Renaissance of Low-Dose Radiotherapy Concepts for Cutaneous Lymphomas

Success of Ultra-low Dose Radiation Therapy for Primary Cutaneous B-cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) is a relatively rare disease, associated with 5-year overall survival of nearly 95% when treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone. However, standard EBRT doses yield acute skin toxicity in more than 70% of patients and grade 3 to 4 acute skin toxicity in nearly 10% of patients. Consequently, the PCBCL treatment paradigm is shifting towards lower EBRT doses. This study evaluates our early experience with ultra-low dose EBRT (total dose of 4 Gy in 2 fractions) for PCBCL.

METHODS

Four biopsy-confirmed PCBCL lesions (1 anterior thigh and 3 chest) in 2 male patients were treated with 2 Gy×2 fraction EBRT using electrons through a clinical setup. The anterior thigh lesion was treated using a clamshell to protect the scrotum from scatter dose. Treatment was achieved using 9 MeV electrons to the 85% isodose line using no bolus, with follow-up every 4 months and potential retreatment if no visible response at 8 to 9 months.

RESULTS

All lesions demonstrated a response to EBRT by 4 months, visibly manifesting as flattening with changes in pigmentation. At the last follow-up (20, 20, 16.5, and 4 mo, respectively), all lesions had flattened with no evidence of local recurrence and no skin toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of PCBCL with ultra-low dose EBRT to 4 Gy total dose in 2 fractions provides durable local control with zero skin toxicity. These results are encouraging for both the success of treatment and the potential to use similarly low doses for retreatment should patients exhibit local recurrence.

How do we treat cutaneous T-cell lymphoma?

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas which are based on the malignant proliferation of skin-related T lymphocytes. The clinical appearance, as well as the course and the associated therapeutic approach, are sometimes very different between the different subtypes. Since allogeneic stem cell transplantation is currently the only curative option, and the morbidity and mortality are not insignificant, a therapy concept should be developed that considers its often rather indolent but chronic course. This concept should enable a good disease control with as few side effects as possible and preserve or improve the quality of life. In the early stages of the disease, skin-oriented therapies are generally used first before systemic and increasingly aggressive therapeutic agents are used as the disease progresses. Considering the current guidelines, literature and subjective experience, we summarize in this review how we treat cutaneous T-cell lymphomas.

Total skin electron beam therapy for primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: clinical characteristics and outcomes in a Mexican reference center

Aim

The aim of this study was to assess treatment modalities, treatment response, toxicity profile, disease progression and outcomes in 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (PCTCL) treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT).

Background

Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) are extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas originating in the skin without evidence of extracutaneous disease at diagnosis. Despite advances in systemic and local therapy options, the management of advanced stages remains mostly palliative.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients with PCTCL, diagnosed and treated in a reference center in Mexico City, analyzing treatment modalities, response to treatment, long-term outcome, and mortality.

Results

Eight males (57%) and 6 (43%) females were identified. Most patients were stage IVA (n = 5, 36%) followed by stage IB and IIB (28.5% and 21.4%, respectively). Eleven patients received the low-dose RT scheme (12 Gy), 1 patient, the intermediate-dose RT scheme (24 Gy), and 2 patients, the conventional-dose RT scheme (36 Gy). Mean follow-up time was 4.6 years. At first follow-up examination, 6-8 weeks after radiotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) for the cohort was 85%. The median PFS for the whole cohort was 6 months.

Conclusion

This study reinforces the role of TSEBT when compared with other treatment modalities and novel agents. Low-dose TSEBT is now widely used because of the opportunity for retreatment.

Radiotherapy of primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma: our experience in 30 cases

BACKGROUND

Since the observation of new cases of primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PCALCL) with a seemingly aggressive clinical presentation and a favorable response to radiation therapy (RT), a review of our series has been performed to evaluate the results of RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with PCALCL treated with conventional energy RT.

RESULTS

About 55 fields of irradiation were performed. Complete clinical response (CCR) was obtained in 29 cases and a partial clinical response (PCR) in one. Two lesions had a marginal relapse at 7 and 37 months, respectively. In eight cases, new lesions appeared in the same body district and in six cases, in body sites at distance from the field of treatment. Total radiation dose ranged from 15 to 35 Gy (median 25 Gy). Follow-up range was 2-218 months (median 38.5 months) with a local control rate of 85% and a relapse-free rate of 49% at 5 years from RT. Three cases developed a nodal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

PCALCL belongs to the group of primary cutaneous CD30⁺ lymphoproliferative disorders, accounting for 25-30% of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. RT is considered of choice as alternative to surgical excision of solitary lesions. Recent studies have focused on ideal dose to obtain local control indicating 30 Gy as adequate, but others have hypothesized that lower doses may suffice. Our study confirms the excellent role of RT in the local control of the disease with total doses ≤25 Gy.

De-escalated radiotherapy for indolent primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy (RT) has an established role in the curative treatment of indolent primary cutaneous B‑cell lymphoma (PCBCL). With the role of low-dose regimens such as 2 × 2 Gy being uncertain, we compared conventional-dose RT to a low-dose approach and investigated outcome and toxicities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 26 patients with 44 cutaneous lesions treated at our institution between 2007 and 2017, comprising 22 marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL) lesions and 22 follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL) lesions. Seven lesions (16%) were treated with low-dose RT (LDRT) (4 Gy) and 37 (84%) with conventional-dose RT (≥24 Gy, median 40 Gy). Median follow-up duration was 76 months.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was 91% (complete response rate [CRR]: 75%). The 5‑year local control rate (LCR) was 88% and the 10-year LCR was 84%. The response rates were significantly higher following conventional-dose RT (ORR: 92% vs. 86%; CRR: 84% vs. 29%; P = 0.007). In terms of radiation dose, the rate of infield relapses (14% vs. 11%, P = 0.4) and the 5‑year LCR (86% vs. 90%, P = 0.4) were comparable in the LDRT and conventional-dose RT groups. During RT courses, about two-thirds of patients experienced mild toxicities, with grade I and II acute toxicity rates of 61% and 9%, respectively, with lower incidences of grade I (14% vs. 70%) and grade II (0% vs. 8%, P = 0.004) toxicities following LDRT.

