National Impact of Maintenance Dialysis or Renal Transplantation on Outcomes Following ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Underutilization of left heart catheterization in kidney transplant patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant (KT) patients. The perceived risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may create a reluctance to perform coronary angiography in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Methods

National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database was used to sample individuals presenting with NSTEMI. Patients were stratified into KT and Non-KT cohorts. Outcomes included left heart catheterization rates, mortality, arrhythmias, acute kidney injury/acute renal failure (AKI/ARF), and extended length of hospital stay (ELOS) (>72 h). Propensity matching (1:1 ratio) and regression analyses were performed.

Results

Out of 336,354 patients with NSTEMI, 742 patients were in the KT group. KT patients were less likely to have LHC relative to non-KT patients (22.0 % vs 18.3 %); a difference that persisted on post-match analysis (27.1 % vs 19.4 %). On pre-match analysis, KT transplant patients that underwent LHC had lower mortality (10.3 % vs 0.7 %), AKI/ARF (44.6 % vs 27.9 %), arrhythmias (30.4 % vs 20.6 %) and lower ELOS (58.6 % vs 41.9 %). Post-match, KT cohort patient that underwent LHC had lower arrhythmias (OR:0.60[0.38-0.96]), AKI/ARF (OR = 0.51[0.34-0.77]), ELOS (OR:0.49[0.34-0.73]).

Conclusion

KT patients underwent LHC much less frequently than their non-KT counterparts for NSTEMI. Coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization were associated with a significant decrease in morbidity and mortality. This theorized risk of CIN should not outweigh the benefit of LHC in KT patients.

Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Dialysis Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Patients receiving maintenance dialysis have higher mortality following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) than patients not receiving dialysis. Whether pPCI confers a similar benefit to patients receiving dialysis remains unknown. We compared the effect of pPCI on in-hospital outcomes among patients hospitalized for STEMI and receiving maintenance dialysis to the effect among patients hospitalized for STEMI but not receiving dialysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We used the National-Inpatient-Sample (2016-2018) and included all adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of STEMI.

PREDICTORS

Primary exposure was PCI. Confounders included dialysis status, demographics, insurance, household income, comorbidities, and the elective nature of the admission.

OUTCOMES

In-hospital mortality, stroke, AKI, new dialysis requirements, vascular complications, gastrointestinal bleeding, blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, palliative care, and discharge destination.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

The average treatment effect [ATE] of pPCI was estimated using propensity score matching within ESRD and non-ESRD groups independently to explore if the effect is modified by ESRD status. Additionally, the average marginal effect [AME] was calculated accounting for the clustering within hospitals.

RESULTS

4,220 (1.07%) out of 413,500 hospitalizations were for patients receiving dialysis. The dialysis cohort was older (65.2±12.2 vs. 63.4±13.1, p<0.001), had more females (42.4% vs. 30.6%, p<0.001) and more comorbidities, but fewer White patients (41.1% vs. 71.7%, p<0.001). Patients receiving dialysis underwent less angiography (73.1% vs. 85.4%, p<0.001) or pPCI (57.5% vs. 79.8%, p<0.001). pPCI was associated with lower mortality in patients receiving dialysis (15.7% vs. 27.1%, p<0.001) as well as in those who were not (5.0% vs. 17.4%, p<0.001). The ATE on mortality did not differ significantly between patients receiving dialysis (-8.6% [-15.6%, -1.6%], p=0.02) and those who were not (-8.2% [-8.8%, -7.5%], p<0.001 (p-interaction=0.9). The AME method showed similar results (-9.4% [-14.8%, -4.0%], p<0.001) among patients receiving dialysis and those who were not (-7.9% [-8.5%, -7.4%], p<0.001) (p-interaction=0.59). Both the ATE and AME were comparable for other in-hospital outcomes in both groups.

LIMITATIONS

Administrative data, lack of pharmacotherapy and long-term outcome data, and residual confounding.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conservative management, pPCI for STEMI was associated with comparable reductions in short-term mortality among patients irrespective of their receipt of maintenance dialysis.

ST elevation myocardial infarction and kidney transplant: A large cohort study: STEMI and renal transplant

BACKGROUND

The literature on outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) amongst kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To study the outcomes of STEMI among KTR.

METHODS

Data from the national readmissions database (NRD) sample that constitutes 49.1% of the stratified sample of all hospitals in the USA were analyzed for hospitalizations with STEMI among KTR for the years 2012-2018. Complications associated with STEMI were extracted using International Classification of Diseases codes.

