A metastatic ovarian angiosarcoma mimicking hematologic neoplasia at diagnosis

Ovarian angiosarcoma: A systematic review of literature and survival analysis

Ovarian angiosarcoma (OA) is rare, with only sporadic cases reported in English literature. We performed a systematic review of cases published in the PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases with the aim of describing the reported clinicopathological features of OA. Fifty-three articles that reported 60 patients were reviewed. Of the 60 patients, 7 (11.6 %) were diagnosed with secondary (metastatic) ovarian angiosarcoma and 53 (88.3 %) were diagnosed with primary ovarian angiosarcoma. The mean age at presentation for ovarian angiosarcoma was 38.3±17.8 years. The average tumor size for ovarian angiosarcoma was 11.9±6.1 cm. Abdominal distention was reported in 45/60 (75 %). Microscopic examination revealed necrosis in 28/60 (46.7 %), pleomorphism in 32/59 (54.2 %), mitotic figures in 44/60 (73.3 %), spindle-shaped cells in 27/36 (75 %), epithelioid-shaped cells in 20/36 (55.5 %), and mixed epithelioid and spindle-shaped cells in 12/36 (33.3 %) patients. On immunohistochemistry CD 31 was positive in 41/41 (100 %), CD 34 in 38/39 (97.4 %), and Factor VIII related antigen in 18/21 (85.7 %) patients. Metastasis was present in 43/60 (71.6 %) patients. Chemotherapy and surgery was performed in 36/52 (69.2 %). The median follow-up time for ovarian angiosarcoma was 7 months (IQR1-IQR3:2-13.5 months). 24 (48 %) of the 50 patients with available survival data were alive and 26/50 (52 %) were dead of disease. Survival analyses (KM curves) revealed that the presence of necrosis (log-rank test; p = 0.05) and absence of spindle-shaped cells (log rank test; p = 0.04) on histopathology were associated with worse outcomes, while treatment with combined chemotherapy and surgical excision was associated with better survival (P < 0.001) therefore, prompt diagnosis and early treatment with combined chemotherapy and surgical excision can prolong survival in OA.

Primary ovarian angiosarcoma: a rare and recognizable ovarian tumor

The diagnosis of primary angiosarcoma of ovary is still a challenge as it has no specific clinical symptoms and is easily confused with other malignant neoplasms in morphology. Here, we described a case of primary ovarian angiosarcoma and reviewed the literature. A 47-year-old female showed a left ovary mass. Grossly, the cut surface of the tumor was solid and gray-white with intermediate texture. Some areas were spongy and atropurpureus with a soft texture. Microscopically, the tumor cells were arranged into a variety of different structures with visible hemorrhage. Immunochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CD31, ERG, Fli1, D2-40 and vimentin in a strong and diffused manner. CD34 stain showed focal positivity. Epithelial markers (e.g. CK, CK7, CK8/18 and PAX8) were all negative. Negative immunostaining for SMA, S-100, P53 and calretinin also were detected. The proliferative index (Ki-67) was approximately 40%. After surgery, the patient was treated with radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. In the 9-month follow-up, the patient was survival without evidence of disease. The diagnosis of ovarian angiosarcoma required the careful observation of morphology and the reasonable application of immunohistochemistry. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are the potential directions for the treatment of angiosarcoma.

Angiosarcoma Arising in Ovarian Mucinous Tumor: A Challenge in Intraoperative Frozen Section Diagnosis

Angiosarcoma of the ovary is rare but represents an aggressive type of malignant ovarian neoplasms. The purpose of this report is to describe the features of angiosarcoma arising in mucinous tumor that was misinterpreted as a benign vascular proliferation during the intraoperative consultation. A 45-year-old woman presented with an abdominal mass for 1 month. Exploratory laparotomy was performed. A 35 cm right ovarian mass submitted for intraoperative consultation was a multicystic mucinous tumor with an 8 cm area of hemorrhagic lesion between cystic locules. The frozen section diagnosis was at least mucinous borderline tumor. The hemorrhagic area, which was intraoperatively interpreted as organizing vessels associated with previous hemorrhage, represented angiosarcoma in permanent sections. Angiosarcoma may present a challenge in intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of an ovarian mass. The presence of ectatic anastomosing vessels with dissecting growth appears to be the clue to a suspicion of angiosarcoma. The presence of endothelial atypia provides further support for the diagnosis. A macroscopic hemorrhagic area in an ovarian mucinous tumor should be evaluated with care, and the possibility of angiosarcoma should be borne in mind.