Pharmacokinetics of imipenem/cilastatin during continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration

Imipenem dosing recommendations for patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy: systematic review and Monte Carlo simulations

Background

The appropriate dosing of imipenem for critically ill AKI patients undergoing CRRT remains scarce.

Purpose

This study aimed to (1) gather the available published pharmacokinetic studies conducted in septic patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and (2) to define the optimal imipenem dosing regimens in these populations via Monte Carlo simulations.

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to May 2020. We used the Medical Subject Headings of “Imipenem,” “CRRT,” and “pharmacokinetics” or related terms or synonym to identify the studies for systematic reviews. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was conducted to predict imipenem levels for the initial 48 h of therapy. The pharmacodynamic target was 40% of free drug level above 4 times of the MIC (40% fT > 4 MIC). The dose that achieved at least 90% of the probability of target attainment was defined as an optimal dose.

Results

Eleven articles were identified and included for our systematic review. The necessary pharmacokinetic parameters such as the volume of distribution and the CRRT clearance were mentioned in 100 and 90.9%, respectively. None of the current studies reported the complete necessary parameters. A regimen of 750 mg q 6 h was the optimal dose for the predilution-CVVH and CVVHD modality with two effluent rates (25 and 35 mL/kg/h) for the pharmacodynamic target of 40% fT > 4MIC.

Conclusions

None of the current studies showed the complete necessary pharmacokinetic parameters for drug dosing. Pharmacodynamic target significantly contributed to imipenem dosing regimens in these patients. Different effluent rates and types of CRRT had minimal impact on dosing regimens. Clinical validation of the recommendation is necessary.

The Effects of Continuous Renal Replacement on Anti-infective Therapy in the Critically Ill

Acute renal failure represents a frequent, severe complication in critically ill patients leading to a direct increase in mortality and resource utilization. Today, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has replaced traditional hemodialysis, providing more precise fluid and metabolic control and decreased hemodynamic instability. There are a limited number of studies conducted for the ideal dosing of individual anti-infective agents for patients receiving CRRT. However, knowledge of the basic principles of CRRT, in conjunction with pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infectives, allows sound dosing recommendations to be formulated to ensure maximal killing effects with minimal risk of toxicity in patients receiving CRRT.

Using imipenem and cilastatin during continuous renal replacement therapy

AIM

To identify and review studies which have sought to define the pharmacokinetics of imipenem and cilastatin in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHOD

Literature was primarily identified using Pharmline, Embase and Medline databases using the search terms "imipenem," "haemofiltration," "haemodialysis" and "pharmacokinetics." Papers that discussed only intermittent haemodialysis were excluded.

RESULTS

Seven papers were identified which described the pharmacokinetics of imipenem in patients receiving CRRT. Four different modes of CRRT were used. The methods of sampling, dosages used and assumptions made during pharmacokinetic calculations varied widely between the studies. Total body clearance of imipenem during CRRT in patients suffering from acute renal failure was found to range between 89 and 149 ml/min. Total body clearance of cilastatin ranged between 9 and 32 ml/min. Total body clearance of both imipenem and cilastatin was reduced in patients with chronic renal failure. Total body clearance of cilastatin was also reduced by impaired liver function. Dose recommendations made ranged between 500 mg 6-hourly and 500 mg 12-hourly.

CONCLUSIONS

The heterogeneity of the studies identified prevents them being analysed as a single group. For meaningful dosage recommendations to be made, further studies are required using larger populations and with more detail regarding liver dysfunction and duration of renal failure.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of imipenem during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients

