141* with the carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) exhibited 81.8% sensitivity and 92.6% specificity and an area under the curve of 0.939 for diagnosing endometriosis. When combining miR-199a, miR-122, miR-145*, miR-542-3p, and CA125, the receiver operating characteristics curve showed an area under the curve of 0.759 and 79.6% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity for stage I/II versus III/IV endometriosis. Circulating miRNA levels were associated with pelvic adhesions (miR-199a, P < .05), lesion distribution (miR-9*, miR-145*, and miR-141*; all P < .05), and the presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis (miR-199a and miR-122; both P < .001). The expression levels of miR-199a, miR-122, and miR-542-3p decreased with an increasing endometriosis fertility index. The model combining circulating miRNAs (miR-199a, miR-122, miR-145*, and miR-141*) and CA125 is promising for diagnosing endometriosis and its severity. miR-199a, miR-122, and miR-542-3p were associated with the endometriosis fertility index and might be used to predict fertility preoperatively, but these results require confirmation.

Guideline No. 435: Minimally Invasive Surgery in Fertility Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefits and risks of minimally invasive procedures in the management of patients with infertility and provide guidance to gynaecologists who manage common conditions in these patients.

TARGET POPULATION

Patients with infertility (inability to conceive after 12 months of unprotected intercourse) undergoing investigation and treatment.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Minimally invasive reproductive surgery can be used to treat infertility, improve fertility treatment outcomes, or preserve fertility. All surgery has risks and associated complications. Reproductive surgery may not improve fertility outcomes and may, in some instances, damage ovarian reserve. All procedures have costs, which are borne either by the patient or their health insurance provider.

EVIDENCE

We searched English-language articles from January 2010 to May 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (see Appendix A for MeSH search terms).

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix B (Tables B1 for definitions and B2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Gynaecologists who manage common conditions in patients with infertility.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Directive clinique no 435 : Chirurgie minimalement invasive dans les traitements de fertilité

OBJECTIF

Évaluer les risques et bénéfices de la chirurgie minimalement invasive dans la prise en charge des patientes atteintes d'infertilité et fournir des conseils aux gynécologues qui prennent en charge les problèmes les plus fréquents chez ces patientes.

POPULATION CIBLE

Patientes atteintes d'infertilité (incapacité à concevoir après 12 mois de rapports sexuels non protégés) en processus diagnostique ou sous traitement. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: On peut recourir à la chirurgie de la reproduction minimalement invasive pour traiter l'infertilité, améliorer les résultats des traitements de fertilité ou préserver la fertilité. Toutes les interventions chirurgicales comportent des risques et des complications associées. La chirurgie de la reproduction n'améliore pas toujours la fertilité et peut, dans certains cas, compromettre la réserve ovarienne. Toutes les interventions entraînent des coûts, lesquels sont assumés par la patiente ou son assureur. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été faites dans les bases de données PubMed-Medline, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus et Cochrane Library pour répertorier les articles publiés en anglais dans la période de janvier 2010 à mai 2021 (voir les termes de recherche MeSH à l'annexe A). MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe B en ligne (tableau B1 pour les définitions et tableau B2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Gynécologues qui prennent en charge les affections courantes chez les patientes atteintes d'infertilité. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Endometriosis and Infertility: Prognostic Value of #Enzian Classification Compared to rASRM and EFI Score

This study’s objective was to compare the predictive validity of the three most utilized classification scores for endometriosis, #Enzian, EFI, and rASRM, in achieving a spontaneous pregnancy or pregnancy via assisted reproductive technology (ART) after surgery for endometriosis. The monocentric retrospective study was carried out from January 2012 to December 2021 at the gynaecology department of the cantonal hospital of Fribourg. Patients consulting for infertility and operated on for endometriosis with histological confirmation were included. The predictive value of #Enzian, rASRM, and EFI was evaluated and compared concerning the prediction of fertility after surgery, both spontaneous and ART, during the following 12 months. A total of 58 women (mean age 33.1 ± 4.57 years) were included. Overall, 30 women achieved a pregnancy, seven spontaneously. Among all women who achieved a pregnancy, there was a lower prevalence of rASRM stage III−IV (16.67% vs. 39.29%, p = 0.054). Women achieving a pregnancy had a significantly higher EFI score than others (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed concerning the #Enzian score. In conclusion, the revised #Enzian score is not correlated with pregnancy achievement; EFI score is the only score significantly associated with the pregnancy outcome in women affected by endometriosis.

Outcomes between non-IVF and IVF treatment after laparoscopic conservative surgery of advanced endometriosis with Endometriosis Fertility Index score >3

