Crosstalk between Stem and Progenitor Cellular Mediators with Special Emphasis on Vasculogenesis

The vascular microenvironment and its stem cells regulate vascular homeostasis

The vascular microenvironment comprises of anatomical structures, extracellular matrix components, and various cell populations, which play a crucial role in regulating vascular homeostasis and influencing vascular structure and function. Under physiological conditions, intrinsic regulation of the vascular microenvironment is required to sustain vascular homeostasis. In contrast, under pathological conditions, alterations to this microenvironment lead to vascular injury and pathological remodeling. According to the anatomy, the vascular microenvironment can be subdivided into three sections from the inside out. The vascular endothelial microenvironment, centered on vascular endothelial cells (VECs), includes the extracellular matrix and various vascular physicochemical factors. The VECs interact with vascular physicochemical factors to regulate the function of various parenchymal cells, including hepatocytes, neurons and tumor cells. The vascular wall microenvironment, comprising the vasa vasorum and their unique stem/progenitor cell niches, plays a pivotal role in vascular inflammation and pathological remodeling. Additionally, the perivascular microenvironment, which includes perivascular adipose tissue, consists of adipocytes and stem cells, which contribute to the pathological processes of atherosclerosis. It is anticipated that targeted regulation of the vascular microenvironment will emerge as a novel approach for the treatment of various diseases. Accordingly, this review will examine the structure of the vascular microenvironment, the regulation of vascular function by vascular cells and stem/progenitor cells, and the role of the vascular microenvironment in regulating cardiovascular diseases.

Advanced therapy to cure diabetes: mission impossible is now possible?

Cell and Gene therapy are referred to as advanced therapies that represent overlapping fields of regenerative medicine. They have similar therapeutic goals such as to modify cellular identity, improve cell function, or fight a disease. These two therapeutic avenues, however, possess major differences. While cell therapy involves introduction of new cells, gene therapy entails introduction or modification of genes. Furthermore, the aim of cell therapy is often to replace, or repair damaged tissue, whereas gene therapy is used typically as a preventive approach. Diabetes mellitus severely affects the quality of life of afflicted individuals and has various side effects including cardiovascular, ophthalmic disorders, and neuropathy while putting enormous economic pressure on both the healthcare system and the patient. In recent years, great effort has been made to develop cutting-edge therapeutic interventions for diabetes treatment, among which cell and gene therapies stand out. This review aims to highlight various cell- and gene-based therapeutic approaches leading to the generation of new insulin-producing cells as a topmost "panacea" for treating diabetes, while deliberately avoiding a detailed molecular description of these approaches. By doing so, we aim to target readers who are new to the field and wish to get a broad helicopter overview of the historical and current trends of cell- and gene-based approaches in β-cell regeneration.

Role of Canagliflozin on function of CD34+ve endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) has been shown to be dysfunctional in both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) leading to poor regeneration of endothelium and renal perfusion. EPCs have been shown to be a robust cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk indicator. Effect of sodium glucose channel inhibitors (SGLT2i) such as Canagliflozin (CG) on a cellular biomarker such as CD34+ve progenitor cells, which may help predict CVD risk, in patients with T2DM with established CKD has not been explored.

METHODS

This is a pilot study where 29 subjects taking metformin and/or Insulin were enrolled in a 16 week, double blind, randomized placebo matched trial, with a low dose 100 mg CG as the intervention group compared to matched placebo. Type 2 diabetes subjects (30-70 years old), with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7-10%, were enrolled. CD34+ve cell number, migratory function, gene expression along with vascular parameters such as arterial stiffness, serum biochemistry pertaining to cardio-metabolic health, resting energy expenditure and body composition were measured. Data were collected at week 0, 8 and 16. A mixed model regression analysis was done and p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A significant expression of CXCR4 receptor with a concomittant increase in migratory function of CD34+ve cells was observed in CG treated group as compared to placebo group. Gene expression analysis of CD34+ve cells showed an increase in expression of antioxidants (superoxide dismutase 2 or SOD2, Catalase and Glutathione Peroxidase or GPX) and notable endothelial markers (PECAM1, VEGF-A, and NOS3). A significant reduction in glucose and HbA1c levels were observed along with improved systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the CG group. A significant increase in adiponectin (p = 0.006) was also noted in treatment group. Urinary exosomal protein leak in urine, examining podocyte health (podocalyxin, Wilm's tumor and nephrin) showed reduction with CG CONCLUSION: Low dose Canagliflozin has a beneficial effect on CD34+ cell function, serum biochemistry and urinary podocyte specific exosomes in type 2 diabetes.

