Clinical Management of Chronic Portal/Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis: The Surgeon's Point of View

Update on Shunt Surgery

Background

Bleeding from esophagogastric varices is a life-threatening complication from portal hypertension. It occurs in 15% of patients and has a mortality rate of 20-35%.

Summary

The primary therapy for variceal bleeding is medical. In cases of recurrent bleeding, a definitive therapy is required. In cases of parenchymal decompensation, liver transplantation is the causal therapy, but if liver function is preserved, portal decompression is the therapy of choice. The use of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has achieved widespread acceptance, although evidence for surgical shunts is comparable or better in patients with good hepatic reserve. The type of surgical shunt depends on the patent veins of the portomesenteric system. If total occlusion is present, a devascularization procedure might be indicated.

Key Messages

Therapy, taking into account liver function, morphology of the portovenous system, and imminent liver transplantation, should be performed by an interdisciplinary team of gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and gastrointestinal surgeons.

Radical surgical treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome through entire exposure of hepatic inferior vena cava

OBJECTIVE

Therapies for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) can be divided into three main categories: medical, endovascular, and surgical. Surgery is applicable to the disease when other therapeutic options have failed. We introduce a surgical method of recanalization through exposure of the entire hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic vein (HV) outflow tract for BCS and investigate the long-term outcomes.

METHODS

From July 2002 to December 2015 in our center, 83 consecutive symptomatic BCS patients with failure of endovascular therapy were treated by radical surgical recanalization. IVC recanalization was the first goal for all patients, and recanalization of at least one HV was the second goal for selected patients at the same surgical operation. Patients were followed up, and data on technical and clinical success, survival, and patency of target vessels were analyzed.

RESULTS

Technical success of surgical recanalization was achieved in 80 patients (96.4%), with relief of clinical symptoms and improvement of liver function. During a mean follow-up of 84 ± 25.9 months, the cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year primary patency rates of the HV were 96.7%, 90.0%, and 83.3%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year primary patency of the IVC was 86.7%, 71.7%, and 68.3%, respectively. No factor demonstrated significant association with recurrence of obstruction. During follow-up, 10 patients died, 8 of end-stage hepatic disease and 2 of unknown causes. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year all-cause survival rates were 91%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Female sex, encephalopathy, severe ascites, and hypersplenism had an impact on survival in univariate analysis. With Cox regression, encephalopathy was the only independent determining factor for surgical survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical recanalization through exposure of the entire hepatic IVC for BCS is suitable for most primary BCS patients after failure of endovascular therapies.

Partial spleen embolization reduces the risk of portal hypertension-induced upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients not eligible for TIPS implantation

Introduction

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a severe and life-threatening complication among patients with portal hypertension (PH). Covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the treatment of choice for patients with refractory or recurrent UGIB despite pharmacological and endoscopic therapy. In some patients, TIPS implantation is not possible due to co-morbidity or vascular disorders. Spleen embolization (SE) may be a promising alternative in this setting.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 9 patients with PH-induced UGIB who underwent partial SE between 2012 and 2016. All patients met the following criteria: (i) upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage with primary or secondary failure of endoscopic interventions and (ii) TIPS implantation not possible. Each patient was followed for at least 6 months after embolization.

Results

Five patients (56%) suffered from cirrhotic PH, 4 patients (44%) from non-cirrhotic PH. UGIB occured in terms of refractory hemorrhage from gastric varices (3/9; 33%), hemorrhage from esophageal varices (3/9; 33%), and finally, hemorrhage from portal-hypertensive gastropathy (3/9; 33%). None of the patients treated with partial SE experienced re-bleeding episodes or required blood transfusions during a total follow-up time of 159 months, including both patients with cirrhotic- and non-cirrhotic PH.

Discussion

Partial SE, as a minimally invasive intervention with low procedure-associated complications, may be a valuable alternative for patients with recurrent PH-induced UGIB refractory to standard therapy.

Liver surgery in cirrhosis and portal hypertension

The prevalence of hepatic cirrhosis in Europe and the United States, currently 250 patients per 100000 inhabitants, is steadily increasing. Thus, we observe a significant increase in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension needing liver resections for primary or metastatic lesions. However, extended liver resections in patients with underlying hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension still represent a medical challenge in regard to perioperative morbidity, surgical management and postoperative outcome. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification recommends to restrict curative liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients to early tumor stages in patients with Child A cirrhosis not showing portal hypertension. However, during the last two decades, relevant improvements in preoperative diagnostic, perioperative hepatologic and intensive care management as well as in surgical techniques during hepatic resections have rendered even extended liver resections in higher-degree cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension possible. However, there are few standard indications for hepatic resections in cirrhotic patients and risk stratifications have to be performed in an interdisciplinary setting for each individual patient. We here review the indications, the preoperative risk-stratifications, the morbidity and the mortality of extended resections for primary and metastatic lesions in cirrhotic livers. Furthermore, we provide a review of literature on perioperative management in cirrhotic patients needing extrahepatic abdominal surgery and an overview of surgical options in the treatment of hepatic cirrhosis.