RESULTS

A total of 588,668 index KTR hospitalizations (mean age 57.67±14.22 years; female 44.5%) of which 3,496 (0.59%) had STEMI were recorded in the NRD for the years 2012-2018. A total of 11,676 (1.98%) patients died during the hospitalization. In-hospital mortality among STEMI was higher, 465 (13.3%), than without-STEMI 11,211 (1.92%). Among the complications, mechanical complications occurred among 1.0% vs 0.02%, cardiogenic shock 10.6 vs 0.3%, ventricular arrythmias 8.3% vs 0.8%, conduction block 6.9% vs 2%, stroke 4.1% vs 1.9%, and acute kidney injury 31.6% vs 28.3% among STEMI and without-STEMI respectively. Among coronary procedures, coronary angiography was performed among 1,999 (57.2%) of which 1,777 (50.8%) had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). On coarsened exact matching of baseline characteristics, PCI was less likely associated with mortality, odds ratio 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0.64; p=0.0002). The trends of mortality among STEMI were steady (p-trend 0.11). PCI trend increased (p-trend 0.008) and incidence of STEMI decreased over the study years 2012 (0.66%)-2018(0.474%). A total of 84,810 (14.4%) patients were readmitted in 30 days of which 696 (20%) patients were among the STEMI subgroup.

CONCLUSION

STEMI is not an uncommon complication among KTR and is associated with significant mechanical complications. Improvement in cardiovascular risk factors might improve the STEMI rates among KTR.

Creatinine variation improves Zwolle score in selecting low-risk patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The Zwolle score is recommended to identify ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with low-risk eligible for early discharge. Our aim was to ascertain if creatinine variation (Δ-sCr) would improve Zwolle score in the decision-making of early discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 3296 patients with STEMI that underwent primary PCI were gathered from the Portuguese Registry on Acute Coronary Syndromes. A Modified-Zwolle score, including Δ-sCr, was created and compared with the original Zwolle score. Δ-sCr was also compared between low (Zwolle score ≤3) and non-low-risk patients (Zwolle score >3). The primary endpoint is 30-day mortality and the secondary endpoints are in-hospital mortality and complications. Thirty-day mortality was 1.5% in low-risk patients (35 patients) and 9.2% in non-low-risk patients (92 patients). The Modified-Zwolle score had a better performance than the original Zwolle score in all endpoints: 30-day mortality (area under curve 0.853 versus 0.810, P < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (0.889 versus 0.845, P < 0.001) and complications (0.728 versus 0.719, P = 0.037). Reclassification of patients lead to a net reclassification improvement of 6.8%. Additionally, both original Zwolle score low-risk patients and non-low-risk patients who had a Δ-sCr ≥0.3 mg/dl had higher 30-day mortality (low-risk: 1% versus 6.6%, P < 0.001; non-low-risk 4.4% versus 20.7%, P < 0.001), in-hospital mortality and complications.

CONCLUSION

Δ-sCr enhanced the performance of Zwolle score and was associated with higher 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality and complications in low and non-low-risk patients. This data may assist the selection of low-risk patients who will safely benefit from early discharge after STEMI.

Early postoperative acute myocardial infarction in kidney transplant recipients: A nested case-control study

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology of early acute myocardial infarctions after kidney transplantation has not been well characterized. This study sought to examine the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of early acute myocardial infarctions or EAMI in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A total of 1976 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our center from Jan 1, 2000, to Sept 30, 2016, were included. A nested case-control design was used to study EAMI risk factors using a conditional logistic regression model. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of EAMI with death-censored graft failure, death with graft function, and total graft failure.

RESULTS

Seventy four patients had an EAMI within 3 months post-transplant. Based on univariable analyses, risk factors for EAMI included age and recipient history of diabetes mellitus or coronary artery disease. After adjustment, recipient history of coronary artery disease was the only independent predictor for EAMI (OR 3.76, p < .001). Patients who experienced EAMI were more likely to experience death-censored graft failure, death with graft function, and total graft failure.

CONCLUSION

While the incidence of EAMI in kidney transplant recipients is relatively low, these data show that EAMI has profound long-term effects on morbidity and mortality.

Beta blockers in patients with end-stage renal disease-Evidence-based recommendations

For patients who require hemodialysis, beta blockers offer a simultaneous opportunity and challenge in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Beta blockers are well supported by data from nondialysis populations and directly mitigate the sympathetic overactivity that links chronic kidney disease with cardiovascular sequelae. However, the evidence supporting their use in patients receiving hemodialysis is sparse and the heterogeneity of the beta blocker class makes it difficult to prescribe these medications with confidence. Despite these limitations, both trial and observational data exist that can help guide the use of these medications. In this review, we outline the reasons to consider beta blockers for patients receiving hemodialysis, discuss the barriers to their use, and provide specific evidence-based recommendations for beta blocker use in patients with heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease and arrhythmia.