Multitask Deep Neural Network for the Fully Automatic Measurement of the Angle of Progression

The angle of progression (AoP) for assessing fetal head (FH) descent during labor is measured from the standard plane of transperineal ultrasound images as the angle between a line through the long axis of pubic symphysis (PS) and a second line from the right end of PS tangentially to the contour of the FH. This paper presents a multitask network with a shared feature encoder and three task-special decoders for standard plane recognition (Task1), image segmentation (Task2) of PS and FH, and endpoint detection (Task3) of PS. Based on the segmented FH and two endpoints of PS from standard plane images, we determined the right FH tangent point that passes through the right endpoint of PS and then computed the AoP using the above three points. In this paper, the efficient channel attention unit is introduced into the shared feature encoder for improving the robustness of layer region encoding, while an attention fusion module is used to promote cross-branch interaction between the encoder for Task2 and that for Task3, and a shape-constrained loss function is designed for enhancing the robustness to noise based on the convex shape-prior. We use Pearson's correlation coefficient and the Bland–Altman graph to assess the degree of agreement. The dataset includes 1964 images, where 919 images are nonstandard planes, and the other 1045 images are standard planes including PS and FH. We achieve a classification accuracy of 92.26%, and for the AoP calculation, an absolute mean (STD) value of the difference in AoP (∆AoP) is 3.898° (3.192°), the Pearson's correlation coefficient between manual and automated AoP was 0.964 and the Bland-Altman plot demonstrates they were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, our approach can achieve a fully automatic measurement of AoP with good efficiency and may help labor progress in the future.

The JNU-IFM dataset for segmenting pubic symphysis-fetal head

The use of transperineal ultrasound techniques for the assessment of fetal head descent and progression is an adjunct to clinical examination. Automatic identification of parameters based on ultrasound images will greatly reduce the subjectivity and non-repeatability of the clinician's judgment. However, the lack of a pubic symphysis-fetal head dataset hinders the development of algorithms. Here, we present an intrapartum transperineal ultrasound dataset of the Intelligent Fetal Monitoring Lab of Jinan University (named the JNU-IFM dataset), in which intrapartum transperineal ultrasound videos of 78 were recorded from 51 patients. These data were obtained with the Youkey D8 wireless 2D ultrasound probe with its corresponding supporting software by Wuhan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China. In these videos, 6224 high-quality images with four categories were selected to form the JNU- IFM dataset. These images were labelled using the Pair software and then validated by two experienced radiologists. We hope that this data set can be used in the segmentation of the pubic symphysis-fetal head.

The correlation between levator ani co-activation and fetal head regression on maternal pushing at term

OBJECTIVE

To assess the correlation between fetal head regression and levator ani muscle (LAM) co-activation under Valsalva maneuver.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study on the association between the angle of progression (AoP) and labor outcome. We scanned a group of nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor at rest and under maximum Valsalva maneuver. In addition to the previously calculated AoP, in the present study, we measured the anteroposterior diameter of LAM hiatus (APD) on each ultrasound image. LAM co-activation was defined as APD at Valsalva less than that at rest, whereas fetal head regression was defined as AoP at Valsalva less than that at rest. We calculated the correlation between the two phenomena. Finally, we examined various labor outcomes according to the presence, absence, or co-existence of these two phenomena.

RESULTS

We included 469 women. A total of 129 (27.5%) women presented LAM co-activation while 50 (10.7%) showed head regression. Only 15 (3.2%) women showed simultaneous head regression and LAM co-activation. Women with coexisting LAM co-activation and head regression had the narrowest AoP at Valsalva in comparison with other study groups (p < .001). In addition, they had the highest risk of Cesarean delivery (40%) and longest first, second, and active second stage durations, although none of these reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor fetal head regression and LAM co-activation at Valsalva are two distinct phenomena that uncommonly coexist.

Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of transperineal ultrasound-measured angles of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies with cephalic presentation.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a predefined systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to February 5, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Prospective cohort studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of transperineal ultrasound-measured angles of progression (index test) at the onset of the second stage of labor (ie, when complete cervical dilation is diagnosed) for the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery (reference standard) were eligible for inclusion. Eligible studies were limited to those published as full-text articles in the English language and those that included only parturients with a singleton healthy fetus at term with cephalic presentation.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves, pooled sensitivities and specificities, area under the curve, and summary likelihood ratios were calculated using the Stata software. Subgroup analyses were done based on angle of progression ranges of 108° to 119°, 120° to 140°, and 141° to 153°.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies reporting on 887 pregnancies were included. Summary estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of transperineal ultrasound-measured angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for predicting spontaneous vaginal delivery were 94% (95% confidence interval, 88%-97%) and 47% (95% confidence interval, 18%-78%), respectively, for an angle of progression of 108° to 119°, 81% (95% confidence interval, 70%-89%) and 73% (95% confidence interval, 57%-85%), respectively, for an angle of progression of 120° to 140°, and 66% (95% confidence interval, 56%-74%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 66%-92%), respectively, for an angle of progression of 141° to 153°. Likelihood ratio syntheses gave overall positive likelihood ratios of 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 1-3.3), 3 (95% confidence interval, 2-4.7), and 3.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-8.1) and negative likelihood ratios of 0.13 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.22), 0.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.38), and 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.60) for angle of progression ranges of 108° to 119°, 120° to 140°, and 141° to 153°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Angle of progression measured by transperineal ultrasound at the onset of the second stage of labor may predict spontaneous vaginal delivery in singleton, term, cephalic presenting pregnancies and has the potential to be used along with physical examinations and other clinical factors in the management of labor and delivery.

Novel artificial intelligence approach for automatic differentiation of fetal occiput anterior and non-occiput anterior positions during labor

OBJECTIVES

To describe a newly developed machine-learning (ML) algorithm for the automatic recognition of fetal head position using transperineal ultrasound (TPU) during the second stage of labor and to describe its performance in differentiating between occiput anterior (OA) and non-OA positions.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study including singleton term (> 37 weeks of gestation) pregnancies in the second stage of labor, with a non-anomalous fetus in cephalic presentation. Transabdominal ultrasound was performed to determine whether the fetal head position was OA or non-OA. For each case, one sonographic image of the fetal head was then acquired in an axial plane using TPU and saved for later offline analysis. Using the transabdominal sonographic diagnosis as the gold standard, a ML algorithm based on a pattern-recognition feed-forward neural network was trained on the TPU images to discriminate between OA and non-OA positions. In the training phase, the model tuned its parameters to approximate the training data (i.e. the training dataset) such that it would identify correctly the fetal head position, by exploiting geometric, morphological and intensity-based features of the images. In the testing phase, the algorithm was blinded to the occiput position as determined by transabdominal ultrasound. Using the test dataset, the ability of the ML algorithm to differentiate OA from non-OA fetal positions was assessed in terms of diagnostic accuracy. The F₁ -score and precision-recall area under the curve (PR-AUC) were calculated to assess the algorithm's performance. Cohen's kappa (κ) was calculated to evaluate the agreement between the algorithm and the gold standard.

RESULTS

Over a period of 24 months (February 2018 to January 2020), at 15 maternity hospitals affiliated to the International Study group on Labor ANd Delivery Sonography (ISLANDS), we enrolled into the study 1219 women in the second stage of labor. On the basis of transabdominal ultrasound, they were classified as OA (n = 801 (65.7%)) or non-OA (n = 418 (34.3%)). From the entire cohort (OA and non-OA), approximately 70% (n = 824) of the patients were assigned randomly to the training dataset and the rest (n = 395) were used as the test dataset. The ML-based algorithm correctly classified the fetal occiput position in 90.4% (357/395) of the test dataset, including 224/246 with OA (91.1%) and 133/149 with non-OA (89.3%) fetal head position. Evaluation of the algorithm's performance gave an F₁ -score of 88.7% and a PR-AUC of 85.4%. The algorithm showed a balanced performance in the recognition of both OA and non-OA positions. The robustness of the algorithm was confirmed by high agreement with the gold standard (κ = 0.81; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This newly developed ML-based algorithm for the automatic assessment of fetal head position using TPU can differentiate accurately, in most cases, between OA and non-OA positions in the second stage of labor. This algorithm has the potential to support not only obstetricians but also midwives and accoucheurs in the clinical use of TPU to determine fetal occiput position in the labor ward. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Automation in the Fields of Gynaecology and Obstetrics - an Assessment of the State of Play

