Effects of L-carnitine supplementation in the dialysate on serum lipoprotein composition of hemodialysis patients

Carnitine metabolism in uremia

Carnitine is a conditionally essential metabolite that plays a critical role in cell physiology by participating in transesterification reactions and preventing organic acid accumulation. A number of disease states are characterized by carnitine depletion that may lead to metabolic and clinical disturbances. In maintenance hemodialysis, carnitine is lost through dialytic membranes, leading in selected patients to carnitine depletion with a relative increase of the esterified forms. Carnitine supplementation after or during dialysis counteracts such alterations and may be associated with some clinical benefits. Recent meta-analyses of the literature indicate that carnitine supplementation in hemodialysis patients may improve the hematological status (allowing a reduction of the requirement for erythropoietin), the exercise tolerance, the plasma lipid profile, and the intradialytic symptoms. In addition, carnitine supplementation may improve cardiac functions, protein metabolism, and insulin resistance. Carnitine supplementation has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration not only for the treatment, but also for the prevention of carnitine depletion in dialysis patients. Furthermore, clinical guidelines developed by both American and European nephrological societies suggest that a trial with carnitine supplementation could be recommended in selected dialysis patients who do not adequately respond to standard therapy for certain conditions, such as severe and persistent muscle cramps or hypotension during dialysis, lack of energy affecting quality of life, skeletal muscle weakness or myopathy, cardiomyopathy, and anemia of uremia unresponsive to or requiring large doses of erythropoietin.

Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with renal disease

A growing number of clinical trials have examined the effects of different lipid lowering strategies in patients with renal disease. We carried out a meta-analysis to compare and contrast the relative efficacy of various antilipemic therapies in different renal disease settings. Studies that investigated one or more therapies designed to lower serum lipids were combined using weighted multiple linear regression. The analysis adjusted treatment effects for differences in baseline lipid levels and possible placebo effects. The results showed that antilipemic therapies generally had similar effects on lipids in different renal disease settings. In nephrotic syndrome the greatest and most consistent reductions in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) were seen with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (regression coefficient with 95% confidence interval in mg/dl = -63, -79 to -46). Similar results were seen for LDL in renal transplant (-51, -57 to -45), renal insufficiency (-62, -82 to -42), hemodialysis (-65, -80 to -50) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (-84, -104 to -64). Fibric acid analogues had less effect on LDL, but caused greater reductions in triglycerides: -132, -178 to -87, in nephrotic syndrome; -69, -93 to -45 in transplant: -107, -169 to -45 in renal insufficiency; -72, -120 to -24 in hemodialysis; and -96, -162 to -30 in CAPD. In general, the effects of diet and other therapies were less consistent. Despite possible limitations of this meta-analysis, the results provide a useful framework for choosing antilipemic therapy, and point to areas for future long-term studies examining the safety and efficacy of lipid lowering strategies in patients with renal disease.