Continuous arteriovenous and venovenous hemodialysis in critically ill patients

The role of continuous renal replacement therapy in the treatment of poisoning

Extracorporeal elimination of drugs and toxins is a critical component in the management of poisonings, though specific techniques and indications remain a matter of debate. Conventional hemodialysis is frequently the treatment of choice because of its widespread availability and proven effectiveness for certain drugs and toxins. With the increased availability of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) modalities, there is yet another therapeutic option, but one that has yet to find a definitive role in this field. The continuous nature of these therapies is attractive for the management of acute renal failure, but the relatively slower clearance rates as compared to conventional hemodialysis is a distinct drawback in patients with acute xenobiotic-induced toxicity. There are abundant case reports as well as a few small case series in the medical literature documenting the use of CRRT, but specific techniques and the clinical outcomes vary considerably. Therefore one cannot draw definitive conclusions regarding benefit. Some patients, particularly those who are hemodynamically unstable and are not candidates for conventional hemodialysis, may warrant a trial of CRRT. However, at the present time, routine use for the treatment of poisoning is not supported. Controlled trials to better clarify its role would be beneficial, though such studies would be extremely difficult to conduct in this field. We believe that the intelligent application of extracorporeal modalities requires a thorough knowledge of drug pharmacokinetics, of the techniques utilized, and a skeptical analysis of the available literature.

Epidemiology of acute renal failure and outcome of haemodiafiltration in intensive care

OBJECTIVE

To examine the epidemiology of acute renal failure (ARF) and to identify predictors of mortality in patients treated by continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).

DESIGN

Uncontrolled observational study.

SETTING

One intensive care unit (ICU) at a surgical and trauma centre.

PATIENTS

A consecutive sample of 3591 ICU treatments.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Demographic data, indications for ICU admission, severity scores and organ system failure at the beginning of CVVHDF were set against the occurrence of ARF and ICU mortality. 154 (4.3% of ICU patients and 0.6% of the hospital population) developed ARF and were treated with CVVHDF. Higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status and higher Apache II score were associated with ICU incidence of ARF. However, these criteria were not able to predict outcome in ARF. A simplified predictive model was derived using multivariate logistic regression modelling. The mortality rates were 12% with one failing organ system (OSF), 38% with two OSF, 72% with three OSF, 90% with four OSF and 100% with five OSF. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of death was 7.7 for cardiovascular failure, 6.3 for hepatic failure, 3.6 for respiratory failure, 3.0 for neurologic failure, 5.3 for massive transfusion and 3.7 for age of 60 years or more.

CONCLUSION

General measures of severity are not useful in predicting the outcome of ARF. Only the nature and number of dysfunctioning organ systems and massive transfusion at the beginning of CVVHDF and the age of the patients gave a reliable prognosis in this group of patients.

Management of acute renal failure: new perspectives

Despite major developments in medicine, surgery, and intensive care, acute renal failure (ARF) still remains a common problem affecting approximately 5% of all general hospital patients. Mortality of all forms of ARF continues to be greater than 50%, and this percentage has not decreased significantly over the last 30 years. There are multiple factors, which may explain the persistence of such high mortality; the most important of these is probably the evolution of the disease spectrum underlying the development of ARF. At present, ARF is more often observed in older or more complex patients frequently in association with multiorgan system failure. The annual cost of managing ARF is staggering. This article reviews several of the new strategies and approaches that have been developed to aid in the management and prevention of ARF. For example, the use of biocompatible membranes has been proven to positively influence the course of ARF, which necessitates renal replacement therapy. Although continuous renal replacement therapy has a theoretical advantage compared with intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable patients, there are no well-controlled clinical studies to support a beneficial effect on mortality. There is, however, good evidence that calcium channel blockers play a positive role in the management of ARF, especially that associated with cadaveric kidney transplantation. Vasoactive agents, such as dopamine, may have the advantage of increasing the urine output in patients with oliguric ARF; however, their efficacy in otherwise altering the course of ARF is not well substantiated. Finally, growth factors and atrial natriuretic peptide appear to have the potential for accelerating renal recovery and decreasing morbidity and mortality from this commonly encountered medical problem. Prospective randomized clinical studies are the key to many of the dilemmas encountered with ARF.

Continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients: an update

Despite continuous progress in intensive care during the last decades, the outcome of critically ill patients in whom acute renal failure (ARF) develops is still poor. This outcome may be explained partially by the frequent occurrence of ARF as part of multiple organ systems failure (MOSF). In this complex and unstable patient population, the provision of adequate renal support with either intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis may pose major problems. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is now increasingly accepted as the preferred treatment modality in the management of ARF in these patients. The technique offers adequate control of biochemistry and fluid balance in hemodynamically unstable patients, thereby enabling aggressive nutritional and inotropic support without the risk of exacerbating azotemia or fluid overload. In addition, experimental and clinical data suggest that CRRT may have a beneficial influence on hemodynamics and gas exchange in patients with septic shock and (nonrenal) MOSF, independent of an impact on fluid balance. We review both technical and clinical aspects of various continuous therapies, including their impact on serum drug levels and nutrient balance. In addition, an attempt is made to clarify the possible beneficial role of CRRT in reducing patient morbidity and mortality in the ICU.