Surgical excision of advanced endometriosis has been demonstrated to improve women's pain symptoms and quality of life in women in randomized placebo-controlled trials, but there is no strong evidence regarding the live birth rate. The revised American Fertility Society (r-AFS) classification for endometriosis has a limited predictive ability for fertility outcomes after surgery; therefore, EFI scoring has been advised for predicting conception after endometriosis surgery. No randomized controlled trials have investigated fertility outcomes in patients with advanced endometriosis after surgery. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or non-IVF treatments after conservative surgery for advanced endometriosis in patients with good prognosis Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) scores (>3). This prospective cohort study was conducted between April 2014 and April 2019 at a tertiary research hospital. In total, 113 women with suspected preoperative advanced endometriosis were enrolled in this study. A total of 90 women with advanced endometriosis underwent laparoscopic surgery. Fourteen patients with EFI score of ≤3 and 3 of them who had bilateral tubal occlusion were also excluded. Seventy-three women were included in this study. The remaining 30 women in the non-IVF group and 32 women in the IVF group were analyzed. The main outcome measures were cumulative pregnancy rates and live birth rates in both groups. Women who underwent IVF treatment were older than women (30 ± 3.41) who had non-IVF treatment (26.5 ± 3.07) after laparoscopic surgery (P < .001). The remaining baseline characteristics of the patients in both groups were similar. Clinical pregnancy, abortion, and live birth rates were similar in both the groups after 36 months of follow-up. This study demonstrated that cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were similar to those of non-IVF or IVF treatments after conservative surgery for advanced endometriosis, if patients had good prognosis EFI scores. Furthermore, non-IVF treatments resulted in nearly the same clinical pregnancy results as IVF treatment within 1 year after surgery.

Endometriosis Classification, Staging and Reporting Systems: A Review on the Road to a Universally Accepted Endometriosis Classification

OBJECTIVE

In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed. Which endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published and validated for use in clinical practice?

DATA SOURCES

A systematic PUBMED literature search was performed. Data were extracted and summarized.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

na TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Twenty-two endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published between 1973 and 2021, each developed for specific, and different, purposes. There still is no international agreement on how to describe the disease. Studies evaluating the different systems are summarized showing a discrepancy between the intended and the evaluated purpose, and a general lack of validation data confirming a correlation with pain symptoms or quality of life for any of the current systems. A few studies confirm the value of the ENZIAN system for surgical description of deep endometriosis. With regards to infertility, the endometriosis fertility index has been confirmed valid for its intended purpose.

CONCLUSION

Of the 22 endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems identified in this historical overview, only a few have been evaluated for the purpose for which they were developed. The literature search was limited to PUBMED. Unpublished classification, staging or reporting systems, or those published in books were not considered. It can be concluded that there is no international agreement on how to describe endometriosis or how to classify it, and that most classification/staging systems show no or very little correlation with patient outcomes. This overview of existing systems is a first step in working towards a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classification. Hum Reprod Open 2021;2021:hoab025. [PMID: 34693032 PMCID: PMC8530712 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab025]

STUDY QUESTION

Which endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published and validated for use in clinical practice?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Of the 22 endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems identified in this historical overview, only a few have been evaluated, in 46 studies, for the purpose for which they were developed.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A systematic PUBMED literature search was performed. Data were extracted and summarized.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Twenty-two endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published between 1973 and 2021, each developed for specific, and different, purposes. There still is no international agreement on how to describe the disease. Studies evaluating the different systems are summarized showing a discrepancy between the intended and the evaluated purpose, and a general lack of validation data confirming a correlation with pain symptoms or quality of life for any of the current systems. A few studies confirm the value of the ENZIAN system for surgical description of deep endometriosis. With regards to infertility, the endometriosis fertility index has been confirmed valid for its intended purpose.

LARGE SCALE DATA

NA.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The literature search was limited to PUBMED. Unpublished classification, staging or reporting systems, or those published in books were not considered.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

It can be concluded that there is no international agreement on how to describe endometriosis or how to classify it, and that most classification/staging systems show no or very little correlation with patient outcomes. This overview of existing systems is a first step in working toward a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The meetings and activities of the working group were funded by the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and World Endometriosis Society. A.W.H. reports grant funding from the MRC, NIHR, CSO, Wellbeing of Women, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring, Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust, Standard Life, Consultancy fees from Roche Diagnostics, AbbVie, Nordic Pharma and Ferring, outside the submitted work. In addition, A.W.H. has a patent Serum biomarker for endometriosis pending. N.P.J. reports personal fees from Abbott, Guerbet, Myovant Sciences, Vifor Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work; he is also President of the World Endometriosis Society and chair of the trust board. S.M. reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, and personal fees from Roche outside the submitted work. C.T. reports grants, non-financial support and other from Merck SA, non-financial support and other from Gedeon Richter, non-financial support from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work and without private revenue. K.T.Z. reports grants from Bayer Healthcare, MDNA Life Sciences, Roche Diagnostics Inc, Volition Rx, outside the submitted work; she is also a Board member (Secretary) of the World Endometriosis Society and World Endometriosis Research Foundation, Research Advisory Board member of Wellbeing of Women, UK (research charity), and Chair, Research Directions Working Group, World Endometriosis Society. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NA.

Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classification

Background

In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed. However, endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems that have been published and validated for use in clinical practice have not been systematically reviewed up to now.

Objectives

The aim of the current review is to provide a historical overview of these different systems based on an assessment of published studies.

Materials and Methods

A systematic Pubmed literature search was performed. Data were extracted and summarised.

Results

Twenty-two endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published between 1973 and 2021, each developed for specific and different purposes. There is still no international agreement on how to describe the disease. Studies evaluating different systems are summarised showing a discrepancy between the intended and the evaluated purpose, and a general lack of validation data confirming a correlation with pain symptoms or quality of life for any of the current systems. A few studies confirm the value of the Enzian system for surgical description of deep endometriosis. With regards to infertility, the endometriosis fertility index has been confirmed valid for its intended purpose.