The pharmacokinetics of imipenem were studied in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH; n=6 patients) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF; n=6 patients). Patients (mean+/-standard deviation age, 50.9+/-15.9 years; weight, 98.5+/-15.9 kg) received imipenem at 0.5 g every 8 to 12 h (total daily doses of 1 to 1.5 g/day) by intravenous infusion over 30 min. Pre- and postmembrane blood (plasma) and corresponding ultrafiltrate or dialysate samples were collected 1, 2, 4, and 8 or 12 h (depending on dosing interval) after completion of the drug infusion. Drug concentrations were measured using validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Mean systemic clearance (CL(S)) and elimination half-life (t1/2) of imipenem were 145+/-18 ml/min and 2.7+/-1.3 h during CVVH versus 178+/-18 ml/min and 2.6+/-1.6 h during CVVHDF, respectively. Imipenem clearance was substantially increased during both CVVH and CVVHDF, with membrane clearance representing 25% and 32% of CL(S), respectively. The results of this study indicate that CVVH and CVVHDF contribute to imipenem clearance to a greater degree than previously reported. Imipenem doses of 1.0 g/day appear to achieve concentrations adequate to treat most common gram-negative pathogens (MIC up to 2 microg/ml) during CVVH or CVVHDF, but doses of 2.0 g/day or more may be required to adequately treat and prevent resistance in pathogens with higher MICs (MIC=4 to 8 microg/ml). Higher doses should only be used after consideration of potential central nervous system toxicities or other risks of therapy in these severely ill patients.

Pharmacokinetics and dosage adaptation of meropenem during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients

Meropenem, a carbapenem broad-spectrum antibiotic, is regularly used in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Its disposition was studied over one dosage interval in 15 patients under CVVHDF on a steady regimen of 500 or 1000 mg every 8 to 12 hours. Meropenem levels were measured in plasma and filtrate-dialysate by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection. The mean CVVHDF flow rates were 7.1 +/- 0.9 L/h for blood (mean +/- SD), 0.5 +/- 0.3 L/h for predilution solution, 1.2 +/- 0.3 L/h for countercurrent dialysate, and 1.8 +/- 0.5 L/h for the total filtrate-dialysate. The pharmacokinetic analysis was based both on a noncompartmental approach and on a four-compartment modeling. The mean (coefficient of variation [CV]) total body clearance, volume of distribution at steady state, and mean residence time were, respectively, 5.0 L/h (46%), 14.3 L (29%), and 4.8 h (36%). The hemodiafiltration clearances calculated from plasma data alone and plasma with filtrate-dialysate data were 1.2 L/h (26%) and 1.6 L/h (39%), respectively. The compartmental model was used to optimize the therapeutic schedule of meropenem, considering reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of sensitive strains (4 mg/L). The results indicate that two different therapeutic schedules of meropenem are equally applicable to patients receiving CVVHD: either 750 mg tid or 1500 bid.

Influence of renal replacement therapy on pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients

Critical illness has a great impact on many pharmacokinetic parameters. An increased volume of distribution often results in drug underdosing, whereas organ impairment may lead to drug accumulation and overdosing. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients with renal failure may significantly increase drug clearance, requiring drug-dosing adjustments. Drugs significantly eliminated by the kidney are likely to experience substantial removal during RRT, and a supplemental dose--corresponding to the amount of drug removed by RRT--should be administered. Mechanisms of drug removal during RRT are reviewed together with methods for measuring or estimating RRT drug clearances. Approaches for drug-dosing adjustments are suggested and, at the end, the pharmacological principles for antibiotic prescription in the critically ill are discussed.

