Preoperative embolization of renal tumors--comparison of different methods

Role of embolization in the treatment of renal masses

Renal arterial embolization (RAE) performed for the treatment of renal masses has been proven to be a safe and effective technique, with several decades of experience. RAE is well tolerated with few complications, particularly if the time interval from embolization to surgery is reduced to less than 48 hours. Review of the literature suggests that RAE is also extremely effective for palliation of symptoms in the setting of nonoperative advanced stage renal cell carcinoma. In addition, this technique plays a large role in the management of angiomyolipomas that are symptomatic or at risk of spontaneous rupture. To date, RAE has not been evaluated in a randomized controlled setting, which has contributed to its underutilization. All of these potential benefits warrant the need for prospective studies for further validation.

The role of arterial embolization in renal cell carcinoma

Twenty-five years ago arterial embolization was introduced to facilitate the surgical excision of the carcinomatous kidney or to palliate symptoms, such as haemorrhage from non-resectable tumours. The role of this technique in the therapeutic armamentarium has been a source of debate in the literature. We reviewed all the available literature. A total of 389 papers were evaluated. Fifty-one publications and 3225 case histories met explicit entry criteria for inclusion. Until now no prospective randomized study of this approach to the management of renal carcinoma has been published. In the majority of studies the patients are grouped together irrespective of indication, i.e. pre-operative or palliative. Few articles are prospective or contain clear information regarding tumour stage, indication and adequate follow-up. Although we are not able to distinguish with certainty the effect of embolization on the course of the disease, it seems that complete pre-operative renal artery embolization facilitates the excision of large vein-invading tumours. The optimal delay between embolization and operation is probably one day. The embolization material of choice is ethanol. Palliative embolization in non-operable tumours with serious haemorrhage seems to have been successful in most cases. The scientific basis for the implementation of renal artery embolization in renal cell carcinoma is weak. We believe that either controlled trials or parallel prospective cohort studies should be undertaken to compare treatment of selected locally advanced renal carcinomas with and without embolization.

Therapeutic embolization of pelvic metastases of renal cell carcinoma

The results of arterial embolization of symptomatic pelvic osseous metastases associated with extensive soft tissue tumors in 5 patients with renal cell carcinoma are presented. Of the 5 patients 4 experienced significant relief of pain and improved performance status, as well as objective evidence of bone recalcification or tumor reduction at an average followup of 10 months. One significant complication occurred in a patient with previous local irradiation. Possible advantages over conventional external beam radiation therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and future applications of arterial embolization of bulky metastatic tumors are discussed briefly.