Oxidative stress markers cannot be used as endometriosis biomarkers in infertile patients

OBJECTIVES

Endometriosis is a common benign gynaecological disease that significantly compromises the quality of life of patients. To date, invasive surgery is the method of choice to visually and histologically confirm endometriosis. Thus, there is a major interest to develop noninvasive diagnostic tools. Oxidative stress is one of the proposed mechanisms of pathogenesis and may be involved in pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility in endometriosis patients. Thus, markers of oxidative stress may serve as diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis.

DESIGN

This prospective case-control study assessed erythrocyte superoxide dismutase (SOD), erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase (GPX), serum hexanoyl lysine (HEL) and peritoneal fluid HEL.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, AND METHODS

We enrolled 86 women with primary infertility; the case group included 57 women with endometriosis, and the control group included 29 women with unexplained primary infertility. All the patients underwent laparoscopy, and the diagnosis was confirmed histologically. RANDOX and RANSEL reagents were used to determine the levels of SOD and GPX, respectively, and ELISA was used to determine the levels of HEL.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences in the erythrocyte levels of GPX (p value 0.623) or SOD (p value 0.122) or the serum or peritoneal fluid levels of HEL (p value 0.562 and 0.329 accordingly).

CONCLUSIONS

SOD, GPX, and HEL levels most likely do not differ between patients with unexplained infertility and patients with endometriosis.

Noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis: Review of current peripheral blood and endometrial biomarkers

A noninvasive biomarker-based test could help shorten the diagnostic delay for endometriosis. The most investigated biomarker sources are peripheral blood and endometrium. Discovery of endometriosis biomarkers is often hypothesis-driven, i.e. when one or a few biomarkers are investigated based on their role in the disease pathogenesis. Alternatively, a hypothesis-generating approach has been followed using the "omics" technologies. A variety of biomarkers for endometriosis have been investigated, but no biomarker has been validated for clinical use. Many challenges lie ahead in the endometriosis biomarker field. In the future, harmonized collection and reporting methods should allow large-scale international collaboration for highly powered studies.