Pharmacological principles of antibiotic prescription in the critically ill

The goal of antimicrobial prescription is to achieve effective drug concentrations. Standard antimicrobial dosing regimens are based on research performed often decades ago and for the most part with patients who were not critically ill. More recent insights into antibiotic activity (e.g. the importance of high peak/MIC ratios for aminoglycosides and time above MIC for beta-lactam antibiotics), drug pharmacokinetics (e.g. increased volume of distribution and altered clearances) and the pathogenesis of sepsis (e.g. third space losses and altered creatinine clearances) have made re-evaluation of dosing regimens necessary for the critically ill. The inflammatory response associated with sepsis results in a rapid decrease in serum albumin levels, large fluid shifts and third space losses, initially with a high cardiac output. In turn these changes result in increased creatinine clearance and increased renal drug clearance. Unless these effects are offset by ensuing renal and/or hepatic impairment, with subsequent drug accumulation, antibiotic levels may be too low for optimal efficacy. The institution of continuous renal replacement therapy separately affects antibiotic clearances, and therefore dosing, even further. This article reviews relevant literature and offers principles for more effective and appropriate antibiotic dosing in the critically ill, based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of the main antibiotic groups (aminoglyosides, glycopeptides, beta-lactams, carbapenems and quinolones) and knowledge of the pathophysiology of the inflammatory response syndrome. Finally it also provides some guidance on the basic principles of drug prescription for patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Critically ill patients exhibit a range of organ dysfunctions and often require treatment with a variety of drugs including sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blockers, antimicrobials, inotropes and gastric acid suppressants. Understanding how organ dysfunction can alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs is a vital aspect of therapy in this patient group. Many drugs will need to be given intravenously because of gastrointestinal failure. For those occasions on which the oral route is possible, bioavailability may be altered by hypomotility, changes in gastrointestinal pH and enteral feeding. Hepatic and renal dysfunction are the primary determinants of drug clearance, and hence of steady-state drug concentrations, and of efficacy and toxicity in the individual patient. Oxidative metabolism is the main clearance mechanism for many drugs and there is increasing recognition of the importance of decreased activity of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system in critically ill patients. Renal failure is equally important with both filtration and secretion clearance mechanisms being required for the removal of parent drugs and their active metabolites. Changes in the steady-state volume of distribution are often secondary to renal failure and may lower the effective drug concentrations in the body. Failure of the central nervous system, muscle, the endothelial system and endocrine system may also affect the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs. Time-dependency of alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters is well documented for some drugs. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology in the critically ill and applying pharmacokinetic principles in selection of drug and dose regimen is, therefore, crucial to optimising the pharmacodynamic response and outcome.

Pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration

The pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin were investigated in 12 critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) managed by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) while receiving a fixed combination of 500 mg of imipenem-cilastatin intravenously three or four times daily. No adverse drug reactions were observed. Plasma and hemofiltrate samples were taken at specified times during one dosing interval, and the concentrations of imipenem and cilastatin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated by a first-order, two-compartment pharmacokinetic model for both substances. Total clearances of imipenem and cilastatin (mean +/- standard deviations) were 122.2 +/- 28.6 and 29.2 +/- 13.7 ml/min, respectively, with hemofiltration clearances of 22.9 +/- 2.5 and 16.1 +/- 3.1 ml/min, respectively, and nonrenal, nonhemofiltration clearances of 90.8 +/- 26.3 and 13.2 +/- 13.9 ml/min, respectively. Mean imipenem dosage requirements were approximately 2,000 mg/24 h (2,111.8 +/- 493.4 mg/24 h). They were calculated in order to achieve an average steady-state concentration of 12 mg/liter to ensure that concentrations in plasma exceeded the MICs at which 90% of intermediately resistent bacteria are inhibited (8 mg/liter) during the majority of the dosing interval. By contrast, the recommended dosage for patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) and infections caused by intermediately resistant bacteria is 1,000 mg/24 h. This remarkable difference may be due (i) to differences in the nonrenal clearance of imipenem between patients with ARF and ESRF and (ii) to the additional clearance by the hemofilter. Since the total clearance of cilastatin was low, marked accumulation occurred, and this was particularly pronounced in patients with additional liver dysfunction. Thus, in patients with ARF managed by CVVH, rather high imipenem doses are required, and these inevitably result in a marked accumulation of cilastatin. The doses of imipenem recommended for patients with ESRF, however, will lead to underdosing and inadequate antibiotic therapy.