The long-awaited progress in digitalisation is generating huge amounts of medical data every day, and manual analysis and targeted, patient-oriented evaluation of this data is becoming increasingly difficult or even infeasible. This state of affairs and the associated, increasingly complex requirements for individualised precision medicine underline the need for modern software solutions and algorithms across the entire healthcare system. The utilisation of state-of-the-art equipment and techniques in almost all areas of medicine over the past few years has now indeed enabled automation processes to enter - at least in part - into routine clinical practice. Such systems utilise a wide variety of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, the majority of which have been developed to optimise medical image reconstruction, noise reduction, quality assurance, triage, segmentation, computer-aided detection and classification and, as an emerging field of research, radiogenomics. Tasks handled by AI are completed significantly faster and more precisely, clearly demonstrated by now in the annual findings of the ImageNet Large-Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVCR), first conducted in 2015, with error rates well below those of humans. This review article will discuss the potential capabilities and currently available applications of AI in gynaecological-obstetric diagnostics. The article will focus, in particular, on automated techniques in prenatal sonographic diagnostics.

The Assessment of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasonographic Parameters for their Effectiveness in Evaluation of Progress of Labor and Prediction of Mode of Delivery in Egyptian Women

Introduction: High fetal head station has been associated with prolonged labor and delivery outcomes. Although clinical assessment of fetal head station is both subjective and unreliable, women with prolonged labor are subjected to multiple digital vaginal examinations. The use of ultrasound has been proposed to aid in the management of labor since 1990s. Ultrasound examination is more accurate and reproducible than clinical examination in the diagnosis of fetal head station and in the prediction of arrest of labor. Ultrasound examination can, to some extent, distinguish those women destined for spontaneous vaginal delivery and those destined for operative delivery and  may predict the outcome of instrumental vaginal delivery. Such a technique has the potential to reduce the frequency of intrusive internal examinations and associated infection and could be useful in allowing the assessment of women in whom digital VE is traumatic or contra-indicated. Intrapartum ultrasound not only provides objective and quantitative data in labor, but also helps to make more reliable clinical decisions aiming to improve obstetric outcomes of both the mother and fetus as a supplementary tool for active management. Aim of the work: This study aims at assessing the value of intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography as a quantitative and objective tool in the evaluation of progress of labor and prediction of mode of delivery. Subjects: This study was a prospective observational study conducted on 600 primiparous women in active first stage of labor admitted to Kasr Al Ainy maternity hospital from January 2017 to June 2018. The studied population was divided into two groups. Group A of 300 women with normal progress of labor and group B of 300 women with prolonged 1st stage of labor. Methods: Fetal head station(FHS) was assessed clinically by digital vaginal examination (dVE) and sonographically by transperineal ultrasound measurement of  head perineal distance (HPD) and angle of progression (AOP). Intrapartum care of the patient continued as normal based only on digital vaginal examinations using the modified WHO partogram. (1). Statistical analysis was targeted towards assessing the potential of the intrapartum ultrasonography in the evaluation of progress of labor and prediction of mode of delivery. Results: All studied parameters for assessment of FHS (dVE, HPD, and AOP) significantly corelated with each other and with both progress of labor and mode of delivery with P value (<0.001). The highest sensitivity for prediction of progress of labor is observed using dVE (83%), the highest specificity is observed using AOP (78.3%). The highest sensitivity for prediction mode of delivery is for combined HPD & AOP (97.7%) while the highest specificity is for AOP (81%). When combining both HPD and AOP for prediction of mode of delivery, the assessment of both parameters was found to have a high sensitivity of 97.7% and a high positive predictive value of 86.63%. Conclusion: Intrapartum ultrasound examination is a valuable tool in the prediction of progress of labor and mode of delivery. The assessment of fetal head station by transperineal ultrasound measurement of HPD and AOP is much more informative of the progress of labor and the mode of delivery than digital assessment of fetal head station. Keywords: Labor, intrapartum ultrasound, Angle of progression, Head perineal distance, fetal head station, digital vaginal examination.

Transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head elevation by maneuvers used for managing umbilical cord prolapse

OBJECTIVE

To assess objectively the degree of fetal head elevation achieved by different maneuvers commonly used for managing umbilical cord prolapse.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of pregnant women at term before elective Cesarean delivery. A baseline assessment of fetal head station was performed with the woman in the supine position, using transperineal ultrasound for measuring the parasagittal angle of progression (psAOP), head-symphysis distance (HSD) and head-perineum distance (HPD). The ultrasonographic measurements of fetal head station were repeated during different maneuvers, including elevation of the maternal buttocks using a wedge, knee-chest position, Trendelenburg position with a 15° tilt and filling the maternal urinary bladder with 100 mL, 300 mL and 500 mL of normal saline. The measurements obtained during the maneuvers were compared with the baseline measurements.

RESULTS

Twenty pregnant women scheduled for elective Cesarean section at term were included in the study. When compared with baseline (median psAOP, 103.6°), the knee-chest position gave the strongest elevation effect, with the greatest reduction in psAOP (psAOP, 80.7°; P < 0.001), followed by filling the bladder with 500 mL (psAOP, 89.9°; P < 0.001) and 300 mL (psAOP, 94.4°; P < 0.001) of normal saline. Filling the maternal bladder with 100 mL of normal saline (psAOP, 96.1°; P = 0.001), the Trendelenburg position (psAOP, 96.8°; P = 0.014) and elevating the maternal buttocks (psAOP, 98.3°; P = 0.033) gave modest elevation effects. Similar findings were reported for HSD and HPD. The fetal head elevation effects of the knee-chest position, Trendelenburg position and elevation of the maternal buttocks were independent of the initial fetal head station, but that of bladder filling was greater when the initial head station was low.

CONCLUSIONS

To elevate the fetal presenting part, the knee-chest position provides the best effect, followed by filling the maternal urinary bladder with 500 mL then 300 mL of fluid, respectively. Filling the bladder with 100 mL of fluid, the Trendelenburg position and elevation of the maternal buttocks have modest effects. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Fetal head progression and regression on maternal pushing at term and labor outcome

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was two-fold. First, to evaluate the association between the change in the angle of progression (AoP) on maternal pushing and labor outcome. Second, to assess the incidence and clinical significance of the reduction of AoP on maternal pushing.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy at term. AoP was measured at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver before the onset of labor, and the difference between AoP on maximum Valsalva and that at rest (ΔAoP) was calculated for each woman. Following delivery and data collection, we assessed the association between ΔAoP and various labor outcomes, including Cesarean section (CS), duration of the first, second and active second stages of labor, Apgar score and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The prevalence of women with reduction of AoP on maximum Valsalva maneuver (AoP-regression group) was calculated and its association with the mode of delivery and duration of different stages of labor was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 469 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 273 (58.2%) had spontaneous vaginal birth, 65 (13.9%) had instrumental delivery and 131 (27.9%) underwent CS. Women in the CS group were older, had narrower AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva, higher rate of epidural administration and lower 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores in comparison with the vaginal-delivery group. ΔAoP was comparable between the two groups. On Pearson's correlation analysis, AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver had a significant negative correlation with the duration of the first stage of labor. ΔAoP showed a significant negative correlation with the duration of the active second stage of labor (Pearson's r, -0.125; P = 0.02). Cox regression model analysis showed that ΔAoP was associated independently with the duration of the active second stage (hazard ratio, 1.014 (95% CI, 1.003-1.025); P = 0.012) after adjusting for maternal age and body mass index. AoP reduction on maximum Valsalva was found in 73 (15.6%) women. In comparison with women who showed no change or an increase in AoP on maximum Valsalva, the AoP-regression group did not demonstrate significant difference in maternal characteristics, mode of delivery, rate of epidural analgesia, duration of the different stages of labor or rate of NICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

In nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor, narrower AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva, reflecting fetal head engagement, is associated with a higher risk of Cesarean delivery. The increase in AoP from rest to Valsalva, reflecting more efficient maternal pushing, is associated with a shorter active second stage of labor. Fetal head regression on maternal pushing is present in about 16% of women and does not appear to have clinical significance. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor

BACKGROUND

Occiput posterior position is the most frequent cephalic malposition, and its persistence at delivery is associated with a higher risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Diagnosis and management of occiput posterior position remain a clinical challenge. This is partly caused by our inability to predict fetuses who will spontaneously rotate into occiput anterior from those who will have persistent occiput posterior position. The angle of progression, measured with transperineal ultrasound, represents a reliable tool for the evaluation of fetal head station during labor. The relationship between the persistence of occiput posterior position and fetal head station in the second stage of labor has not been previously assessed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the role of fetal head station, as measured by the angle of progression, in the prediction of persistent occiput posterior position and the mode of delivery in the second stage of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited a nonconsecutive series of women with posterior occiput position diagnosed by transabdominal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. For each woman, a transperineal ultrasound was performed to measure the angle of progression at rest. We compared the angle of progression between women who delivered fetuses in occiput anterior position and those with persistent occiput posterior position at delivery. Receiver operating characteristics curves were performed to evaluate the accuracy of the angle of progression in the prediction of persistent occiput posterior position. Finally, we performed a multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of persistent occiput posterior position.

RESULTS

Overall, 63 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 39 women (62%) delivered in occiput anterior position, whereas 24 (38%) delivered in occiput posterior position (persistent occiput posterior position). The angle of progression was significantly narrower in the persistent occiput posterior position group than in women who delivered fetuses in occiput anterior position (118.3°±12.2° vs 127.5°±10.5°; P=.003). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.731 (95% confidence interval, 0.594-0.869) with an estimated best cutoff range of 121.5° (sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 67%). On logistic regression analysis, the angle of progression was found to be independently associated with persistence of occiput posterior position (odds ratio, 0.942; 95% confidence interval, 0.889-0.998; P=.04). Finally, women who underwent cesarean delivery had significantly narrower angle of progression than women who had a vaginal delivery (113.5°±8.1 vs 128.0°±10.7; P<.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the prediction of cesarean delivery was 0.866 (95% confidence interval, 0.761-0.972). At multivariable logistic regression analysis including the angle of progression, parity, and gestational age at delivery, the angle of progression was found to be the only independent predictor associated with cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.849; 95% confidence interval, 0.775-0.0930; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

In fetuses with occiput posterior at the beginning of the second stage of labor, narrower values of the angle of progression are associated with higher rates of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery and a higher risk of cesarean delivery.

Transperineal ultrasound assessment of maternal pelvic floor at term and fetal head engagement

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between pelvic floor dimensions in nulliparous women at term and fetal head engagement, as assessed by transperineal ultrasound.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of nulliparous women at term. Before the onset of labor, transperineal ultrasound was used to measure the anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the levator hiatus and the angle of progression (AoP) at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction and on maximum Valsalva maneuver (before and after visual feedback). We assessed the correlation between pelvic floor static and dynamic dimensions (levator hiatal APD and levator ani muscle coactivation) and AoP, which is an objective index of fetal head engagement.

RESULTS

In total, 282 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 211 (74.8%) women had a vaginal delivery while 71 (25.2%) had a Cesarean delivery. AoP was narrower in the Cesarean-delivery group at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction and on maximum Valsalva, whereas no differences in levator hiatal APD were found between the two groups. We found a negative correlation between levator hiatal APD at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction and on maximum Valsalva and the duration of the second stage of labor. There was a positive correlation between AoP and levator hiatal APD on maximum Valsalva maneuver after visual feedback (r = 0.15, P = 0.01). Women with levator ani muscle contraction on Valsalva maneuver (i.e. coactivation), both pre and post visual feedback, had a narrower AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva. After visual feedback, women with levator ani muscle coactivation had a longer second stage of labor than did those without (80.8 ± 61.4 min vs 62.9 ± 43.4 min (P = 0.04)).