Pump-assisted hemofiltration in infants with acute renal failure

Hemofiltration is accepted management for acute renal failure in critically ill patients. However, in infants, obtaining arterial access or adequate flow through the access is often difficult. We report our technique and experience with pump-assisted hemofiltration (PAHF) in ten infants with acute renal failure. In five patients, double-lumen venous catheters provided access, while two catheters at separate sites were used in the remaining patients. In all patients, hemofilters were used with standard intravenous tubing added to pre-filter tubing and placed through a standard volumetric infusion pump for regulation of blood flow. The infants, aged 5-575 days, weighed from 2.8 to 11.4 kg and had primary diagnoses of post-operative congenital heart disease in five, sepsis in four, and renal dysplasia in one. The duration of PAHF averaged 158 +/- 115 h (range 20-332 h). Complications included bleeding at a catheter or surgical site in one patient each and asymptomatic hyponatremia in five patients. Thus, with adequate nurse training, PAHF using a volumetric infusion pump for blood regulation can be acceptable therapy in acute renal failure in infants.

Acute continuous hemodiafiltration: a prospective study of 110 patients and a review of the literature

One hundred ten critically ill patients with acute renal failure receiving acute continuous hemodiafiltration (ACHD) in our intensive care unit were studied prospectively. Acute continuous hemodiafiltration consisted either of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration or of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration, and was used for 17,817 hours (mean duration of patient treatment, 161.9 hours), resulting in a fall from a mean pre-ACHD urea of 35.7 mmol/L to a plateau value of 16.8 mmol/L at 72 hours of treatment. The mean urea clearance achieved was 24.9 mL/min. Eighty of these patients (72.7%) were receiving artificial ventilation at the time of ACHD and 45 (40.9%) had more than four failing organs. The mean APACHE II score was 27.7. Despite the degree of illness severity, 42 patients (32.2%) survived to discharge from hospital. The use of ACHD was associated with hemodynamic stability, rapid normalization of electrolytes, and the ability to freely administer drugs, blood, and/or blood products. It also allowed for maintenance of an aggressive, nitrogen-rich, nutritional regimen. Support of these critically ill patients with acute renal failure using ACHD was achieved safely and without the employment of additional dialysis-trained nursing staff. Our own experience and a review of the available literature strongly suggest that the advantages associated with the use of ACHD therapies are clinically significant and support the view that ACHD is a modality of renal replacement most suited to critically ill patients with acute renal failure.

Drug dosage in patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations

The advantages of continuous haemofiltration and haemodialysis over intermittent haemodialysis for the treatment of acute renal failure are well recognised. In intensive care patients, 4 different continuous procedures, arteriovenous and venovenous haemofiltration (CAVH and CVVH) or haemodialysis (CAVHD and CVVHD), are employed. These effective detoxification treatments require knowledge of their influence on drug disposition. Data on kinetics of drugs during continuous treatment are scarce and limited almost exclusively to the oldest and least effective procedure (CAVH). Selected dialysis membranes may adsorb drugs, as in the case of aminoglycosides. In addition, elimination of substances with large molecular weights may vary depending on the pore size of the membrane, as in the case of vancomycin. Thus, even if drug dosages can be based on pharmacokinetic studies, selection of a dialysis membrane not studied may cause unpredictable drug concentrations. With these limitations in mind and considering the available literature on pharmacokinetics in patients with renal failure, general guidelines for drug dosage during continuous renal replacement therapy can be given. In haemofiltration, drug protein binding is the major factor determining sieving, i.e. the appearance of the drug in the ultrafiltrate. In haemodialysis, diffusion is added to ultrafiltration, and therefore the saturation of the combined dialysate and ultrafiltrate will decrease further with increasing dialysate flow rate. In continuous haemofiltration or haemodialysis the extracorporeal clearance can be calculated by multiplying the saturation value (estimated or, better, measured) with the ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rate. Dividing the extracorporeal clearance by the total clearance (including the nonrenal clearance) gives the fraction of the dose removed due to extracorporeal elimination. Whether dosage recommendations available for anuric patients have to be modified or not can be decided on the basis of this value. In case of high nonrenal clearance, the degree of saturation is without clinical significance. Based on these considerations guidelines have been constructed for the effect of extracorporeal elimination on more than 120 different drugs commonly used in intensive care patients.