Efficacy, Safety, and Reoperation-free Survival of Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Non-neurological Male Patients over 75 Years of Age

Background

Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is a gold standard treatment in male stress urinary incontinence but remains poorly used in elderly patients.

Objective

To assess the efficacy, safety, and reoperation-free survival of AUS implantation in male patients over 75 yr of age.

Design setting and participants

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all 1233 non-neurological male AUS implantations between 2005 and 2020 at 13 French centers. We compared 330 patients ≥75 yr old (GROUP75+) with 903 patients <75 yr old (GROUP75-) at the time of AUS implantation.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Our primary endpoint was social continence at 3 mo defined as the use of one or fewer pad daily. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess reoperation-free survival. We sought factors of erosion using logistic regression.

Results and limitations

Early postoperative continence was comparable in both groups (74.4% vs 80.1%, p = 0.114). We observed a higher rate of postoperative complications in GROUP75+ (18.8% vs 12.6%, p = 0.014), but the complications were more frequently of low grade in GROUP75+ (p = 0.025). The overall reoperation-free survival was similar (p = 0.076) after a median follow-up of 2 yr. However, patients in GROUP75+ had poorer explantation-free survival (p < 0.0001). A history of radiotherapy was a predictive factor of erosion (odds ratio [OR] = 5.31, p < 0.01), but age was not (OR = 1.08, p = 0.87). Unfortunately, our dataset did not include a systematic geriatric evaluation.

Conclusions

AUS in elderly patients appears to be an effective option to treat stress urinary incontinence. However, we observed more postoperative complications and explantations, although age was not associated with the onset of erosion. A prospective study is required to determine whether a geriatric evaluation would be an effective strategy to select patients before surgery.

Patient summary

In this study, we looked at outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter in elderly men in a large population. We found satisfying efficacy but slightly more postoperative complications and device infections.

Long-term functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800™) implantation in women aged over 75 years and suffering from stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in older women aged over 75 years.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective study included all non-neurological women aged over 75 years suffering from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency and undergoing an AUS placement between 1991 and 2015. Early postoperative complications were reported according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Continence, defined as no pad use, was assessed at the end of follow-up. Explantation, revision and deactivation rates of the AUS were reported. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was generated to evaluate the survival rate of the device without revision or explantation.

RESULTS

Among 393 AUS implantations, a total of 45 patients, median age 77 years (IQR 75-79), were included. Twenty-six early postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (40%) patients. All were minor Clavien grades (I-II) except one (grade IVa). Median follow-up was 36 months (IQR 16-96). Overall, 32 women (71.1%) still had their AUS in place at the end of the follow-up, without revision or explantation. The AUS was definitively removed in four (8.9%). The AUS required revisions in nine (20%) women. The 5- and 10-year survival rates of the device without revision or explantation were 78 and 50%, respectively. Three patients (6.7%) had their AUS deactivated. At last follow-up, in an intention-to-treat analysis, the continence rate was 68.9%.

CONCLUSION

In women aged over 75-years-old, suffering from SUI, the AUS provides satisfactory functional results comparable to the general population.

Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment and Sphincter Misuse Among Men With Artificial Urinary Sphincters

OBJECTIVES

To define the prevalence of cognitive impairment and sphincter misuse among men who had undergone AUS placement.

METHODS

Men who had previously undergone AUS placement from 2004 to 2019 were assessed through comprehensive telephone surveys. The primary survey outcome was cognitive function, assessed via validated Telephone Mini-Mental State Examination. Secondary survey outcomes included rate of AUS misuse, surgical outcomes, and overall device satisfaction. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences between patients with and without cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients participated, with a mean age and follow-up of 75 and 7.8 years, respectively. Telephone Mini-Mental State Examination assessment revealed cognitive impairment in 18 (24%) patients, 13 (18%) with mild-moderate and 5 (7%) with severe impairment. Overall, 23 (31%) and 11 (15%) patients reported inconsistent use (not cycling AUS with every void) and device neglect, respectively. Patients with impaired cognition were more likely to report difficulty with AUS use compared to those with normal cognition (39% vs 9%, P= .01). There was no difference seen in rates of revision, rates of retention, or urinary tract infections between cognitive groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed significant rates of cognitive impairment and sphincter misuse among men with AUS. These data suggest a role for long-term follow-up and monitoring for cognitive changes. Prospective study of cognitive decline and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing AUS is warranted.