Conclusions

Of the 22 endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems identified in this historical overview, only a few have been evaluated, in 46 studies, for the purpose for which they were developed. It can be concluded that there is no international agreement on how to describe endometriosis or how to classify it, and that most classification/staging systems show no or very little correlation with patient outcomes.

What is new?

This overview of existing systems is a first step in working towards a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

Patterns of Immune Infiltration in Endometriosis and Their Relationship to r-AFS Stages

Background: Endometriosis (EMS) is an estrogen-dependent disease in which endometrial glands and stroma arise outside the uterus. Current studies have suggested that the number and function of immune cells are abnormal in the abdominal fluid and ectopic lesion tissues of patients with EMS. The developed CIBERSORT method allows immune cell profiling by the deconvolution of gene expression microarray data. Methods: By applying CIBERSORT, we assessed the relative proportions of immune cells in 68 normal endometrial tissues (NO), 112 eutopic endometrial tissues (EU) and 24 ectopic endometrial tissues (EC). The obtained immune cell profiles provided enumeration and activation status of 22 immune cell subtypes. We obtained associations between the immune cell environment and EMS r-AFS stages. Macrophages were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 60 patients with ovarian endometriomas. Results: Total natural killer (NK) cells were significantly decreased in EC, while plasma cells and resting CD4 memory T cells were increased in EC. Total macrophages in EC were significantly increased compared to those of EU and NO, and M2 macrophages were the primary macrophages in EC. Compared to those of EC from patients with r-AFS stage I ~ II, M2 macrophages in EC from patients with stage III ~ IV were significantly increased. IHC experiments showed that total macrophages were increased in EC, with M2 macrophages being the primary subtype. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that deconvolution of gene expression data by CIBERSORT provides valuable information about immune cell composition in EMS.

Estimation of the Endometriosis Fertility Index prior to operative laparoscopy

STUDY QUESTION

Can the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) be estimated accurately before surgery?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The EFI can be estimated accurately based on mere clinical/ultrasound information, with some improvement after adding data from diagnostic laparoscopy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The EFI is a validated clinical instrument predicting the probability of pregnancy after endometriosis surgery without the use of ART. Being an end-of-surgery-score, it implies the decision for operative laparoscopy to be made in advance-hence, its role in the pre-surgical decision-making process remains to be established.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Single-cohort prospective observational study in 82 patients undergoing complete endometriosis excision (between June and December 2016). Two methods were used to estimate the final EFI: type A based on non-surgical clinical/ultrasound findings only, and type B based on the combination of non-surgical clinical/ultrasound findings and diagnostic laparoscopy data. To calculate EFI type A, an algorithm was created to translate non-surgical clinical/imaging information into rASRM (revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine)-and EFI points. EFI type A and type B estimates were assessed for their clinical and numerical agreement with the final EFI score. Agreement was defined as clinical if EFI scores were within the same range (0-4, 5-6, 7-10), and numerical if their difference was ≤1.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All 82 patients underwent complete laparoscopic CO2-laser excision of any rASRM stage of endometriosis in the Leuven University Fertility Centre (LUFC) of University Hospitals Leuven, a tertiary referral centre for both endometriosis and infertility. An anonymized clinical research file was created. For each patient, three different data sets were created, in order to allow the estimation of the (surgical part) EFI and of the rASRM scores, defined as follows: 'Estimated type A' contained only non-surgical clinical/imaging data, 'Estimated type B' included type A information plus the information of the diagnostic laparoscopy and 'Final EFI' included information of type A, type B and all intra-operative information required to calculate the final EFI. To calculate EFI type A without surgical information, a set of rules was used to translate pre-surgical clinical/imaging information into (rASRM and EFI points). Scoring was done by one person (C.T.), with a time interval of 4 weeks between sessions for each EFI type. Next to the EFI, also rASRM score and stage were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Agreement rate between estimated EFI type A and final EFI was high for both the clinical (0.915; 95% CI 0.832-0.965) and numerical definition (0.878; 95% CI 0.787-0.940). Agreement rates between estimated EFI type B and final EFI were even higher (clinical (0.988; 95% CI 0.934-1.000), numerical (0.963; 95% CI 0.897-0.992)).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Type A estimation is dependent on high-level gynaecological ultrasound expertise, which may not be available in all clinics. A small number of patients had no prior clinical, ultrasound (hard markers) or surgical confirmation of the diagnosis of endometriosis. When applying the estimated EFI type A in clinical practice, a priori assumptions of the presence or absence of endometriosis will need to be made in adjunct to the estimation of the estimated type A EFI when counselling patients on the potential benefit of an (at least diagnostic) laparoscopy. The level of agreement for type A or B should also be taken into account when counselling patients on the type of efforts undertaken to attempt to diagnose or rule out endometriosis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

As this study reports, the EFI can be estimated accurately based on clinical/ultrasound data only without the need for any surgical data. This means that the EFI could be used as an instrument to guide joint physician-patient decision-making between surgery, ART or other fertility management options for the individualized treatment of women with endometriosis-related infertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

