1
|
Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, Timothy Garvey W, Joffe AM, Kim J, Kushner RF, Lindquist R, Pessah-Pollack R, Seger J, Urman RD, Adams S, Cleek JB, Correa R, Figaro MK, Flanders K, Grams J, Hurley DL, Kothari S, Seger MV, Still CD. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2020; 28:O1-O58. [PMID: 32202076 DOI: 10.1002/oby.22719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists. METHODS Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts. RESULTS New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest). CONCLUSIONS Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey I Mechanick
- Guideline Task Force Chair (AACE); Professor of Medicine, Medical Director, Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Health at Mount Sinai Heart; Director, Metabolic Support Divisions of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Past President, AACE and ACE
| | - Caroline Apovian
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (TOS); Professor of Medicine and Director, Nutrition and Weight Management, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stacy Brethauer
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASMBS); Professor of Surgery, Vice Chair of Surgery, Quality and Patient Safety; Medical Director, Supply Chain Management, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - W Timothy Garvey
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (AACE); Butterworth Professor, Department of Nutrition Sciences, GRECC Investigator and Staff Physician, Birmingham VAMC; Director, UAB Diabetes Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Aaron M Joffe
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASA); Professor of Anesthesiology, Service Chief, Otolaryngology, Oral, Maxillofacial, and Urologic Surgeries, Associate Medical Director, Respiratory Care, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Julie Kim
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASMBS); Harvard Medical School, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Robert F Kushner
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (TOS); Professor of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Richard Lindquist
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (OMA); Director, Medical Weight Management, Swedish Medical Center; Director, Medical Weight Management, Providence Health Services; Obesity Medicine Consultant, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rachel Pessah-Pollack
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (AACE); Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer Seger
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (OMA); Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Long School of Medicine, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Richard D Urman
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASA); Associate Professor of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie Adams
- Writer (AACE); AACE Director of Clinical Practice Guidelines Development, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - John B Cleek
- Writer (TOS); Associate Professor, Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Riccardo Correa
- Technical Analysis (AACE); Assistant Professor of Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Fellowship Director, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - M Kathleen Figaro
- Technical Analysis (AACE); Board-certified Endocrinologist, Heartland Endocrine Group, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Karen Flanders
- Writer (ASMBS); Massachusetts General Hospital Weight Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jayleen Grams
- Writer (AACE); Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Staff Surgeon, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Daniel L Hurley
- Writer (AACE); Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shanu Kothari
- Writer (ASMBS); Fellowship Director of MIS/Bariatric Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin
| | - Michael V Seger
- Writer (OMA); Bariatric Medical Institute of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher D Still
- Writer (TOS); Medical Director, Center for Nutrition and Weight Management Director, Geisinger Obesity Institute; Medical Director, Employee Wellness, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, Garvey WT, Joffe AM, Kim J, Kushner RF, Lindquist R, Pessah-Pollack R, Seger J, Urman RD, Adams S, Cleek JB, Correa R, Figaro MK, Flanders K, Grams J, Hurley DL, Kothari S, Seger MV, Still CD. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 16:175-247. [PMID: 31917200 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists. METHODS Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts. RESULTS New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest). CONCLUSIONS Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey I Mechanick
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Health at Mount Sinai Heart, New York, New York; Metabolic Support Divisions of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Caroline Apovian
- Nutrition and Weight Management, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - W Timothy Garvey
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama; UAB Diabetes Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Aaron M Joffe
- University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Julie Kim
- Harvard Medical School, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Robert F Kushner
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Rachel Pessah-Pollack
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer Seger
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Long School of Medicine, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Stephanie Adams
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - John B Cleek
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | - Karen Flanders
- Massachusetts General Hospital Weight Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jayleen Grams
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Daniel L Hurley
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael V Seger
- Bariatric Medical Institute of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher D Still
