Utilization of Flow Cytometry in Pediatric Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens

Lymph node FNA cytology: Diagnostic performance and clinical implications of proposed diagnostic categories

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread clinical use, lymph node fine-needle aspiration cytology (LN-FNAC) lacks universal acceptance for definitively diagnosing lymphomas. This is likely due to reports of lower diagnostic performance, inconsistent terminology use in cytopathology diagnostic reports, and only limited data on the clinical implications of LN-FNAC diagnoses. Recently, a uniform LN-FNAC cytopathological diagnostic reporting system was proposed (the Sydney System). This study evaluated LN-FNAC diagnostic performance and risks of malignancy associated with the proposed diagnostic categories.

METHODS

LN-FNAC specimens obtained in 2018-2019, with and without concurrent core biopsy, to evaluate for suspected lymphoma were analyzed (n = 349). LN-FNAC diagnoses were compared with final diagnoses obtained via subsequent tissue biopsy and/or clinical assessment.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 57.6 years, and 41% were female. LN-FNAC was the initial diagnostic test in 223 (63.9%), and it was used to evaluate for recurrence in 126 (36.1%). LN-FNAC diagnosed 202 hematological malignancies (57.9%), 23 nonhematological malignancies (6.6%), and 124 reactive processes (35.5%). Subsequent tissue biopsy was performed in 42 (12%). The risks of malignancy per diagnostic category were as follows: inadequate, 58.3%; benign, 6.4%; atypical, 69.2%; suspicious, 96.7%; and malignant, 99.3%. LN-FNAC demonstrated up to 96.3% sensitivity, 91.91% specificity, and 87.35% accuracy. Optimal specimen quality and the use of intradepartmental consultation reduced diagnostic error rates in FNA cases without concurrent core biopsy (P = .029 and P = .0002 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LN-FNAC is accurate and reliable for the diagnosis of lymphoma. Inadequate LN-FNAC samples should be resampled due to a significant associated risk of lymphoma. The diagnostic performance of LN-FNAC may be improved with good specimen quality and reviews by multiple pathologists. Understanding the risks of malignancy associated with LN-FNAC diagnostic categories will help to guide optimal patient management.

Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Lymphadenopathy Using Flow Cytometry on Fine Needle Aspirate: Report on 269 Cases

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is frequently the first noninvasive test used for the diagnostic workup of lymphadenopathy. There have been many studies showing its usefulness, especially in conjunction with other techniques for the diagnosis of lymphoma, but it remains inferior to histological examination. The data regarding this subject have mostly been reported mostly from first-world countries, but are scarce for emerging economies. Thus, the current study assesses the agreement between fine needle aspiration flow cytometry (FNA FC) and histology in the aforementioned region. Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including the FNA FC adenopathy diagnoses made between January 2011 and December 2016 at the Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Additional variables included were the histological diagnosis, sex and age of the included patients. Results: In the descriptive part of the current study, 269 FNA FC samples were included. The most frequent diagnoses made on these were represented by B-cell lymphoma, reactive adenopathy, no abnormality detected (NAD), and non-hematological malignancy. In the analytical part of the current study, there were 115 cases included that had both valid FNA FC and histological diagnoses. It could be observed that FNA FC can correctly diagnose B-cell lymphoma in most cases, but it is a poor diagnostic tool especially for Hodgkin lymphoma in this setting as only a four-color flow cytometer was available for diagnosis. Moreover, FNA FC diagnosis of reactive adenopathy and of no abnormalities detected was shown to frequently hide a malignant disease. Conclusion: In countries with scarce resources, FNA FC represents a useful diagnostic tool in the case of B-cell lymphoma, but may misdiagnose reactive adenopathy. Thus, FNA FC should be used in a case-specific manner, in addition to as a screening tool, with the knowledge that in cases with a high clinical suspicion of lymphoma, histological diagnosis is a necessity.