During this study period, C.T. was supported by FWO (Research Fund Flanders, Grant number 1700816N) and UZ Leuven KOF (University Hospitals Leuven, Klinisch Onderzoeksfonds).The LUFC received unrestricted research grants from Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck SA. Gedeon Richter and MSD sponsored travel to and attendance at scientific meetings. C.M. received consultancy fees from Lumenis (paid to KU Leuven, no private revenue). T.D. has been vice-president and head of global medical affairs infertility for the multinational pharmaceutical company Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) since 1 October 2015. He continues his academic appointment on a part-time basis as Professor of Reproductive Medicine at the University of Leuven (KU Leuven). T.D. has been vice-president and head of global medical affairs infertility for the multinational pharmaceutical company Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) since October 2015. He is also a Guest Professor in Reproductive Medicine and Biology at the Department of Development and Regeneration, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Belgium, and an Adjunct Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the University of Yale, New Haven, USA. This work was initiated before he joined Merck KGaA in October 2015, and completed during the subsequent years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

study registration number at UZ Leuven Clinical Trial Centre: S59221.

Classification of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic disease associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Several classification systems for the severity of endometriosis have been proposed. Of these, the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification is the most well-known. The ENZIAN classification was developed to classify deep infiltrating endometriosis and focused on the retroperitoneal structures. The endometriosis fertility index was developed to predict the fertility outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for endometriosis. Finally, the American Association of Gynecological Laparoscopists classification is currently being developed, for which 30 endometriosis experts are analyzing and researching data by assigning scores to categories considered important; however, it has not yet been fully validated and published. Currently, none of the classification systems are considered the gold standard. In this article, we review the classification systems, identify their pros and cons, and discuss what improvements need to be made to each system in the future.

Analysis of factors related to fertility after endometriosis combined with infertility laparoscopic surgery

To investigate the influence factors of laparoscopic postoperative pregnancy of patients with endometriosis and infertility, further validate the application of EFI scoring system in endometriosis, and to improve the pregnancy rate.A total of 258 patients with endometriosis and infertility who underwent laparoscopic surgery and follow-up treatment at Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were selected and divided into pregnant and non-pregnant groups according to whether they were pregnant. All patients were divided into 4 groups according to EFI score: group with EFI score ≥9, 7-8, 4-6, and <4, and divided into I, II, III, and IV groups according to AFS stages. The uterus-laparoscopic surgery was performed. The patients were followed up for 3 years. The factors affecting the pregnancy rate were analyzed. The pregnancy rate and pregnancy types were calculated at different time points.Multivariate analysis showed that age <35 years, infertility time <5 years, secondary infertility, EFI score, postoperative ART application were protection factors of postoperative pregnancy. The 3-year cumulative postoperative pregnancy rate was 75.6%. The cumulative pregnancy rate was 92.2% in group with EFI score ≥9, 85.9% in group with EFI score 7-8, 62.5% in group with EFI score 4-6 and 5.9% in group with EFI score <4, there was significant difference between the 4 groups (P < .05). The proportion of pregnancies in 6 months and 12 months was higher in patients with EFI score ≥7, 61.0% in patients with EFI score ≥9 and 41.1% in patients with EFI score ≥7. The highest natural pregnancy rate was 83.1% in group with EFI score ≥9, and there was significant difference between the 4 groups (P < .05).Age <35 years, infertility time <5 years, secondary infertility, EFI score and ART application were the protective factors of postoperative pregnancy. EFI score had positive significance in predicting and guiding the postoperative pregnancy of patients with endometriosis and infertility. According to EFI score, the pregnancy rate of patients with endometriosis and infertility can be significantly improved by strict management and active pregnancy program.

Negative Sliding Sign during Dynamic Ultrasonography Predicts Low Endometriosis Fertility Index at Laparoscopy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis fertility index (EFI) is a robust tool to predict the pregnancy rate in patients with endometriosis who are attempting non-in vitro fertilization conception. However, EFI calculation requires laparoscopy. Newly established imaging techniques such as sliding sign, which is used to diagnose pouch of Douglas obliteration, could provide a promising alternative. The objective of this study was to investigate the practicality of using ultrasound data to predict a low EFI (score ≤6).

DESIGN

Observational study from a prospective registry (Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort, clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02911090). Analyzed data were captured from December 2013 to June 2017.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center at British Columbia Women's Hospital.

PATIENTS

We analyzed data for 2583 participants from the Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort. In this cross-sectional study, we included 86 women aged <40 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Dynamic ultrasonography for the sliding sign testing and EFI calculation during laparoscopic surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Logistic regression was used to obtain receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction models. Significance was p <.05. Patients with a negative sliding sign were older and had severe endometriosis and longer duration of infertility. Patients with a negative sliding sign had significantly lower total EFI scores and lower surgical factors scores than patients with a positive sliding sign. Logistic regression showed that a negative sliding sign and EFI historic factors score can predict an EFI score ≤6 (sensitivity = 87.9%, specificity = 81.1%, AUC = 0.93 [95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.98]). Adding the diagnosis of endometrioma to the previous prediction model resulted in AUC = 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.995), sensitivity = 84.8%, and specificity = 92.5%.

CONCLUSION

The sliding sign could be a potential alternative to the EFI surgical factors, and it could be used in combination with EFI historic factors and the diagnosis of endometrioma to predict an EFI score ≤6 for patients who are not scheduled for immediate surgery.