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller pelvic floor dimensions and levator ani muscle coactivation are associated with higher fetal head station and with a longer second stage of labor in nulliparous women at term. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

New technique for automatic sonographic measurement of change in head-perineum distance and angle of progression during active phase of second stage of labor

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of a new ultrasound technique for the automatic assessment of the change in head-perineum distance (delta-HPD) and angle of progression (delta-AoP) during the active phase of the second stage of labor.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational cohort study including singleton term pregnancies with fetuses in cephalic presentation during the active phase of the second stage of labor. In each patient, two videoclips of 10 s each were acquired transperineally, one in the axial and one in the sagittal plane, between rest and the acme of an expulsive effort, in order to measure HPD and AoP, respectively. The videoclips were processed offline and the difference between the acme of the pushing effort and rest in HPD (delta-HPD) and AoP (delta-AoP) was calculated, first manually by an experienced sonographer and then using a new automatic technique. The reliability of the automatic algorithm was evaluated by comparing the automatic measurements with those obtained manually, which was considered as the reference gold standard.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 women were included. A significant correlation was observed between the measurements obtained by the automatic and the manual methods for both delta-HPD (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.97) and delta-AoP (ICC = 0.99). The high accuracy provided by the automatic algorithm was confirmed by the high values of the coefficient of determination (r²  = 0.98 for both delta-HPD and delta-AoP) and the low residual errors (root mean square error = 1.2 mm for delta-HPD and 1.5° for delta-AoP). A Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.52 mm (limits of agreement, -1.58 to 2.62 mm) for delta-HPD (P = 0.034) and 0.35° (limits of agreement, -2.54 to 3.09°) for delta-AoP (P = 0.39) between the manual and automatic measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The automatic assessment of delta-AoP and delta-HPD during maternal pushing efforts is feasible. The automatic measurement of delta-AoP appears to be reliable when compared with the gold standard manual measurement by an experienced operator. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Automatic measurement of head-perineum distance during intrapartum ultrasound: description of the technique and preliminary results

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a new ultrasound technique for the automatic assessment of the head-perineum distance (HPD) during childbirth.

METHODS

HPD was measured on a total of 40 acquisition sessions in 30 laboring women both automatically by an innovative algorithm and manually by trained sonographers, assumed as gold standard.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was found between manual and automatic measurements (Intra-CC = 0.994). High values of the coefficient of determination (r²=0.98) and low residual errors: RMSE = 2.01 mm (4.9%) were found.

CONCLUSION

The automatic algorithm for the assessment of the HPD represents a reliable technique.

Feasibility, Reliability, and Agreement of Transperineal Ultrasound Measurement: Results from a Longitudinal Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and agreement of serial transperineal ultrasound (TPU) assessment of fetal head station (parasagittal angle of progression [psAOP], head-perineum distance [HPD], and head-symphysis distance [HSD]) and sonographic cervical dilatation (SCD), compared to fetal head station and cervical dilatation determined by vaginal examination, respectively.

METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal study in singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor at term. Paired assessment of fetal head station and cervical dilatation by vaginal examination, with TPU assessment of psAOP, HPD, HSD, and SCD was made serially. Feasibility, correlation, reliability, and agreement were determined.

RESULTS

1,139 paired measurements among 326 women were included. psAOP and HPD were achievable in all assessments. HSD was not achievable in 3.4% (11/326) due to high fetal head station. Fetal head station by vaginal examination was positively correlated with psAOP (rho = 0.70) but negatively correlated with HPD (rho = -0.57) and HSD (rho = -0.52). The feasibility to measure SCD reduced as cervical dilatation increased. Cervical dilatation and SCD were positively correlated (rho = 0.96) with strong agreement (concordant correlation coefficient = 0.925).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of psAOP and HPD are feasible and correlate significantly with fetal head station by vaginal examination. Measurement of HSD is not feasible when fetal head station is high. Measurement of SCD is feasible, but it is more difficult in the advanced stage of labor. The correlation, reliability, and agreement between SCD and cervical dilatation by vaginal examination are high.

Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome

OBJECTIVES

First, to compare the manual sagittal and parasagittal and automated parasagittal methods of measuring the angle of progression (AoP) by transperineal ultrasound during labor, and, second, to develop models for the prediction of time to delivery and need for Cesarean section (CS) for failure to progress (FTP) in a population of patients undergoing induction of labor.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of transperineal ultrasound in a cohort of 512 women with a singleton pregnancy undergoing induction of labor. A random selection of 50 stored images was assessed for inter- and intraobserver reliability of AoP measurements using the manual sagittal and parasagittal and automated parasagittal methods. In cases of vaginal delivery, univariate linear, multiple linear and quantile regression analyses were performed to predict time to delivery. Univariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to predict CS for FTP in the first stage of labor.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the manual parasagittal method for a single observer was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98) and for two observers it was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98), indicating good reliability. The ICC for the sagittal method for a single observer was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.96) and for two observers it was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.58-0.84), indicating moderate reliability for a single observer and poor reliability between two observers. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated narrower limits of agreement for the manual parasagittal approach than for the sagittal approach for both a single and two observers. The automated parasagittal method failed to capture an image in 19% of cases. The mean difference in AoP measurements between the sagittal and manual parasagittal methods was 11°. In pregnancies resulting in vaginal delivery, 54% of the variation in time to delivery was explained in a model combining parity, epidural and syntocinon use during labor and the sonographic findings of fetal head position and AoP. In the prediction of CS for FTP in the first stage of labor, a model which combined maternal factors with the sonographic measurements of AoP and estimated fetal weight was superior to one utilizing maternal factors alone (area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve, 0.80 vs 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

First, the method of measuring AoP with the greatest reliability is the manual parasagittal technique and future research should focus on this technique. Second, over half of the variation in time to vaginal delivery can be explained by a model that combines maternal factors, pregnancy characteristics and ultrasound findings. Third, the ability of AoP to provide clinically useful prediction of CS for FTP in the first stage of labor is limited. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Predicting the Mode of Delivery by Angle of Progression (AOP) before the Onset of Labor by Transperineal Ultrasound in Nulliparous Women

Background:

Prediction of the mode of delivery is crucial for better labour outcome. Recent studies suggest that the angle of progression (AOP), measured using transperineal ultrasound, can substantially aid the assessment of fetal head descent during labor, thereby predicting the mode of delivery.

Objective:

To assess the ability of the AOP measured by transperineal ultrasound to predict the mode of delivery in nulliparous women before the onset of labor.

Methods:

A prospective observational study was conducted at our hospital, of nulliparous women who had presented to the antenatal clinic at ≥ 38 weeks of gestation but not in labor. AOP was measured using transperineal ultrasonography and compared among the women having Caesarean section (CS) due to labor dystocia and vaginal delivery (VD). Various other confounding factors which increase the risk of caesarean section were analyzed.

Results:

Among total 120 nulliparous women, the mean AOP was narrower in patients undergoing CS (n = 28) compared to those with VD (n = 92) (91.6 ± 6.1° vs. 100.7 ± 6.9°; P < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that narrow AOP values (OR 3.66; P < 0.001; 95% CI 1.7- 14.5) and occiput-posterior fetal position (OR 1.63; P = 0.04; 95% CI 1.0-7.5) were the independent risk factors for CS. An AOP ≥ 96° (calculated from the ROC curve) was associated with VD in 95% (76/80) of women and an AOP < 96° was observed among 60% (24/40) of women who underwent CS.

Conclusion:

Narrow AOP (< 96°) and occiput-posterior fetal position are at higher risk for CS due to labor dystocia. AOP measured at the antenatal period could accurately predict the mode of delivery, thereby modifying labor outcome.

Reliability of transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of the angle of progression in labor using parasagittal approach versus midsagittal approach

OBJECTIVE

To assess the inter-method agreement between midsagittal (msAoP) and parasagittal (psAoP) measurements of the angle of progression (AoP) during labor. In addition, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between AoP measurements by both midsagittal and parasagittal approaches with the mode of delivery.

METHODS

We recruited a nonconsecutive series of women in active labor with a singleton uncomplicated term pregnancy with fetuses in vertex presentation. Women underwent transperineal ultrasound in the absence of uterine contractions or maternal pushing to measure both msAoP and psAoP. The inter-method agreement between the two acquisitions was then assessed. Lastly, both measurements were compared between women who had a vaginal delivery versus those who underwent cesarean section (CS).