The Role of Educational Level and Cognitive Status in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between education level, cognitive function of patients and the success/ revision rates of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in men with postprostatectomy incontinence.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and March 2018, 163 patients (mean age, 68 ± 6.8 years) with moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence who underwent AUS implantation were retrospectively examined. Demographic data, body mass index, comorbidities, surgical technique, previous strictures, and radiation therapy were recorded. Incontinence was measured by daily pad use and evaluated by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form. Patients' overall improvement was assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Education level was determined using the International Standard Classification of Education. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Treatment success was defined as the need for ≤1 pad/day at last follow-up.

RESULTS

AUS was successful in 77.3% of patients. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form score improved significantly from 19.9 ± 2.9 to 4.4 ± 5.4 (P = .001). The median outcome reported subjectively on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale was 2.1 ± 1.5 (1-7) and self-reported as "much better." Patients' education level had statistically no significant relationship with AUS success and revision rates. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between cognitive status, educational level and the need for revision of AUS (P >.05). However, patients with moderate cognitive impairment and a body mass index >30 showed significantly lower AUS success rates (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

AUS implantation is safe and effective treatment option especially for nonobese and cognitively intact patients of all educational levels.

Is pre-operative urodynamic bladder function the true predictor of outcome of male sling for post prostatectomy incontinence?

PURPOSE

To investigate pre-operative urodynamic parameters in male sling patients to ascertain whether this might better predict surgical outcomes and facilitate patient selection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, case notes and video-urodynamics, review of men who underwent AdVanceXP male sling in three London hospitals between 2012 and 2019. Urodynamics were performed in all centres, while retrograde leak point pressure (RLPP) was performed in one centre.

RESULTS

Successful outcome was seen in 99/130 (76%) of men who required one pad or less per day. The dry rate was 51%. Pad usage was linked to worse surgical outcomes, mean 2.6 (range 1-6.5) for success vs 3.6 (range 1-10) although the ranges were wide (p = 0.002). 24 h pad weight also reached statistical significance (p = 0.05), with a mean of 181 g for success group versus 475 g for the non-successful group. The incidence of DO in the non-successful group was significantly higher than in successful group (55% versus 29%, p = 0.0009). Bladder capacity less than 250 ml was also associated with worse outcomes (p = 0.003). Reduced compliance was not correlated with outcomes (31% for success groups vs 45% for non-successful group, p = 0.15). Preoperative RLPP was performed in 60/130 patients but did not independently reach statistical significance (p = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Urodynamic parameters related to bladder function-detrusor overactivity and reduced maximum cystometric capacity predict male sling outcomes and may help in patient selection for male sling (or sphincter) surgery; whereas urodynamic parameters of sphincter incompetency (RLPP) were not predictive. Further larger scale studies are required to confirm these findings.

Long-term outcome of the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS): results of a European multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS^® , Agency for Medical Innovations A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria) in a European-wide multicentre setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 287 men with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were treated with the ATOMS device between June 2009 and March 2016. Continence parameters (daily pad test/pad use), urodynamics (maximum urinary flow rate, voiding volume, residual urine), and pain/quality of life (QoL) ratings (visual analogue scale/Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form [ICIQ-SF]/Patient Global Impression of Improvement [PGI-I]) were compared preoperatively and after intermediate (12 months) as well as after individual maximum follow-up. Overall success rate, dry rate (<10 mL/day and 0-1 pad/day), device durability, treatment failure, and device complications were recorded. Nonparametric tests were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

After a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up of 31 (10-54) months and a median (IQR) of 3 (2-4) adjustments, the overall success rate was 90% (258 men) and the dry rate was 64% (184). Daily pad test and pad use decreased from a median of 400 mL/day and 4 pads/day to a median of 18 mL/day and 1 pad/day (both P < 0.001), concomitantly QoL ratings significantly improved and changed to a high level of satisfaction (PGI-I 4 to 2, ICIQ-SF 17 to 5; both P < 0.001). The UI results at 12 months were comparable to those at final follow-up. Chronic pain and intraoperative complications did not occur. Most of the postoperative complications were Clavien-Dindo grade I-III (no grade IV or V). At present, 231 (80%) of all the ATOMS devices are still functioning; 56 (20%) were removed, the most common reason being local titanium intolerance (41%) and leak/dysfunction (30%). The operating time and continence outcome varied between port generations. In this regard the latest port generation (silicone-covered scrotal port) was superior to its predecessors. Primary implantation (P = 0.002), good physical health (P = 0.001), and no history of radiotherapy (P < 0.001) were prognostic factors for beneficial treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

The ATOMS device is safe and shows high treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction in the largest cohort study to date. The latest generation, with its pre-attached silicone-covered scrotal port, is superior to its predecessors. Significantly better results were achieved with primary implantation and in those without a history of radiotherapy.