A review of continuous renal replacement therapy

Patients in the Intensive Care Unit commonly develop acute renal failure (ARF). The kidneys are rarely the only organs failing in these patients. Frequently ARF is part of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The choice of dialytic therapy should consider, not only the efficacy of the therapy, but also the undesirable effects such therapy may have on the other failing organs. Intermittent Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis were the conventional forms of dialysis available. Both are associated with complications which may make them unsuitable for use in the haemodynamically unstable, hypercatabolic patients, seen in the Intensive Care setting. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) has been introduced in many Intensive Care Units to provide a more stable, flexible form of dialysis. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the various forms of CRRT and to discuss the advantages of this form of therapy.

Drug dosage in patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations

The advantages of continuous haemofiltration and haemodialysis over intermittent haemodialysis for the treatment of acute renal failure are well recognised. In intensive care patients, 4 different continuous procedures, arteriovenous and venovenous haemofiltration (CAVH and CVVH) or haemodialysis (CAVHD and CVVHD), are employed. These effective detoxification treatments require knowledge of their influence on drug disposition. Data on kinetics of drugs during continuous treatment are scarce and limited almost exclusively to the oldest and least effective procedure (CAVH). Selected dialysis membranes may adsorb drugs, as in the case of aminoglycosides. In addition, elimination of substances with large molecular weights may vary depending on the pore size of the membrane, as in the case of vancomycin. Thus, even if drug dosages can be based on pharmacokinetic studies, selection of a dialysis membrane not studied may cause unpredictable drug concentrations. With these limitations in mind and considering the available literature on pharmacokinetics in patients with renal failure, general guidelines for drug dosage during continuous renal replacement therapy can be given. In haemofiltration, drug protein binding is the major factor determining sieving, i.e. the appearance of the drug in the ultrafiltrate. In haemodialysis, diffusion is added to ultrafiltration, and therefore the saturation of the combined dialysate and ultrafiltrate will decrease further with increasing dialysate flow rate. In continuous haemofiltration or haemodialysis the extracorporeal clearance can be calculated by multiplying the saturation value (estimated or, better, measured) with the ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rate. Dividing the extracorporeal clearance by the total clearance (including the nonrenal clearance) gives the fraction of the dose removed due to extracorporeal elimination. Whether dosage recommendations available for anuric patients have to be modified or not can be decided on the basis of this value. In case of high nonrenal clearance, the degree of saturation is without clinical significance. Based on these considerations guidelines have been constructed for the effect of extracorporeal elimination on more than 120 different drugs commonly used in intensive care patients.

Comparison of imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with acute or chronic renal failure treated with continuous hemofiltration

The total clearance of imipenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, is reduced from approximately 230 mL/min in patients with normal renal function to approximately 50 mL/min in patients with chronic renal failure. This decline in clearance results not only from the loss of renal clearance, but also from a reduction in the nonrenal clearance from 130 to 50 mL/min. Current dosing recommendations for the administration of imipenem to patients with acute or chronic renal failure are based on this reduced clearance rate. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of imipenem in critically ill patients with acute or chronic renal failure to determine whether published dosing guidelines were applicable to both patient populations. Imipenem pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in 10 anuric patients with renal failure managed by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Seven patients had acute renal failure, while the other three had preexisting chronic renal failure. Imipenem serum concentration data were incorporated into a first-order, single-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Determinations of the area under the serum concentration-time curve were made by the trapezoidal rule. Dosing regimens were calculated from clearance data to achieve a mid-dose imipenem serum concentration of 12 mg/L. The total clearance of imipenem in patients with acute renal failure (108.3 +/- 13.8 mL/min; mean +/- SD) was significantly greater than the total clearance measured in patients with chronic renal failure (64.4 +/- 10.5 mL/min; P < 0.02). This increased clearance resulted from a greater nonrenal clearance of the drug in patients with acute renal failure (95.0 +/- 13.8 v 51.1 +/- 10.5 mL/min; P < 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)