- Center for Nutrition and Weight Management Director, Geisinger Obesity Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania; Employee Wellness, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen W, Jiang X, Huang H, Ding Z, Li C. Jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy is associated with better short-term absorption capacity and quality of life in early-stage gastric cancer patients. BMC Surg 2018; 18:63. [PMID: 30126403 PMCID: PMC6102876 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-018-0397-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background No consensus exists regarding the best reconstruction style after total gastrectomy (TG). Roux-en-Y oesophagojejunostomy is a simple option for gastrointestinal tract reconstruction. Recently, jejunal pouch reconstruction has been suggested as an appropriate approach. We compared the postoperative outcomes of the two surgical approaches using a well-characterized cohort of gastric carcinoma patients. Methods A total of 60 patients who underwent TG were divided into two groups according to the reconstruction style. Both groups were compared regarding patient characteristics, perioperative data and quality of life (QoL), which was assessed using the Spitzer QoL index (QLI) and Visick grade. The incidence of long-term surgery-related complications, including reflux oesophagitis, dumping syndrome, and retention syndrome, was also compared to evaluate postoperative restoration. Results Both study groups were comparable with respect to general patient characteristics. No mortality or no significant differences in surgery-related data were found except in the operation time. Compared to Orr Roux-en-Y reconstruction, pouch reconstruction was associated with a longer procedure time, a lower incidence of dumping/retention syndrome and better QoL parameters (p < 0.05). Conclusion In this study, jejunal pouch reconstruction after TG was superior to the traditional Roux-n-Y oesophagojejunostomy with respect to improved dietary intake and QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Central Hospital of the Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xumian Jiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Central Hospital of the Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hui Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Central Hospital of the Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China
| | - Zao Ding
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430014, People's Republic of China
| | - Chihua Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, 430014, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumar P, Hamza N, Madhok B, De Alwis N, Sharma M, Miras AD, Mahawar KK. Copper Deficiency after Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2018; 26:1335-42. [PMID: 27034062 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2162-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
A large number of patients undergoing bariatric surgery are deficient in copper, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can further aggravate it. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of copper deficiency can leave patients with residual neurological disability. This has led to recommendation from the British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society that copper levels should be monitored annually after gastric bypass. This review concludes that copper deficiency in adequately supplemented patients is rare and can be adequately treated if a related haematological or neurological disorder is diagnosed. The cost of routine monitoring may therefore not be justified for adequately supplemented, asymptomatic patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The screening may however be necessary for high-risk patient groups to prevent severe complications and permanent disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parveen Kumar
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Numan Hamza
- Bariatric Unit, Department of General Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK
| | - Brijesh Madhok
- Bariatric Unit, Department of General Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK
| | - Nimantha De Alwis
- Bariatric Unit, Department of General Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK
| | - Manisha Sharma
- Department of Chemical Pathology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Kamal K Mahawar
- Bariatric Unit, Department of General Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jacobson AE, Kahwash SB, Chawla A. Refractory cytopenias secondary to copper deficiency in children receiving exclusive jejunal nutrition. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64. [PMID: 28475294 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Copper deficiency is a known cause of anemia and neutropenia that is easily remedied with copper supplementation. Copper is primarily absorbed in the stomach and proximal duodenum, so patients receiving enteral nutrition via methods that bypass this critical region may be at increased risk for copper deficiency. In pediatrics, postpyloric enteral feeding is increasingly utilized to overcome problems related to aspiration, severe reflux, poor gastric motility, and gastric outlet obstruction. However, little is known about the prevalence of copper deficiency in this population. We describe three pediatric patients receiving exclusive jejunal feeds who developed cytopenias secondary to copper deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Jacobson
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Samir B Kahwash
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Pathology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Anjulika Chawla
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Pediatrics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu X, Tang H, Guan A, Sun F, Wang H, Shu J. Finding gastric cancer related genes and clinical biomarkers for detection based on gene-gene interaction network. Math Biosci 2016; 276:1-7. [PMID: 26700107 DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2015.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 12/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of death resulted from cancer globally. The most common cause of GC is the infection of Helicobacter pylori, approximately 11% of cases are caused by genetic factors. The objective of this study was to develop an effective computational method to meaningfully interpret these GC-related genes and to predict potential prognostic genes for clinical detection. METHODS We employed the shortest path algorithm and permutation test to probe the genes that have relationship with known GC genes in gene-gene interaction network. We calculated the enrichment scores of gene ontology and pathways of gastric cancer related genes to characterize these genes in terms of molecular features. The optimal features that primly representing the gastric cancer related genes were selected using Random Forest classification and incremental feature selection. Random Forest classification was also used for the prediction of the novel gastric cancer related genes based on the selected features and the identification of novel prognostic genes based on the expression of genes. RESULTS Based on the shortest path analysis of 36 known GC genes, 39 genes occurring in shortest path were identified as GC-related genes. In subsequent classification, 4153 gene ontology terms and 157 pathway terms were identified as the optimal features to depict these gastric cancer related genes. Based on them, a total of 886 genes were predicted as related genes. These 886 genes could serve as expression biomarkers for clinical detection and they achieved a 100% accuracy for distinguishing gastric cancer from a case-control dataset, better than any of 886 random selected genes did. CONCLUSION By analyzing the features of known GC-related genes, we employed a systematic method to predict gastric cancer related genes and novel prognostic genes for accurate clinical detection.
Collapse
|