Fertility Outcomes After Laparoscopic Cystectomy in Infertile Patients with Stage III-IV Endometriosis: a Cohort with 6-10 years of Follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian endometriosis is the most common type of endometriosis (EM), affecting more than 40% of women with EM. Currently, surgical intervention is still controversial in infertile patients with ovarian endometriosis, especially in those with stage III-IV EM. Very few studies have been done to analyze long-term pregnancy results in patients with endometrioma more than 5 years after surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the pregnancy outcomes and the related factors in patients with endometrioma and stage III-IV endometriosis during a long-term follow-up postoperatively.

METHODS

We collected 347 patients with ovarian endometriosis, which included 59 infertile patients with stage III-IV endometriosis who had a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up after undergoing laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas performed by a single doctor at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2009 to April 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 59 infertile patients were recruited. The mean age was 31.8 ± 3.6 years. The mean size of the endometriomas was 6.8 ± 3.3 cm. Before surgery, dysmenorrhea was present in 88.1% (52/59) of the cases, while chronic pelvic pain was reported in nine cases (15.3%). A total of 20.3% (12/59) of cases were concurrent with leiomyoma, 52.5% (31/59) with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and 39.0% (23/59) with adenomyosis. During laparoscopy, 21 cases were diagnosed as stage III (35.6%) and 38 as stage IV (64.4%) EM according to the revised American Fertility Society (AFS) classification. After laparoscopic cystectomy, 38 (64.4%) patients became successfully pregnant by the 5th year. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the postoperative pregnancy outcomes. In univariate analysis, the higher mean age and concurrent diagnosis of adenomyosis were seen to be related to poor postoperative pregnancy outcomes (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, however, the mean age, chronic pelvic pain (CPP), and adenomyosis were independent risk factors of pregnancy outcomes between the two groups (p < 0.05). With a minimum follow-up of 6 years, 23.7% (14/59) of recurrence was observed in the entire study cohort.

CONCLUSION

Infertile patients with endometrioma and stage III-IV EM may have lower pregnancy rates after laparoscopic cystectomy if they are older and present with CPP and adenomyosis. Our data showed a lower rate of recurrence but a higher rate of pregnancy after surgery.

Endometriosis fertility index for predicting non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy after endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Results of studies that have assessed the accuracy of the endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) for predicting non-assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

We intended to evaluate the accuracy of EFI for the prediction of non-ART pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science were searched up to 5 October 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies that used EFI to predict non-ART pregnancy in women with surgically documented endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A total of 5547 studies were identified, from which we included 17 studies on 4598 women in the meta-analysis. Eight studies were classified as good quality, and the rest were considered to be of fair quality. Only five (29.41%) studies used appropriate approaches to account for potential confounders. Pooled effect sizes with corresponding 95% CI were calculated using random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

The cumulative non-ART pregnancy rate at 36 months was 10% (95% CI: 3, 16%; P < 0.001) for women with an EFI of 0-2, which significantly increased to 69% (95% CI: 58, 79%; P < 0.001) for women with an EFI of 9-10. Compared with women with an EFI of 3-4 (18%, 95% CI: 12, 24%; P < 0.001), the combined cumulative non-ART pregnancy rates were 44% (95% CI: 26, 63%; P < 0.001) for women with an EFT of 5-6 and 55% (95% CI: 47, 64%; P < 0.001) for women with an EFI of 7-8. Paired comparison by the chi-square test showed a significant difference between all categories (P < 0.001). The odds ratio (OR) for EFI was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.49, P < 0.001) and the summary area under the curve (AUC) was 72% (95% CI: 65, 80%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The current findings highlighted the good performance of the EFI score in predicting the non-ART pregnancy rate. However, these findings should be considered with caution because of the substantial heterogeneity between studies.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Review findings show the merits of Endometriosis Fertility Index as having a prognostic ability for non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy.

Clinical utility of combined preimplantation genetic testing methods in couples at risk of passing on beta thalassemia/hemoglobin E disease: A retrospective review from a single center

Thalassemia and hemoglobinopathy is a group of hereditary blood disorder with diverse clinical manifestation inherited by autosomal recessive manner. The Beta thalassemia/Hemoglobin E disease (HbE/βthal) causes a variable degree of hemolysis and the most severe form of HbE/βthal disease develop a lifelong transfusion-dependent anemia. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is an established procedure of embryo genetic analysis to avoid the risk of passing on this particular condition from the carrier parents to their offspring. Preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (PGT-A) also facilitates the selection of embryos without chromosomal aberration resulting in the successful embryo implantation rate. Herein, we study the clinical outcome of using combined PGT-M and PGT-A in couples at risk of passing on HbE/βthal disease. The study was performed from January 2016 to December 2017. PGT-M was developed using short tandem repeat linkage analysis around the beta globin gene cluster and direct mutation testing using primer extension-based mini-sequencing. Thereafter, we recruited 15 couples at risk of passing on HbE/βthal disease who underwent a combined total of 22 IVF cycles. PGT was performed in 106 embryos with a 3.89% allele drop-out rate. Using combined PGT-M and PGT-A methods, 80% of women obtained satisfactory genetic testing results and were able to undergo embryo transfer within the first two cycles. The successful implantation rate was 64.29%. PGT accuracy was evaluated by prenatal and postnatal genetic confirmation and 100% had a genetic status consistent with PGT results. The overall clinical outcome of successful live birth for couples at risk of producing offspring with HbE/βthal was 53.33%. Conclusively, combined PGT-M and PGT-A is a useful technology to prevent HbE/βthal disease in the offspring of recessive carriers.