CONCLUSION

This long-term analysis confirms the excellent outcome of RT in the management of PCBCL. The LDRT concept with 4 Gy was associated with a comparable LCR and reduced rates of acute toxicity. However, the response rates were significantly lower for this group and LDRT may therefore not be recommended as standard treatment.

Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy: Quality of life improvement and clinical impact of maintenance and adjuvant treatment in patients with mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome

PURPOSE

Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) has proved to be a safe and effective treatment for cutaneous T‑cell lymphomas. Here, we examined the impact of this treatment on patient quality of life and outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sezary syndrome (SS) received 48 TSEBT courses with a median dose of 12 Gy within the past 8 years at our institute. Patient and treatment characteristics for these cases as well as the impact of TSEBT on quality of life and duration of response were retrospectively analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The median modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool score before the start of TSEBT was 44. The overall response rate was 88%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 33%. The median follow-up period was 13 months. The median duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort were 10 months and 9 months, respectively. Patient-reported symptom burden was measured with the Dermatological Life Quality Index and Skindex-29 questionnaires. The mean symptom reductions were 6 ± 8 (P = 0.005) and 21 ± 24 (P = 0.002), respectively. In the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Assessment, significant improvements in the emotional (P = 0.03) domains were observed after TSEBT. Patients who received maintenance or adjuvant treatments had a longer PFS (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

TSEBT improved disease symptoms and significantly improved emotional domains of patients' quality of life in patients with MF or SS. In addition, our results indicate that maintenance or adjuvant therapy after TSEBT may improve the PFS.

Necrotizing Fasciitis: Low-Dose Radiotherapy as a Potential Adjunct Treatment

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly spreading bacterial infection causing extensive tissue necrosis and destruction. Despite appropriate therapy, the disease results in significant morbidity/mortality and substantial treatment costs. Several studies published in the early 1900s demonstrated the effective use of low-dose X-ray radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of many diverse inflammatory conditions and diseases (eg, gas gangrene, sinus infections, arthritis, tendonitis, and serious inflammatory lung conditions). The mechanism by which therapeutic RT doses produce positive patient outcomes is related at least in part to its capacity to induce tissue-based anti-inflammatory responses. This action is due to the polarization of macrophages to an anti-inflammatory or M2 phenotype via optimized low-dose RT. Low-dose RT has the potential to significantly reduce debilitating surgeries and aggressive treatments required for NF, providing a 3-prong benefit in terms of patient mortality, length of hospitalization stays, and cost of health care (both short term and long term). Low cost and easy availability of low-dose RT makes it a potentially useful option for patients of every age-group. In addition, low-dose RT may be a particularly useful option in countries treating many patients who are unable to afford surgeries, antibiotics, and hyperbaric oxygen.

Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues

Health impacts of low-dose ionizing radiation are significant in important fields such as X-ray imaging, radiation therapy, nuclear power, and others. However, all existing and potential applications are currently challenged by public concerns and regulatory restrictions. We aimed to assess the validity of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model of radiation damage, which is the basis of current regulation, and to assess the justification for this regulation. We have conducted an extensive search in PubMed. Special attention has been given to papers cited in comprehensive reviews of the United States (2006) and French (2005) Academies of Sciences and in the United Nations Scientific Committee on Atomic Radiation 2016 report. Epidemiological data provide essentially no evidence for detrimental health effects below 100 mSv, and several studies suggest beneficial (hormetic) effects. Equally significant, many studies with in vitro and in animal models demonstrate that several mechanisms initiated by low-dose radiation have beneficial effects. Overall, although probably not yet proven to be untrue, LNT has certainly not been proven to be true. At this point, taking into account the high price tag (in both economic and human terms) borne by the LNT-inspired regulation, there is little doubt that the present regulatory burden should be reduced.

Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy for cutaneous lymphoma : Minimal risk of acute toxicities

BACKGROUND

Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is attracting increased interest for the effective palliative treatment of primary cutaneous T‑cell lymphoma (pCTCL). In this study, we compared toxicity profiles following various radiation doses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 60 patients who underwent TSEBT for pCTCL between 2000 and 2016 at the University Hospital of Munster. The treatment characteristics of the radiotherapy (RT) regimens and adverse events (AEs) were then analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

In total, 67 courses of TSEBT were administered to 60 patients. Of these patients, 34 (51%) received a standard dose with a median surface dose of 30 Gy and 33 patients (49%) received a low dose with the median surface dose of 12 Gy (7 salvage low-dose TSEBT courses were administered to 5 patients). After a median follow-up of 15 months, the overall AE rate was 100%, including 38 patients (57%) with grade 2 and 7 (10%) with grade 3 AEs. Patients treated with low-dose TSEBT had significantly fewer grade 2 AEs than those with conventional dose regimens (33 vs. 79%, P < 0.001). A lower grade 3 AE rate was also observed in patients who had received the low-dose regimen compared to those with the conventional dose regimens (6 vs. 15%, P = 0.78). Multiple/salvage low-dose TSEBT courses were not associated with an increased risk of acute AEs.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose TSEBT regimens are associated with significantly fewer grade 2 acute toxicities compared with conventional doses of TSEBT. Repeated/Salvage low-dose TSEBT, however, appears to be tolerable and can even be applied safely in patients with cutaneous relapses.