RESULTS

Overall, 151 women were included in the study. We found an excellent agreement between msAoP and psAoP (ICC 0.935; 95% CI 0.912-0.953, p < .001). On the other hand, psAoP overestimated the measurements in comparison with msAoP (101.2 ± 15.6 versus 98.2 ± 16.0, p < .001). There was a significant correlation between both methods of AoP assessment and duration of the active second stage of labor and AoP measured by either method was significantly wider in patients who delivered vaginally compared to those who had a CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed a significant difference in the measured angle between the psAoP and the originally described msAoP. The automated measurements of AoP that have been introduced are designed using the parasagittal visualization of the more echogenic pubic arch, rather than the hypoechogenic pubic symphysis. We think that in the light of our data, care should be taken before applying data from midsagittal measurement in centers using the parasagittal automated approach.

Dynamic changes of fetal head descent at term before the onset of labor correlate with labor outcome and can be improved by ultrasound visual feedback

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the dynamic changes of angle of progression (AoP) before the onset of labor and their correlation with labor outcome and to investigate the effect of visual feedback using transperineal ultrasound on maternal pushing.

METHODS

We recruited a group of low-risk nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy at term. We measured AoP at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and Valsalva maneuver (before and after visual feedback). We compared AoP between women who delivered vaginally (VD) and those who underwent a cesarean section (CS). We also assessed the correlation between AoP and labor durations.

RESULTS

Overall, 222 women were included in the study; 129 (58.1%) had spontaneous VD, 35 (15.8%) had instrumental delivery, and 58 (26.1%) underwent CS. In comparison with rest, AoP decreased at PFMC (p < .001) and increased at first Valsalva (p < .001). AoP increased further significantly at Valsalva after visual feedback (p < .001). Women with VD had wider AoP at rest (p = .020), during Valsalva maneuver before (p = .024), and after visual feedback (p = .037). At cox regression analysis, wider AoP was associated with shorter first, second, and active second stages.

CONCLUSION

Wider AoP at rest and under Valsalva is associated with vaginal delivery, the shorter interval to delivery, and shorter labor duration in nulliparous women at term. The accuracy of AoP in the prediction of cesarean delivery is modest and is unlikely to be clinically applicable in isolation for the prediction of the mode of delivery.

Ultrasound in labor: impact of a theoretical and practical course on caregiver's perspective and accuracy

Objective: The aim of the present study was two-fold; first is to assess the impact of a theoretical and practical course on the caregiver's perspective on the use of ultrasound in labor. Second is to evaluate the impact of the course on the measurement of the angle of progression.Materials and methods: Obstetricians participating in the course responded twice to a questionnaire addressing the caregiver's perspective on the use of ultrasound in labor, before and at the end of the course. In addition, all participants measured the angle of progression on a digital simulation software once following the theoretical part and a second time after the conclusion of both the theoretical and practical sessions. All answers to the questionnaire were compared before versus after the course. The angle of progression assessments after the theoretical part and those after the course were compared with those performed by an expert operator.Results: Overall, data from 51 participants were analyzed. In comparison with the pre-course questionnaire, more participants after the course believed ultrasound can be a useful instrument for fetal occiput presentation diagnosis (45; 88.2% versus 26; 51%, p < .001) and for fetal head progression evaluation (37; 72.5% versus 19; 37.3%; p < .001). Although before the course, most participants (32; 62.7%) thought that the transperineal parameters were too complex to be applied, only 19 (37.3%) still considered the complexity of the ultrasound indices, an obstacle against their application in clinical practice after the course (p = .002). Regarding the angle of progression, precourse measurements showed a systematic overestimation in comparison with the gold standard. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation, more than halved following the practical simulation reflecting at least a doubling of the angle of progression (AoP) measurement precision (14.2 versus 5.5%).Conclusions: A theoretical and practical course conducted by expert operators may positively change obstetricians' perspective on the use of ultrasound in labor. Moreover, a practical session seems to improve the participants' accuracy and precision in the assessment of fetal head descent by transperineal ultrasound.

Three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: clinical utility and future prospects

During the last decade, there has been a huge advancement in the use of transperineal ultrasound (TPU) in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Its main applications in obstetrics include the monitoring of fetal progression in labor and recently the assessment of maternal pelvic dimensions, whereas in gynecology, TPU is at present widely used for the evaluation of the female pelvic floor, opening new boundaries for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders. The association of volumetric three-dimensional techniques has largely contributed to the remarkable progress that has occurred in the use of TPU. The aim of this paper is to offer an overview of the advantages, challenges and future perspectives of the use of TPU for women’s imaging.