Reproducibility of the Endometriosis Fertility Index: a prospective inter-/intra-rater agreement study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reproducibility of the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI).

DESIGN

Single-cohort prospective observational study.

SETTING

University hospital.

POPULATION

Women undergoing laparoscopic resection of any rASRM-stage endometriosis.

METHODS

Details of pre- and peroperative findings were collected into a coded research file. EFI scoring was performed en-bloc by three different raters (expert-1 [C.T.], expert-2 [C.M.], junior [C.B.]). Required sample size: 71. Definitions used for agreement: clinical (scores within same range: 0-4, 5-6, 7-10) and numerical (difference ≤1 EFI point).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome: rate of clinical agreement between two experts.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

expert numerical agreement, clinical and numerical agreement between expert-1 and junior, and within expert-1 (intra-observer), agreement of rASRM score and -stage.

RESULTS

A near 'inter-expert' clinical agreement rate (1.000, 95% CI 0.956-1.000; P = 0.0149) was observed. The numerical agreement between two experts was also high (0.988, 95% CI 0.934-1.000); similarly, high agreement rates were observed for both 'junior-expert' comparisons (clinical 0 .963, 95% CI 0.897-0.992; numerical 0.988, 95% CI 0.934-1.000) and 'intra-expert' comparisons (clinical 0.988, 95% CI 0.934-1.000; numerical 1.000, 95% CI 0.956-1.000). Reasons for disagreements were different scoring of the least-function score and disagreements in rASRM scores. The reproducibility of the rASRM score was clearly inferior to that of the EFI for all comparisons.

CONCLUSION

The EFI can be reproduced reliably by different raters, further supporting its use in daily clinical practice as the principal clinical tool for postoperative fertility counselling/management of women with endometriosis.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

A study confirming the high reproducibility of the EFI substantiates its use in daily clinical practice.

The Clinical Anatomy of Endometriosis: A Review

Endometriosis is a gynecological disorder identified by the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue outside the uterus. Largely, it affects reproductive-aged women and is a major cause of infertility. Clinical manifestations of endometriosis include dyspareunia, cyclic menstrual pain, chronic pelvic pain, and dyschezia, all of which can affect the patient's quality of life and health severely; therefore, it is paramount that medical treatment is initiated as soon as endometriosis is suspected clinically. In this review, we examine the known anatomic principles of endometriosis in the literature and outline ways to manage patients with this condition better.

Endometriosis fertility index predicts live births following surgical resection of moderate and severe endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

Can live birth be accurately predicted following surgical resection of moderate-severe (Stage III-IV) endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Live births can accurately be predicted with the endometriosis fertility index (EFI), with adnexal function being the most important factor to predict non-assisted reproductive technology (non-ART) fertility or the requirement for ART (www.endometriosisefi.com).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Fertility prognosis is important to many women with severe endometriosis. Controversy persists regarding optimal post-operative management to achieve pregnancy and the counselling of patients regarding duration of conventional treatments before undergoing ART. The EFI is reported to correlate with expectant management pregnancy rate, although external validation has been performed without specifically addressing fertility in women with moderate and severe endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective cohort study of 279 women from September 2001 to June 2016.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS

We included women undergoing laparoscopic resection of Stage III-IV endometriosis who attempted pregnancy post-operatively. The EFI was calculated based on detailed operative reports and surgical images. Fertility outcomes were obtained by direct patient contact. Kaplan-Meier model, log rank test and Cox regression were used for analyses.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The follow-up rate was 84% with a mean duration of 4.1 years. A total of 147 women (63%) had a live birth following surgery, 94 of them (64%) without ART. The EFI was highly associated with live births (P < 0.001): for women with an EFI of 0-2 the estimated cumulative non-ART live birth rate at five years was 0% and steadily increased up to 91% with an EFI of 9-10, while the proportion of women who attempted ART and had a live birth, steadily increased from 38 to 71% among the same EFI strata (P = 0.1). A low least function score was the most significant predictor of failure (P = 0.003), followed by having had a previous resection (P = 0.019) or incomplete resection (P = 0.028), being older than 40 compared to <35 years of age (P = 0.027), and having leiomyomas (P = 0.037).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design. Imprecision was higher with low EFI due to smaller sample size in this subgroup. Finally, the EFI is somewhat subjective and could be prone to intra- and inter-observer variations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Women with a high EFI score have excellent fertility prognosis and may be advised to try to become pregnant with timed intercourse compared to women with a low score, for which prompt referral to ART seems more reasonable. Other prognostic factors can be used to guide the management of women with an intermediate EFI score. These data follow women over many years post-resection and represent longitudinal fertility data rarely demonstrated in such a cohort. The location and impact of lesions on the ability of the adnexa to function seems crucial for the fertility prognosis and should be further investigated.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by the GRACE Research funds. S.M.-L. is the recipient of a Training Award from the Fonds de Recherche Quebec-Sante. D.A. is the primary author of the Endometriosis Fertility Index. All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Endometriosis and infertility: Insights into the causal link and management strategies

When evaluating the correlation between endometriosis and infertility with application of the evidence-based guidelines to establish causality in medicine, it becomes apparent that endometriosis causes infertility. This is supported by a strong and consistent association between the two in various settings (prevalence, natural conception, intrauterine insemination (IUI), and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs)), evidence for a temporal relation, arguments for a dose-response gradient, and proven effects of the removal of lesions on infertility. Next to surgical treatment of endometriosis lesions, medically assisted reproduction treatments such as IUI and ART such as in vitro fertilization are cornerstones of the management of endometriosis-related infertility. Because the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) staging system is poorly correlated with pregnancy rates as opposed to the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI), the latter should be used as the preferred clinical tool to counsel patients on their postoperative fertility management options.

