Cataract prevalence study--an Indian experience

Comparative pupil dilation using phenylephrine alone or in combination with tropicamide

OBJECTIVE

A prevalence survey of actinic and other eye diseases was conducted in Nambour, Queensland, Australia, in 1992. Pupils were dilated with phenylephrine alone for cataract identification because there were concerns that patient discomfort, due to cycloplegia occurring with the usual dilating agents of tropicamide and phenylephrine, may influence future compliance in an associated intervention study. This validation study was undertaken to measure the possible underestimation of cataract prevalence in this community study, which may have occurred because of inadequate dilation from phenylephrine alone.

DESIGN

The study design was a repeated measures experimental design.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-seven normal subjects participated in the study. Both eyes were tested.

INTERVENTION

Pupil diameter after dilation with three drops of 10% phenylephrine alone was compared with pupil diameter after dilation with three drops of 10% phenylephrine together with three drops of 1% tropicamide. The two regimens were given to the same subjects 1 week apart. Reversal was attempted with thymoxamine hydrochloride 0.5%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pupil diameter was assessed using a Neitz cataract camera, and accommodation reserve also was measured. Subjects' subjective appreciation of return of ocular function was assessed by a questionnaire. Repeated measures analysis of variance, paired t test, McNemar's test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyze outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean maximum pupil size with 10% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide was significantly larger than pupil size after the use of 10% phenylephrine alone (F1,19 = 18.99, P = 0.0003). However, there was no significant difference between the two dilation regimens when comparing the proportion of subjects who dilated to 6 mm or more (McNemar's X(2)1 = 2.7, P > 0.1). Compared with 10% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide, pupil diameters were significantly smaller (t46 = 16.77, P = 0.0001), and accommodation reserve greater (t46 = 4.14, P = 0.0001), 40 minutes after reversal with thymoxamine in the group dilated with 10% phenylephrine alone.

CONCLUSION

Pupil dilation with 10% phenylephrine alone, if allowed at least 40 minutes to act, will be as satisfactory for the identification of cataracts in a normal population as 10% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide and is more acceptable because of reduced problems with glare and accommodation.

Antioxidant vitamins in cataract prevention

The ocular lens, which is continually exposed to light and ambient oxygen, is at high risk of photooxidative damage resulting in cataract. Oxygen free radicals appear to impair not only lens crystallins which will aggregate and precipitate forming opacities but also proteolytic enzymes whose function it would be to eliminate the damaged proteins. Apart from an enzymatic defense system consisting of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase against excited oxygen species the lens contains the antioxidant vitamins C, E and presumably beta-carotene as another line of defense. In vitro and in vivo studies in different animal species have demonstrated a significant protective effect of vitamins C and E against light-induced cataract. Sugar and steroid cataracts were prevented as well. Epidemiological evidence in humans suggests that persons with comparatively higher intakes or blood concentrations of antioxidant vitamins are at a reduced risk of cataract development. These positive findings established by several research groups justify extensive intervention trials with antioxidant vitamins in humans using presenile cataract development as a model.