1
|
Spiegel JL, Weiss BG, Mueller J, Hempel JM, Rader T, Bertlich M, Canis M, Ihler F. Significance of endolymphatic sac surgery with and/or without simultaneous cochlea implant surgery in respect of vertigo control and speech perception in patients with Menière's disease. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:639-647. [PMID: 37470816 PMCID: PMC10796641 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08122-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The focus on treating patients with Menière's Disease (MD) lies on the reduction of vertigo attacks and the preservation of sensory function. Endolympathic hydrops is considered as an epiphenomenon in MD, which can potentially be altered by endolymphatic sac surgery (ESS). Purpose of the study was to investigate the influences on vertigo control through manipulation of the perilymphatic system with or without ESS. METHODS Retrospective data analysis of 86 consecutive patients with MD according to current diagnostic criteria after endolymphatic sac surgery alone (ESSalone; n = 45), cochlear implantation (CI) alone (CIalone; n = 12), and ESS with CI (ESS + CI; n = 29), treated at a tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES vertigo control, speech perception pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS Gender, side, and preoperative treatment were similar in all groups. Age was younger in the ESSalone-group with 56.2 ± 13.0 years (CIalone = 64.2 ± 11.4 years; ESS + CI = 63.1 ± 9.7 years). Definitive MD was present in all the CIalone, in 79.3% of the ESS + CI and in 59.6% of the ESSalone-patients. Likewise, vertigo control rate was 100% in the CIalone, 89.7% in the ESS + CI and 66.0% in the ESSalone-group. CONCLUSIONS Vertigo control was improved in all three groups, however, superior in groups treated with CI, potentially contributed by the manipulation of both the endo- and perilymphatic systems. A more systematic characterization of the patients with larger case numbers and documentation of follow up data would be needed to evaluate a clinical effect more properly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Spiegel
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Bernhard G Weiss
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - John-Martin Hempel
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Rader
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Mattis Bertlich
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Canis
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Friedrich Ihler
- Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Greifswald, University of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee A, Webster KE, George B, Harrington-Benton NA, Judd O, Kaski D, Maarsingh OR, MacKeith S, Ray J, Van Vugt VA, Burton MJ. Surgical interventions for Ménière's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 2:CD015249. [PMID: 36825750 PMCID: PMC9955726 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015249.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ménière's disease is a condition that causes recurrent episodes of vertigo, associated with hearing loss and tinnitus. First-line treatments often involve dietary or lifestyle changes, medication or local (intratympanic) treatments. However, surgery may also be considered for people with persistent or severe symptoms. The efficacy of different surgical interventions at preventing vertigo attacks, and their associated symptoms, is currently unclear. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of surgical interventions versus placebo or no treatment in people with Ménière's disease. SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 14 September 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults with definite or probable Ménière's disease comparing ventilation tubes, endolymphatic sac surgery, semi-circular canal plugging/obliteration, vestibular nerve section or labyrinthectomy with either placebo (sham surgery) or no treatment. We excluded studies with follow-up of less than three months, or with a cross-over design (unless data from the first phase of the study could be identified). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were: 1) improvement in vertigo (assessed as a dichotomous outcome - improved or not improved), 2) change in vertigo (assessed as a continuous outcome, with a score on a numerical scale) and 3) serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were: 4) disease-specific health-related quality of life, 5) change in hearing, 6) change in tinnitus and 7) other adverse effects. We considered outcomes reported at three time points: 3 to < 6 months, 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included two studies with a total of 178 participants. One evaluated ventilation tubes compared to no treatment, the other evaluated endolymphatic sac decompression compared to sham surgery. Ventilation tubes We included a single RCT of 148 participants with definite Ménière's disease. It was conducted in a single centre in Japan from 2010 to 2013. Participants either received ventilation tubes with standard medical treatment, or standard medical treatment alone, and were followed up for two years. Some data were reported on the number of participants in whom vertigo resolved, and the effect of the intervention on hearing. Our other primary and secondary outcomes were not reported in this study. This is a single, small study and for all outcomes the certainty of evidence was low or very low. We are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Endolymphatic sac decompression We also included one RCT of 30 participants that compared endolymphatic sac decompression with sham surgery. This was a single-centre study conducted in Denmark during the 1980s. Follow-up was predominantly conducted at one year, but additional follow-up continued for up to nine years in some participants. Some data were reported on hearing and vertigo (both improvement in vertigo and change in vertigo), but our other outcomes of interest were not reported. Again, this is a single, very small study and we rated the certainty of the evidence as very low for all outcomes. We are therefore unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are unable to draw clear conclusions about the efficacy of these surgical interventions for Ménière's disease. We identified evidence for only two of our five proposed comparisons, and we assessed all the evidence as low- or very low-certainty. This means that we have very low confidence that the effects reported are accurate estimates of the true effect of these interventions. Many of the outcomes that we planned to assess were not reported by the studies, such as the impact on quality of life, and adverse effects of the interventions. Consensus on the appropriate outcomes to measure in studies of Ménière's disease is needed (i.e. a core outcome set) in order to guide future studies in this area and enable meta-analyses of the results. This must include appropriate consideration of the potential harms of treatment, as well as the benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambrose Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Katie E Webster
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ben George
- Corpus Christi College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Owen Judd
- ENT Department, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Diego Kaski
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Otto R Maarsingh
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Samuel MacKeith
- ENT Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vincent A Van Vugt
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|