Endometriosis Fertility Index for Predicting Pregnancy after Endometriosis Surgery

BACKGROUND

The endometriosis fertility index (EFI) has a predictive value for pregnancy after surgery. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is a good treatment to infertility. This study aimed to provide external validation of EFI, assess the factors affecting the ability of EFI to predict cumulative spontaneous pregnancy rates (PRs), and propose reasonable advice for treatment by evaluating the effect of infertility management combining surgery and IVF-ET.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 345 endometriosis-related infertile women after laparoscopic surgery from January 2012 to January 2016. Among them, 234 patients tried to conceive naturally and were divided into six groups according to their different EFI scores. Of the 345 patients, 307 with an EFI score ≥5 were divided into non-IVF-ET group (n = 209) and IVE-ET group (n = 98) to compare the cumulative PRs. Cumulative PRs' curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimate and the differences were evaluated by log-rank test. Independent predictive factors for pregnancy were assessed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Significant differences in spontaneous PRs among different EFI scores were identified (χ2=29.945, P< 0.05). The least function score was proved to be the most important factor for EFI (χ2 = 6.931, P< 0.05) staging system. In patients with an EFI score ≥5 after 12 months from surgery, the cumulative PRs of those who received both surgery and IVF-ET were much higher than the spontaneous PRs of those who received surgery alone (χ2=4.160, P= 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

The EFI is a reliable staging system to predict the spontaneous PR of patients. The least function score was the most influential factor to predict the spontaneous PR. Patients with an EFI score ≥5 after 12 months from surgery are recommended to receive IVF-ET to achieve a higher PR.

Pregnancy Rates after Intrauterine Insemination in Moderate to Severe Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in moderate to severe endometriosis patients, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted since the role of this treatment strategy in these patients is a matter of debate in the literature. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl, and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 1, 2016. Studies including moderate to severe endometriosis patients reporting pregnancy rates after IUI were selected. The primary outcome was live birth after IUI treatment compared to expectant management. Secondary noncomparative outcomes were live birth and clinical pregnancy, which were presented as weighed mean pregnancy rates. Nineteen articles (2 unclear design, 11 retrospective, 6 prospective) were included for the analysis. Our primary outcome measure was only addressed by one study, showing an odds ratio of 1.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–3.63) on live birth favoring IUI versus no treatment. The calculated weighed mean live birth and clinical pregnancy rate per patient was 20.3% (95% CI, 11.2–29.4) and 32.7% (95% CI, 21.3– 44.0), respectively. This meta-analysis of observational data showed that IUI could be a feasible treatment in moderate to severe endometriosis. Whether this treatment should be structurally offered prior to in vitro fertilization needs to be investigated in a randomized, controlled trial, including time-to-pregnancy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

Research Priorities for Endometriosis

The 3rd International Consensus Workshop on Research Priorities in Endometriosis was held in São Paulo on May 4, 2014, following the 12th World Congress on Endometriosis. The workshop was attended by 60 participants from 19 countries and was divided into 5 main sessions covering pathogenesis/pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis/classification/prognosis, disease/symptom management, and research policy. This research priorities consensus statement builds on earlier efforts to develop research directions for endometriosis. Of the 56 research recommendations from the 2011 meeting in Montpellier, a total of 41 remained unchanged, 13 were updated, and 2 were deemed to be completed. Fifty-three new research recommendations were made at the 2014 meeting in Sao Paulo, which in addition to the 13 updated recommendations resulted in a total of 66 new recommendations for research. The research recommendations published herein, as well as those from the 2 previous papers from international consensus workshops, are an attempt to promote high-quality research in endometriosis by identifying and agreeing on key issues that require investigation. New areas included in the 2014 recommendations include infertility, patient stratification, and research in emerging nations, in addition to an increased focus on translational research. A revised and updated set of research priorities that builds on this document will be developed at the 13th World Congress on Endometriosis to be held on May 17-20, 2017, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Women's Reproductive History Before the Diagnosis of Incident Endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a gynecologic disease reported to be associated with infertility and, possibly, adverse pregnancy outcomes. While considerable research focuses on pregnancy outcomes following diagnosis and/or treatment, few data actually describe women's reproductive history before diagnosis for a more complete understanding of endometriosis and reproduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample comprised 473 women (aged 18-44 years) undergoing laparoscopies or laparotomies, irrespective of surgical indication at 14 clinical sites, during the period 2007-2009. Upon enrollment and before surgery, women were queried about pregnancy intentions and the time required to become pregnant for planned pregnancies. Endometriosis was defined as surgically visualized disease. Using discrete time survival analysis, we estimated fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess time to pregnancy (TTP) after adjusting for potential confounders (age, body composition, cigarette smoking, site). Generalized estimating equations accounted for multiple pregnancy attempts per woman. FORs <1.0 denote a longer TTP or diminished fecundity.

