Definition, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury: An International Survey of Nephrologists

EDTAKI: A Nephrology and Public Policy Committee (NPPC) Platform Call for More European Involvement in AKI

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is an often neglected but crucial element of clinical nephrology. The aim of the Nephrology Public Policy Committee (NPPC) of the European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) is to promote several key aspects of European nephrology. One of the targets proposed by NPPC was to advance European nephrology involvement in AKI. We undertook literature analyses to define the current position of European nephrology in the field of AKI compared to other regions, and about how different European countries compare to each other. It appeared that vis-à-vis countries with a comparable socio-economic status (the US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada), the European contribution was almost 50% lower. Within Europe, Central/Eastern Europe and countries with a lower gross domestic product (GDP) showed lower scientific output. Nephrologists contributed to less than half of the output. There was no trend for a change over the last decade. It is concluded that there is room to improve the contribution of European nephrology in the field of AKI. We propose a model on how to promote clinical collaboration on AKI across Europe, the creation of a pan-European nephrology network of interested units is proposed, to improve clinical outcomes, increase nephrologist involvement and awareness outside nephrology, and stimulate research on AKI in Europe. Accordingly, we also propose a list of research priorities and stress the need for more European funding of AKI research.

Prerenal acute kidney injury—still a relevant term in modern clinical practice?

The traditional taxonomy of acute kidney injury (AKI) has remained pervasive in clinical nephrology. While the terms ‘prerenal’, ‘intrarenal’ and ‘postrenal’ highlight the diverse pathophysiology underlying AKI, they also imply discrete disease pathways and de-emphasize the nature of AKI as an evolving clinical syndrome with multiple, often simultaneous and overlapping, causes. In a similar vein, prerenal AKI comprises a diverse spectrum of kidney disorders, albeit one that is often managed by using a standardized clinical algorithm. We contend that the term ‘prerenal’ is too vague to adequately convey our current understanding of hypoperfusion-related AKI and that it should thus be avoided in the clinical setting. Practice patterns among nephrologists indicate that AKI-related terminology plays a significant role in the approaches that clinicians take to patients that have this complex disease. Thus, it appears that precise terminology does impact the treatment that patients receive. We will outline differences in the diagnosis and management of clinical conditions lying on the so-called prerenal disease spectrum to advocate caution when administering intravenous fluids to these clinically decompensated patients. An understanding of the underlying pathophysiology may, thus, avert clinical missteps such as fluid and vasopressor mismanagement in tenuous or critically ill patients.

Histopathology and Long-Term Outcome of Kidneys Transplanted From Donors With Severe Acute Kidney Injury

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury is a treatable entity although difficult to recognize without diagnostic biopsy. We investigated the potential association between clinically defined deceased donors and acute kidney injury with preimplantation histological findings and recipient outcomes.

METHODS

Kidney biopsies from donors were classified using the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria and assessed for percentage glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and vascular narrowing with the Remuzzi score and for acute tubular necrosis. Differences in incidence rates of delayed graft function (DGF) and cumulative rejection episodes were compared between recipients transplanted with normal and 3 levels of acute kidney injury using the analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction ( P = .0012).

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 335 donors showed a severe acute kidney injury level 3 with a median serum creatinine of 458 µmol/L. Fourteen (88%) had 0-3 Remuzzi score and were used for single kidney transplantation and 2 (12%) were used for dual kidney transplantation (score: 4-6). Recipients who received a kidney from a donor with level 3 acute kidney injury had a higher percentage of DGF (47%) without statistical significance ( P = .008). The rate of cumulative rejection (45%) at 2 years was not significantly increased ( P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients receiving level 3 acute kidney injury kidneys, selected with Remuzzi histopathological score and acute tubular necrosis assessment, had a greater incidence of DGF but a similar long-term cumulative rejection compared to no injury and level 1 and level 2 acute kidney injury donors. The application of the histopathological examination allowed expansion of the kidney donor pool.