Prognostic Hub Genes in the Immune Microenvironment of Lung Adenocarcinoma by Estimation

BACKGROUND

The mortality of lung adenocarcinoma(LUAD) is high. Recent studies have found that the degree of immune infiltration and stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment or tumours makes a significant contribution to prognosis.

METHODS

During study, we screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of TCGA database for prognostic genes in LUAD immune microenvironment. Further, immune and stromal cells were quantified using ESTIMATE algorithm. To study the effects of immune and stromal cell-associated genes on the prognosis of LUAD, LUAD patients were divided into high and low groups according to their immune/ stromal scores. The obtained scores were found to be related to the phenotype and survival rate of LUAD patients. By selecting DEGs with high expression in immune and stromal cells, we performed functional enrichment analysis and found that most genes are associated with pathways of cancer, stimulus response and the MAPK signaling. The functions and enriched pathways of LUAD prognostic genes were shown by a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Nonetheless, an external database was used to validate the prognostic genes from the TCGA.

RESULTS

Prognostic genes were listed according to their expression position and protein function.

CONCLUSION

We provided a new targets for immunotherapy of LUAD, which further provides basic knowledge for future clinical research.

Molecular regulation of arteriovenous endothelial cell specification

The systemic circulation depends upon a highly organized, hierarchal blood vascular network that requires the successful specification of arterial and venous endothelial cells during development. This process is driven by a cascade of signaling events (including Hedgehog, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Notch, connexin (Cx), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF- β), and COUP transcription factor 2 (COUP-TFII)) to influence endothelial cell cycle status and expression of arterial or venous genes and is further regulated by hemodynamic flow. Failure of endothelial cells to properly undergo arteriovenous specification may contribute to vascular malformation and dysfunction, such as in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) and capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation (CM-AVM) where abnormal vessel structures, such as large shunts lacking clear arteriovenous identity and function, form and compromise peripheral blood flow. This review provides an overview of recent findings in the field of arteriovenous specification and highlights key regulators of this process.

Stem cell therapy targeting the right ventricle in pulmonary arterial hypertension: is it a potential avenue of therapy?

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is an incurable disease characterized by an increase in pulmonary arterial pressure due to pathological changes to the pulmonary vascular bed. As a result, the right ventricle (RV) is subject to an increased afterload and undergoes multiple changes, including a decrease in capillary density. All of these dysfunctions lead to RV failure. A number of studies have shown that RV function is one of the main prognostic factors for PAH patients. Many stem cell therapies targeting the left ventricle are currently undergoing development. The promising results observed in animal models have led to clinical trials that have shown an improvement of cardiac function. In contrast to left heart disease, stem cell therapy applied to the RV has remained poorly studied, even though it too may provide a therapeutic benefit. In this review, we discuss stem cell therapy as a treatment for RV failure in PAH. We provide an overview of the results of preclinical and clinical studies for RV cell therapies. Although a large number of studies have targeted the pulmonary circulation rather than the RV directly, there are nonetheless encouraging results in the literature that indicate that cell therapies may have a direct beneficial effect on RV function. This cell therapy strategy may therefore hold great promise and warrants further studies in PAH patients.

Stem cells and heart disease - Brake or accelerator?

After two decades of intensive research and attempts of clinical translation, stem cell based therapies for cardiac diseases are not getting closer to clinical success. This review tries to unravel the obstacles and focuses on underlying mechanisms as the target for regenerative therapies. At present, the principal outcome in clinical therapy does not reflect experimental evidence. It seems that the scientific obstacle is a lack of integration of knowledge from tissue repair and disease mechanisms. Recent insights from clinical trials delineate mechanisms of stem cell dysfunction and gene defects in repair mechanisms as cause of atherosclerosis and heart disease. These findings require a redirection of current practice of stem cell therapy and a reset using more detailed analysis of stem cell function interfering with disease mechanisms. To accelerate scientific development the authors suggest intensifying unified computational data analysis and shared data knowledge by using open-access data platforms.