RESULTS

Approximately 66% and 69% of women with and without endometriosis, respectively, reported having a planned pregnancy before surgery, respectively. After adjustment, an endometriosis diagnosis was associated with ≈29% reduction in fecundity or a longer TTP across all pregnancy-trying attempts (adjusted FOR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.46-1.10). While FORs were consistently <1.0, irrespective of endometriosis staging, CIs included 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with endometriosis had a longer TTP than unaffected women, irrespective of disease severity, although the findings did not achieve significance. Prior reproductive history may be informative for predicting fecundity and pregnancy outcomes following diagnosis/treatment.

Evaluation of the correlation between body mass index and endometriosis among Iranian fertile women

AIMS

The investigations have revealed an inverse correlation between body mass index (BMI) and endometriosis. Endometriosis is a common gynecological disease among women of reproductive age, which is defined as the implantation of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus. In this respect, we aimed to study the correlation between endometriosis and BMI in Iranian fertile women.

METHODS

In a case-control design, 46 fertile women with endometriosis and 53 matched controls were recruited. All of the patients had a laparoscopy or laparotomy surgery and histologically confirmed endometriosis. The control group was selected from healthy volunteers who referred to gynecologist for tubal ligation or surgery of benign gynecological diseases. The participants were interviewed based on a structured questionnaire which covered inquiries regarding demographics, reproductive and menstrual history.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis was performed by categorizing the BMI to four main groups: >30, 25-29.9, 18.5-24.9 and <18.5. The results showed a significant inverse correlation between BMI and endometriosis (p = 0.039). BMI over 30 was observed in 26% of healthy controls versus 13% of endometriosis patients. On the other hand, BMI under 18.5 were detected in 3 individuals, all of them belonged to the endometriosis group.

DISCUSSION

Recent investigations have emphasized the role of BMI in endometriosis. The results of this study suggest that lower BMI is associated with an increased risk of endometriosis. As a parameter easily obtained, BMI may be useful for risk assessment of endometriosis.

Pregnancy rate in endometriosis patients according to the severity of the disease after using a combined approach of laparoscopy, GnRH agonist treatment and in vitro fertilization

AIM

To evaluate the effects of combined treatment approaches on endometriosis-associated infertility in different stages of endometriosis using laparoscopy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (GnRHa) therapy and in vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out on 179 women with surgically confirmed endometriosis. Patients were divided into subgroups: group 1 (stage I-II, n = 121) and group 2 (stage III-IV, n = 58). Patients eligible for IVF, who were found to have adenomyosis or moderate to severe endometriosis, were also given postoperative GnRHa. Pregnancy and delivery rates were cumulatively calculated during 5 years according to the severity of the disease.

RESULTS

The overall pregnancy, delivery and miscarriage rates were 66.5, 56.4 and 15.1%, respectively, for all patients following spontaneous and assisted conception. There were no significant differences in reproductive outcomes between the study groups. The pregnancy and delivery rates were also comparable within group 1 between the patients with and without GnRHa treatment.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy and delivery rates at different stages of endometriosis were not affected by the different approaches used for infertility treatment, with >60 and >50% of patients having conceived and delivered a baby, respectively, in both groups. The usefulness of GnRHa treatment for endometriosis patients with minimal to mild forms is questionable and deserves further studies.

How to evaluate adenomyosis in patients affected by endometriosis?

Objective. The aim of the study is to evaluate adenomyosis in patients undergoing surgery for different type of endometriosis. It is an observational study including women with preoperative ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis. Demographic data and symptoms were recorded (age, body mass index, parity, history of previous surgery, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria, and abnormal uterine bleeding). Moreover a particular endometrial shape "question mark sign" linked to the presence of adenomyosis was assessed. Results. From 217 patients with ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis, we found 73 with ovarian histological confirmation of endometriosis, 92 with deep infiltrating endometriosis, and 52 patients who underwent surgery for infertility. Women with adenomyosis alone represented the oldest group of patients (37.8 ± 5.18 years, P = 0.02). Deep endometriosis patients were nulliparous more frequently (P < 0.0001), had history of previous surgery (P = 0.004), and complained of more intense pain symptoms than other groups. Adenomyosis alone was significantly associated with abnormal uterine bleeding (P < 0.0001). The question mark sign was found to be strongly related to posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis (P = 0.01). Conclusion. Our study confirmed the strong relationship between adenomyosis and endometriosis and evaluated demographic aspects and symptoms in patients affected by different type of endometriosis.

Biomechanical perspective on the remineralization of dentin

The objective of this article is to critically evaluate the methods that are used to assess outcomes of remineralization of dentin. Currently, the most used assessment methods fall either into quantitative analysis of the mineral content of the remineralized structures or dry measurements of their mechanical properties. Properties obtained from the dehydrated organic dentin matrix may not reflect the true mechanical behavior of the remineralized tissue under physiological and hydrated conditions. Here we seek to clarify the biomechanical aspects of remineralization of dentin, pointing out the effects of hydration and dehydration on the mechanical properties of treated tissues. We also emphasize that a more appropriate endpoint to evaluate the effectiveness of remineralization in dentin should be associated with the recovery of the mechanical properties of the hydrated tissue, which is presumed to correlate well with its overall functionality.